Artigo Revisado por pares

The time course of CO2 laser-evoked responses and of skin nerve fibre markers after topical capsaicin in human volunteers

2010; Elsevier BV; Volume: 121; Issue: 8 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1016/j.clinph.2010.02.159

ISSN

1872-8952

Autores

Michaël Ragé, Nathalie Van Acker, P. Facer, Ravikiran Shenoy, Michiel Knaapen, Maarten Timmers, Johannes Streffer, Praveen Anand, Theo Meert, Léon Plaghki,

Tópico(s)

Dermatology and Skin Diseases

Resumo

To assess the temporal relationship between skin nerve denervation and regeneration (dermal and intra-epidermal fibres, IENF) and functional changes (CO(2) laser-evoked potentials, LEPs, and quantitative sensory tests, QST) after topical cutaneous application of capsaicin.Capsaicin (0.075%) was applied to the lateral calf for three consecutive days. QST, LEPs and skin biopsies were performed at baseline and time intervals up to 54days post-capsaicin treatment. Biopsies were immunostained with antibodies for PGP9.5, TRPV1, and GAP-43 (marker of regenerating nerve fibres), and analyzed for IENFs and dermal innervation (for GAP-43).At 1day post-capsaicin, cutaneous thermal sensitivity was reduced, as were LEPs. PGP9.5, TRPV1, and GAP-43 immunoreactive-nerve fibres were almost completely absent. By Day 12, LEPs had fully recovered, but PGP9.5 and TRPV1 IENF continued to be significantly decreased 54days post-capsaicin. In contrast, dermal GAP-43 immunoreactivity closely matched recovery of LEPs.A good correlation was observed between LEPs and GAP-43 staining, in contrast to PGP9.5 and TRPV1. Laser stimulation is a non-invasive and sensitive method for assessing the initial IENF loss, and regenerating nerve fibres.Assessing skin biopsies by PGP9.5 immunostaining alone may miss significant diagnostic and prognostic information regarding regenerating nerve fibres, if other approaches are neglected, e.g. LEPs or GAP-43 immunostaining.

Referência(s)