Artigo Acesso aberto Revisado por pares

Three-amino acid Extension Loop Homeodomain Proteins Meis2 and TGIF Differentially Regulate Transcription

2000; Elsevier BV; Volume: 275; Issue: 27 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1074/jbc.m908382199

ISSN

1083-351X

Autores

Young Yang, Cheol Kyu Hwang, Ursula M. D’Souza, Sang-Hyeon Lee, Eunsung Junn, M. Maral Mouradian,

Tópico(s)

Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation

Resumo

Three-amino acid extension loop (TALE) homeobox proteins are highly conserved transcription regulators. We report that two members of this family, Meis2 and TGIF, which frequently have overlapping consensus binding sites on complementary DNA strands in opposite orientations, can function competitively. For example, in theD1A gene, which encodes the predominant dopamine receptor in the striatum, Meis2 and TGIF bind to the activator sequence ACT (−1174 to −1154) and regulate transcription differentially in a cell type-specific manner. Among the five cloned splice variants of Meis2, isoforms Meis2a–d activate theD1A promoter in most cell types tested, whereas TGIF competes with Meis2 binding to DNA and represses Meis2-induced transcription activation. Consequently, Meis2 cannot activate theD1A promoter in a cell that has abundant TGIF expression. The Meis2 message is highly co-localized with the D1A message in adult striatal neurons, whereas TGIF is barely detectable in the adult brain. Our observations provide in vitro and in vivo evidence that Meis2 and TGIF differentially regulate their target genes. Thus, the delicate ratio between Meis2 and TGIF expression in a given cell type determines the cell-specific expression of theD1A gene. We also found that splice variant Meis2e, which has a truncated homeodomain, cannot bind to theD1A ACT sequence or activate transcription. However, Meis2e is an effective dominant negative regulator by blocking Meis2d-induced transcription activation. Thus, truncated homeoproteins with no DNA binding domains can have important regulatory functions. Three-amino acid extension loop (TALE) homeobox proteins are highly conserved transcription regulators. We report that two members of this family, Meis2 and TGIF, which frequently have overlapping consensus binding sites on complementary DNA strands in opposite orientations, can function competitively. For example, in theD1A gene, which encodes the predominant dopamine receptor in the striatum, Meis2 and TGIF bind to the activator sequence ACT (−1174 to −1154) and regulate transcription differentially in a cell type-specific manner. Among the five cloned splice variants of Meis2, isoforms Meis2a–d activate theD1A promoter in most cell types tested, whereas TGIF competes with Meis2 binding to DNA and represses Meis2-induced transcription activation. Consequently, Meis2 cannot activate theD1A promoter in a cell that has abundant TGIF expression. The Meis2 message is highly co-localized with the D1A message in adult striatal neurons, whereas TGIF is barely detectable in the adult brain. Our observations provide in vitro and in vivo evidence that Meis2 and TGIF differentially regulate their target genes. Thus, the delicate ratio between Meis2 and TGIF expression in a given cell type determines the cell-specific expression of theD1A gene. We also found that splice variant Meis2e, which has a truncated homeodomain, cannot bind to theD1A ACT sequence or activate transcription. However, Meis2e is an effective dominant negative regulator by blocking Meis2d-induced transcription activation. Thus, truncated homeoproteins with no DNA binding domains can have important regulatory functions. three-amino acid extension loop retinoid X receptor polymerase chain reaction reverse transcription polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis chloramphenicol acetyltransferase enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay glutathioneS-transferase base pair(s) analysis of variance activator sequence −1173 to −1154 in the human D1A gene The three-amino acid loop extension (TALE)1 superclass of homeobox proteins is characterized by an extension of three amino acids between α-helices 1 and 2 within the homeodomain. The genes encoding these proteins are highly conserved and are present in the common ancestor of plants, fungi, and animals. Members of this family of homeoproteins include Meis, Pbx, and TGIF (1.Burglin T.R. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997; 25: 4173-4180Crossref PubMed Scopus (499) Google Scholar). Cooperative function among TALE family members is critical for transcription regulation (2.Bischof L.J. Kagawa N. Moskow J.J. Takahashi Y. Iwamatsu A. Buchberg A.M. Waterman M.R. J. Biol. Chem. 1998; 273: 7941-7948Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (53) Google Scholar, 3.Chang C.P. Jacobs Y. Nakamura T. Jenkins N.A. Copeland N.G. Cleary M.L. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1997; 17: 5679-5687Crossref PubMed Scopus (211) Google Scholar, 4.Knoepfler P.S. Calvo K.R. Chen H. Antonarakis S.E. Kamps M.P. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1997; 94: 14553-14558Crossref PubMed Scopus (168) Google Scholar), and several members have been shown to function as essential contributors to Hox-mediated developmental programs (5.Chan S.K. Jaffe L. Capovilla M. Botas J. Mann R.S. Cell. 1994; 78: 603-615Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (333) Google Scholar, 6.Mann R.S. Chan S.K. Trends Genet. 1996; 12: 258-262Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (395) Google Scholar, 7.Rauskolb C. Wieschaus E. EMBO J. 1994; 13: 3561-3569Crossref PubMed Scopus (134) Google Scholar). Human Meis1 (myeloid ecotropic viral integration site 1) has been cloned from BHX-2 myeloid tumors as a novel common oncogenic site of proviral integration (8.Moskow J.J. Bullrich F. Huebner K. Daar I.O. Buchberg A.M. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1995; 15: 5434-5443Crossref PubMed Scopus (284) Google Scholar). Murine Meis2 was isolated by DNA cross-hybridization with a murine Meis1 cDNA (9.Nakamura T. Jenkins N.A. Copeland N.G. Oncogene. 1996; 13: 2235-2242PubMed Google Scholar) or with a partial human Meis2 cDNA (10.Cecconi F. Proetzel G. Alvarez-Bolado G. Jay D. Gruss P. Dev. Dyn. 1997; 210: 184-190Crossref PubMed Scopus (60) Google Scholar) and was found to be inducible by retinoic acid during differentiation of P19 embryonal carcinoma cells (11.Oulad-Abdelghani M. Chazaud C. Bouillet P. Sapin V. Chambon P. Dolle P. Dev. Dyn. 1997; 210: 173-183Crossref PubMed Scopus (85) Google Scholar). Murine Meis2 is highly expressed in the lateral ganglionic eminence and in the developing striatum (12.Toresson H. Mata de Urquiza A. Fagerstrom C. Perlmann T. Campbell K. Development. 1999; 126: 1317-1326PubMed Google Scholar). Human TGIF (5′-TG-3′interacting factor) is known to bind to the retinoid X receptor (RXR)-responsive element in the cellular retinol-binding protein II promoter, which contains an unusual DNA target for homeobox proteins. The interactions of TGIF and RXRα with this element occur on overlapping areas and generate a mutually exclusive binding. In addition, TGIF inhibits 9-cis-retinoic acid-dependent RXRα-induced transactivation of this promoter (13.Bertolino E. Reimund B. Wildt-Perinic D. Clerc R.G. J. Biol. Chem. 1995; 270: 31178-31188Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (263) Google Scholar). The interplay of a variety of transcription factors like the homeoproteins plays an important role in the regulated, tissue-specific, and developmental expression of eukaryotic genes. These factors exert their effects on target genes by both activating and repressing transcription. Such complex regulation is particularly evident in the brain, where a large number of genes are expressed with unique regional distributions. For example, specificity of the biological effects of dopamine is determined at least in part by the intricate spatial and temporal regulation of genes encoding its receptors. To date, five G protein-coupled dopamine receptors encoded by different genes have been cloned. Based on their homology and pharmacological criteria, they are classified into two subtypes, D1-like (D1A and D5 or D1B) and D2-like (D2, D3, and D4) receptors (14.Dearry A. Gingrich J.A. Falardeau P. Fremeau Jr., R.T. Bates M.D. Caron M.G. Nature. 1990; 347: 72-76Crossref PubMed Scopus (569) Google Scholar, 15.Gingrich J.A. Caron M.G. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 1993; 16: 299-321Crossref PubMed Scopus (689) Google Scholar). Among these, the D1A subtype is the predominant dopamine receptor in the striatum, the brain region that is innervated by dopaminergic neurons of the substantia nigra which degenerate in Parkinson's disease (16.Hornykiewicz O. Pharmacol. Rev. 1966; 18: 925-964PubMed Google Scholar). Alterations in the functional state of dopamine receptors in neuropsychiatric disorders and with chronic dopaminergic therapy are thought to underlie long term complications such as parkinsonian motor response fluctuations and tardive dyskinesias (17.Lee T. Seeman P. Tourtellotte W.W. Farley I.J. Hornykiewicz O. Nature. 1978; 274: 897-900Crossref PubMed Scopus (227) Google Scholar, 18.Mouradian M.M. Juncos J.L. Fabbrini G. Schlegel J. Bartko J.J. Chase T.N. Ann. Neurol. 1988; 24: 372-378Crossref PubMed Scopus (285) Google Scholar). Our previous analysis of the human D1A receptor gene revealed that the region between nucleotides −1173 and −1154 (ACT) may function for its neural cell-specific expression (19.Minowa M.T. Minowa T. Mouradian M.M. J. Biol. Chem. 1993; 268: 23544-23551Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar). In addition, the ACT sequence is highly conserved between human, pig, and rat D1A genes (20.Lee S.-H. Yajima S. Mouradian M.M. Neurosci. Res. 1999; 34: 225-234Crossref PubMed Scopus (9) Google Scholar). We now sought to identify cell- or tissue-specific transcription factors that bind to this sequence using the yeast one-hybrid screen. We found that human Meis2 and TGIF differentially regulate transcription of theD1A gene by binding to complementary DNA sequences within its ACT region. The murine neuroblastoma cell line NS20Y was a gift from Dr. Marshall Nirenberg (NHLBI, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD). Human neuroblastoma SK-N-MC and SH-SY5Y, murine neuroblastoma NB41A3, human hepatoblastoma HepG2, and opossum kidney OK cells were purchased from ATCC. All cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Mediatech) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (BioWhittaker) at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 10% CO2. The MATCHMAKER One-Hybrid System (CLONTECH) was used according to the supplier's protocol. Three tandem repeats of the bp −1173 to −1154 sequence (ACT) from the human D1A promoter (20.Lee S.-H. Yajima S. Mouradian M.M. Neurosci. Res. 1999; 34: 225-234Crossref PubMed Scopus (9) Google Scholar) were ligated into pHISi and pLacZ to generate pHISi-ACT and pLacZ-ACT, respectively, for screening a human brain cDNA library (CLONTECH). The plasmid from the single positive blue clone was sequenced, and its homology was analyzed using BLAST. The Meis2b cDNA isolated from the yeast one-hybrid screening was sequenced and oligonucleotide primers were synthesized to screen a SuperScript™ human brain cDNA library using GeneTrapper system (Life Technologies). These PCR primers were: forward, 5′-AGTATGGGATCCGCTGTCAA-3′; reverse, 5′-GAGCTGCCGTCTCTTTCATC-3′. All positive clones were sequenced, and five different Meis2 splice variants were identified and designated pCMV-Meis2a–e, respectively. The coding region of TGIF cDNA was cloned using RT-PCR with total RNA from human brain (CLONTECH) using primers: forward, 5′-CGGGATCCTCCAGAATGAAAGGCAAGAAA-3′; reverse, 5′-GGCTCGAGTTAAGCTGTAAGTTTTGC-3′, designed to haveBamHI and XhoI sites (underlined), respectively. The amplified TGIF cDNA was digested withBamHI and XhoI and subcloned into the respective sites of pcDNA3.1 (Invitrogen) to generate pcDNA-TGIF. To construct an expression vector having only the TGIF homeodomain, the cDNA region covering amino acid residues 31–97 was amplified by PCR using pcDNA-TGIF as template with primers 5′-AACTGCAG ATGGCTGGCTCAGGCAAGAGAAGG-3′ (PstI site underlined; inserted ATG codon italicized) and 5′-GAGCTCGAGCATGTCAGGGAGGAGCCTGCG-3′ (XhoI site underlined). The product was digested with PstI andXhoI and ligated into the same sites of pCMV/myc/nuc (Invitrogen) in frame with the nuclear localization signal of the vector. The insert in the resultant plasmid pTGIF-HD was confirmed by sequencing. In vitro transcription/translation (Life Technologies, Inc.) was carried out with pCMV-Meis2a–e and pcDNA-TGIF in a reaction mixture containing [35S]methionine (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) using a TNT coupled reticulocyte lysate system (Promega). The labeled proteins were then electrophoresed in 10% SDS-PAGE to determine that they were of the predicted sizes. Human Genomewalker kit (CLONTECH) was used to isolate a genomic fragment harboring the exon/intron junction region of Meis2e. After designing two gene-specific primers (GSP1 and GSP2) within the exon region of Meis2e, PCR was performed with GSP1 (5′-CTTCACCTGGTACAGGTGACGATGA-3′) and AP1 (adaptor primer 1), followed by a second PCR with GSP2 (5′-TCATGAGAGCATGGCTCTTCCAGCA-3′) and AP2 (nested adaptor primer 2). The second PCR yielded a 1.2-kilobase pair product, which was subcloned into pCR2.1 (Invitrogen) and sequenced. Mouse Multiple Tissue and Embryonic Stages cDNA Panel (CLONTECH) was used to amplify Meis2e isoforms. To separate the Meis2efragment from other Meis2 isoforms, PCR was performed with sense primer P1 (5′-GATGATGCAACCTCAACCCAC-3′, located between nucleotides 919 and 939) and antisense primer P2 (5′-ATCCAACACAAAGCTCCC-3′, located between nucleotides 1354 and 1372) (Fig. 2 A). PCR products were electrophoresed in a 1.5% agarose gel, and the 355-bp fragment was subcloned into pGEM-T Easy Vector (Promega) and sequenced. P2 primer sequence is identical between human and mouse Meis2 (11.Oulad-Abdelghani M. Chazaud C. Bouillet P. Sapin V. Chambon P. Dolle P. Dev. Dyn. 1997; 210: 173-183Crossref PubMed Scopus (85) Google Scholar). The two base substitutions (T924C and C936G in primer P1) in the mouse did not affect the outcome of this PCR with murine tissues. To identify Meis2 isoforms expressed in SH-SY5Y and SK-N-MC cell lines, RT-PCR was performed using sense primer P1 paired with either antisense primer P2 or P3 (5′-ATTGGGGGTCCATGTCTT-3′, located between nucleotides 1608 and 1625). These PCR products were electrophoresed in a 3% agarose gel. Transfections were carried out by the standard calcium phosphate co-precipitation method (Invitrogen). Briefly, HepG2, OK, SK-N-MC, and SH-SY5Y cells were plated in 100-mm dishes at a concentration of 1 × 106 cells/dish and cultured overnight before transfection. Various plasmids at the indicated concentrations in each figure were used. Total amount of DNA was kept constant by adding pcDNA3.1. After transfection periods of 6 h (OK) or 18 h (SK-N-MC, SH-SY5Y, and HepG2), cells were incubated in fresh medium for an additional 48 h. CAT protein was quantified by the CAT ELISA kit (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). Each experiment was carried out in triplicate. The coding regions of Meis2a–e were amplified by PCR using pCMV-Meis2a–e as templates with primers containing either EcoRI or XhoI sites, and sequences were confirmed. All five Meis2a–e cDNAs were subcloned into pGEX4T-1 to produce GST fusion proteins and designated pGEX-Meis2a–e, respectively. The resultant plasmids were used to transform Escherichia coli BL21. Fusion proteins of Meis2 isoforms were induced by 0.1 misopropyl-1-thio-β-d-galactopyranoside and purified using glutathione-conjugated Sepharose beads (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). For gel mobility shift assays, wild-type and mutant ACT probes (Fig. 1) were synthesized using an ABI DNA synthesizer. One strand was labeled with [γ-32P]ATP and annealed with the cold complementary strand. Double-stranded, end-labeled DNA probe (20 kcpm/binding reaction; 5 fmol) was incubated with 200 ng of GST-Meis2 fusion proteins in a final volume of 20 μl at room temperature for 30 min. In some experiments, a polyclonal antibody to GST was co-incubated with GST-Meis2 fusion proteins for 30 min at room temperature prior to adding the probe. The reaction mixtures were electrophoresed in 4% polyacrylamide nondenaturing gel in 1× Tris/glycine buffer as described previously (19.Minowa M.T. Minowa T. Mouradian M.M. J. Biol. Chem. 1993; 268: 23544-23551Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar). pCMV-Meis2a was digested withEcoRI and XhoI, and the Meis2a insert was subcloned in pGEM-3Zf(−) to generate pGEM-Meis2a. Antisense probe was transcribed from the SP6 promoter after linearizing withEcoRI, and the sense probe was transcribed from the T7 promoter after linearizing with HindIII. Digoxigenin-labeled RNA probes were transcribed according to the protocol of the kit's supplier (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) and hydrolyzed to approximately 200-bp fragments by alkaline hydrolysis. [35S]UTP-labeled D1A probes were transcribed from pGEM-mD1A that had been linearized with EcoRI for generation of sense probe from the SP6 promoter or withHindIII for generation of antisense probe from the T7 promoter using the SP6/T7 transcription kit (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). Fourteen-μm-thick sections of the mouse striatum were subjected to simultaneous hybridization with two probes as described (21.Wilkinson D.G. In Situ Hybridization: A Practical Approach. Oxford University Press, New York1992Google Scholar). To identify transcription factors that bind to the D1A ACT region, the yeast one-hybrid screen was performed. A double-stranded oligonucleotide having three tandem repeats of the ACT sequence (Fig.1) was subcloned into pHISi and introduced into yeast cells. The resultant strain was transformed with a human brain cDNA library. Plasmids prepared from seven positive colonies that grew on selection medium were transformed into yeast strain containing the pLacZ-bait construct. One of these seven clones was found to be a true positive after the lacZ expression test. Sequence analysis of the positive clone indicated that it is the human homologue of murine Meis2b. The Meis2b cDNA insert in the library plasmid was fused in-frame with the GAL4 activation domain. To obtain full-length Meis2 clones, PCRs were carried out using a SuperScript™ human brain cDNA library (Life Technologies) and five splice variants were isolated (Fig.2 A). These clones were designated Meis2a to Meis2e, analogous to the nomenclature of murine Meis2 isoforms (11.Oulad-Abdelghani M. Chazaud C. Bouillet P. Sapin V. Chambon P. Dolle P. Dev. Dyn. 1997; 210: 173-183Crossref PubMed Scopus (85) Google Scholar). HumanMeis2a, Meis2b, Meis2c, andMeis2d use the same exons as in murine Meis2cDNAs. Meis2a, which includes all exons, andMeis2b, which lacks exon 3(A), encode isoforms that end at the first termination codon. On the other hand, Meis2c, which lacks exon 4, and Meis2d, which lacks both exons 3(A) and 4, encode isoforms that end at the second termination codon. Comparison of human and mouse Meis2a and Meis2b sequences revealed 100% amino acid identity. In Meis2c, the two species differ by a single amino acid at position 439, whereas in Meis2d they differ by two amino acids at positions 394 and 432. Meis2e, which had not been identified previously, has the same start codon as that ofMeis2a–d, but an early termination codon TAA within the homeodomain due to alternative splicing resulting in deletion of exon 1 and a frameshift. Thus, the Meis2e protein has a truncated homeodomain (Fig. 2, A and B). To exclude the possibility that Meis2e could be an artifact of library construction, 3′ genomic walking was performed with gene-specific primers to determine the exon-intron boundary in the deleted region. Comparison of genomic and cDNA sequences indicated that the splice donor site of this alternatively spliced product obeys the GT-AG rule (data not shown) (22.Breathnach R. Chambon P. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1981; 50: 349-383Crossref PubMed Scopus (3298) Google Scholar). The splice acceptor site at this exon has been reported previously in the mouse (11.Oulad-Abdelghani M. Chazaud C. Bouillet P. Sapin V. Chambon P. Dolle P. Dev. Dyn. 1997; 210: 173-183Crossref PubMed Scopus (85) Google Scholar). To verify the endogenous expression of the Meis2e splice variant in biological tissues, PCR was carried out on cDNA obtained from multiple adult mouse tissues as well as from different embryonic stages (CLONTECH) using a primer pair designed to separate Meis2e from the other four Meis2 isoforms (Fig. 2 C). In addition to a doublet band representing 454 bp for variants “a” and “c” and 433 bp for variants “b” and “d,” a 355-bp fragment was amplified and cloned. Upon sequencing, the latter was confirmed to represent Meis2e. The relative abundance of Meis2e in different tissues was quite variable with highest level in muscle and lowest levels in brain, heart, and kidney. The ability of all five Meis2 cDNA isoforms to encode proteins was verified by in vitro translation and the products were analyzed on SDS-PAGE (Fig. 2 D). All Meis2a–e isoforms were expressed and electrophoresed slower than expected from their calculated molecular weights, probably because of the abundance of prolines and stretches of acidic residues (9.Nakamura T. Jenkins N.A. Copeland N.G. Oncogene. 1996; 13: 2235-2242PubMed Google Scholar). To confirm whether Meis2 can indeed bind to the ACT sequence, gel mobility shift assays were carried out using GST fusion proteins of each human Meis2 isoform (Fig.3). All GST-Meis2 fusion proteins were able to shift the target ACT oligonucleotide probe except GST-Meis2e, which has a truncated homeodomain. This finding indicates that the homeodomain in Meis2 is essential for consensus sequence recognition and binding. The specificity of this DNA-protein interaction was verified by complete inhibition in the presence of cold wild-type ACT oligonucleotide and by lack of Meis2a–d binding to a mutant ACT probe. Furthermore, the shifted Meis2a–d bands were supershifted with a GST polyclonal antibody, indicating that they represent GST-Meis2 fusion proteins. Interestingly, Meis2a–d showed two shifted bands (Fig. 3, lanes 2–5), although purified GST-Meis2a–d fusion proteins ran as single major bands of the expected sizes on SDS-PAGE (data not shown). The latter observations suggest that Meis2 proteins could form homodimers similar to murine Meis1 (23.Shen W.F. Montgomery J.C. Rozenfeld S. Moskow J.J. Lawrence H.J. Buchberg A.M. Largman C. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1997; 17: 6448-6458Crossref PubMed Scopus (227) Google Scholar). We had previously demonstrated that theD1A promoter in pCATD1–1197 harboring the ACT region is expressed in a neuronal cell-specific manner (19.Minowa M.T. Minowa T. Mouradian M.M. J. Biol. Chem. 1993; 268: 23544-23551Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar). To study this observation further, Meis2 Northern analysis was initially carried out using RNA from various cell lines in order to select appropriate cells for Meis2 co-transfection with pCATD1–1197. All neuronal cell lines tested (NS20Y, SK-N-MC, NB41A3, SH-SY5Y) had endogenous Meis2 expression, whereas non-neuronal cells HepG2 and OK did not (Fig.4). To determine whether Meis2 isoforms could increase the activity of pCATD1–1197 in non-neuronal cells, OK and HepG2 cells were co-transfected with Meis2a–e expression constructs and with pCATD1–1197 template plasmid. All co-transfected Meis2 isoforms were able to increase CAT expression significantly in both cell lines, except Meis2e, which lacks the homeodomain necessary for DNA binding (Fig. 5 A). These results indicate that Meis2 proteins can function as activators ofD1A gene transcription even in non-neuronal cells. Meis2b could increase CAT activity in HepG2, but not in OK cells, a finding that remains of unclear significance. The specificity of the Meis2d effect on pCATD1–1197 was investigated by co-transfecting OK cells with two additionalD1A promoter-CAT constructs, pCATD1–1154 and pCATD1–1120, which lack the ACT region (Fig. 5 B). This experiment demonstrated that the Meis2d effect is specific to pCATD1–1197, which harbors the ACT sequence. Interestingly, although Meis2e cannot bind to the ACT sequence (Fig. 3), it potently inhibits Meis2d-induced pCATD1–1197 activation in OK cells (Fig.5 C). The latter finding indicates that the NH2-terminal region of Meis2 proteins could play a role in regulating D1A gene transcription in addition to their homeodomains, which recognize target DNA sequences. The physiological significance of Meis2-induced activation of pCATD1–1197 transcription was addressed next by investigating changes in endogenous D1A mRNA levels in OK cells. This cell line was chosen because of the absence of Meis2 mRNA (Fig. 4) to allow interpretation of reconstitution experiments. In addition, although these cells had no detectableD1A mRNA in our Northern analysis (Fig. 4), they have previously been shown to express this dopamine receptor (24.Nash S.R. Godinot N. Caron M.G. Mol. Pharmacol. 1993; 44: 918-925PubMed Google Scholar), indicating that they have the basal transcription machinery to express this gene. Total RNA was prepared from cells transfected with pCMV-Meis2d or with control vector (pcDNA3.1) and Northern analysis was performed (Fig. 5 D). Meis2d significantly increased the endogenous D1A message compared with control vector-transfected cells. The functional relevance of our findings in cell lines was further addressed by investigating the cellular co-localization ofMeis2 and D1A messages within the adult striatum, the brain region in which both genes are highly expressed (12.Toresson H. Mata de Urquiza A. Fagerstrom C. Perlmann T. Campbell K. Development. 1999; 126: 1317-1326PubMed Google Scholar, 25.Okazawa H. Imafuku I. Minowa M.T. Kanazawa I. Hamada H. Mouradian M.M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1996; 93: 11933-11938Crossref PubMed Scopus (25) Google Scholar). Simultaneous hybridization of a digoxigenin-labeledMeis2a probe and a radiolabeled D1A probe revealed considerable overlap between the two signals (Fig.6). While some cells expressMeis2 alone, very few neurons expressD1A alone. This observation could reflect the important activating function of this nuclear protein on theD1A dopamine receptor gene. To study the effect of Meis2 overexpression on the D1A gene in human neuronal cell lines, SK-N-MC and SH-SY5Y cells expressing different amounts of D1A mRNA (Fig. 4) were co-transfected with all five Meis2 expression constructs and pCATD1–1197. Compared with the results in SK-N-MC cells, Meis2a–d induced robust increases of CAT activity in SH-SY5Y cells (Fig.7 A). The minimal changes with Meis2c and Meis2d in SK-N-MC cells are of unclear biologic significance. The decrease with Meis2e in both cell lines could be explained by repression of endogenous Meis2 activity. Since Meis2e is a potent repressor of Meis2d-induced pCATD1–1197 activity (Fig. 5 C), the expression levels ofMeis2e were checked in SH-SY5Y and SK-N-MC cells looking for a clue for the notable inability of Meis2a–d to activate theD1A promoter in the latter cell line. RT-PCR with primer pairs P1 and P2, designed to amplify a 355-bpMeis2e cDNA, failed to detect the expected fragment in either cell line but could amplify a complex band corresponding toMeis2a–d (Fig. 7 B). In addition, RT-PCR using primers P1 and P3 could amplify each of the Meis2a–dcDNAs in both cell lines but not Meis2e (Fig.7 C). Thus, the difference between these two cell lines with respect to Meis2a–d-induced activation of pCATD1–1197 (Fig.7 A) could not be explained by differences inMeis2e expression since neither cell had this truncated isoform. To gain further insight into the inability of Meis2a–d to activate transcription in SK-N-MC cells, careful examination of the ACT sequence led to the observation that a TGIF consensus sequence actually overlaps with the Meis2 consensus sequence with the opposite orientation (Fig.1). Furthermore, TGIF and Meis2 mRNAs are expressed at different levels in the cell lines tested, with relatively high TGIF in cells that have low or noD1A mRNA (Fig. 4). Therefore, to investigate the role of TGIF in regulating Meis2 effects on theD1A gene, the TGIF cDNA was cloned by RT-PCR from a human brain cDNA library and subcloned into pcDNA3.1 expression vector. The ability of TGIF to bind to the ACT region was tested by gel mobility shift assay using in vitrotranslated protein (Fig. 7 D). TGIF indeed bound to the wild-type ACT probe but not to the mutant ACT probe. Cold competitor significantly competed off TGIF binding. The overlapping TGIF and Meis2 binding sites within theD1A ACT sequence raised the possibility that the two proteins could compete for binding to the same target. In addition, TGIF has been known as a transcriptional repressor (13.Bertolino E. Reimund B. Wildt-Perinic D. Clerc R.G. J. Biol. Chem. 1995; 270: 31178-31188Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (263) Google Scholar). To address this hypothesis, first, competitive gel shift assay was performed.In vitro translated TGIF and GST-Meis2a fusion protein were added to the gel shift reaction mixture and electrophoresed in a 4% native polyacrylamide gel (Fig. 7 E). Addition of rising amounts of Meis2a with a constant amount of TGIF diminished TGIF binding to DNA. At the same time, presence of TGIF suppressed the relative intensity of the band shifted by rising amounts of Meis2a. Second, to investigate whether the in vitro competition of TGIF for the Meis2 recognition site has a functional impact within cells, SH-SY5Y cells were co-transfected with expression vectors for TGIF and for Meis2a and with pCATD1–1197. Co-expression of increasing amounts of TGIF resulted in a dramatic inhibition of Meis2a-induced pCATD1–1197 activity in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 7 F). Since TGIF has its own repressor domain (26.Wotton D. Lo R.S. Swaby L.A. Massague J. J. Biol. Chem. 1999; 274: 37105-37110Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (170) Google Scholar), the possibility that it blocks Meis2a-induced activation of theD1A promoter without necessarily displacing Meis2a was entertained next. pTGIF-HD expressing only the homeodomain of TGIF fused to a nuclear localization signal significantly repressed Meis2a-induced activation of pCATD1–1197 in SH-SY5Y cells in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 7 G), indicating that TGIF competes with Meis2 function by displacing it from its target DNA. However, full-length TGIF appeared more potent than its homeodomain alone in repressing the Meis2 effect. In our search for transcription factors that regulate the humanD1A dopamine receptor gene, we have identified two TALE superclass homeobox genes, Meis2 andTGIF, which share overlapping and complementary common binding sites in the activator ACT sequence of theD1A promoter. The yeast one-hybrid screen employed with the ACT sequence as bait led to the isolation of Meis2 only but not TGIF. The very low expression of TGIF in the adult brain could explain the latter observation. The consensus DNA sequence for the murine Meis1 binding site has been previously characterized (23.Shen W.F. Montgomery J.C. Rozenfeld S. Moskow J.J. Lawrence H.J. Buchberg A.M. Largman C. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1997; 17: 6448-6458Crossref PubMed Scopus (227) Google Scholar) and the third helix of the homeodomain has been shown to be important for its DNA binding (27.Ekker S.C. von Kessler D.P. Beachy P.A. EMBO J. 1992; 11: 4059-4072Crossref PubMed Scopus (128) Google Scholar, 28.Treisman J. Gonczy P. Vashishtha M. Harris E. Desplan C. Cell. 1989; 59: 553-562Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (398) Google Scholar). Since murine Meis1 and Meis2 as well as human Meis2 have an identical amino acid sequence within their homeodomains (11.Oulad-Abdelghani M. Chazaud C. Bouillet P. Sapin V. Chambon P. Dolle P. Dev. Dyn. 1997; 210: 173-183Crossref PubMed Scopus (85) Google Scholar), human Meis2 likely binds to the same consensus DNA sequence as murine Meis1. Thus, it was not surprising that we cloned Meis2 with the yeast one-hybrid screen since the D1A ACT bait contains a consensus sequence for Meis1 binding, TGACAG, albeit in the opposite orientation relative to the promoter (Fig. 1). Alternatively spliced variants that lack the homeodomain have been recognized in several homeobox genes such as Drosophila bicoid (29.Berleth T. Burri M. Thoma G. Bopp D. Richstein S. Frigerio G. Noll M. Nusslein-Volhard C. EMBO J. 1988; 7: 1749-1756Crossref PubMed Scopus (577) Google Scholar), Xenopus XIHbox 2 (30.Wright C.V. Cho K.W. Fritz A. Burglin T.R. De Robertis E.M. EMBO J. 1987; 6: 4083-4094Crossref PubMed Scopus (45) Google Scholar), and Xenopus Xhox 36 (31.Condie B.G. Brivanlou A.H. Harland R.M. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1990; 10: 3376-3385Crossref PubMed Scopus (27) Google Scholar), but the precise functional role of these variants is unclear. In the present study, we identified five alternatively splicedMeis2 isoforms (Meis2a–e) in biological tissues, one of which, Meis2e, has a truncated homeodomain. In contrast to Meis2a–d, which transactivate theD1A promoter in pCATD1–1197 through the ACT sequence, Meis2e cannot because of its inability to bind to its target sequence. Furthermore, the homeodomain-lacking Meis2e inhibits Meis2d-induced transcriptional activation of pCATD1–1197. It, thus, appears that Meis2e acts as a natural dominant transcriptional repressor of Meis2 proteins. Another homeodomain-lacking protein, CSX1, has been reported to transactivate a reporter gene (32.Shiojima I. Komuro I. Mizuno T. Aikawa R. Akazawa H. Oka T. Yamazaki T. Yazaki Y. Circ. Res. 1996; 79: 920-929Crossref PubMed Scopus (64) Google Scholar). These observations collectively suggest that homeodomain-lacking proteins can act either as dominant negative regulators or as positive regulators by a homeodomain-independent mechanism. One of these homeodomain-independent mechanisms could be protein-protein interactions. For example, the amino termini of Meis1 and Pbx1a are known to be necessary and sufficient for their dimerization in solution and their interaction enhances transcriptional activity ofHoxb2 (33.Jacobs Y. Schnabel C.A. Cleary M.L. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1999; 19: 5134-5142Crossref PubMed Scopus (214) Google Scholar). It is conceivable that the NH2termini of Meis2 proteins bind to an unidentified factor, and that Meis2e could interrupt such interactions without binding to the target DNA sequence. Whether such an interacting factor is a DNA-binding protein or not, Meis2e could act as a dominant negative regulator. The present study revealed that the consensus sequences for Meis2 and for TGIF binding sites usually overlap. These sequences are on complementary DNA strands and in opposite orientations. In theD1A promoter, for example, the target site for TGIF is in the same orientation as the promoter whereas that for Meis2 is in the reverse orientation (Fig. 1). Many genes, in fact, have similar overlapped sequences such as CRBPII (34.Nakshatri H. Chambon P. J. Biol. Chem. 1994; 269: 890-902Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar), lactoferrin (35.Liu Y.H. Teng C.T. J. Biol. Chem. 1991; 266: 21880-21885Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar), complement factor H (36.Munoz-Canoves P. Vik D.P. Tack B.F. J. Biol. Chem. 1990; 265: 20065-20068Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar), and myosin heavy chain (37.Flink I.L. Morkin E. J. Biol. Chem. 1990; 265: 11233-11237Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar, 38.Umesono K. Murakami K.K. Thompson C.C. Evans R.M. Cell. 1991; 65: 1255-1266Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1497) Google Scholar, 39.Zhang X.K. Lehmann J. Hoffmann B. Dawson M.I. Cameron J. Graupner G. Hermann T. Tran P. Pfahl M. Nature. 1992; 358: 587-591Crossref PubMed Scopus (522) Google Scholar). Although the Meis2 consensus site is in the reverse orientation relative to the 5′-3′ orientation of the D1A promoter, Meis2a–d have positive regulatory effects on pCATD1–1197. Our finding is consistent with the recent report that murine Meis1 can activate transcription even if its recognition site has an orientation opposite that of the promoter (33.Jacobs Y. Schnabel C.A. Cleary M.L. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1999; 19: 5134-5142Crossref PubMed Scopus (214) Google Scholar). The effect of sequence orientation of the TGIF consensus binding site remains to be investigated. While Meis2a–d proteins activate transcription of theD1A gene, TGIF represses it by binding to complementary DNA sequences. Therefore, the ratio between TGIF and Meis2 concentrations would be a critical factor for the transcriptional regulation of their target genes. Our gel shift experiments revealed a competition for binding to the ACT sequence between Meis2 and TGIF (Fig. 7 E). In addition, our co-transfection experiments indicated that TGIF or its homeodomain down-regulate Meis2-induced transactivation of the D1A promoter (Fig. 7,F and G), supporting the importance of Meis2 displacement from its target DNA. However, full-length TGIF was more potent than its homeodomain alone, suggesting an additional functional role of the TGIF repressor domain in modulating this effect. Thus, the inability of Meis2 to activate the D1A promoter in SK-N-MC cells (Fig. 7 A) may well be due to the high steady-state levels of TGIF expression in this cell line demonstrated by Northern blot analysis (Fig. 4). On the other hand, the relatively low TGIF expression in HepG2 and OK cells could account for the ability of Meis2 to activate pCATD1–1197 in both cell lines (Fig.5 A), and account for the ability of Meis2 to increase endogenous D1A message levels in OK cells (Fig.5 D). Furthermore, comparison of mRNA levels in different cell lines revealed that the presence of more Meis2 relative to TGIF is a requisite for endogenous D1A expression (Fig. 4). Hence, our studies provide both in vitro and in vivoevidence that the balance between Meis2 and TGIF is involved in the intricate regulation of D1A gene transcription. During development, Meis2 is highly expressed in the lateral ganglionic eminence of embryonic day 12.5 mouse telencephalon, suggesting that it can be a marker of striatal neuronal progenitors (12.Toresson H. Mata de Urquiza A. Fagerstrom C. Perlmann T. Campbell K. Development. 1999; 126: 1317-1326PubMed Google Scholar). Similar in situ hybridization studies have shown that the D1A dopamine receptor gene is also highly expressed in the striatum from day 14 embryos (40.Jung A.B. Bennett Jr., J.P. Brain Res. Dev. Brain Res. 1996; 94: 121-132Crossref PubMed Scopus (21) Google Scholar). Thus, Meis2 expression begins prior to that of the D1A gene prenatally supporting the ability of Meis2 to activate theD1A gene during striatal development. Furthermore, Meis2 and D1A messages are highly co-localized within the same neurons of the adult striatum (Fig. 6), providing the anatomic requisite for their functional interaction. In conclusion, the foregoing observations indicate that truncated homeoproteins such as Meis2e can function as dominant negative repressors of transcription. Detailed analysis of the spatial and temporal expression patterns of Meis2e compared with Meis2a–d can shed light on the mechanism of action of Meis2 proteins. In addition, since TGIF and Meis2 consensus sites usually overlap on complementary strands and in opposite orientations, and since TGIF represses Meis2-induced transactivation, their relative abundance in the cell determines the expression level of their target genes such as that encoding theD1A dopamine receptor.

Referência(s)
Altmetric
PlumX