Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

The Contribution of the Pathologist After a Perinatal Loss What we should be telling the parents

1996; Wiley; Volume: 36; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1111/j.1479-828x.1996.tb02913.x

1479-828X

T. Yee Khong,

Health and Conflict Studies

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and GynaecologyVolume 36, Issue 1 p. 15-17 The Contribution of the Pathologist After a Perinatal Loss What we should be telling the parents T.Y. Khong, Corresponding Author T.Y. Khong Department of Pathology, Women's and Children's Hospital, North Adelaide2 Department of Pathology, Women's and Children's Hospital, 72 King William Road, North Adelaide, South Australia 5006.Search for more papers by this author T.Y. Khong, Corresponding Author T.Y. Khong Department of Pathology, Women's and Children's Hospital, North Adelaide2 Department of Pathology, Women's and Children's Hospital, 72 King William Road, North Adelaide, South Australia 5006.Search for more papers by this author First published: February 1996 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828X.1996.tb02913.xCitations: 4AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat References 1 Abdul Rahman H, Khong TY. Perinatal infant postmortem examination. Survey of women's reactions to perinatal necropsy. Br Med J 1995; 310: 870–871. 10.1136/bmj.310.6983.870e Google Scholar 2 Sailer DN, Lesser KB, Harrel U, Rogers BB, Oyer CE. The clinical utility of the perinatal autopsy. J Am Med Assoc 1995; 273: 663–665. 10.1001/jama.273.8.663 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 3 Cartlidge PHT, Dawson AT, Stewart JH, Vujanic GM. Value and quality of perinatal and infant postmortem examinations: cohort analysis of 400 consecutive deaths. Br Med J 1995; 310: 155–158. 10.1136/bmj.310.6973.155 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 4 Porter HJ, Keeling JW. Value of perinatal necropsy examination. J Clin Pathol 1987; 40: 180–184. 10.1136/jcp.40.2.180 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 5 Duley LMM. A validation of underlying cause of death, as recorded by clinicians on stillbirth and neonatal death certificates. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1986; 93: 1233–1235. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1986.tb07856.x CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 6 Rushton DI. West Midlands perinatal mortality survey, 1987. An audit of 300 perinatal autopsies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1991; 98: 624–627. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1991.tb13446.x PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 7 Khong TY, Hill F, Chambers HM, Staples A, Harry C. Acceptance of mementos of fetal and perinatal loss in a South Australian population. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 1993; 33: 392–394. 10.1111/j.1479-828X.1993.tb02118.x CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 8 Oglethorpe RJL. Stillbirth: a personal experience. Br Med J 1983; ii: 1197–1198. 10.1136/bmj.287.6400.1197 Web of Science®Google Scholar 9 Knowles S. A passage through grief – the Western Australian rural pregnancy loss team. Br Med J 1994; 309: 1705–1708. 10.1136/bmj.309.6970.1705 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 10 Valdes-Dapena M. The postautopsy conference with families. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1984; 108: 497–498. PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 11 Khong TY. A review of perinatal autopsy rates worldwide, 1960s to 1990s. Paediatr Perinatal Epidemiol, in press. Google Scholar 12 Khong TY, Wan Mansor FA, Staples AJ. Are perinatal necropsy rates satisfactory? A study from an Australian maternity hospital. Med J Aust 1995; 162: 469–470. 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1995.tb140007.x CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Citing Literature Volume36, Issue1February 1996Pages 15-17 ReferencesRelatedInformation