
Association between metabolic control and oral health in adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus
2010; Elsevier BV; Volume: 109; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.10.037
ISSN1528-395X
AutoresIvana Maria Saes Busato, Mônica Sommer Bittencourt, Maria Ângela Naval Machado, Ana Maria Trindade Grégio, Luciana Reis Azevedo‐Alanis,
Tópico(s)Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
ResumoObjectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between metabolic control and oral health of adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM1). Study design A case-control epidemiologic study was performed on adolescents allocated between 2 groups: DM1 group composed of 51 with DM1, and control group composed of 51 without diabetes. In the DM1 group, metabolic control data were observed (glycosylated hemoglobin (GHb) and capillary glucose), whereby GHb ≤8.0% was considered to indicate good metabolic control (DM1-A) and >8.0% poor metabolic control (DM1-B). Oral mucosal abnormalites, Community Periodontal Index (CPI), and decayed, missing, and filled (DMF) index were documented. Salivary flow was evaluated by means of stimulated saliva collection (SSFR). Results Glycosylated hemoglobin values of ≤8.0% (DM1-A) were observed in 17 (24%) and >8.0% (DM1-B) in 34 (76%) of the subjects. The average DMF indexes were 1.5 (control) and 3.3 (DM1-group) (P ≤ .05). The average CPIs were 0.2 (control), 1.4 (DM1-A), and 2.0 (DM1-B) (P ≤ .05). Average SSFRs were 0.997 (DM1-A), 0.903 (DM1-B), and 1.224 (control) mL/min. Conclusions Oral health of adolescents with DM1 was impaired regardless of metabolic control. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between metabolic control and oral health of adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM1). A case-control epidemiologic study was performed on adolescents allocated between 2 groups: DM1 group composed of 51 with DM1, and control group composed of 51 without diabetes. In the DM1 group, metabolic control data were observed (glycosylated hemoglobin (GHb) and capillary glucose), whereby GHb ≤8.0% was considered to indicate good metabolic control (DM1-A) and >8.0% poor metabolic control (DM1-B). Oral mucosal abnormalites, Community Periodontal Index (CPI), and decayed, missing, and filled (DMF) index were documented. Salivary flow was evaluated by means of stimulated saliva collection (SSFR). Glycosylated hemoglobin values of ≤8.0% (DM1-A) were observed in 17 (24%) and >8.0% (DM1-B) in 34 (76%) of the subjects. The average DMF indexes were 1.5 (control) and 3.3 (DM1-group) (P ≤ .05). The average CPIs were 0.2 (control), 1.4 (DM1-A), and 2.0 (DM1-B) (P ≤ .05). Average SSFRs were 0.997 (DM1-A), 0.903 (DM1-B), and 1.224 (control) mL/min. Oral health of adolescents with DM1 was impaired regardless of metabolic control.
Referência(s)