We Don't Replicate Accounting Research—Or Do We?
2014; Wiley; Volume: 31; Issue: 4 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1111/1911-3846.12102
ISSN1911-3846
Autores Tópico(s)Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
ResumoContemporary Accounting ResearchVolume 31, Issue 4 p. 1134-1142 Introduction Article We Don't Replicate Accounting Research—Or Do We?† Steven E. Salterio, Steven E. Salterio Queen's UniversitySearch for more papers by this author Steven E. Salterio, Steven E. Salterio Queen's UniversitySearch for more papers by this author First published: 28 October 2014 https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12102Citations: 39 †An introduction to the mini-forum on replication research in accounting prepared by the then CAR Editor (in-Chief) to provide context for the forum. Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat References Basu, S. 2012. How can accounting researchers become more innovative? Accounting Horizons 26 (4): 851–70. Begley, S. 2012. More trial, less error—An effort to improve scientific studies. Reuters. Available online at www.reuters.com/assets/print?aid=USBRE87DOI820120814, retrieved August 14, 2013. Bem, D. J. 2011. Feeling the future: Experimental evidence for anomalous retroactive influences on cognition and affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 100 (3): 407–25. Call, A., S. Chen, and Y. Tong 2013. Are analysts' cash flow forecasts naïve extensions of their own earnings forecasts? Contemporary Accounting Research 30 (2): 438–65. Callihan, D. S. 1994. Corporate effective tax rates: A synthesis of the literature. Journal of Accounting Literature 13: 1–43. Cooper, D. J., and W. Morgan. 2008. Case study research in accounting. Accounting Horizons 22 (2): 159–78. Evanschitzky, H., C. Baumgarth, R. Hubbard, and J. S. Armstrong. 2007. Replication research's disturbing trend. Journal of Business Research 60 (4): 411–15. Fama, E., and K. French. 2008. Dissecting anomalies. Journal of Finance 63 (4): 1653–78. Freese, J. 2007. Replication standards for quantitative social science: Why not sociology? Sociological Methods and Research 36 (2): 153–72. Givoly, D., C. Hayn, and R. Lehavy. 2009. The quality of analysts' cash flow forecasts. The Accounting Review 84 (6): 1877–911. Glandon, P. 2011. Report on the American economic review data availability compliance project. American Economic Association. Available online at http://www.aeaweb.org/aer/2011_Data_Compliance_Report.pdf, retrieved August 14, 2013. Gray, R., R. Kouhy, and S. Lavers. 1995. Methodological themes: Constructing a research database of social and environmental reporting by UK companies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 8 (2): 78–87. Guthrie, J., and L. D. Parker. 2012. Reflections and projections. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 25 (1): 6–26. Humphrey, C. 2008. Auditing research: A review across the disciplinary divide. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 21 (2): 170–203. Hunton, J., and A. Gold. 2010. A field experiment comprising the outcomes of three fraud brainstorming procedures: Nominal group, round robin, and open discussions. The Accounting Review 85 (3): 911–35. Hunton, J., V. Arnold, and J. Reck. 2010. Decision aid reliance: A longitudinal field study involving professional buy-side financial analysts. Contemporary Accounting Research 27 (4): 997–1023. Hunton, J., R. Hoitash, and J. Thibodeau. 2011. The relationship between perceived tone at the top and earnings quality. Contemporary Accounting Research 28 (4): 1190–224. Jasny, B., G. Chin, L. Chong, and S. Vignieri. 2011. Again, and again, and again. Science 334 (December 2): 1225. Lillis, A. M., and J. Mundy. 2005. Cross-sectional field studies in management accounting research-closing the gaps between surveys and case studies. Journal of Management Accounting Research 17: 119–41. Lindsay, R. M. 1995. Reconsidering the status of tests of significance: An alternative criterion of adequacy. Accounting, Organizations and Society 20 (1): 35–53. Lindsay, R. M. 1997. Lies, damned lies and more statistics: The neglected issue of multiplicity in accounting research. Accounting and Business Research 27 (3): 243–58. Lindsay, R. M., and A. S. C. Ehrenberg. 1993. The design of replicated studies. The American Statistician 47 (3): 217–22. Lipe, M., and S. Salterio. 2000. Balanced scorecard: Judgmental effects of common and unique performance measures. The Accounting Review 75 (3): 283–98. Milner, B. 2013. Bad math? Reinhart-Rogoff study on perils of debt called into question. Globe and Mail, April 16, B-9. Mohanran, P. 2014. Analysts cash flow forecasts and the decline of the accruals anomaly. Contemporary Accounting Research 31 (4): 1143–70. Nosek, B. A., J. R. Spies, and M. Motyl. 2012. Scientific Utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspectives on Psychological Science 7 (6): 615–31. Open Science Collaboration. 2012. An open, large-scale, collaborative effort to estimate the reproducibility of Psychological Science. Perspectives on Psychological Science 7 (6): 657–60. Pomeroy, B., and D. B. Thornton. 2008. Meta-analysis and the accounting literature: The case of audit committee independence and financial reporting quality. European Accounting Review 17 (2): 305–30. Reinhart, C. M., and K. S. Rogoff. 2009. This time it is different. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Salterio, S. E. 2012. Balancing the scorecard through academic accounting research: Opportunity lost? Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change 8 (4): 458–74. Salterio, S. 2013. Contemporary Accounting Research 2012 Editor's Report. Available online at https://www.caaa.ca/CAR/index.html, retrieved August 14, 2013. Shiller, R. J. 2003. From efficient markets theory to behavioral finance. Journal of Economic Perspectives 17 (1): 83–104. Tan, H.-T., R. Libby, and J. Hunton. 2010. When do analysts adjust for biases in management guidance? Effects of guidance track record and analysts' incentives. Contemporary Accounting Research 27 (1): 187–208. Taylor, S. 2009. Capital markets regulation: How can accounting research contribute? Australian Accounting Review 19 (4): 319–25. Tsang, E. W. K., and K.-M. Kwan. 1999. Replication and theory development in organizational science: A critical realist perspective. Academy of Management Review 24 (4): 759–80. Waymire, G. B. 2012. Seeds of innovation in accounting scholarship. Issues in Accounting Education 27 (4): 1077–93. Wible, J. R. 1991. Maximization, replication and the economic rationality of positive economic science. Review of Political Economy 3 (2): 164–86. Wu, S.-L., and S. Radhakrishnan. 2014. Analysts' cash flow forecasts and accrual mispricing. Contemporary Accounting Research 31 (4): 1191–219. Yong, E. 2012. Bad copy: In the wake of high profile controversies, psychologists are facing up to problems with replication. Nature 485 (May): 298–300. Citing Literature Volume31, Issue4Winter 2014Pages 1134-1142 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)