Clinical Utility of Serial and Continuous ST-Segment Recovery Assessment in Patients With Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction
2004; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Volume: 110; Issue: 25 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1161/01.cir.0000150401.54856.d3
ISSN1524-4539
AutoresMitchell W. Krucoff, Per Johanson, Ricardo Baeza, Suzanne W. Crater, Mikael Dellborg,
Tópico(s)Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
ResumoHomeCirculationVol. 110, No. 25Clinical Utility of Serial and Continuous ST-Segment Recovery Assessment in Patients With Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Free AccessReview ArticlePDF/EPUBAboutView PDFView EPUBSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationsTrack citationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyReddit Jump toFree AccessReview ArticlePDF/EPUBClinical Utility of Serial and Continuous ST-Segment Recovery Assessment in Patients With Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial InfarctionAssessing the Dynamics of Epicardial and Myocardial Reperfusion Mitchell W. Krucoff, MD, Per Johanson, MD, PhD, Ricardo Baeza, MD, Suzanne W. Crater, ANP-C and Mikael Dellborg, MD, PhD Mitchell W. KrucoffMitchell W. Krucoff From the eECG Core Laboratory, Duke University Medical Center/Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina (M.W.K., R.B., S.W.C.), and the eVCG Core Laboratory, Göteborg University, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Ostra, Göteborg, Sweden (P.J., M.D.). , Per JohansonPer Johanson From the eECG Core Laboratory, Duke University Medical Center/Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina (M.W.K., R.B., S.W.C.), and the eVCG Core Laboratory, Göteborg University, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Ostra, Göteborg, Sweden (P.J., M.D.). , Ricardo BaezaRicardo Baeza From the eECG Core Laboratory, Duke University Medical Center/Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina (M.W.K., R.B., S.W.C.), and the eVCG Core Laboratory, Göteborg University, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Ostra, Göteborg, Sweden (P.J., M.D.). , Suzanne W. CraterSuzanne W. Crater From the eECG Core Laboratory, Duke University Medical Center/Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina (M.W.K., R.B., S.W.C.), and the eVCG Core Laboratory, Göteborg University, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Ostra, Göteborg, Sweden (P.J., M.D.). and Mikael DellborgMikael Dellborg From the eECG Core Laboratory, Duke University Medical Center/Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina (M.W.K., R.B., S.W.C.), and the eVCG Core Laboratory, Göteborg University, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Ostra, Göteborg, Sweden (P.J., M.D.). Originally published21 Dec 2004https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000150401.54856.D3Circulation. 2004;110:e533–e539Acute ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a global source of mortality and morbidity and consequently is one of the most active areas of applied research. In the face of multiple reports of new combinations of medical and interventional therapies, the challenge to the clinician is both to understand data from key clinical trials and to translate that understanding to the individual patient at the bedside.STEMI is defined by "ST elevation" on the ECG, which is the electrical manifestation of the pathophysiological changes that follow a thrombotic occlusion of an epicardial coronary artery.1 The ECG is ubiquitous in cardiology, applied as a diagnostic, prognostic, and management tool. Although a single ECG presents about 10 seconds of waveform morphology, acute STEMI displays its dynamic behavior over time, both spontaneously and in response to therapy.The systematic use of serial and continuous ECG assessments has been one of the most fertile areas of advancement in the ability to measure and thereby recognize the presence, speed, quality, and stability of reperfusion of an infarct artery. In addition to providing insights into pathophysiological mechanisms and novel therapies in research protocols, serial or continuous use of this simple, noninvasive, quantitative measure has the potential to guide clinicians through the dynamic events surrounding the management of STEMI patients' disease. This is illustrated in the following case studies of 3 patients, all of whom presented with 3 hours of chest pain with angiographically documented Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 3 flow, were managed with serial ECGs for clinical purposes, and were simultaneously monitored for research protocols with "black box" continuous 12-lead ECG monitors.Case ReportsPatient 1G.E. was a 67-year-old man with a history of hypertension and tobacco use who presented with 3 hours of chest pain. The initial ECG showed anterolateral ST-segment elevation with a maximum of 15 mm of ST-segment elevation in lead V2. He was treated with aspirin, heparin, and full-dose front-loaded tissue plasminogen activator. Although the patient had some pain relief, a repeat ECG 90 minutes later showed no interval change, with 15 mm of ST-segment elevation in lead V2. Acute angiography documented TIMI 3 flow through a 95% proximal left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) stenosis, on which angioplasty was successfully performed. The patient subsequently did well.Figure 1 graphically shows the ST-segment levels from continuously recorded 12-lead ECGs in this patient. In the 90 minutes between the first and second ECGs, ST-segment levels increased overall to a peak abnormality of 37-mm elevation in lead V2. Worsening condition from the time 0 ECG to these peak levels suggests ongoing occlusion of the infarct artery early after lytic therapy. By the 90-minute ECG, however, the 15-mm ST-segment elevation was actually a recovery of >50% from the 37-mm peak, suggesting reperfusion of the infarct artery, as was documented at catheterization. Download figureDownload PowerPointFigure 1. ST-segment levels from continuously recorded 12-lead ECGs in patient 1. ECG #1 was taken at time 0. ECG #2 was taken 90 minutes after presentation.Patient 2P.M. was a 72-year-old woman with a history of coronary disease, having undergone bypass surgery 4 years before. The patient presented with 3 hours of waxing-waning chest pain. On arrival in the emergency department, she had 7 mm of anterior ST-segment elevation but rapidly became pain free, with a nonacute ECG, when treated with sublingual nitroglycerine, aspirin, and heparin. She was admitted to the coronary care unit (CCU), but on arrival had recurrent pain. A repeat ECG showed recurrent anterior ST-segment elevation. She was quickly taken to cardiac catheterization. On arrival in the catheterization laboratory, she was pain free, with no ST-segment changes on ECG. Catheterization was deferred, and the patient was taken back to the CCU. She was stable for 2 hours, when she again experienced chest pain with anterior ST-segment elevation. She was taken back to the catheterization laboratory; on arrival she was again pain free, with a normalized ECG. Catheterization was performed, and a hazy mid-LAD lesion was defined with TIMI 3 flow. She was treated with abciximab in conjunction with angioplasty, and stenting was performed with a good result. The patient did well for ≈6 hours, when she experienced recurrent pain and ST-segment elevation because of stent thrombosis. She underwent urgent bypass with placement of a left internal mammary artery graft to the LAD.Figure 2 shows the continuous ECG data from patient 2. Anterior ST-segment elevation evolves and resolves repeatedly, suggesting intermittent changes in epicardial coronary patency, or "cyclic flow." Although the patient had 2 episodes of ST-segment re-elevation accompanied by chest pain, the vast majority of these episodes of ST-segment re-elevation were asymptomatic. Several episodes of ST-segment elevation and recovery were the result of balloon occlusion and reperfusion during angioplasty. Re-elevation is seen late from stent thrombosis, with the recording terminated as the patient went to bypass surgery. Download figureDownload PowerPointFigure 2. ST-segment levels from continuously recorded 12-lead ECGs in patient 2. ECGs were taken at different times as indicated. CABG indicates coronary artery bypass grafting; all other abbreviations as in text.Patient 3M.L. was a 57-year-old man with diabetes who otherwise was in generally good health. He presented to the emergency department with a history of 3 hours of chest fullness. An ECG showed posterior infarction with ST-segment depression in the anterior leads, maximal at −11 mm in lead V2. He was treated with aspirin, heparin, morphine, and full-dose tissue plasminogen activator. During the course of 90 minutes, his symptoms resolved; however, an ECG at 90 minutes showed worsening symptoms, with 14 mm of depression in lead V2. He was taken to cardiac catheterization, where TIMI 3 flow was observed through a 95% proximal circumflex stenosis. Stenting of the lesion was successfully performed, with persistence of TIMI 3 flow but minimal ECG recovery. The patient was subsequently treated with pressors and intraaortic balloon pump support, but he died 8 hours after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).Figure 3 shows the ST-segment levels recorded during the entire 11 hours from presentation to death in patient 3. Although it was documented angiographically that the epicardial infarct artery had reperfused within 90 minutes of the onset of lytic therapy, the persistence of ST-segment deviation in the presence of TIMI 3 flow suggests that microvascular myocardial perfusion remained poor, with ongoing cellular injury and death. Further manipulation of the epicardial vessel with angioplasty, although angiographically successful, did not improve myocardial perfusion, and the patient finally succumbed to a massive infarction. Download figureDownload PowerPointFigure 3. ST-segment levels from continuously recorded 12-lead ECGs in patient 3. ECG #1 was taken at time 0 in the emergency department, with symptoms. ECG #2 was taken 90 minutes after presentation, without symptoms.DiscussionPathophysiological insight into the thrombotic occlusion of an epicardial vessel1 and the associated "wavefront" of cell death2 revolutionized the clinical management of patients experiencing acute STEMI. Mortality reduction with thrombolytic therapy and aspirin3,4 generated a new standard of care for medical therapy. Mechanical revascularization of the infarct artery, although logistically more challenging, appears to offer an even greater clinical benefit to these patients.5,6Exploration of optimal therapy for acute STEMI continues to advance the clinical armamentarium, with safer, more effective lytic agents7,8 and novel anticoagulant and antiplatelet adjuncts9,10 in both medical and facilitated PCI strategies. Unique devices inducing hypothermia or providing distal protection from thrombotic embolization are also under study.The principles guiding these research directions are conceptually and mechanistically familiar to the clinician at the bedside. Conceptually, optimal therapy for STEMI must minimize cell death by interrupting the infarction and begin to reverse the ischemic metabolic derangement of still-viable cells. ST-segment recovery over serial ECGs in STEMI represents both reversal of ischemia and interruption of infarction.11 Mechanistically, optimal therapy is mediated through 2 related but independent phenomena, the speed and stability with which the epicardial vessel is recanalized and the quality of the nutritive response to reperfusion at the cellular level.12–14The speed and stability of reperfusion at the epicardial level can be both unpredictable and dynamic. Cyclic flow, such as illustrated in patient 2, has been reported in 35% to 50% of patients treated with thrombolytic therapies.15–19 Although the waxing and waning of chest pain may be a clinical signal of such events, reocclusion of the infarct vessel is also frequently asymptomatic.15 Serial and continuous ECG assessments over time provide a noninvasive modality for tracking the status of epicardial patency. The more frequently ECGs can be taken, the more precisely the timing of reperfusion and the stability of patency over time can be characterized.20,21 As shown in patient 2, cyclic flow changes can be both dramatic and rapid, with more frequent or continuous ECG assessment progressively correcting potential temporal undersampling errors.20Recanalization of the infarct vessel can be recognized by >50% ST-segment recovery.20,22,23 As shown in patient 1, however, this "absolute relative" calculation depends on the initial as well as the current ECG used for comparison. Thus, in patient 1, the 90-minute ECG was no different from the time 0 ECG, but it was >50% recovered from the much worsened peak ECG that evolved within the 90-minute window. Although waiting 60 to 90 minutes to assess the adequacy of thrombolytic therapy is a clinically reasonable strategy, taking more frequent serial or continuous ECGs during the course of the waiting period may correct undersampling of the true peak levels of injury current from which "percent recovery" is measured.It is now widely appreciated that recanalization of the epicardial vessel is a necessary but insufficient condition of nutritive reperfusion that actually reverses ischemia and interrupts infarction.12,13,24,25 Mechanistic observations with contrast echo perfusion and myocardial blush25–27 suggest that in ≈30% of patients in whom recanalization produces TIMI 3 flow, the quality of nutritive reperfusion is compromised. Characterization of the quality of reperfusion with both of these biomarkers is strongly correlated with the extent of ST-segment recovery observed over serial ECGs.26,28The "gold standard" defining nutritive reperfusion is mortality, and it is well established that successful recanalization of the infarct artery with TIMI 3 flow yields a mortality benefit as compared with failed recanalization.29 The extent of ST-segment recovery further stratifies mortality significantly in patients with TIMI 3 flow.30–32 In patients treated with thrombolytics, the prognostic information provided by ST-segment recovery analyses can be assessed over an array of time periods, from 60 to 240 minutes after administration of thrombolytic therapy.33–36 At any given time, the extent of ST-segment recovery, corresponding with the quality of reperfusion, appears to provide the key information, as patients with ≥70% ST-segment recovery have superior survival to those with 30% to 70% recovery, who in turn do better than those with <30% recovery.32,33,35 ST-segment elevation on the surface ECG is a physiological reflection of a focal area of myocytes so deprived of oxygen that ATP-dependent transmembrane ion gradients are lost. Fast, stable, and complete ST-segment recovery quantifies the reversal of this state and thus has proved to be one of the most predictive and clinically practical measures of the cellular response to reperfusion. As seen in patient 3, despite recanalization of the infarct artery, elimination of the stenosis, and brisk TIMI flow at the epicardial level, worsening ST-segment deviation identified the absence of nutritive benefit at the cellular level (despite reperfusion), with ongoing cell death and ultimately death of the patient.For clinical purposes, the use of serial or continuous ECG measurements must not only have a sound rationale for its application but must also be logistically feasible in the flow of acute care. Accurate manual measurements of severely abnormal ST segments over serial ECGs can be challenging, and digital ECG tools may be helpful. Digital tools may be susceptible to artifactual information if the measurement point is taken at or close to the J point because subtle shifts of key fiducial points in the digital instrumentation may intermittently pull the measurement point of interest into the S wave.Similarly, the summation of multiple measurements over combinations of affected leads may be quite complex and too time consuming for clinical use. With regard to the prognostic value for patients, the information content from absolute, relative, and temporal measurements based on the single-peak lead selected from the standard 12-lead ECG seems similar to the information content from multiple-lead measures,37 and it is certainly simpler for clinical use.Acquiring serial ECGs in the clinic is easily done with any standard ECG. Care must be taken to ensure that the lead positions are marked or stay in place during the course of serial acquisitions to avoid artifact from repositioning. How frequently to check the ECG is best guided by the recognition that STEMI is a highly dynamic pathophysiology and undersampling may significantly affect the interpretation of serial ECG information.20 In this setting and within reason, the simple maxim "more is better" is applicable, ideally with no more than 5 to 10 minutes (or less) between assessments during the first 60 to 90 minutes of care.Historically, the perceived complexity of continuous multilead ST-segment monitoring equipment and the absence of guidelines and standards have limited widespread use in clinical care despite a relatively low cost. In Sweden, however, real-time continuous ST-segment monitoring has become a standard of care in the management of CCU patients,38–40 and in the United States, several centers have applied this technology in chest pain observation units.41,42 Radiolucent electrodes allow continuous monitoring during chest x-ray or angiography. The emergence of consensus standards for ST-segment monitoring43 and more facile devices and user interfaces from all of the major commercial manufacturers of monitoring equipment have enhanced the clinical potential of modern ECG and vectorcardiogram monitoring for patients with acute coronary syndromes.In research studies of new therapeutics in populations presenting with acute STEMI, serial and continuous multilead ST-segment recovery assessment has emerged as one of the most robust and widely used measures to quantify the speed, stability, and quality of reperfusion. In the clinical setting, this application of the ECG signal provides an inexpensive, noninvasive, and highly reliable approach to patient management and risk stratification that can be individualized to every patient during the dynamic course of his or her illness.FootnotesCorrespondence to Mitchell W. Krucoff, 2400 Pratt St, Room 9032, PO Box 17969, Durham, NC 27705. E-mail [email protected] References 1 DeWood MA, Spores J, Notske R, Mouser LT, Burroughs R, Golden MS, Lang HT. Prevalence of total coronary occlusion during the early hours of transmural myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1980; 303: 897–902.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar2 Reimer KA, Lowe JE, Rasmussen MM, Jennings RB. The wavefront phenomenon of ischemic cell death, 1: Myocardial infarct size vs duration of coronary occlusion in dogs. Circulation. 1977; 56: 786–794.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar3 Effectiveness of intravenous thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Streptochinasi nell'Infarto Miocardico (GISSI). Lancet. 1986; 1: 397–402.MedlineGoogle Scholar4 Randomised trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both, or neither among 17,187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-2. ISIS-2 (Second International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group. Lancet. 1988; 2: 349–360.MedlineGoogle Scholar5 Stone GW, Grines CL, Browne KF, Marco J, Rothbaum D, O'Keefe J, Hartzler GO, Overlie P, Donohue B, Chelliah N, Timmis GC, Vlietstra R, Strzelecki M, Puchrowicz-Ochocki S, O'Neill WW. Predictors of in-hospital and 6-month outcome after acute myocardial infarction in the reperfusion era: the Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995; 25: 370–377.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar6 Stone GW, Grines CL, Cox DA, Garcia E, Tcheng JE, Griffin JJ, Guagliumi G, Stuckey T, Turco M, Carroll JD, Rutherford BD, Lansky AJ; Controlled Abciximab and Device Investigation to Lower Late Angioplasty Complications (CADILLAC) Investigators. Comparison of angioplasty with stenting, with or without abciximab, in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346: 957–966.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar7 An international randomized trial comparing four thrombolytic strategies for acute myocardial infarction. The GUSTO investigators. N Engl J Med. 1993; 329: 673–682.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar8 Single-bolus tenecteplase compared with front-loaded alteplase in acute myocardial infarction: the ASSENT-2 double-blind randomised trial. Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Thrombolytic Investigators. Lancet. 1999; 354: 716–722.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar9 Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Thrombolytic Regimen (ASSENT)-3 Investigators. Efficacy and safety of tenecteplase in combination with enoxaparin, abciximab, or unfractionated heparin: the ASSENT-3 randomised trial in acute myocardial infarction. Lancet. 2001; 358: 605–613.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar10 Topol EJ; GUSTO V Investigators. Reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction with fibrinolytic therapy or combination reduced fibrinolytic therapy and platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition: the GUSTO V randomised trial. Lancet. 2001; 357: 1905–1914.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar11 Krucoff MW, Ohman EM, Trollinger KM, Christensen R, Sawchak ST, Shah A, Pope JE, Califf RM. Noninvasive definition of failed reperfusion at the bedside: looking beyond the tip of the catheter. In: Califf RM, Mark DB, Wagner GS, eds. Acute Coronary Care. 2nd ed. St. Louis, Mo: C.V. Mosby; 1995: 443–468.Google Scholar12 Lincoff AM, Topol EJ. Illusion of reperfusion. Does anyone achieve optimal reperfusion during acute myocardial infarction? Circulation. 1993; 88: 1361–1374.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar13 Roe MT, Ohman EM, Maas AC, Christenson RH, Mahaffey KW, Granger CB, Harrington RA, Califf RM, Krucoff MW. Shifting the open-artery hypothesis downstream: the quest for optimal reperfusion. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 37: 9–18.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar14 de Lemos JA, Braunwald E. ST segment resolution as a tool for assessing the efficacy of reperfusion therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 38: 1283–1294.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar15 Hackett D, Davies G, Chierchia S, Maseri A. Intermittent coronary occlusion in acute myocardial infarction. Value of combined thrombolytic and vasodilator therapy. N Engl J Med. 1987; 317: 1055–1059.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar16 Krucoff MW, Croll MA, Pope JE, Pieper KS, Kanani PM, Granger CB, Veldkamp RF, Wagner BL, Sawchak ST, Califf RM. Continuously updated 12-lead ST-segment recovery analysis for myocardial infarct artery patency assessment and its correlation with multiple simultaneous early angiographic observations. Am J Cardiol. 1993; 71: 145–151.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar17 Kwon K, Freedman SB, Wilcox I, Allman K, Madden A, Carter GS, Harris PJ. The unstable ST segment early after thrombolysis for acute infarction and its usefulness as a marker of recurrent coronary occlusion. Am J Cardiol. 1991; 67: 109–115.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar18 Johanson P, Swedberg K, Dellborg M. ST variability during the first 4 hours of acute myocardial infarction predicts 1-year mortality. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2001; 6: 198–202.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar19 Johanson P, Svensson AM, Dellborg M. Clinical implications of early ST-segment variability. A report from the ASSENT 2 ST-monitoring sub-study. Coron Artery Dis. 2001; 12: 277–283.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar20 Veldkamp RF, Green CL, Wilkins ML, Pope JE, Sawchak ST, Ryan JA, Califf RM, Wagner GS, Krucoff MW. Comparison of continuous ST-segment recovery analysis with methods using static electrocardiograms for noninvasive patency assessment during acute myocardial infarction. Thrombolysis and Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (TAMI) 7 Study Group. Am J Cardiol. 1994; 73: 1069–1074.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar21 Shah PK, Cercek B, Lew AS, Ganz W. Angiographic validation of bedside markers of reperfusion. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993; 21: 55–61.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar22 Hackworthy RA, Vogel MB, Harris PJ. Relationship between changes in ST segment elevation and patency of the infarct-related coronary artery in acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 1986; 112: 279–284.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar23 Krucoff MW, Croll MA, Pope JE, Granger CB, O'Connor CM, Sigmon KN, Wagner BL, Ryan JA, Lee KL, Kereiakes DJ, Samaha JK, Worley SJ, Ellis SG, Wall TC, Topol EJ, Califf RM; for the TAMI 7 Study Group. Continuous 12-lead ST-segment recovery analysis in the TAMI 7 study. Performance of a noninvasive method for real-time detection of failed myocardial reperfusion. Circulation. 1993; 88: 437–446.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar24 Kloner RA, Ganote CE, Jennings RB. The "no-reflow" phenomenon after temporary coronary occlusion in the dog. J Clin Invest. 1974; 54: 1496–1508.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar25 Ito H, Tomooka T, Sakai N, Yu H, Higashino Y, Fujii K, Masuyama T, Kitabatake A, Minamino T. Lack of myocardial perfusion immediately after successful thrombolysis. A predictor of poor recovery of left ventricular function in anterior myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1992; 85: 1699–1705.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar26 van 't Hof AW, Liem A, Suryapranata H, Hoorntje JC, de Boer MJ, Zijlstra F. Angiographic assessment of myocardial reperfusion in patients treated with primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: myocardial blush grade. Zwolle Myocardial Infarction Study Group. Circulation. 1998; 97: 2302–2306.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar27 Gibson CM, Cannon CP, Murphy SA, Ryan KA, Mesley R, Marble SJ, McCabe CH, Van De Werf F, Braunwald E. Relationship of TIMI myocardial perfusion grade to mortality after administration of thrombolytic drugs. Circulation. 2000; 101: 125–130.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar28 Santoro GM, Valenti R, Buonamici P, Bolognese L, Cerisano G, Moschi G, Trapani M, Antoniucci D, Fazzini PF. Relation between ST-segment changes and myocardial perfusion evaluated by myocardial contrast echocardiography in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with direct angioplasty. Am J Cardiol. 1998; 82: 932–937.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar29 Ross AM, Coyne KS, Moreyra E, Reiner JS, Greenhouse SW, Walker PL, Simoons ML, Draoui YC, Califf RM, Topol EJ, Van de Werf F, Lundergan CF. Extended mortality benefit of early postinfarction reperfusion. GUSTO-I Angiographic Investigators. Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries Trial. Circulation. 1998; 97: 1549–1556.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar30 van 't Hof AW, Liem A, de Boer MJ, Zijlstra F. Clinical value of 12-lead electrocardiogram after successful reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Zwolle Myocardial Infarction Study Group. Lancet. 1997; 350: 615–619.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar31 Corbalan R, Larrain G, Nazzal C, Castro PF, Acevedo M, Dominguez JM, Bellolio F, Krucoff MW. Association of noninvasive markers of coronary artery reperfusion to assess microvascular obstruction in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol. 2001; 88: 342–346.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar32 de Lemos JA, Antman EM, Giugliano RP, McCabe CH, Murphy SA, Van de Werf F, Gibson CM, Braunwald E. ST-segment resolution and infarct-related artery patency and flow after thrombolytic therapy. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 14 investigators. Am J Cardiol. 2000; 85: 299–304.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar33 Johanson P, Jernberg T, Gunnarsson G, Lindahl B, Wallentin L, Dellborg M. Prognostic value of ST-segment resolution—when and what to measure. Eur Heart J. 2003; 24: 337–345.MedlineGoogle Scholar34 de Lemos JA, Antman EM, Giugliano RP, Morrow DA, McCabe CH, Cutler SS, Charlesworth A, Schroder R, Braunwald E. Comparison of a 60- versus 90-minute determination of ST-segment resolution after thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. In TIME-II Investigators. Intravenous nPA for Treatment of Infarcting Myocardium Early-II. Am J Cardiol. 2000; 86: 1235–1237.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar35 Schroder R, Wegscheider K, Schroder K, Dissmann R, Meyer-Sabellek W. Extent of early ST segment elevation resolution: a strong predictor of outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction and a sensitive measure to compare thrombolytic regimens. A substudy of the International Joint Efficacy Comparison of Thrombolytics (INJECT) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995; 26: 1657–1664.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar36 Mauri F, Maggioni AP, Franzosi MG, de Vita C, Santoro E, Santoro L, Giannuzzi P, Tognoni G. A simple electrocardiographic predictor of the outcome of patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with a thrombolytic agent. A Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell'Infarto Miocardico (GISSI-2)-Derived Analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994; 24: 600–607.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar37 Schroder K, Wegscheider K, Zeymer U, Neuhaus KL, Schroder R. Extent of ST-segment deviation in the single ECG lead of maximum deviation present 90 or 180 minutes after start of thrombolytic therapy best predicts outcome in acute myocardial infarction. Z Kardiol. 2001; 90: 557–567.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar38 Johanson P, Rossberg J, Dellborg M. Continuous ST monitoring: a bedside instrument? A report from the Assessment of the Safety of a New Thrombolytic (ASSENT 2) ST monitoring substudy. Am Heart J. 2001; 142: 58–62.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar39 Johanson P, Wallentin L, Nilsson T, Bergstrand L, Lindahl B, Dellborg M. ST-segment analyses and residual thrombi in the infarct-related artery: a report from the ASSENT PLUS ST-monitoring substudy. Am Heart J. 2004; 147: 853–858.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar40 Dellborg M, Malmberg K, Ryden L, Svensson AM, Swedberg K. Dynamic on-line vectorcardiography improves and simplifies in-hospital ischemia monitoring of patients with unstable angina. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995; 26: 1501–1507.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar41 Fesmire FM, Hughes AD, Fody EP, Jackson AP, Fesmire CE, Gilbert MA, Stout PK, Wojcik JF, Wharton DR, Creel JH. The Erlanger chest pain evaluation protocol: a one-year experience with serial 12-lead ECG monitoring, two-hour delta serum marker measurements, and selective nuclear stress testing to identify and exclude acute coronary syndromes. Ann Emerg Med. 2002; 40: 584–594.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar42 Crater SW, Taylor CA, Maas AC, Loeffler AK, Pope JE, Drew BJ, Krucoff MW. Real-time application of continuous 12-lead ST-segment monitoring: 3 case studies. Crit Care Nurse. 2000; 20: 93–99.Google Scholar43 Drew BJ, Krucoff MW. Multilead ST-segment monitoring in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a consensus statement for healthcare professionals. ST-Segment Monitoring Practice Guideline International Working Group. Am J Crit Care. 1999; 8: 372–388.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Previous Back to top Next FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited By Damman P, de Winter R and Krucoff M (2016) ST-elevation no myocardial infarction, Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, 10.1007/s11239-016-1454-0, 43:3, (426-427), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2017. Antman E (2012) ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Braunwald's Heart Disease: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine, 10.1016/B978-1-4377-0398-6.00054-8, (1087-1110), . Toogood M (2011) Electrocardiographic monitoring Coronary Care Manual, 10.1016/B978-0-7295-3927-2.10026-0, (192-201), . Carmo P, Ferreira J, Aguiar C, Ferreira A, Raposo L, Gonçalves P, Brito J and Silva A (2011) Does Continuous ST-Segment Monitoring Add Prognostic Information to the TIMI, PURSUIT, and GRACE Risk Scores?, Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology, 10.1111/j.1542-474X.2011.00438.x, 16:3, (239-249), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2011. Yan A, Steg P, FitzGerald G, Feldman L, Eagle K, Gore J, Anderson F, López-Sendón J, Gurfinkel E, Brieger D and Goodman S (2010) Recurrent ischemia across the spectrum of acute coronary syndromes: Prevalence and prognostic significance of (Re-)infarction and ST-segment changes in a large contemporary registry, International Journal of Cardiology, 10.1016/j.ijcard.2009.05.007, 145:1, (15-20), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2010. Rousseau M, Yan R, Tan M, Lefkowitz C, Casanova A, Fitchett D, Jolly S, Langer A, Goodman S and Yan A (2010) Relation Between Hemoglobin Level and Recurrent Myocardial Ischemia in Acute Coronary Syndromes Detected by Continuous Electrocardiographic Monitoring, The American Journal of Cardiology, 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.07.009, 106:10, (1417-1422), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2010. Verouden N, Haeck J, Koch K, Henriques J, Baan J, van der Schaaf R, Vis M, Peters R, Wilde A, Piek J, Tijssen J and de Winter R (2010) ST-Segment Resolution Prior to Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Is a Poor Indicator of Coronary Artery Patency in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction, Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology, 10.1111/j.1542-474X.2010.00350.x, 15:2, (107-115), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2010. Albertal M, Cura F, Thierer J, Trivi M, Escudero A, Padilla L and Belardi J (2010) Time to Stable ST-Segment Recovery Following Primary Angioplasty is Predictive of Regional Wall Motion Score and Clinical Outcome, Angiology, 10.1177/0003319710369099, 61:7, (638-642), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2010. van der Zwaan H, Stoel M, Roos-Hesselink J, Veen G, Boersma E and von Birgelen C (2010) Early versus late ST-segment resolution and clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction, Netherlands Heart Journal, 10.1007/BF03091808, 18:9, (416-422), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2010. Bekkers S, Yazdani S, Virmani R and Waltenberger J (2010) Microvascular Obstruction, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.12.037, 55:16, (1649-1660), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2010. Galiuto L, Garramone B, Scarà A, Rebuzzi A, Crea F, La Torre G, Funaro S, Madonna M, Fedele F and Agati L (2008) The Extent of Microvascular Damage During Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography Is Superior to Other Known Indexes of Post-Infarct Reperfusion in Predicting Left Ventricular Remodeling, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.09.051, 51:5, (552-559), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2008. Yan A, Yan R, Huynh T, DeYoung P, Weeks A, Fitchett D, Langer A and Goodman S (2008) Bleeding and outcome in acute coronary syndrome: Insights from continuous electrocardiogram monitoring in the Integrilin and Enoxaparin Randomized Assessment of Acute Coronary Syndrome Treatment (INTERACT) trial, American Heart Journal, 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.05.022, 156:4, (769-775), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2008. Niccoli G, Lanza G, Spaziani C, Altamura L, Romagnoli E, Leone A, Fusco B, Trani C, Burzotta F, Mazzari M, Mongiardo R, Biasucci L, Rebuzzi A and Crea F (2007) Baseline systemic inflammatory status and no-reflow phenomenon after percutaneous coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction, International Journal of Cardiology, 10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.05.012, 117:3, (306-311), Online publication date: 1-May-2007. Yan A, Yan R, Tan M, Senaratne M, Fitchett D, Langer A and Goodman S (2007) Long-term prognostic value and therapeutic implications of continuous ST-segment monitoring in acute coronary syndrome, American Heart Journal, 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.02.003, 153:4, (500-506), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2007. December 21, 2004Vol 110, Issue 25 Advertisement Article InformationMetrics https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000150401.54856.D3PMID: 15611375 Originally publishedDecember 21, 2004 PDF download Advertisement SubjectsAcute Coronary SyndromesMyocardial Infarction
Referência(s)