The Reversal Test: Eliminating Status Quo Bias in Applied Ethics
2006; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 116; Issue: 4 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/505233
ISSN1539-297X
Autores Tópico(s)Free Will and Agency
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessThe Reversal Test: Eliminating Status Quo Bias in Applied Ethics*Nick Bostrom and Toby OrdNick Bostrom and Toby OrdPDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Ethics Volume 116, Number 4July 2006 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/505233 Views: 1352Total views on this site Citations: 115Citations are reported from Crossref © 2006 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Sheshadri Chatterjee, Ranjan Chaudhuri, Demetris Vrontis, Fauzia Jabeen Digital transformation of organization using AI-CRM: From microfoundational perspective with leadership support, Journal of Business Research 153 (Dec 2022): 46–58.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.08.019Marie-E. Godefroid, Ralf Plattfaut, Björn Niehaves How to measure the status quo bias? A review of current literature, Management Review Quarterly 4 (Aug 2022).https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-022-00283-8Edmund Handby Assessing the Use of Intuitions in Contemporary Political Theory, The Journal of Politics 84, no.33 (Apr 2022): 1595–1606.https://doi.org/10.1086/719270Lysette Chaproniere Understanding the Relationship Between Disability and Enhancement, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 32 (May 2022).https://doi.org/10.1111/papq.12410Emmanuelle Caccamo, Maude Bonenfant Rhétorique des discours transhumanistes : arguments et fondements discursifs, Communication & langages N° 210, no.44 (Nov 2021): 5–31.https://doi.org/10.3917/comla1.210.0005Alexandre Erler Neuro-Doping and the Value of Effort in Endurance Sports, Neuroethics 14, no.S2S2 (Oct 2020): 191–203.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-020-09450-8Neil Levy, Julian Savulescu After the Pandemic: New Responsibilities, Public Health Ethics 14, no.22 (May 2021): 120–133.https://doi.org/10.1093/phe/phab008Jon Rueda From Self‐Determination to Offspring‐Determination? Reproductive Autonomy, Procrustean Parenting, and Genetic Enhancement, Theoria 9 (Sep 2021).https://doi.org/10.1111/theo.12349Jonathan Stanhope Warrants to conserve, Analysis 81, no.11 (May 2021): 62–71.https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anaa048David Faraci, Peter M. Jaworski ON LEAVING SPACE FOR ALTRUISM, Public Affairs Quarterly 35, no.22 (Apr 2021): 83–93.https://doi.org/10.2307/48616068Christopher Robertson The Ethics of Research That May Disadvantage Others, Ethics & Human Research 43, no.11 (Jan 2021): 2–16.https://doi.org/10.1002/eahr.500074Anass Bayaga Faculty Views of Adaptive E-Learning in a South African University, (Feb 2021): 145–162.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44217-0_7Giuseppe Renato Gristina Withholding or Withdrawing Life-Sustaining Treatments, (Sep 2021): 99–112.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80112-0_6Francesco Paolo Adorno Theory and Practice of Transhumanism, (Nov 2021): 67–120.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82423-5_4Adam J. Kolber The Ethics of Memory Dampening, (Dec 2021): 213–240.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84494-3_7Sven Nyholm, Jilles Smids Automated cars meet human drivers: responsible human-robot coordination and the ethics of mixed traffic, Ethics and Information Technology 22, no.44 (Jan 2018): 335–344.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-018-9445-9Jesse Gray Radical enhancement as a moral status de-enhancer, Monash Bioethics Review 38, no.22 (Jul 2020): 146–165.https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-020-00118-wMARINA MOTSENOK, TALYA STEINER, LIAT NETZER, YUVAL FELDMAN, RAANAN SULITZEANU-KENAN The slippery slope of rights-restricting temporary measures: an experimental analysis, Behavioural Public Policy 273 (Aug 2020): 1–21.https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2020.35Tomasz Żuradzki The Normative Significance of Empirical Moral Psychology, Diametros 17, no.6464 (Jun 2020): 1–5.https://doi.org/10.33392/diam.1626Kalle Lyytinen, Jeffrey V Nickerson, John L King Metahuman systems = humans + machines that learn, Journal of Information Technology 37 (May 2020): 026839622091591.https://doi.org/10.1177/0268396220915917Giulia Cavaliere The problem with reproductive freedom. Procreation beyond procreators' interests, Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 23, no.11 (Aug 2019): 131–140.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-019-09917-3Anass Bayaga Faculty Views of Adaptive E-Learning in a South African University, (Jun 2020): 1–18.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43042-9_7-1Logan L. Watts, Kelsey E. Medeiros, Tristan J. McIntosh, Tyler J. Mulhearn Decision biases in the context of ethics: Initial scale development and validation, Personality and Individual Differences 153 (Jan 2020): 109609.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109609Jessica Flanigan, Christopher Freiman Drug War Reparations, Res Philosophica 97, no.22 (Jan 2020): 141–168.https://doi.org/10.11612/resphil.1886Maurizio Balistreri, Solveig Lena Hansen Moral and Fictional Discourses on Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Current Responses, Future Scenarios, NanoEthics 13, no.33 (Dec 2019): 199–207.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-019-00359-yJared Ng, Manne Sjöstrand, Nir Eyal Adding Lithium to Drinking Water for Suicide Prevention—The Ethics, Public Health Ethics 12, no.33 (Feb 2019): 274–286.https://doi.org/10.1093/phe/phz002K. Linnerud, P. Toney, M. Simonsen, E. Holden Does change in ownership affect community attitudes toward renewable energy projects? Evidence of a status quo bias, Energy Policy 131 (Aug 2019): 1–8.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.04.039Rebecca Roache Social media and friendship, (May 2019): 135–148.https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315107752-11Alberto Giubilini, Francesca Minerva Enhancing Equality, The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine 44, no.33 (May 2019): 335–354.https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhz002Markus Rüther, Jan-Hendrik Heinrichs Human Enhancement: Deontological Arguments, Zeitschrift für Ethik und Moralphilosophie 2, no.11 (Jun 2019): 161–178.https://doi.org/10.1007/s42048-019-00036-5Bjørn Hofmann Categorical Mistakes and Moral Biases in the Withholding-Versus-Withdrawal Debate, The American Journal of Bioethics 19, no.33 (Mar 2019): 29–31.https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2018.1563662Dominic Wilkinson, Ella Butcherine, Julian Savulescu Withdrawal Aversion and the Equivalence Test, The American Journal of Bioethics 19, no.33 (Mar 2019): 21–28.https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2019.1574465Bjørn Hofmann Human Enhancement: Enhancing Health or Harnessing Happiness?, Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 16, no.11 (Dec 2018): 87–98.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-018-9888-zVeljko Dubljević, Eric Racine Pediatric Neuro-enhancement, Best Interest, and Autonomy: A Case of Normative Reversal, (May 2019): 199–212.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10677-5_13Jessica Flanigan Philosophical methodology and leadership ethics, Leadership 14, no.66 (Jun 2017): 707–730.https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715017711823Pei-Hua Huang Moral Enhancement, Self-Governance, and Resistance, The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine 43, no.55 (Sep 2018): 547–567.https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhy023Steven Umbrello The moral psychology of value sensitive design: the methodological issues of moral intuitions for responsible innovation, Journal of Responsible Innovation 5, no.22 (Apr 2018): 186–200.https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2018.1457401Francesca Minerva Cryothanasia, (Jun 2018): 97–110.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78599-8_5Susan B. Levin Creating a Higher Breed: Transhumanism and the Prophecy of Anglo-American Eugenics, (Aug 2018): 37–58.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89429-4_4Javier Hidalgo Cosmopolitan Moral Enhancement, (Oct 2017): 173–196.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95303-5_10Christopher Freiman Why Parents Should Enhance Their Children, (Oct 2017): 155–171.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95303-5_9Steven Umbrello The Moral Psychology of Value Sensitive Design: The Methodological Issues of Moral Intuitions for Responsible Innovation, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2018).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3141471Christopher Gyngell, Julian Savulescu Promoting Biodiversity, Philosophy & Technology 30, no.44 (Sep 2016): 413–426.https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-016-0234-2Bjørn Hofmann Limits to human enhancement: nature, disease, therapy or betterment?, BMC Medical Ethics 18, no.11 (Oct 2017).https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0215-8Søren Holm Evaluating the Posthuman Future – Some Philosophical Problems, European Review 25, no.11 (Oct 2016): 131–139.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798716000375Catherine H. Tinsley, James B. Wade, Brian G. M. Main, Charles A. O'Reilly Gender Diversity on U.S. Corporate Boards, ILR Review 70, no.11 (Jan 2017): 160–189.https://doi.org/10.1177/0019793916668356Xavier Marquez An Epistemic Argument for Conservatism, Res Publica 22, no.44 (Oct 2015): 405–422.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-015-9296-8Andreas T. Schmidt Withdrawing Versus Withholding Freedoms: Nudging and the Case of Tobacco Control, The American Journal of Bioethics 16, no.77 (Jun 2016): 3–14.https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2016.1180442Steve Clarke The reversal test, status quo bias, and opposition to human cognitive enhancement, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 46, no.33 (Jan 2020): 369–386.https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2016.1176982Kevin Patrick Tobia Personal Identity, Direction of Change, and Neuroethics, Neuroethics 9, no.11 (Jan 2016): 37–43.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-016-9248-9Susan B. Levin Upgrading Discussions of Cognitive Enhancement, Neuroethics 9, no.11 (Mar 2016): 53–67.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-016-9253-zMiroslav Popper Human enhancement and the concept of liminality, Human Affairs 26, no.22 (Apr 2016): 128–139.https://doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2016-0014Nadira S. Faber, Julian Savulescu, Thomas Douglas Why is Cognitive Enhancement Deemed Unacceptable? The Role of Fairness, Deservingness, and Hollow Achievements, Frontiers in Psychology 7 (Feb 2016).https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00232Russell Powell In Genes We Trust: Germline Engineering, Eugenics, and the Future of the Human Genome, The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine 40, no.66 (Oct 2015): 669–695.https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhv025B. Saunders Procreative Beneficence, Intelligence, and the Optimization Problem, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 40, no.66 (Oct 2015): 653–668.https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhv026Inmaculada de Melo-Martı´n On the Value of Diversity, The American Journal of Bioethics 15, no.99 (Aug 2015): W1–W2.https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2015.1065023Laura Y. Cabrera, Nicholas S. Fitz, Peter B. Reiner Reasons for Comfort and Discomfort with Pharmacological Enhancement of Cognitive, Affective, and Social Domains, Neuroethics 8, no.22 (Oct 2014): 93–106.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-014-9222-3Robert Sparrow Imposing Genetic Diversity, The American Journal of Bioethics 15, no.66 (Jun 2015): 2–10.https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2015.1028658Stephen M. Campbell, Lance Wahlert Is Disability Conservationism Rooted in Status Quo Bias?, The American Journal of Bioethics 15, no.66 (Jun 2015): 20–22.https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2015.1028671Russell Powell The Disvalue of Genetic Diversity, or: How (Not) to Treat a Sandelian Ethos on Steroids, The American Journal of Bioethics 15, no.66 (Jun 2015): 29–32.https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2015.1028675Michael Kates The Ethics of Sweatshops and the Limits of Choice, Business Ethics Quarterly 25, no.22 (Jun 2015): 191–212.https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2015.9Alberto Giubilini, Sagar Sanyal The Ethics of Human Enhancement, Philosophy Compass 10, no.44 (Apr 2015): 233–243.https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12208David M. Shaw Ethical Aspects of the Glasgow Effect, Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 12, no.11 (Feb 2015): 11–14.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-015-9627-7 추병완 Neuroethical reflection on moral enhancement of transhumanism and its implications to moral education, Journal of Ethics 1, no.100100 (Mar 2015): 33–62.https://doi.org/10.15801/je.1.100.201503.33Nicolae Morar An Empirically Informed Critique of Habermas' Argument from Human Nature, Science and Engineering Ethics 21, no.11 (Jan 2014): 95–113.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-013-9509-5Andrea C. Palk The implausibility of appeals to human dignity: an investigation into the efficacy of notions of human dignity in the transhumanism debate, South African Journal of Philosophy 34, no.11 (Apr 2015): 39–54.https://doi.org/10.1080/02580136.2015.1010133Jacob M. Nebel Status Quo Bias, Rationality, and Conservatism about Value, Ethics 125, no.22 (Jun 2015): 449–476.https://doi.org/10.1086/678482John Danaher Responsible Innovation in Social Epistemic Systems: The P300 Memory Detection Test and the Legal Trial, (May 2015): 245–263.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17308-5_13Karim Jebari Sensory Enhancement, (Sep 2014): 827–838.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4707-4_106THOMAS DOUGLAS The Harms of Enhancement and the Conclusive Reasons View, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 24, no.11 (Dec 2014): 23–36.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180114000218Karim Jebari What to Enhance: Behaviour, Emotion or Disposition?, Neuroethics 7, no.33 (Feb 2014): 253–261.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-014-9204-5Lucius Caviola, Adriano Mannino, Julian Savulescu, Nadira Faulmüller Cognitive biases can affect moral intuitions about cognitive enhancement, Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience 8 (Oct 2014).https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2014.00195Jason Marsh Quality of Life Assessments, Cognitive Reliability, and Procreative Responsibility, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 89, no.22 (May 2014): 436–466.https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12114G. Owen Schaefer, Guy Kahane, Julian Savulescu Autonomy and Enhancement, Neuroethics 7, no.22 (Aug 2013): 123–136.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-013-9189-5Nicholas S. Fitz, Roland Nadler, Praveena Manogaran, Eugene W. J. Chong, Peter B. Reiner Public Attitudes Toward Cognitive Enhancement, Neuroethics 7, no.22 (Aug 2013): 173–188.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-013-9190-zDan Weijers Nozick's experience machine is dead, long live the experience machine!, Philosophical Psychology 27, no.44 (Feb 2013): 513–535.https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2012.757889D.A. Baker Bound to be 'normal': Assistive technology, fair opportunity, and athletic excellence, (May 2014): 1–5.https://doi.org/10.1109/ETHICS.2014.6893420Kimberly J. Schelle, Nadira Faulmüller, Lucius Caviola, Miles Hewstone Attitudes toward pharmacological cognitive enhancement—a review, Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience 8 (Apr 2014).https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2014.00053Aveek Bhattacharya, Robert Mark Simpson Life in Overabundance: Agar on Life-Extension and the Fear of Death, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17, no.22 (May 2013): 223–236.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-013-9431-6Anders Sandberg Cognition Enhancement, (Mar 2014): 69–91.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444393552.ch5Nick Bostrom, Rebecca Roache Smart Policy, (Mar 2014): 138–149.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444393552.ch9Sonum Panesar, Gregor Wolbring Analysis of North American Newspaper Coverage of Bionics Using the Disability Studies Framework, Technologies 2, no.11 (Feb 2014): 1–30.https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies2010001Carl Shulman, Nick Bostrom Embryo Selection for Cognitive Enhancement: Curiosity or Game-changer?, Global Policy 5, no.11 (Feb 2014): 85–92.https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12123Tamara Garcia, Ronald Sandler Enhancing Justice?, (Jan 2014): 252–266.https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137349088_17Colette Cuijpers Nicholas Agar, Humanity's End: Why We Should Reject Radical Enhancement, Law, Innovation and Technology 5, no.22 (May 2015): 278–288.https://doi.org/10.5235/17579961.5.2.278Karim Jebari Brain Machine Interface and Human Enhancement – An Ethical Review, Neuroethics 6, no.33 (Jan 2013): 617–625.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-012-9176-2J. McMahan Genetic modification of characteristic masculine traits: enhancement or deformity?, Journal of Medical Ethics 39, no.1212 (Sep 2013): 736–740.https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2012-100976Gregor Wolbring, Lucy Diep, Sophya Yumakulov, Natalie Ball, Verlyn Leopatra, Dean Yergens Emerging Therapeutic Enhancement Enabling Health Technologies and Their Discourses: What Is Discussed within the Health Domain?, Healthcare 1, no.11 (Jul 2013): 20–52.https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare1010020Jacqui Mason, Val Nixon Clinical Decision Making, (Aug 2017): 50–76.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119464389.ch3Robert Sparrow Queerin' the PGD Clinic, Journal of Medical Humanities 34, no.22 (Mar 2013): 177–196.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10912-013-9223-yThomas Douglas Enhancement, Biomedical, (Feb 2013).https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee560Maartje Schermer Preference Adaptation and Human Enhancement: Reflections on Autonomy and Well-Being, (Jan 2013): 117–136.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38376-2_8Mark Coeckelbergh Introduction, (Jan 2013): 1–16.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6025-7_1Mark Coeckelbergh The Transhumanist Challenge, (Jan 2013): 19–36.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6025-7_2Peter B. Reiner The Biopolitics of Cognitive Enhancement, (Mar 2013): 189–200.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6253-4_16S. Matthew Liao, Anders Sandberg, Rebecca Roache Human Engineering and Climate Change, Ethics, Policy & Environment 15, no.22 (Jun 2012): 206–221.https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2012.685574 신상규 Transhumanism, the most dangerous idea in the world?, Sogang Journal of Philosophy 29, no.nullnull (May 2012): 189–217.https://doi.org/10.17325/sgjp.2012.29..189Liana Giorgi The Challenging Marriage of Two Thorny Concepts, European Journal of Risk Regulation 3, no.11 (Jan 2017): 97–103.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1867299X00001872Anton Vedder, Laura Klaming Human Enhancement for the Common Good—Using Neurotechnologies to Improve Eyewitness Memory, AJOB Neuroscience 1, no.33 (Jun 2010): 22–33.https://doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2010.483996Ronald M. Green THE PRESIDENT'S COUNCIL ON BIOETHICS-REQUIESCAT IN PACE, Journal of Religious Ethics 38, no.22 (Jun 2010): 197–218.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9795.2010.00426.xBenjamin Schanker Relativistic Perspectives of Genetic Enhancement: A Challenge to Future Progress, The American Journal of Bioethics 10, no.44 (Apr 2010): 74–76.https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161003633011Arianna Ferrari Developments in the Debate on Nanoethics: Traditional Approaches and the Need for New Kinds of Analysis, NanoEthics 4, no.11 (Jan 2010): 27–52.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-009-0081-zFelipe De Brigard If you like it, does it matter if it's real?, Philosophical Psychology 23, no.11 (Feb 2010): 43–57.https://doi.org/10.1080/09515080903532290Liana Giorgi Converging technologies – what future? The views of the science and policy communities, Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 22, no.44 (Dec 2009): 427–442.https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610903462399W. Miller Brown The Case for Perfection, Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 36, no.22 (Oct 2009): 127–139.https://doi.org/10.1080/00948705.2009.9714752Nick Bostrom, Anders Sandberg Cognitive Enhancement: Methods, Ethics, Regulatory Challenges, Science and Engineering Ethics 15, no.33 (Jun 2009): 311–341.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-009-9142-5Dominic Wilkinson Challenging the Status Quo, Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6, no.22 (Apr 2009): 235–237.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-009-9148-3Dominic J Wilkinson Cool heads: ethical issues associated with therapeutic hypothermia for newborns, Acta Paediatrica 98, no.22 (Dec 2008): 217–220.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2008.01127.xDominic Wilkinson Challenging the Status Quo, (Jan 2009): 105–107.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0564-7_10Nick Bostrom The Future of Humanity, (Jan 2009): 186–215.https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230227279_10Liana Giorgi Converging Technologies - What Future? The Views of the Science and Policy Communities, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2009).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1783642Tamara Garcia, Ronald Sandler Enhancing Justice?, NanoEthics 2, no.33 (Nov 2008): 277–287.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-008-0048-5Robert Smith Forecasting Revenues and Expenditures in the Public Sector, (Dec 2009): 527–549.https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420045833.ch23Ronald Sandler Nanotechnology and Social Context, Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 27, no.66 (Jul 2016): 446–454.https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467607308288Alfred Nordmann If and Then: A Critique of Speculative NanoEthics, NanoEthics 1, no.11 (Apr 2007): 31–46.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-007-0007-6
Referência(s)