Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Facile and General Synthesis of Photoactivatable Xanthene Dyes

2011; Wiley; Volume: 50; Issue: 47 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1002/anie.201104571

1521-3773

Laura M. Wysocki, Jonathan B. Grimm, Ariana N. Tkachuk, Timothy A. Brown, Eric Betzig, Luke D. Lavis,

Photochromic and Fluorescence Chemistry

Angewandte Chemie International EditionVolume 50, Issue 47 p. 11206-11209 CommunicationOpen Access Facile and General Synthesis of Photoactivatable Xanthene Dyes† Dr. Laura M. Wysocki, Dr. Laura M. Wysocki Janelia Farm Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 19700 Helix Drive, Ashburn, VA 20147 (USA)Search for more papers by this authorJonathan B. Grimm, Jonathan B. Grimm Janelia Farm Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 19700 Helix Drive, Ashburn, VA 20147 (USA)Search for more papers by this authorAriana N. Tkachuk, Ariana N. Tkachuk Janelia Farm Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 19700 Helix Drive, Ashburn, VA 20147 (USA)Search for more papers by this authorDr. Timothy A. Brown, Dr. Timothy A. Brown Janelia Farm Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 19700 Helix Drive, Ashburn, VA 20147 (USA)Search for more papers by this authorDr. Eric Betzig, Dr. Eric Betzig Janelia Farm Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 19700 Helix Drive, Ashburn, VA 20147 (USA)Search for more papers by this authorDr. Luke D. Lavis, Corresponding Author Dr. Luke D. Lavis lavisl@janelia.hhmi.org Janelia Farm Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 19700 Helix Drive, Ashburn, VA 20147 (USA)Janelia Farm Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 19700 Helix Drive, Ashburn, VA 20147 (USA)Search for more papers by this author Dr. Laura M. Wysocki, Dr. Laura M. Wysocki Janelia Farm Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 19700 Helix Drive, Ashburn, VA 20147 (USA)Search for more papers by this authorJonathan B. Grimm, Jonathan B. Grimm Janelia Farm Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 19700 Helix Drive, Ashburn, VA 20147 (USA)Search for more papers by this authorAriana N. Tkachuk, Ariana N. Tkachuk Janelia Farm Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 19700 Helix Drive, Ashburn, VA 20147 (USA)Search for more papers by this authorDr. Timothy A. Brown, Dr. Timothy A. Brown Janelia Farm Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 19700 Helix Drive, Ashburn, VA 20147 (USA)Search for more papers by this authorDr. Eric Betzig, Dr. Eric Betzig Janelia Farm Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 19700 Helix Drive, Ashburn, VA 20147 (USA)Search for more papers by this authorDr. Luke D. Lavis, Corresponding Author Dr. Luke D. Lavis lavisl@janelia.hhmi.org Janelia Farm Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 19700 Helix Drive, Ashburn, VA 20147 (USA)Janelia Farm Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 19700 Helix Drive, Ashburn, VA 20147 (USA)Search for more papers by this author First published: 26 September 2011 https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201104571Citations: 96 † This work was supported by The Howard Hughes Medical Institute. We thank C. G. Galbraith, J. A. Galbraith, S. M. Sternson, and P. H. Lee for contributive discussions. AboutSectionsPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditWechat Abstract Despite the apparent simplicity of the xanthene fluorophores, the preparation of caged derivatives with free carboxy groups remains a synthetic challenge. A straightforward and flexible strategy for preparing rhodamine and fluorescein derivatives was developed using reduced, "leuco" intermediates. Photoactivatable "caged" fluorophores enable numerous advanced biological imaging experiments,1 including photoactivated localization microscopy (PALM)2 and related super-resolution imaging techniques.3 Of the extant fluorophore scaffolds, caged rhodamines and fluoresceins display properties that are exceptionally well suited for super-resolution microscopy, exhibiting high contrast and photon yields. The utility of these probes in PALM imaging has been hampered, however, by inefficient syntheses. For example, the existing route to caged Q-rhodamine, a promising PALM probe,2 requires harsh, strongly basic conditions and is reported to "generate many products" with yields given as "poor" and "variable".1a Such difficult, inefficient syntheses have rendered these important caged molecules unavailable to the scientific community. We set out to develop a general synthesis of photoactivatable xanthene fluorophores and evaluate these dyes as PALM labels. We recognized the synthetic difficulties of caged xanthenes are inextricably linked with the fluorogenic mechanism of the dyes. Rhodamines and fluoresceins exist in equilibrium between a brightly fluorescent, "open" quinoid structure and a colorless, "closed" lactone.1b This equilibrium can be controlled in a light-dependent manner using several strategies1, 4 with the most versatile involving attachment of electron withdrawing photolabile groups to the aniline nitrogens of rhodamine or phenolic oxygens of fluorescein. While the open–closed equilibrium is essential for the fluorogenic properties of the caged dyes, this attribute also complicates their syntheses. The quinoid form of the dye, which predominates under the basic conditions required for functionalization, exhibits poor solubility and low reactivity thereby frustrating the installation of caging groups. Since the open–closed equilibrium is both the basis for fluorogenicity and the cause of synthetic difficulties, we envisioned eliminating this process in a reversible manner. Rhodamines and fluoresceins can be reduced to "leuco" derivatives, which are widely used sensors for reactive oxygen species5 but essentially unexplored as synthetic intermediates for fluorogenic derivatives. We surmised reduction of the xanthene core would increase the reactivity of the aniline nitrogens in rhodamines and the phenolic oxygens in fluoresceins allowing installation of caging groups using mild conditions. Here, we establish the use of leuco-dyes as an effective method to prepare caged fluorophores. This efficient and general route enables the preparation of the elusive caged Q-rhodamine (RhQ) with exceptional ease, and can be extended to rhodamine 110 (Rh110) and 2′,7′-difluorofluorescein6 (Oregon Green) derivatives bearing free carboxyl groups for bioconjugation. This synthetic method facilitated the evaluation of these probes for super-resolution microscopy, culminating in the first PALM imaging of DNA in a cellular context. Our synthesis of a caged Q-rhodamine is shown in Scheme 1. Condensation of trimellitic anhydride (1) and 7-hydroxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinoline (2) gave a crude isomeric mixture of 5(6)-carboxy-RhQ.1a To install base-labile protecting groups7 on the nitrogen substitutents we treated this material with trifluoroacetic anhydride (TFAA), affording 5(6)-carboxy-RhQ-bis(trifluoroacetamide). The trifluoroacetamides also facilitated isolation of 5-carboxy-RhQ-bis(trifluoroacetamide) (3) by straightforward crystallization. Compound 3 was reduced to the leuco-rhodamine by catalytic hydrogenation at ambient temperature and pressure.8 Esterification with 2,4-dimethoxybenzyl (DMB) alcohol (4) using N,N′-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC) and catalytic 4-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP) furnished leuco-rhodamine diester 5 in 74 % yield over the two-step sequence. Hydrolysis of the trifluoroacetamides, followed by acylation with chloroformate 6 to install the ortho-nitroveratryloxycarbonyl (NVOC) cages, yielded reduced rhodamine 7. The aniline nitrogens in the leuco-Q-rhodamine are more reactive than in Q-rhodamine, allowing high-yielding functionalization under mild conditions. This step represents a significant improvement over the reported reaction to install caging groups onto RhQ.1a Treatment of the protected, reduced rhodamine adduct 7 with the mild oxidant 2,3-dichloro-5,6-dicyanobenzoquinone (DDQ) allowed removal of the DMB esters9 with concomitant oxidation of the reduced dye core. This reaction yields fully deprotected and oxidized NVOC2-5-carboxy-RhQ (8). Scheme 1Open in figure viewerPowerPoint Synthesis of NVOC2-5-carboxy-RhQ 8. a) TsOH, EtCO2H, reflux. b) TFAA, py, CH2Cl2. c) H2(g), Pd/C, THF. d) 4, DCC, DMAP, CH2Cl2. e) NH4CO3H, THF, H2O, CH3OH. f) 6, DIEA, CH2Cl2. g) DDQ, CH2Cl2 (wet), reflux. To test the generality of this leuco-dye approach, we applied this strategy to rhodamine 110. Installation of caging groups onto Rh110 requires highly reactive electrophiles10 and the synthesis of caged 5-carboxy-Rh110 derivatives has not been reported. Based on our success with RhQ, we first attempted the preparation of 5-carboxy-Rh110-bis(trifluoroacetamide) through the reaction of 3-aminophenol and trimellitic anhydride,11 followed by treatment with TFAA. This protocol delivered a complex mixture of rhodamine and rhodol products that precluded purification by chromatography or crystallization. We therefore developed a novel approach to the preparation of 5-carboxy-Rh110 derivatives as shown in Scheme 2. 5-Carboxy-3′,6′-dibromofluoran 912 was protected as the benzyl ester. Pd-catalyzed cross-coupling12, 13 of the aryl bromide substituents in 10 with benzophenone imine gave rhodamine 11. Hydrolysis of this diimine using aqueous acid and subsequent amidation with TFAA afforded bis(trifluoroacetamide) 12 in excellent yield over two steps. Reduction of 12 under H2(g) and Pd/C produced leuco-rhodamine 110. The resulting free carboxyl groups were esterified using benzyl alcohol 4, DMAP, and 3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide (EDC) to produce diester 13. Deprotection of the aniline groups with NH2OH,7 followed by acylation with 6 to install the NVOC cages, yielded intermediate 14. Paralleling the RhQ example, oxidation of leuco-rhodamine adduct 14 using DDQ gave NVOC2-5-carboxy-Rh110 15. Scheme 2Open in figure viewerPowerPoint Synthesis of NVOC2-5-carboxy-Rh110 15. a) BnOH, EDC, DMAP, CH2Cl2. b) Pd(OAc)2, binap, Cs2CO3, toluene, 100 °C. c) 5 % HCl/THF. d) TFAA, py, CH2Cl2. e) H2(g), Pd/C, THF. f) 4, EDC, DMAP, CH2Cl2/EtOAc. g) NH2OH, CH3OH. h) 6, DIEA, CH2Cl2. i) DDQ, CH2Cl2 (wet), reflux. We also used this approach with a fluorescein dye, the photostable 2′,7′-difluorofluorescein,6 as shown in Scheme 3. Fluoresceins are easier to derivatize than rhodamines,1a but treatment with alkylating agents gives undesired, fluorescent ether–esters as the major products, due to competing reactivity of the ortho-carboxylate. The desired nonfluorescent caged fluorescein is typically obtained in low yield and requires extensive purification.14 Our synthetic strategy eliminates this unproductive route while improving solubility in organic solvents. 5-Carboxy-2′,7′-difluorofluorescein diacetate (16)6 was reduced to the leuco-fluorescein diacetate by catalytic hydrogenation. Esterification of the resulting diacid with alcohol 4 using N,N′-diisopropylcarbodiimide (DIC) gave the tetraester 17. Selective hydrolysis of the acetate esters afforded diphenol 18, which was efficiently alkylated with bromide 19 using phase-transfer conditions to install the ortho-nitroveratryl (NV) photolabile groups in diether 20. Treatment with DDQ gave the desired caged NV2-5-carboxy-2′,7′-difluorofluorescein 21 in good yield, showing the final oxidation step is general for both rhodamine and fluorescein dyes. Scheme 3Open in figure viewerPowerPoint Synthesis of NV2-5-carboxy-2′,7′-difluorofluorescein 21. a) H2(g), Pd/C, THF. b) 4, DIC, DMAP, CH2Cl2. c) NH4CO3H, THF, H2O, CH3OH. d) NH4HSO4, K2CO3, H2O, CH2Cl2. e) DDQ, CH2Cl2 (wet), reflux. We then investigated the chemical and photophysical properties of the caged dyes. Biotin conjugates of compounds 8, 15, and 21 were synthesized by straightforward amidation of the free carboxyl groups revealed during the final step of the synthesis (see Schemes S1–S3 in the Supporting Information). The chemical stability of these molecules was assessed at pH 5–9; we observed negligible (<1 %) spontaneous uncaging after 48 h (Figure S1). We also determined the average photon yields for the biotin adducts of 8, 15, and 21 as well as biotinylated mEos2, a photoswitchable protein that is used widely in PALM imaging and exhibits a localization precision of 11 nm.15 Both of the caged rhodamines, 8-biotin and 15-biotin, showed excellent properties with mean photon yields exceeding or equivalent to mEos2-biotin (139 % and 97 %, respectively; Figure S2). The caged Oregon Green 21-biotin showed lower photostability than the rhodamine dyes with an average photon yield at 60 % relative to mEos2. Thus, photoactivatable small-molecule fluorophores, especially caged rhodamines, exhibit photon yields that are comparable to an established photoactivatable label capable of high resolution PALM. Based on the favorable photon yields exhibited by compounds 8, 15, and 21 we explored the utility of these dyes in a cellular super-resolution microscopy experiment. Again taking advantage of the free carboxyl groups in these molecules, we prepared azide-containing derivatives of rhodamines 8 and 15 and fluorescein 21 (Schemes S4–S6). This allowed metabolic labeling of cellular DNA by first incubating cells with 5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine (EdU) followed by the CuI-catalyzed Huisgen 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition between the alkynyl nucleobase and the caged dye–azide conjugate (i.e., "click chemistry").16 This labeling allowed super-resolution localization microscopy of labeled cellular DNA using all three dyes as shown in Figure 1. Diffraction limited summed total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy images are also given for comparison. As expected from previous in vitro experiments,2 the RhQ derivative 8-azide was a viable probe for PALM imaging (Figure 1 a). Of the shorter-wavelength probes, the caged Rh110 15-azide derivative (Figure 1 b) gave better PALM images than fluorescein 21-azide (Figure 1 c) due to the higher photon yield and lower nonspecific staining. While super-resolution microscopy of purified DNA has been performed by direct stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (dSTORM)17 and stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy,18 this is the first example of super-resolution microscopy of DNA in a cellular context. Moreover, the PALM-caged fluorophore system circumvents the redox buffer conditions necessary for dSTORM and the sculpted light requirement of STED. Molecular maps of cellular DNA will enable precise identification of DNA–protein interactions and determination of the location of these complexes within the cell.19 Figure 1Open in figure viewerPowerPoint PALM images of nuclei from fixed, cryosectioned 3T3 cells labeled with photoactivatable dyes. Left panel: molecule localization image; scale bar: 2 μm. Right panel: zoomed localization probability image/summed-TIRF image; scale bar: 500 nm. a) 8-azide; b) 15-azide; c) 21-azide. In summary, we have established a facile and general strategy to prepare caged rhodamine and fluorescein photoactivatable labels for super-resolution microscopy. The use of leuco-dye intermediates overcomes difficulties with reactivity and solubility, allowing the preparation of these valuable molecules with reaction conditions accessible to any organic chemistry laboratory. Our efficient final synthetic step utilizes a mild oxidant to concurrently remove protecting groups and oxidize the dye. We note this caged xanthene system is highly modular, allowing independent tuning of the dye and the cage. While the caged RhQ and Rh110 dyes already constitute a potential pair of dyes for multicolor PALM imaging, our divergent synthetic route will enable the synthesis of xanthene and isologous20 dyes of different wavelengths bearing cages with tailored chemical and optical properties. These efforts will create a palette of probes to bolster the diminutive collection of synthetic photoactivatable fluorescent labels suitable for super-resolution imaging experiments.1c, 4, 21 Finally, this facile leuco-dye strategy is appropriate for the installation of other blocking groups and will allow the construction of a wide range of useful fluorogenic dyes. Supporting Information Detailed facts of importance to specialist readers are published as "Supporting Information". Such documents are peer-reviewed, but not copy-edited or typeset. They are made available as submitted by the authors. Filename Description anie_201104571_sm_miscellaneous_information.pdf899.7 KB miscellaneous_information Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article. References 1 1aT. J. Mitchison, K. E. Sawin, J. A. Theriot, K. Gee, A. Mallavarapu, G. Marriott, Methods Enzymol. 1998, 291, 63– 78; CrossrefCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 1bL. D. Lavis, R. T. Raines, ACS Chem. Biol. 2008, 3, 142– 155; CrossrefCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 1cM. Fernández-Suárez, A. Ting, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008, 9, 929– 943; CrossrefCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 1dD. Puliti, D. Warther, C. Orange, A. Specht, M. Goeldner, Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2011, 19, 1023– 1029. CrossrefCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 2E. Betzig, G. H. Patterson, R. Sougrat, O. W. Lindwasser, S. Olenych, J. S. Bonifacino, M. W. Davidson, J. Lippincott-Schwartz, H. F. Hess, Science 2006, 313, 1642– 1645. CrossrefCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 3 3aS. T. Hess, T. P. K. Girirajan, M. D. Mason, Biophys. J. 2006, 91, 4258– 4272; CrossrefCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 3bM. J. Rust, M. Bates, X. Zhuang, Nat. Methods 2006, 3, 793– 796. CrossrefCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 4 4aJ. Fölling, V. Belov, D. Riedel, A. Schonle, A. Egner, C. Eggeling, M. Bossi, S. W. Hell, ChemPhysChem 2008, 9, 321– 326; Wiley Online LibraryCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 4bV. N. Belov, C. A. Wurm, V. P. Boyarskiy, S. Jakobs, S. W. Hell, Angew. Chem. 2010, 122, 3598– 3602; Wiley Online LibraryGoogle ScholarAngew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 3520– 3523. Wiley Online LibraryCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 5J. A. Royall, H. Ischiropoulos, Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1993, 302, 348– 355. CrossrefCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 6W.-C. Sun, K. R. Gee, D. H. Klaubert, R. P. Haugland, J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 6469– 6475. CrossrefCASWeb of Science®Google Scholar 7R. P. Haugland, M. T. Z. Spence, I. D. Johnson, Handbook of Fluorescent Probes and Research Chemicals, 6th ed., Molecular Probes, Eugene, 1996. Google Scholar 8T. O. Zaikova, A. V. Rukavishnikov, G. B. Birrell, O. H. Griffith, J. F. W. Keana, Bioconjugate Chem. 2001, 12, 307– 313. CrossrefCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 9C. Kim, P. Misco, Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 26, 2027– 2030. CrossrefCASWeb of Science®Google Scholar 10J. Ottl, D. Gabriel, G. Marriott, Bioconjugate Chem. 1998, 9, 143– 151. CrossrefCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 11I. S. Ioffe, V. F. Otten, Zh. Obshch. Khim. 1961, 31, 1511– 1516. CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar 12C. C. Woodroofe, M. H. Lim, W. M. Bu, S. J. Lippard, Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 3097– 3105. CrossrefCASWeb of Science®Google Scholar 13X. Jin, C. Uttamapinant, A. Y. Ting, ChemBioChem 2011, 12, 65– 70. Wiley Online LibraryCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 14 14aG. A. Krafft, W. R. Sutton, R. T. Cummings, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 301– 303; CrossrefCASWeb of Science®Google Scholar 14bT. J. Mitchison, J. Cell Biol. 1989, 109, 637– 652. CrossrefCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 15S. A. McKinney, C. S. Murphy, K. L. Hazelwood, M. W. Davidson, L. L. Looger, Nat. Methods 2009, 6, 131– 133. CrossrefCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 16A. Salic, T. J. Mitchison, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 2415– 2420. CrossrefCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 17C. Flors, C. N. J. Ravarani, D. Dryden, ChemPhysChem 2009, 10, 2201– 2204. Wiley Online LibraryCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 18F. Persson, P. Bingen, T. Staudt, J. Engelhardt, J. Tegenfeldt, S. W. Hell, Angew. Chem. 2011, 123, 5696– 5698; Wiley Online LibraryGoogle ScholarAngew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 5581– 5583. Wiley Online LibraryCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 19J. Yao, R. D. Fetter, P. Hu, E. Betzig, R. Tjian, Genes Dev. 2011, 25, 569– 580. CrossrefCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 20K. Kolmakov, V. N. Belov, J. Bierwagen, C. Ringemann, V. Müller, C. Eggeling, S. W. Hell, Chem. Eur. J. 2010, 16, 158– 166. Wiley Online LibraryCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 21 21aG. T. Dempsey, M. Bates, W. E. Kowtoniuk, D. R. Liu, R. Y. Tsien, X. Zhuang, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 18192– 18193; CrossrefCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 21bH. D. Lee, S. J. Lord, S. Iwanaga, K. Zhan, H. Xie, J. C. Williams, H. Wang, G. R. Bowman, E. D. Goley, L. Shapiro, R. J. Twieg, J. Rao, W. E. Moerner, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 1642– 1645. Google Scholar Citing Literature Volume50, Issue47November 18, 2011Pages 11206-11209 FiguresReferencesRelatedInformation