Artigo Acesso aberto Revisado por pares

Duplex Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Lower-Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis

2014; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Volume: 129; Issue: 8 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1161/circulationaha.113.002966

ISSN

1524-4539

Autores

Heather L. Gornik, Aditya Sharma,

Tópico(s)

Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis

Resumo

HomeCirculationVol. 129, No. 8Duplex Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Lower-Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis Free AccessResearch ArticlePDF/EPUBAboutView PDFView EPUBSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationsTrack citationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyReddit Jump toFree AccessResearch ArticlePDF/EPUBDuplex Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Lower-Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis Heather L. Gornik, MD, MHS and Aditya M. Sharma, MD Heather L. GornikHeather L. Gornik From the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Section of Vascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland, OH (H.L.G.); and Cardiovascular Medicine Division, University of Virginia, Charlottesville (A.M.S.). and Aditya M. SharmaAditya M. Sharma From the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Section of Vascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland, OH (H.L.G.); and Cardiovascular Medicine Division, University of Virginia, Charlottesville (A.M.S.). Originally published25 Feb 2014https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002966Circulation. 2014;129:917–921Case PresentationA 26-year-old woman presented with progressive swelling and pain of the left leg within 2 months after switching to a different oral contraceptive preparation. On examination, she had marked edema and erythema of the leg from the calf to the thigh with significant tenderness to palpation. Pedal pulses were intact. The right leg was normal. Lower-extremity venous duplex ultrasound (VDUS) with B-mode compression maneuvers and Doppler evaluation was performed, and she was found to have an acute deep venous thrombosis (DVT) of the left leg that extended from the common iliac vein into the left calf (Figure 1A–1E).Download figureDownload PowerPointFigure 1. Acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in a 26-year-old woman with left leg swelling. A, B-mode image of a dilated external iliac vein (arrow) next to the external iliac artery (arrowhead). Intraluminal echoes are present, consistent with thrombus. B, Nearly complete loss of compressibility of the external iliac vein, consistent with acute DVT. C, Spectral Doppler waveform analysis with absent venous flow in the thrombosed and occluded external iliac vein (EIV). Lt DIST indicates left distal. D, B-mode image of acute DVT involving the profunda and femoral confluence into the common femoral vein. E, Color-flow Doppler image demonstrating absent flow in the common (CFV) and femoral (FV) vein and minimal flow in the profunda femoral vein (PFV; arrow).Components of the VDUS Examination to Assess for DVTVDUS combines 2 components to assess for DVT: B-mode or gray-scale imaging with transducer compression maneuvers and Doppler evaluation consisting of color-flow Doppler imaging and spectral Doppler waveform analysis.1 The technique of compression B-mode ultrasonography for the diagnosis of DVT was first described by technologist Steve Talbot in 1982 and has subsequently been refined to become the diagnostic standard.2 B-mode imaging is used while the lower-extremity veins are compressed along their length with the ultrasound probe and for direct visualization of intraluminal thrombus. A patent, thrombus-free vein will demonstrate complete vein wall coaptation with compression by the transducer (Figure 2). Loss of compressibility of the vein is the most reliable indicator of the presence of thrombus within the vein.2 In addition to loss of compressibility, an acutely thrombosed vein is commonly dilated with a diameter greater than that of the adjacent artery. Intraluminal echoes consistent with thrombus may be imaged. Color-flow Doppler is helpful to assess for residual flow within a thrombosed venous segment (ie, nonocclusive DVT) and for confirming patency of venous segments that are not accessible for compression maneuvers (eg, the iliocaval veins). The pulsed Doppler spectral waveform from a normal, widely patent lower extremity demonstrates spontaneous and respirophasic flow (Figure 3A). Alteration of this expected waveform (ie, monophasic flow) raises suspicion of venous obstruction proximal to the level of interrogation (Figure 3B), and additional imaging may be required to definitively establish the diagnosis of DVT. In addition to assessment of respirophasicity, distal augmentation maneuvers (such as compressing the calf) are performed during spectral Doppler evaluation to further demonstrate patency of the veins. While the distal augmentation maneuver is performed, there should be a sharp "spike" of augmented anterograde venous flow (Figure 3A). Blunted or absent flow augmentation suggests venous obstruction distal to the level being interrogated. Retrograde flow in the venous system after a distal augmentation maneuver indicates venous valvular incompetence, which may be a manifestation of prior DVT and the postthrombotic syndrome (Figure 3C). A complete VDUS of the lower extremities includes evaluation from the inguinal ligament (distal external iliac or common femoral veins) into the calf.3 The accuracy of VDUS compared with venography for the diagnosis of proximal and calf DVT has been well established.4,5Download figureDownload PowerPointFigure 2. B-mode imaging of the veins with compression maneuvers, expected normal findings. A, Duplicating femoral veins in the thigh (V) next to superficial femoral artery (A). B, Both femoral veins compress completely with pressure of the ultrasound transducer. Only the superficial femoral artery (A) is seen. C, Calf vein imaging. Shown are the paired posterior tibial veins (PTV) and artery and the 2 peroneal veins (Pero V) and artery. D, During the compression maneuver, the calf veins compress completely, and only the arteries are visualized (A). Acoustic shadowing from the fibula can be seen (arrowhead).Download figureDownload PowerPointFigure 3. Spectral Doppler waveform analysis of the lower-extremity veins. A, Spontaneous and respirophasic flow with normal response to an augmentation maneuver and aliasing of the pulsed Doppler signal (arrow). B, Monophasic venous flow suggesting venous obstruction proximal to this segment. EIV indicates external iliac vein. C, Retrograde flow in the popliteal vein (POP V) after an augmentation maneuver (arrow), consistent with valvular incompetence in a patient with a history of deep venous thrombosis and the postthrombotic syndrome.Assessing the Acuity of DVTThrombus is typically referred to as acute (within the first 2 weeks after the thrombus forms), subacute (>2 weeks and potentially up to 6 months after thrombus forms), or chronic (usually >6 months old).1 Acuity of the DVT is assessed by the appearance of the thrombus on B-mode imaging (eg, hypoechoic, isoechoic, or hyperechoic), vein lumen size, vein wall appearance, venous compressibility, function of the venous valves, and presence of collateral circulation. The classic ultrasound characteristics of acute, subacute, and chronic DVT are shown in the Table, although in many cases, there is overlap of findings, and aging the acuity of thrombus is not possible. In such cases, "DVT of indeterminate age" should be reported. Murphy and Cronan6 previously demonstrated that dilated vein diameter is the most accurate parameter in aging the acuity of DVT.Table. Distinguishing Ultrasound Features of Acute, Subacute, and Chronic DVT*FeaturesAcuteSubacuteChronicAttachment of thrombus to vein wallLoosely attachedFirmly attachedFirmly attachedThrombus echogenicityHypoechoic or isoechoicVariable (more echoic than acute DVT)Hyperechoic (appears as a bright fibrous web or scar attached to the vein wall and protruding into the lumen)Presence of free-floating or mobile thrombus tailMay be presentGenerally absentAbsentVein wall appearanceVariableVariableVenous wall thickening and scarringCalcium deposition may be seen (phlebolith)Vein lumenDistendedStarts to retract to normal sizeSmaller than normal size (atrophic)CompressibilitySlightly deformable, "spongy"More compressible than acutePartly noncompressible, likely partially recanalizedCollateralizationGenerally absentMay be presentMay be presentVenous valve functionUsually competentMay be competent or incompetent (reflux present)Often incompetent (reflux present)DVT indicates deep venous thrombosis.*In some cases, there is overlap of ultrasound features, in which case the DVT should be reported as being of indeterminate age.Controversies in VDUSRepeat Ultrasound and Residual Vein Thrombus After Completion of TherapyMore than half of patients with proximal DVT have residual vein thrombosis seen on VDUS 6 months to 1 year after diagnosis and completion of therapy.7,8 Indeed, the presence of residual DVT has been shown to be a risk factor for recurrent venous thromboembolism.8–10 However, residual vein thrombosis is not yet established as a marker to assess the duration of anticoagulation therapy beyond clinical factors such as the circumstances of the DVT (ie, provoked or unprovoked event), presence of ongoing risk factors, and follow-up D-dimer levels. Regardless, obtaining a repeat VDUS 6 months to 1 year after treatment for proximal DVT is clinically useful because it establishes a new baseline for future comparison in the case of recurrent ipsilateral limb symptoms, when differentiating recurrent DVT from the postthrombotic syndrome can be challenging.Lower-Extremity VDUS in the Evaluation of Patients With Suspected Pulmonary EmbolismVDUS may be used as an adjunct to more definitive imaging modalities in the evaluation of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). One question frequently asked is whether to perform VDUS before chest computed tomography among patients presenting with symptoms of PE, perhaps eliminating the need for chest computed tomography among those with DVT who will require anticoagulation. In general, this practice is discouraged because fewer than half of patients with PE will have residual DVT on VDUS (ie, the majority of thrombus has already embolized to the lungs).11–15 In addition, patients with DVT may have other causes of dyspnea and pleurodynia besides PE such as pneumonia or pleural effusion. Thus, VDUS should not be used solely for the assessment for PE. Diagnostic testing algorithms for PE have been developed that include pretest probability assessment, D-dimer testing, and VDUS to eliminate the need for computed tomographic angiography among low-risk patients.16Pitfalls of Venous Ultrasound for Diagnosis of DVTDuplicate VeinsDuplication of the femoral or popliteal veins is commonly encountered during VDUS and venography.17,18 Unrecognized venous duplication can lead to misdiagnosis of DVT when the thrombus-free vein of a pair is identified and the vein with thrombus is missed. To minimize this error, it is important to note venous duplication on the written report. In 1 study, 15% of duplicated or triplicated veins were missed on repeat evaluations.18Misnomer of the Superficial Femoral VeinThe superficial femoral vein is actually a deep vein that is the continuation of the popliteal vein that joins the profunda femoral vein to form the common femoral vein. Thrombosis in this deep vein warrants treatment with anticoagulation similar to any DVT. Given the potential for diagnostic and treatment errors related to the use of this term, the International Interdisciplinary Consensus Committee on Venous Anatomic Terminology concluded in 2001 that the term superficial femoral vein should not be used.19 Accreditation organizations strongly recommend against using this term, and this venous segment is now referred to as the femoral vein.3,20ConclusionsVDUS using B-mode imaging with compression maneuvers and color and spectral Doppler evaluation is now the standard diagnostic modality for suspected lower-extremity DVT. Loss of compressibility of a venous segment, often with associated Doppler abnormalities, identifies DVT with a high degree of accuracy, and no additional testing is needed to initiate treatment. Negative whole-leg VDUS has a very high negative predictive value for suspected lower-extremity DVT, and no further testing is required to withhold anticoagulation. Whole-leg VDUS, including calf vein assessment, is the diagnostic standard.Case ResolutionThe patient was immediately started on subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin and was ultimately referred for catheter-directed thrombolysis, given the extensive iliofemoral DVT and her severe symptoms.DisclosuresDr Gornik is a noncompensated (volunteer) member of the Board of Directors of the Intersocietal Accreditation Commission–Vascular Testing Division representing the American College of Cardiology. Dr Sharma reports no conflicts.FootnotesCorrespondence to Heather L. Gornik, MD, MHS, Medical Director, Non-Invasive Vascular Laboratory, Cleveland Clinic Heart and Vascular Institute, 9500 Euclid Ave, Desk J3-5, Cleveland, OH 44195. E-mail [email protected]References1. Zwiebel W. Venous thrombosis.In:, Zwiebel W, Pellerito JS. Introduction to Vascular Ultrasonography. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders;2004.Google Scholar2. Talbot S. Use of real-time imaging in identifying deep venous obstruction: a preliminary report.Bruit. 1982; 7:41–42.Google Scholar3. Intersocietal Accreditation Commission (IAC) vascular testing standards: venous disease.http://www.intersocietal.org/vascular/standards/IACVascularTestingStandards2013.pdf. Accessed March 31, 2013.Google Scholar4. Tapson VF, Carroll BA, Davidson BL, Elliott CG, Fedullo PF, Hales CA, Hull RD, Hyers TM, Leeper KV, Morris TA, Moser KM, Raskob GE, Shure D, Sostman HD, Taylor Thompson B. The diagnostic approach to acute venous thromboembolism: clinical practice guideline: American Thoracic Society.Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999; 160:1043–1066.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar5. Kassaï B, Boissel JP, Cucherat M, Sonie S, Shah NR, Leizorovicz A. A systematic review of the accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis in asymptomatic patients.Thromb Haemost. 2004; 91:655–666.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar6. Murphy TP, Cronan JJ. Evolution of deep venous thrombosis: a prospective evaluation with US.Radiology. 1990; 177:543–548.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar7. Kearon C. Natural history of venous thromboembolism.Circulation. 2003; 107(suppl 1):I22–I30.LinkGoogle Scholar8. Prandoni P, Lensing AW, Prins MH, Bernardi E, Marchiori A, Bagatella P, Frulla M, Mosena L, Tormene D, Piccioli A, Simioni P, Girolami A. Residual venous thrombosis as a predictive factor of recurrent venous thromboembolism.Ann Intern Med. 2002; 137:955–960.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar9. Prandoni P, Prins MH, Lensing AW, Ghirarduzzi A, Ageno W, Imberti D, Scannapieco G, Ambrosio GB, Pesavento R, Cuppini S, Quintavalla R, Agnelli G; AESOPUS Investigators. Residual thrombosis on ultrasonography to guide the duration of anticoagulation in patients with deep venous thrombosis: a randomized trial.Ann Intern Med. 2009; 150:577–585.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar10. Young L, Ockelford P, Milne D, Rolfe-Vyson V, Mckelvie S, Harper P. Post-treatment residual thrombus increases the risk of recurrent deep vein thrombosis and mortality.J Thromb Haemost. 2006; 4:1919–1924.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar11. Eze AR, Comerota AJ, Kerr RP, Harada RN, Domeracki F. Is venous duplex imaging an appropriate initial screening test for patients with suspected pulmonary embolism?Ann Vasc Surg. 1996; 10:220–223.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar12. Killewich LA, Nunnelee JD, Auer AI. Value of lower extremity venous duplex examination in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.J Vasc Surg. 1993; 17:934–938.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar13. Matteson B, Langsfeld M, Schermer C, Johnson W, Weinstein E. Role of venous duplex scanning in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.J Vasc Surg. 1996; 24:768–773.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar14. Turkstra F, Kuijer PM, van Beek EJ, Brandjes DP, ten Cate JW, Büller HR. Diagnostic utility of ultrasonography of leg veins in patients suspected of having pulmonary embolism.Ann Intern Med. 1997; 126:775–781.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar15. Perrier A, Bounameaux H. Ultrasonography of leg veins in patients suspected of having pulmonary embolism.Ann Intern Med. 1998; 128:243; author reply 244–245.CrossrefGoogle Scholar16. Lee JA, Zierler BK, Liu CF, Chapko MK. Cost-effective diagnostic strategies in patients with a high, intermediate, or low clinical probability of pulmonary embolism.Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2011; 45:113–121.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar17. Quinlan DJ, Alikhan R, Gishen P, Sidhu PS. Variations in lower limb venous anatomy: implications for US diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis.Radiology. 2003; 228:443–448.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar18. Simpson WL, Krakowsi DM. Prevalence of lower extremity venous duplication.Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2010; 20:230–234.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar19. Caggiati A, Bergan JJ, Gloviczki P, Jantet G, Wendell-Smith CP, Partsch H; International Interdisciplinary Consensus Committee on Venous Anatomical Terminology. Nomenclature of the veins of the lower limbs: an international interdisciplinary consensus statement.J Vasc Surg. 2002; 36:416–422.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar20. American College of Radiology (ACR)-American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM)-Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound (SRU) Practice guideline for the performance of peripheral venous ultrasound examinations.J Ultrasound Med. 2011; 30:143–150.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Previous Back to top Next FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited By Albricker A, Freire C, Santos S, Alcantara M, Saleh M, Cantisano A, Teodoro J, Porto C, Amaral S, Veloso O, Petisco A, Barros F, Barros M, Souza A, Sobreira M, Miranda R, Moraes D, Verrastro C, Mançano A, Lima R, Muglia V, Matushita C, Lopes R, Coutinho A, Pianta D, Santos A, Naves B, Vieira M and Rochitte C (2022)(2022)(2022)(2022) Diretriz Conjunta sobre Tromboembolismo Venoso – 2022, Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, 10.36660/abc.20220213, 118:4, (797-857), Online publication date: 7-Apr-2022., Online publication date: 7-Apr-2022., Online publication date: 1-Apr-2022., Online publication date: 1-Apr-2022. Ma J, Qin J, Shang M, Zhou Y, Zhang Y and Zhu Y (2020) Incidence and risk factors of preoperative deep venous thrombosis in closed tibial shaft fracture: a prospective cohort study, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 10.1007/s00402-020-03685-z, 142:2, (247-253), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2022. Zhao W, Zhao J, Liu T, Liu Z, Liu L and Zhang Y (2022) Incidence and risk factors of preoperative deep venous thrombosis following pelvic and acetabular fractures: a retrospective case–control study, Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 10.1186/s13018-022-02972-2, 17:1, Online publication date: 1-Dec-2022. Maldonado T, Dexter D, Kado H, Schor J, Annambhotla S, Mojibian H and Beasley R (2022) Outcomes from the CLOUT Registry Show Symptom Duration May Underestimate Deep Vein Thrombus Chronicity, Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders, 10.1016/j.jvsv.2022.04.015, Online publication date: 1-Jun-2022. Durmaz F and Gultekin M (2021) Efficacy of Shear Wave Elastography in the Differentiation of Acute and Subacute Deep Venous Thrombosis, Ultrasound Quarterly, 10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000563, 37:2, (168-172) Novitch M, Sudbury A, Fuller M, Dennison J, Koress C, Prabhakar A, Moll V, Cornett E and Kaye A (2021) Clinical Utilization of Ultrasound in Vascular Disease Ultrasound Fundamentals, 10.1007/978-3-030-46839-2_24, (227-237), . Tan Z, Hu H, Wang Z, Wang Y and Zhang Y (2021) Prevalence and risk factors of preoperative deep venous thrombosis in closed patella fracture: a prospective cohort study, Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 10.1186/s13018-021-02558-4, 16:1, Online publication date: 1-Dec-2021. Ma J, Du P, Qin J, Zhou Y, Liang N, Hu J, Zhang Y and Zhu Y (2021) Incidence and risk factors predicting deep venous thrombosis of lower extremity following spinal fractures, Scientific Reports, 10.1038/s41598-021-82147-x, 11:1, Online publication date: 1-Dec-2021. Itou J, Kuwashima U, Itoh M and Okazaki K (2021) No difference in the incidence or location of deep venous thrombosis according to use of pharmacological prophylaxis following total knee arthroplasty, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 10.1186/s12891-021-04707-6, 22:1, Online publication date: 1-Dec-2021. Ma J, Qin J, Hu J, Shang M, Zhou Y, Liang N, Zhang Y and Zhu Y (2020) Incidence and Hematological Biomarkers Associated With Preoperative Deep Venous Thrombosis Following Foot Fractures, Foot & Ankle International, 10.1177/1071100720943844, 41:12, (1563-1570), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2020. Zhu C, Zhuo H, Qin Y, Zhang W, Qiu J and Ran F (2018) Comparison of clear effect and the complications, and short and mid-term effects between ultrasound-guided and non-guided catheter-directed thrombolysis in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis of lower extremity, Vascular, 10.1177/1708538118814609, 27:3, (277-283), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2019. Yusof N, McCann A, Little P and Ta H (2019) Non-invasive imaging techniques for the differentiation of acute and chronic thrombosis, Thrombosis Research, 10.1016/j.thromres.2019.03.009, 177, (161-171), Online publication date: 1-May-2019. Tefft A, Moss T, Stanley A and Malhotra A (2019) Not all deep vein thrombosis is created equal: Incidence of preexisting chronic deep vein thrombosis among high-risk traumatized patients, Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 10.1097/TA.0000000000002228, 86:5, (871-873), Online publication date: 1-May-2019. Lodzinska J, Leigh H, Parys M and Liuti T (2019) Vascular ultrasonographic findings in canine patients with clinically diagnosed phlebitis, Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound, 10.1111/vru.12805, 60:6, (745-752), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2019. Shabani Varaki E, Gargiulo G, Penkala S and Breen P (2018) Peripheral vascular disease assessment in the lower limb: a review of current and emerging non-invasive diagnostic methods, BioMedical Engineering OnLine, 10.1186/s12938-018-0494-4, 17:1, Online publication date: 1-Dec-2018. Maufus M, Elias A, Barrellier M and Pernod G (2018) Diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis recurrence: Ultrasound criteria, Thrombosis Research, 10.1016/j.thromres.2017.11.004, 161, (78-83), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2018. Ivlev D, Shirinli S, Uzlova S and Guria K (2018) Ultrasonic Monitoring of Blood Coagulation and Fibrinolysis under Intensive Blood Flow, Biophysics, 10.1134/S0006350918040085, 63:4, (637-643), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2018. Cannon K, Badiee J, Wallace J, Brill J, Sise M, Bansal V, Sise C and Shackford S (2018) The prevalence of chronic deep venous thrombosis in trauma: Implications for hospitals and patients, Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 10.1097/TA.0000000000001694, 84:1, (170-174), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2018. Angelson M, Wooster D and Wooster E (2018) Pattern Analysis of Lower Extremity Venous Thrombosis: Implications for Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) Protocols, Journal for Vascular Ultrasound, 10.1177/154431671704100403, 41:4, (169-172), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2017. Holder M, Stutzman S and Olson D (2017) Impact of Ultrasound on Short Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Placement on Vein Thrombosis Risk, Journal of Infusion Nursing, 10.1097/NAN.0000000000000219, 40:3, (176-182), Online publication date: 1-May-2017. Viana V, Melo E, Terra-Filho M, Dallan L, Gonzalez M, Hajjar L, Jatene F, Cesar L and Vianna C (2017) Frequency of Deep Vein Thrombosis and/or Pulmonary Embolism After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Investigation Regardless of Clinical Suspicion, The American Journal of Cardiology, 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.09.056, 119:2, (237-242), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2017. Dronkers C, Klok F and Huisman M (2016) Current and future perspectives in imaging of venous thromboembolism, Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 10.1111/jth.13403, 14:9, (1696-1710), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2016. Jaff M (2016) Wait—The Inferior Vena Cava Is Thrombosed? Now What?, JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.01.018, 9:7, (644-645), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2016. Strijkers R, de Wolf M, Arnoldussen C, Timbergen M, de Graaf R, Ten Cate-Hoek A and Wittens C (2015) Venous In-stent Thrombosis Treated by Ultrasound Accelerated Catheter Directed Thrombolysis, European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.01.006, 49:4, (440-447), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2015. Piati P, Peres A, Andrade D, Jorge M and Toregeani J (2019) Análise do grau de recanalização da trombose venosa profunda: estudo comparativo de pacientes tratados com varfarina versus rivaroxabana, Jornal Vascular Brasileiro, 10.1590/1677-5449.180111, 18 Liao T, Hsu H, Wen M, Juan Y, Hung Y and Liaw C (2016) Iliofemoral Venous Thrombosis Mainly Related to Iliofemoral Venous Obstruction by External Tumor Compression in Cancer Patients, Case Reports in Oncology, 10.1159/000452943, 9:3, (760-771) February 25, 2014Vol 129, Issue 8 Advertisement Article InformationMetrics © 2014 American Heart Association, Inc.https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002966PMID: 24566066 Manuscript receivedApril 1, 2013Manuscript acceptedMay 24, 2013Originally publishedFebruary 25, 2014 PDF download Advertisement SubjectsDiagnostic Testing

Referência(s)
Altmetric
PlumX