A New Class of DNA Glycosylase/Apurinic/Apyrimidinic Lyases That Act on Specific Adenines in Single-stranded DNA
1998; Elsevier BV; Volume: 273; Issue: 27 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1074/jbc.273.27.17216
ISSN1083-351X
AutoresÉmmanuelle Nicolas, Joseph M. Beggs, Brett M. Haltiwanger, Theodore F. Taraschi,
Tópico(s)Plant Virus Research Studies
ResumoAlthough the biological function of DNA glycosylases is to protect the genome by removal of potentially cytotoxic or mutagenic bases, this investigation describes the existence of natural DNA glycosylases with activity on undamaged, nonmispaired bases. Gelonin, pokeweed antiviral protein, and ricin, previously described as ribosome-inactivating proteins, are shown to damage single-stranded DNA by removal of a protein-specific set of adenines and cleavage at the resulting abasic sites. Using an oligonucleotide as the substrate reveals that the reaction proceeds via the enzyme-DNA imino intermediate characteristic of DNA glycosylase/AP lyases. The adenine glycosylase activity on single-stranded DNA reported here challenges the concept that a normal base has to be in a mismatch to be specifically removed. By contrast to other glycosylases, these enzymes are expected to damage DNA rather than participate in repair processes. The significance of this DNase activity to the biological function of these plant proteins and to their toxicity to animal cells remains to be determined. Although the biological function of DNA glycosylases is to protect the genome by removal of potentially cytotoxic or mutagenic bases, this investigation describes the existence of natural DNA glycosylases with activity on undamaged, nonmispaired bases. Gelonin, pokeweed antiviral protein, and ricin, previously described as ribosome-inactivating proteins, are shown to damage single-stranded DNA by removal of a protein-specific set of adenines and cleavage at the resulting abasic sites. Using an oligonucleotide as the substrate reveals that the reaction proceeds via the enzyme-DNA imino intermediate characteristic of DNA glycosylase/AP lyases. The adenine glycosylase activity on single-stranded DNA reported here challenges the concept that a normal base has to be in a mismatch to be specifically removed. By contrast to other glycosylases, these enzymes are expected to damage DNA rather than participate in repair processes. The significance of this DNase activity to the biological function of these plant proteins and to their toxicity to animal cells remains to be determined. Ricin and other related plant proteins such as abrin, gelonin, pokeweed antiviral protein (PAP), 1The abbreviations used are: PAP, pokeweed antiviral protein; RIP, ribosome inactivating protein; AP, apurinic/apyrimidinic; ss, single-stranded; ODN, oligodeoxyribonucleotide; UDG, uracil-DNA glycosylase; bp, base pair; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. and trichosanthin have been classified as ribosome-inactivating proteins (RIPs) in reference to the fact that they inhibit protein synthesis by inactivation of the ribosomes (1Barbieri L. Battelli M.G. Stirpe F. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1993; 1154: 237-282Crossref PubMed Scopus (846) Google Scholar). The molecular mechanism of inactivation, elucidated in a cell-free system by Endo and colleagues (2Endo Y. Mitsui K. Motizuki M. Tsurugi K. J. Biol. Chem. 1987; 262: 5908-5912Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar), is the removal of a specific adenine of the 28 S rRNA. This damage, which has been shown to occur in RIP-treated cells, has been generally accepted as responsible for cytotoxicity (1Barbieri L. Battelli M.G. Stirpe F. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1993; 1154: 237-282Crossref PubMed Scopus (846) Google Scholar). However, inPlasmodium falciparum-infected erythrocytes, intoxication by gelonin was reported to be associated with the elimination of the parasite 6-kb extrachromosomal (mitochondrial) DNA (3Nicolas E. Goodyer I.D. Taraschi T.F. Biochem. J. 1997; 327: 413-417Crossref PubMed Scopus (39) Google Scholar). Moreover, some reports of anti-viral or anti-tumor activities of RIPs also suggest the possibility of additional cytotoxic pathways (4Teltow G.J. Irvin J.D. Aron G.M. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1983; 23: 390-396Crossref PubMed Scopus (39) Google Scholar, 5McGrath M.S. Hwang K.M. Caldwell S.E. Gaston I. Luk K.-C. Wu P. Ng V.L. Crowe S. Daniels J. Marsh J. Deinhart T. Lekas P.V. Vennari J.C. Yeung H.-W. Lifson J.D. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1989; 86: 2844-2848Crossref PubMed Scopus (320) Google Scholar, 6Tumer N.E. Hwang D.-J. Bonness M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1997; 94: 3866-3871Crossref PubMed Scopus (130) Google Scholar). The weak activity of RIPs in cleaving and linearizing supercoiled, double-stranded DNA in vitro (7Li M.-X Yeung H.-W. Pan L.-P. Chan S.I. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991; 19: 6309-6312Crossref PubMed Scopus (106) Google Scholar, 8Go T.T.M. Yeung H.W. Fong W.P. Life Sci. 1992; 51: 1347-1353Crossref PubMed Scopus (31) Google Scholar, 9Ling J. Liu W.-Y. Wang T.P. FEBS Lett. 1994; 345: 143-146Crossref PubMed Scopus (69) Google Scholar, 10Ling J. Liu W.-Y. Wang T.P. Bioorg. Chem. 1994; 22: 395-404Crossref Scopus (9) Google Scholar) has not been given serious consideration because of concerns about contaminating nucleases in the protein preparations. More recent reports have described a preference for single-stranded (ss) DNA (11Roncuzzi L. Gasperi-Campani A. FEBS Lett. 1996; 392: 16-20Crossref PubMed Scopus (73) Google Scholar, 12Nicolas E. Beggs J.M. Haltiwanger B.M. Taraschi T.F. FEBS Lett. 1997; 406: 162-164Crossref PubMed Scopus (40) Google Scholar). The polypeptide responsible for the (zinc-activated) degradation of linear ssDNA by preparations of gelonin, from both native and recombinant bacterial sources, has been identified as gelonin by zymography (12Nicolas E. Beggs J.M. Haltiwanger B.M. Taraschi T.F. FEBS Lett. 1997; 406: 162-164Crossref PubMed Scopus (40) Google Scholar). Conflicting conclusions have been reached on the possible mechanism of DNA degradation. On the basis of the observation that the nicked and linear forms generated by the action of RIPs on supercoiled DNA were not labeled by 3H-labeled sodium borohydride, unlike the fragment generated by the action on rRNA (10Ling J. Liu W.-Y. Wang T.P. Bioorg. Chem. 1994; 22: 395-404Crossref Scopus (9) Google Scholar), it was suggested that RIPs do not act by a DNA glycosylase mechanism (13Ling J. Li X.-D. Wu X.-H. Liu W.-Y. Biol. Chem. Hoppe-Seyler. 1995; 376: 637-641Crossref PubMed Scopus (19) Google Scholar). Because boiling ricin-A totally destroyed the activity on 28 S rRNA but only reduced the ability to cleave DNA, the activities were described to be independent (9Ling J. Liu W.-Y. Wang T.P. FEBS Lett. 1994; 345: 143-146Crossref PubMed Scopus (69) Google Scholar). Stirpe and co-workers (14Barbieri L. Valbonesi P. Bonora E. Gorini P. Bolognesi A. Stirpe F. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997; 25: 518-522Crossref PubMed Scopus (270) Google Scholar), however, suggested that DNA breakage could spontaneously occur because of the weakening produced by the removal of adenines. In this investigation, our primary aim was to study the mechanism of DNA degradation of ssDNA by different RIPs, to reconcile, if possible, the recent descriptions of RIPs as polynucleotide:adenosine nucleosidases (15Barbieri L. Gorini P. Valbonesi P. Castiglioni P. Stirpe F. Nature. 1994; 372: 624Crossref PubMed Scopus (108) Google Scholar), polynucleotide:adenosine glycosidases (16Barbieri L. Valbonesi P. Gorini P. Pession A. Stirpe F. Biochem. J. 1996; 319: 507-513Crossref PubMed Scopus (70) Google Scholar, 17Olivieri F. Prasad V. Valbonesi P. Srivastava S. Ghosal-Chowdhury P. Barbieri L. Bolognesi A. Stirpe F. FEBS Lett. 1996; 396: 132-134Crossref PubMed Scopus (54) Google Scholar), and endonucleases (7Li M.-X Yeung H.-W. Pan L.-P. Chan S.I. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991; 19: 6309-6312Crossref PubMed Scopus (106) Google Scholar, 8Go T.T.M. Yeung H.W. Fong W.P. Life Sci. 1992; 51: 1347-1353Crossref PubMed Scopus (31) Google Scholar, 9Ling J. Liu W.-Y. Wang T.P. FEBS Lett. 1994; 345: 143-146Crossref PubMed Scopus (69) Google Scholar, 11Roncuzzi L. Gasperi-Campani A. FEBS Lett. 1996; 392: 16-20Crossref PubMed Scopus (73) Google Scholar, 12Nicolas E. Beggs J.M. Haltiwanger B.M. Taraschi T.F. FEBS Lett. 1997; 406: 162-164Crossref PubMed Scopus (40) Google Scholar). The results reveal a new class of DNA glycosylase/AP lyases that act on specific adenines in ssDNA. Gelonin and ricin were purchased from Sigma. PAP was purchased from Worthington Biochemical Corporation (Freehold, NJ). The proteins were dialyzed against 10 mm HEPES, pH 7.5, prior to use. Protein concentration was determined by reaction with bicinchonic acid (Pierce) using albumin as a standard. The pUC18 DNA plasmid and the 100-bp ladder were obtained from Life Technologies, Inc. The oligodeoxyribonucleotides 28GR-A25 (5′-GTTGGGTCTCGCCTGGGTTTTCCCAGTC-3′), 28P-A14 (5′-TGGCGTCTGGGGGATGTGCTGCTCGGCG-3′), 28GR-U25, and 28P-U14 (with uracil in place of adenine) were purchased from Biosource International (Camarillo, CA). [α-32P]dATP, [γ-32P]ATP, and SequenaseTM T7 polymerase were from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech; T4 polynucleotide kinase was from Promega (Madison, WI); HindIII, Asp700, and G-25 Quickspin columns were from Boehringer Mannheim; uracil-DNA glycosylase (UDG) was from New England Biolabs, Inc. (Beverly, MA); TrevigelTM500 was from Trevigen (Gaithersburg, MD); and SDS-PAGE precast gradients gels (4–20%) were from Bio-Rad. Linear pUC18 DNA was prepared by incubation with HindIII, phenol/chloroform extraction, and ethanol precipitation. The concentration was determined by absorption spectroscopy. The HindIII-Asp700 restriction fragments generated from pUC18 were labeled with [α-32P]dATP and Sequenase™ T7 polymerase. The 791-bp fragment labeled at the 3′ end of the HindIII site was isolated on a preparative, nondenaturing, 4% polyacrylamide gel. In some instances, 7 mol % of the radioactive fragment was added to unlabeled, linear pUC18 DNA. ssDNA was prepared by heat denaturation as described in Ref. 12Nicolas E. Beggs J.M. Haltiwanger B.M. Taraschi T.F. FEBS Lett. 1997; 406: 162-164Crossref PubMed Scopus (40) Google Scholar. The ODNs were 5′ end-labeled with T4 polynucleotide kinase and [γ-32P]ATP. The reaction mixture was loaded onto a G-25 Quickspin column equilibrated in 10 mm HEPES, pH 7.0, to remove the unincorporated label. In the assays with ODNs, activity was assayed by the inclusion of 1 mol %32P-ODN with the unlabeled ODN. The amounts of protein and DNA are indicated in the figure legends. Reactions were carried out in 10 mm HEPES, pH 7.5, 0.1 mm ZnSO4, and the products were resolved by gel electrophoresis in 16 mmHEPES-KOH, 16 mm sodium acetate, 0.8 mm EDTA (18Povirk L.F. Houlgrave C.W. Biochemistry. 1988; 27: 380-385Crossref Scopus (122) Google Scholar). For the inhibition study with NaBH4, a stock solution (1 m) was freshly prepared immediately prior to use. Assays were performed in the presence of 10 mm NaBH4or 10 mm NaCl. To assay for DNA glycosylase activity in the absence of detectable cleavage, a post-treatment with alkali (0.2m NaOH, 50 mm EDTA, 30 min, 4 °C) was performed before electrophoresis. When the radioactive fragment was included in the reaction mixture, assays were terminated by addition of formamide loading dye for direct loading onto a denaturing, 6% polyacrylamide-urea gel for electrophoresis in TBE buffer (89 mm Tris-base, 89 mm boric acid, 2 mm EDTA) and autoradiography. To determine the location of the DNA cleavage sites, the products of the Maxam-Gilbert sequencing reactions (19Maxam A.M. Gilbert W. Methods Enzymol. 1980; 65: 499-560Crossref PubMed Scopus (9015) Google Scholar) on the radioactive fragment were run as markers. 1 μg of gelonin or PAP or 2 μg of ricin, in 10 mm HEPES, pH 7, 0.1 mmZnSO4, was incubated at 37 °C for 1 h with the appropriate oligonucleotide in a reaction volume of 10 μl at protein/DNA molar ratios of 2:1. To assay for DNA glycosylase activity in the absence of spontaneous cleavage, a post-treatment with 10 mm spermidine for 30 min at 37 °C was performed. Assays were terminated by addition of formamide loading dye for direct loading onto a 15% polyacrylamide-urea gel for electrophoresis in TBE buffer and autoradiography. The trapping assay was adapted from Ref. 20Girard P.-M. Guibourt N. Boiteux S. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997; 25: 3204-3211Crossref PubMed Scopus (120) Google Scholar. The oligonucleotides were added after a preincubation for 5 min at 37 °C of the proteins in the reaction buffer used above but supplemented with 10 mmNaCl or NaBH4. After 5 min at 37 °C, the samples were post-treated with spermidine as above and subjected to SDS-PAGE on a polyacrylamide 4–20% gradient gel after addition of loading buffer (0.1 m sodium phosphate, pH 6.0, 4% SDS, 10% glycerol, 2% β-mercaptoethanol, 0.01% bromphenol blue) and boiling. The gel was fixed, Coomassie-stained, photographed, and analyzed by autoradiography. Photographs and autoradiograms were scanned using a Hewlett Packard Scanjet 4C and processed with Adobe Photoshop 3.0. RIPs have been divided into two classes according to their structure. Class I-RIPs are single-chain, basic proteins with a molecular mass of about 30,000 daltons. Class II-RIPs are neutral proteins composed of two dissimilar chains, of approximately 30,000 Da each, connected by a disulfide bridge. Their active chain is homologous to the class I-RIPs (1Barbieri L. Battelli M.G. Stirpe F. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1993; 1154: 237-282Crossref PubMed Scopus (846) Google Scholar). In this study, three RIPs were used. Gelonin and PAP belong to class I, whereas ricin belongs to class II. We have previously reported that ssDNA was the preferred substrate for the nuclease activity of gelonin and that this activity was modulated by zinc (12Nicolas E. Beggs J.M. Haltiwanger B.M. Taraschi T.F. FEBS Lett. 1997; 406: 162-164Crossref PubMed Scopus (40) Google Scholar). Fig. 1 A shows that PAP (lane 3) and ricin (lane 4), like gelonin (lane 2), degraded ssDNA in the presence of zinc. On a molar basis, the activity was gelonin > PAP > ricin. Electrophoresis on agarose gels under nondenaturing conditions has been widely used to demonstrate the activity of various RIPs on supercoiled (7Li M.-X Yeung H.-W. Pan L.-P. Chan S.I. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991; 19: 6309-6312Crossref PubMed Scopus (106) Google Scholar, 8Go T.T.M. Yeung H.W. Fong W.P. Life Sci. 1992; 51: 1347-1353Crossref PubMed Scopus (31) Google Scholar, 9Ling J. Liu W.-Y. Wang T.P. FEBS Lett. 1994; 345: 143-146Crossref PubMed Scopus (69) Google Scholar, 13Ling J. Li X.-D. Wu X.-H. Liu W.-Y. Biol. Chem. Hoppe-Seyler. 1995; 376: 637-641Crossref PubMed Scopus (19) Google Scholar) or linear (12Nicolas E. Beggs J.M. Haltiwanger B.M. Taraschi T.F. FEBS Lett. 1997; 406: 162-164Crossref PubMed Scopus (40) Google Scholar) ssDNA. The appearance of nicked and linear forms or smears was indicative of backbone cleavage. Our first aim was to determine whether the removal of adenines by RIPs described by Barbieri et al. (14Barbieri L. Valbonesi P. Bonora E. Gorini P. Bolognesi A. Stirpe F. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997; 25: 518-522Crossref PubMed Scopus (270) Google Scholar) is the first event in the degradation of ssDNA. The presence of abasic sites is commonly demonstrated by their conversion to nicks upon treatment with alkali (21Doetsch P.W. Cunningham R.P. Mutat. Res. 1990; 236: 173-201Crossref PubMed Scopus (328) Google Scholar). Fig. 1 B shows the effect of RIPs on ssDNA under conditions of limited reaction when compared with Fig. 1 A. The appearance of a smear, only after post-treatment with alkali, was indicative of the existence of intermediates containing abasic sites but no nicks. Fig. 1 C showed that the inclusion of 10 mm sodium borohydride (NaBH4) during the incubation of RIPs with DNA prevented the degradation observed in Fig. 1 A. The presence of 10 mm NaCl had no detectable effect (data not shown), indicating that the inhibition was not because of interference with ionic interactions between RIPs and DNA. Higher concentrations of NaCl (>50 mm) inhibited the degradation of ssDNA (data not shown). The inhibition of cleavage by NaBH4 (Fig. 1 C) suggested that the DNA breakage caused by the RIPs in Fig. 1 A was because of a β-elimination reaction at the abasic sites, possibly by an associated AP lyase activity (22Sun B. Latham K.A. Dodson M.L. Lloyd R.S. J. Biol. Chem. 1995; 270: 19501-19509Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (147) Google Scholar). Primary amine-containing buffers were avoided in these experiments as they were reported to be unsuitable for the assay of enzymes utilizing aldehydes as substrates and for electrophoresis of DNA containing abasic sites, because they can cause DNA breakage (18Povirk L.F. Houlgrave C.W. Biochemistry. 1988; 27: 380-385Crossref Scopus (122) Google Scholar, 23Ray T. Mills R.T. Dyson P. Electrophoresis. 1995; 16: 888-894Crossref PubMed Scopus (52) Google Scholar). The results in Fig. 1 B indicated a significantly greater quantity of alkali-labile sites to authentic single-stranded breaks, suggesting the AP lyase activity, if present, was weak. To identify the bases removed by the DNA glycosylase activity of the RIPs, the electrophoretic mobilities of the alkali-catalyzed, β-elimination products can be compared with those of the products obtained by the Maxam-Gilbert sequencing procedure (19Maxam A.M. Gilbert W. Methods Enzymol. 1980; 65: 499-560Crossref PubMed Scopus (9015) Google Scholar). To apply this strategy, a 3′ 32P end-labeled radioactive fragment of pUC18 DNA was included in the reaction mixture. The reaction conditions were chosen so that the alkali post-treatment was performed on intermediates containing abasic sites but no nicks (data not shown). Electrophoresis in Tris/borate/EDTA did not cleave these intermediates (data not shown). In Fig. 2 A, which shows a portion (C30-T105) of the autoradiogram of the sequencing gel, it was seen that the bands revealed by alkali treatment corresponded to breaks at sugars without adenine. Each protein had a specific set of targets. Gelonin and ricin had similar cleavage patterns, removing adenines 34, 38, 49, 64, and 73. PAP, in addition to adenines 64 and 73, also excised adenines 55, 67, and 82. The excision of 5 adenines of the 17 available between C30 and T105 may explain the appearance of smears in Fig. 1 A, which were suggestive of a sequence-unspecific mode of degradation. An extended incubation of DNA with RIPs, without chemical post-treatment, also fragmented the substrate (Fig. 1 A; Refs. 7Li M.-X Yeung H.-W. Pan L.-P. Chan S.I. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991; 19: 6309-6312Crossref PubMed Scopus (106) Google Scholar, 8Go T.T.M. Yeung H.W. Fong W.P. Life Sci. 1992; 51: 1347-1353Crossref PubMed Scopus (31) Google Scholar, 9Ling J. Liu W.-Y. Wang T.P. FEBS Lett. 1994; 345: 143-146Crossref PubMed Scopus (69) Google Scholar, 11Roncuzzi L. Gasperi-Campani A. FEBS Lett. 1996; 392: 16-20Crossref PubMed Scopus (73) Google Scholar, 12Nicolas E. Beggs J.M. Haltiwanger B.M. Taraschi T.F. FEBS Lett. 1997; 406: 162-164Crossref PubMed Scopus (40) Google Scholar, 13Ling J. Li X.-D. Wu X.-H. Liu W.-Y. Biol. Chem. Hoppe-Seyler. 1995; 376: 637-641Crossref PubMed Scopus (19) Google Scholar). The products generated under these conditions had the same electrophoretic mobilities as the products generated by alkali-catalyzed β-elimination (Fig. 2 B). This indicated that the cleavage occurred at the 3′ side of the abasic sites. Glycosylase/AP lyases cleave the phosphodiester bond 3′ of the abasic site via a β-elimination reaction (22Sun B. Latham K.A. Dodson M.L. Lloyd R.S. J. Biol. Chem. 1995; 270: 19501-19509Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (147) Google Scholar). The results in Figs. 1and 2 suggested that the RIPs were DNA glycosylases that had an associated weak AP lyase activity. A major distinction between simple DNA glycosylases and DNA glycosylase/AP lyases is that the latter group uses an amino group as the nucleophile to attack the sugar of the damaged base nucleotide (22Sun B. Latham K.A. Dodson M.L. Lloyd R.S. J. Biol. Chem. 1995; 270: 19501-19509Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (147) Google Scholar,24Dodson M.L. Michaels M.L. Lloyd R.S. J. Biol. Chem. 1994; 269: 32709-32712Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar), whereas the former use a nucleophile from the medium, most likely a hydroxide ion or an associated water molecule. The glycosylase/AP lyase-DNA covalent intermediate can be trapped by reduction of the imino intermediate with NaBH4 (22Sun B. Latham K.A. Dodson M.L. Lloyd R.S. J. Biol. Chem. 1995; 270: 19501-19509Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (147) Google Scholar) and visualized by autoradiography after SDS-PAGE when a 5′ 32P end-labeled ODN is used as substrate (20Girard P.-M. Guibourt N. Boiteux S. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997; 25: 3204-3211Crossref PubMed Scopus (120) Google Scholar, 22Sun B. Latham K.A. Dodson M.L. Lloyd R.S. J. Biol. Chem. 1995; 270: 19501-19509Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (147) Google Scholar, 25Manuel R.C. Lloyd R.S. Biochemistry. 1997; 36: 11140-11152Crossref PubMed Scopus (78) Google Scholar, 26Tchou J. Grollman A.P. J. Biol. Chem. 1995; 270: 11671-11677Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (128) Google Scholar, 27Zharkov D.O. Rieger R.A. Iden C.R. Grollman A.P. J. Biol. Chem. 1997; 272: 5335-5341Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (176) Google Scholar, 28Hilbert T.P. Boorstein R.J. Kung H.C. Bolton P.H. Xing D. Cunningham R.P. Teebor G.W. Biochemistry. 1996; 35: 2505-2511Crossref PubMed Scopus (78) Google Scholar). To apply this strategy to the characterization of RIPs, their activity on 28GR-A25 and 28P-A14 was first investigated (Fig. 3). These ODNs were designed by modification of fragments of the DNA used in Fig. 2. 28GR and 28P were chosen for the presence of adenines 38 and 82 that appear to be selective targets for gelonin or ricin and PAP, respectively (Fig. 2). 28GR-A25 and 28P-A14 contain only these adenines. The activity was measured at a RIP/ODN molar ratio of 2:1. Fig. 3 A shows that no scission products were detected by direct analysis after incubation of RIPs with 28GR-A25. Incubation of gelonin with 28GR-A25 (lane 4) produced a smear similar to the one produced by incubation of the simple glycosylase UDG with 28GR-U25 (lane 2). Incubation of PAP with 28P-A14 produced a smear similar to the one produced by incubation of UDG with 28P-U14 (data not shown). These smears, ascribed to the instability of electrophoresis of abasic site containing oligonucleotides (29DeMott M.S. Shen B. Park M.S. Bambara R.A. Zigman S. J. Biol. Chem. 1996; 271: 30068-30076Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (65) Google Scholar), were suggestive of adenine-DNA glycosylase activity of the RIPs on ODNs. The preference of gelonin for A25 of 28GR over A14 of 28P and of PAP for A14 of 28P over A25 of 28GR was as predicted from the analysis of Fig. 2. To confirm the hypothesis of adenine removal, the products were analyzed after post-treatment with the β-elimination catalyst spermidine (Fig. 3 B). As expected, incubation of gelonin with 28GR-A25 (2:1 molar ratio) and post-treatment with spermidine (lane 4) totally converted the 28-mer into a labeled product that co-migrated with the product of the incubation of UDG with 28GR-U25 and post-treatment with spermidine (lane 2), whereas incubation of PAP with 28P-A14 and post-treatment with spermidine (lane 11) produced a band that co-migrated with the product of the incubation of UDG with 28P-U14 (lane 8). The activity of gelonin on 28P-A14 (lane 10) was low, as was the activity of PAP on 28GR-A25 (lane 5). Ricin had a detectable glycosylase activity on A25 of 28GR (lane 6). It was concluded from Fig. 3 that RIPs remove adenine from single-stranded 28-mers with preferences similar to that observed with an 800-base substrate. There was no evidence of AP lyase activity on the ODNs. Because it has been proposed in the model for the glycosylase/AP lyase pathway (22Sun B. Latham K.A. Dodson M.L. Lloyd R.S. J. Biol. Chem. 1995; 270: 19501-19509Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (147) Google Scholar) that the imino intermediate could be reversed after base removal so that no strand break would occur, the possibility of its formation was investigated using a NaBH4 trapping assay (Fig. 4). 28GR-A25, shown to be a substrate for all three RIPs in Fig. 3, was used as the substrate. The RIP/ODN molar ratio of 2:1, similar to the one used in Fig. 3, was in the range of the ratios used in Ref. 22Sun B. Latham K.A. Dodson M.L. Lloyd R.S. J. Biol. Chem. 1995; 270: 19501-19509Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (147) Google Scholar to demonstrate the validity of the borohydride trapping assay for distinguishing between the simple glycosylases and the glycosylase/AP lyases. The 2:1 ratio was 50 times lower than was used to demonstrate the formation of the MutY-DNA intermediate (25Manuel R.C. Lloyd R.S. Biochemistry. 1997; 36: 11140-11152Crossref PubMed Scopus (78) Google Scholar). Experiments aimed at defining the trapping assay conditions indicated that 10 mm was a suitable concentration of NaBH4 or NaCl to be used with gelonin and PAP because the presence of 10 mm NaBH4 during the incubation totally inhibited the alkali sensitivity, whereas cleavage was obtained with 10 mm NaCl (data not shown). This concentration was also used with ricin, despite the observation that 10 mm NaCl greatly reduced the glycosylase activity, since 10 mm NaBH4 was determined to be the minimal concentration required to inhibit the alkali sensitivity (data not shown). The electrophoretic mobility of the proteins is shown in Fig. 4 A. The bands of reduced mobility detected by autoradiography (Fig. 4 B) were consistent with the NaBH4 trapping of covalent gelonin-ODN (lane 2) and PAP-ODN (lane 4) complexes. The absence of signal inlane 6 was not unexpected, given the weak glycosylase activity of ricin. Surprisingly, the presence of NaBH4 did not appear to be an absolute requirement for complex detection, especially in the case of gelonin (lane 1). Complexes of similar molecular mass were also detected as minor reaction products, with all three RIPs, when aliquots of the samples previously analyzed by sequencing gel (Fig. 3) were analyzed by SDS-PAGE (data not shown). Formation of complexes via a Schiff base between depurinated DNA and proteins (e.g. histones) that were stable at neutral pH have been observed previously (30Shick V.V. Belyavsky A.V. Bavykin S.G. Mirzabekov A.D. J. Mol. Biol. 1980; 139: 491-517Crossref PubMed Scopus (109) Google Scholar). However, the detection of RIP-ODN complexes was unexpected, given that stabilization of the transition states by modification of the substrate or the enzyme is usually required to observe complexes between DNA and catalytic DNA binding proteins (31Iwai S. Maeda M. Shirai M. Shimada Y. Osafune T. Murata T. Ohtsuka E. Biochemistry. 1995; 34: 4601-4609Crossref PubMed Scopus (21) Google Scholar, 32Schärer O.D. Kawate T. Gallinari P. Jiricny J. Verdine G.L. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1997; 78: 2742-2746Google Scholar). On the basis of the results of our investigation, the RIPs meet the established criteria (22Sun B. Latham K.A. Dodson M.L. Lloyd R.S. J. Biol. Chem. 1995; 270: 19501-19509Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (147) Google Scholar, 24Dodson M.L. Michaels M.L. Lloyd R.S. J. Biol. Chem. 1994; 269: 32709-32712Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar) to be classified as DNA glycosylase/AP lyases. The description of a DNA glycosylase/AP lyase activity on ssDNA is unique, because UDGs, which are the only described DNA glycosylases with in vitro activity on ssDNA, do not have an associated lyase activity (21Doetsch P.W. Cunningham R.P. Mutat. Res. 1990; 236: 173-201Crossref PubMed Scopus (328) Google Scholar). As was the case for several other DNA glycosylases (33Cunningham R.P. Mutat. Res. 1997; 383: 189-196Crossref PubMed Scopus (96) Google Scholar), the associated AP lyase activity that nicks DNA at the site of base removal led to the description of RIPs as "endonucleases." In our investigation, the lyase activity was evident when full-length, single-stranded pUC18 (Fig. 1) or an 800-base fragment (Fig. 2) were used as substrates. The ability to detect intermediates containing abasic sites but no nicks (Figs. 1 and 2) suggested that, similar to the pyrimidine dimer-glycosylase/AP lyase T4 endonuclease V (34Nakabeppu Y. Sekiguchi M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1981; 78: 2742-2746Crossref PubMed Scopus (99) Google Scholar), the AP lyase activity was weak. ODNs were substrates for adenine-DNA glycosylase activity but were not cleaved (Fig. 3). To our knowledge, this is the first report of the absence of AP lyase activity of a native DNA glycosylase/AP lyase on an unmodified ODN. Chemical attachment of a fluorine atom at the 2′ position of the 5′ component of a thymine dimer site has been shown to inhibit the strand cleavage, but not the glycosylase activity, by T4 endonuclease V (31Iwai S. Maeda M. Shirai M. Shimada Y. Osafune T. Murata T. Ohtsuka E. Biochemistry. 1995; 34: 4601-4609Crossref PubMed Scopus (21) Google Scholar). Our results suggest that the classification of enzymes as simple DNA glycosylases or DNA glycosylase/AP lyases should not rely solely on assays using oligonucleotides as substrates nor the NaBH4 trapping procedure. The proposed mechanism for the DNA glycosylase/AP lyase pathway (24Dodson M.L. Michaels M.L. Lloyd R.S. J. Biol. Chem. 1994; 269: 32709-32712Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar) predicts that the fate of the covalent imino intermediate is to be hydrolyzed, either before or after the DNA undergoes a β-elimination reaction, resulting in scission of the phosphodiester backbone. Dissociation of the intermediate before the β-elimination reaction could explain the absence of detectable levels of scission products in Fig. 3 A. The cleavage of the 3′ C–O bond occurs after enzyme-assisted abstraction of the 2′-H (31Iwai S. Maeda M. Shirai M. Shimada Y. Osafune T. Murata T. Ohtsuka E. Biochemistry. 1995; 34: 4601-4609Crossref PubMed Scopus (21) Google Scholar, 35Vassylyev D.G. Kashiwagi T. Mikami Y. Ariyoshi M. Iwai S. Ohtsuka E. Morikawa K. Cell. 1995; 83: 773-782Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (256) Google Scholar, 36Nash H.M. Bruner S.D. Schärer O.D. Kawate T. Addona T.A. Spooner E. Lane W.S. Verdine G.L. Curr. Biol. 1996; 6: 968-980Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (417) Google Scholar). An alternative explanation for the absence of cleavage of ODNs by RIPs despite base removal, which takes into account the observation of formation of stable complexes in the absence of NaBH4, could be that an essential residue, such as Glu23 of T4 endonuclease V (35Vassylyev D.G. Kashiwagi T. Mikami Y. Ariyoshi M. Iwai S. Ohtsuka E. Morikawa K. Cell. 1995; 83: 773-782Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (256) Google Scholar,37Manuel R.C. Latham K.A. Dodson M.L. Lloyd R.S. J. Biol. Chem. 1995; 270: 2652-2661Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (35) Google Scholar) cannot play its role in β-elimination but instead stabilizes the intermediate. The removal of a RIP-specific set of adenines has been established in Figs. 2 and 3. Whereas certain engineered mutations in the active site of human UDG resulted in novel enzymatic activities that released normal pyrimidines from DNA (38Kavli B. Slupphaug G. Mol C.D. Arvai A.S. Petersen S.B. Tainer J.A. Krokan H.E. EMBO J. 1996; 15: 3442-3447Crossref PubMed Scopus (152) Google Scholar), RIPs are the first natural glycosylases able to remove normal bases from DNA. With their unique ability to excise a specific set of undamaged bases from single-stranded DNA, RIPs should be of interest for structural biologists investigating the basis of base recognition by DNA glycosylases, because their activity challenges the concept that a normal base has to be in a mismatch to be specifically removed. Moreover, RIPs could, similarly to UDG, have practical applications in molecular biology. The proteins used in this study are from plants. They are known as ribosome-inactivating proteins, but their physiological function is not clear (1Barbieri L. Battelli M.G. Stirpe F. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1993; 1154: 237-282Crossref PubMed Scopus (846) Google Scholar). A possible role of RIPs could be in adenine metabolism, because enzymes that catalyze cleavage of the N-glycosidic bond in nucleotides, nucleosides, or related compounds are central to salvage pathways. The observation of their induction upon stress or senescence (39Stirpe F. Barbieri L. Gorini P. Valbonesi P. Bolognesi A. Polito L. FEBS Lett. 1996; 382: 309-312Crossref PubMed Scopus (84) Google Scholar) suggests that they could be involved in macromolecular turnover. Viral infection of sugar beets has been shown to induce the expression of RIPs (40Girbès T. de Torre C. Iglesias R. Ferreras J.M. Méndez E. Nature. 1996; 379: 777-778Crossref PubMed Scopus (57) Google Scholar). Although DNA glycosylases can be seen as defenses against potentially injurious modifications of DNA, RIPs now described as adenine-ssDNA glycosylase/AP lyases could have a protective function by damaging the genetic material of invading pathogens. In addition to uses in agribiology (41Shah D.M. Rommens C.M.T. Beachy R.N. Trends Biotechnol. 1995; 13: 362-369Abstract Full Text PDF Scopus (69) Google Scholar), RIPs are being evaluated for their anti-cancer (42Frankel A.E. Tagge E.P. Willingham M.C. Semin. Cancer Biol. 1995; 6: 307-317Crossref PubMed Scopus (62) Google Scholar) or anti-viral efficacy in humans (43Kahn J.O. Gorelick K.J. Gatti G. Arri C.J. Lifson J.D. Gambertoglio J.G. Bostrom A. Williams R. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1994; 38: 260-267Crossref PubMed Scopus (69) Google Scholar). Some reports have suggested that their effects may not be (only) because of inhibition of protein synthesis (3Nicolas E. Goodyer I.D. Taraschi T.F. Biochem. J. 1997; 327: 413-417Crossref PubMed Scopus (39) Google Scholar, 4Teltow G.J. Irvin J.D. Aron G.M. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1983; 23: 390-396Crossref PubMed Scopus (39) Google Scholar, 5McGrath M.S. Hwang K.M. Caldwell S.E. Gaston I. Luk K.-C. Wu P. Ng V.L. Crowe S. Daniels J. Marsh J. Deinhart T. Lekas P.V. Vennari J.C. Yeung H.-W. Lifson J.D. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1989; 86: 2844-2848Crossref PubMed Scopus (320) Google Scholar, 6Tumer N.E. Hwang D.-J. Bonness M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1997; 94: 3866-3871Crossref PubMed Scopus (130) Google Scholar). The observations of selective inhibition of viral DNA synthesis by PAP (4Teltow G.J. Irvin J.D. Aron G.M. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1983; 23: 390-396Crossref PubMed Scopus (39) Google Scholar) or elimination of the parasite 6-kb extrachromosomal (mitochondrial) DNA of P. falciparum infected erythrocytes by gelonin (3Nicolas E. Goodyer I.D. Taraschi T.F. Biochem. J. 1997; 327: 413-417Crossref PubMed Scopus (39) Google Scholar) are consistent with a DNA damaging activity of RIPs. The characterization of the activities on DNA of proteins such as the C-terminal deletion mutant of PAP that inhibits viral infection but does not depurinate host ribosomes (6Tumer N.E. Hwang D.-J. Bonness M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1997; 94: 3866-3871Crossref PubMed Scopus (130) Google Scholar) might give a better insight into the origin of their anti-viral effect. DNA glycosylases are classically described as enzymes of the DNA repair pathway (44Krokan H.E. Standal R. Slupphaug G. Biochem. J. 1997; 325: 1-16Crossref PubMed Scopus (727) Google Scholar). In the last few years, it has become clear that defects in genes that maintain the integrity of the genome may be causes of inherited predispositions to cancer (45Kinzler K.W. Vogelstein B. Nature. 1997; 386: 761-763Crossref PubMed Scopus (1011) Google Scholar). The expression of the UDG engineered mutants that release normal pyrimidines in Escherichia coli has been shown to cause mutations and cytotoxicity (38Kavli B. Slupphaug G. Mol C.D. Arvai A.S. Petersen S.B. Tainer J.A. Krokan H.E. EMBO J. 1996; 15: 3442-3447Crossref PubMed Scopus (152) Google Scholar). The fact that three of the four mutant pyrimidine-DNA glycosylases were produced by single nucleotide substitutions led to the suggestion of the possible natural existence of such enzymes (38Kavli B. Slupphaug G. Mol C.D. Arvai A.S. Petersen S.B. Tainer J.A. Krokan H.E. EMBO J. 1996; 15: 3442-3447Crossref PubMed Scopus (152) Google Scholar). Mutations in DNA glycosylase genes that lead to expression of proteins, which, similar to RIPs, are able to remove normal bases, could be linked to certain (human) diseases. Plant RIPs are a family of enzymes whose physiological function is unknown and whose pharmacological activities do not appear to be solely because of the "classical" property of inhibitors of protein synthesis after which they were named. On the basis of activities observed on various substrates in vitro, it had been proposed to reclassify them as polynucleotide:adenosine nucleosidases (15Barbieri L. Gorini P. Valbonesi P. Castiglioni P. Stirpe F. Nature. 1994; 372: 624Crossref PubMed Scopus (108) Google Scholar) or polynucleotide:adenosine glycosidases (14Barbieri L. Valbonesi P. Bonora E. Gorini P. Bolognesi A. Stirpe F. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997; 25: 518-522Crossref PubMed Scopus (270) Google Scholar, 16Barbieri L. Valbonesi P. Gorini P. Pession A. Stirpe F. Biochem. J. 1996; 319: 507-513Crossref PubMed Scopus (70) Google Scholar). These terminologies appear to be inappropriate. We propose to postpone the renaming of these proteins until their physiological role and cytotoxic pathways are better characterized. We thank Dr. Mary-Ann Bjornsti for valuable discussions and Jolanta Fertala for technical advice in the Maxam- Gilbert sequencing procedure.
Referência(s)