Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

The Oral Mucosa Graft: A Systematic Review

2007; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Volume: 178; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.094

1527-3792

Michael R. Markiewicz, Melissa A. Lukose, Joseph E. Margarone, Guido Barbagli, K. Miller, Sung‐Kiang Chuang,

Congenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery

No AccessJournal of UrologyReview article1 Aug 2007The Oral Mucosa Graft: A Systematic Review Michael R. Markiewicz, Melissa A. Lukose, Joseph E. Margarone, Guido Barbagli, Kennon S. Miller, and Sung-Kiang Chuang Michael R. MarkiewiczMichael R. Markiewicz School of Dental Medicine, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York The Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts The Center for Applied Clinical Investigation, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts , Melissa A. LukoseMelissa A. Lukose School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York , Joseph E. MargaroneJoseph E. Margarone Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York , Guido BarbagliGuido Barbagli Center for Reconstructive Urethral Surgery, Arezzo, Italy , Kennon S. MillerKennon S. Miller Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Brown Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island , and Sung-Kiang ChuangSung-Kiang Chuang The Center for Applied Clinical Investigation, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.094AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract Purpose: We provide the reader with a critical, nonbiased, systematic review of current and precedent literature regarding the use of oral mucosa in the reconstruction of urethral defects associated with stricture and hypospadias/epispadias. Materials and Methods: We reviewed pertinent English literature from January 1966 through August 1, 2006 via the databases MEDLINE/PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE Drugs and Pharmacology regarding the use of oral mucosa graft urethroplasty in the reconstruction of urethral defects associated with stricture and hypospadias/epispadias. Bibliographies of pertinent articles were explored for additional important literature. Results: Data were stratified among studies that only used oral mucosa graft urethroplasty in the reconstruction of urethral defects associated with stricture, and those that used oral mucosa graft urethroplasty in the reconstruction of urethral defects associated with hypospadias/epispadias. Recipient site success in the reconstruction of defects associated with stricture was significantly associated with the location of graft placement (ventral vs dorsal, p <0.001) when an onlay graft was used. Hypospadias/epispadias recipient site success was significantly associated with the type of graft used (tube vs onlay, p <0.001), and by the site of oral mucosa harvest (labial vs buccal, p <0.001). Other perioperative and patient oriented variables were not significantly associated with success at the recipient site. Conclusions: The oral mucosa is a viable source of donor tissue displaying many characteristics of the ideal urethral graft. There are numerous variations of the oral mucosa graft urethroplasty technique. Herein comparisons are made. References 1 : Optimal management of the 3- to 6-centimeter anterior urethral stricture. Curr Urol Rep2000; 1: 180. Google Scholar 2 : Using buccal mucosa for urethral reconstruction in primary and re-operative surgery. Eur Urol1998; 34: 216. Google Scholar 3 : Reconstruction of the urethral meatus with a buccal mucosa graft. Urol Int1995; 55: 29. Google Scholar 4 : Buccal mucosal graft for hypospadias repairs. Tech Urol1998; 4: 173. Google Scholar 5 : Buccal mucosal graft for urethral reconstruction. J Formos Med Assoc2004; 103: 244. Google Scholar 6 : Biological basis for vestibuloplasty procedures. J Oral Surg1976; 34: 890. Google Scholar 7 : Conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy with buccal mucosal graft. Arch Ophthalmol1995; 113: 113. Google Scholar 8 : Reconstruction of the base of the tongue and lateral pharyngeal wall. Laryngoscope1980; 90: 202. Google Scholar 9 : Use of autologous buccal mucosa for vaginoplasty: a study of eight cases. Hum Reprod2003; 18: 604. Google Scholar 10 : A one-stage operation for hypospadias. Br J Surg1941; 29: 84. Google Scholar 11 : The buccal mucosal graft for urethral reconstruction: a preliminary report. J Urol1992; 147: 662. Link, Google Scholar 12 : Autologous buccal mucosa graft for hypospadias repair: an initial report. J Urol1992; 147: 1081. Link, Google Scholar 13 : The Barbagli procedure gives the best results for patch urethroplasty of the bulbar urethra. BJU Int2001; 88: 385. Google Scholar 14 : Reconstruction of resistant strictures of the fossa navicularis and meatus. J Urol1998; 160: 359. Link, Google Scholar 15 : Bulbar urethroplasty using buccal mucosa grafts placed on the ventral, dorsal or lateral surface of the urethra: are results affected by the surgical technique?. J Urol2005; 174: 955. Link, Google Scholar 16 : A comparison of one-stage procedures for post-traumatic urethral stricture repair. BJU Int2005; 95: 1299. Google Scholar 17 : Buccal mucosal urethroplasty: a versatile technique for all urethral segments. BJU Int2005; 95: 625. Google Scholar 18 : The use of buccal mucosa patch graft in the management of anterior urethral strictures. J Urol1993; 149: 276. Link, Google Scholar 19 : Long-term followup of the ventrally placed buccal mucosa onlay graft in bulbar urethral reconstruction. J Urol2003; 169: 1754. Link, Google Scholar 20 : Long-term outcome of ventral buccal mucosa onlay graft urethroplasty for urethral stricture repair. Urology2004; 64: 648. Google Scholar 21 : Dorsal buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty by a ventral sagittal urethrotomy and minimal-access perineal approach for anterior urethral stricture. BJU Int2004; 93: 1287. Google Scholar 22 : Ventral onlay urethroplasty using buccal mucosa for complex stricture repair. Urology2003; 61: 1004. Google Scholar 23 : Urethroplasty for refractory anterior urethral stricture. J Urol2002; 167: 127. Link, Google Scholar 24 : Multi-institutional experience with buccal mucosa onlay urethroplasty for bulbar urethral reconstruction. J Urol2002; 167: 1314. Link, Google Scholar 25 : Ventral onlay buccal mucosal grafts for anterior urethral strictures: long-term followup. J Urol2004; 171: 726. Link, Google Scholar 26 : Urethroplasty following total phallic reconstruction. J Urol1998; 160: 378. Link, Google Scholar 27 : Use of autologous buccal mucosal graft for urethral surgery in males. Eur Urol1996; 29: 227. Google Scholar 28 : Bulbar urethral stricture repair with buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty. Eur Urol2001; 39: 264. Google Scholar 29 : Buccal mucosal grafts in the treatment of ureteric lesions. BJU Int1999; 83: 751. Google Scholar 30 : Buccal mucosa urethroplasty in the treatment of bulbar urethral strictures. Urology2003; 61: 1008. Google Scholar 31 : Dorsal onlay graft urethroplasty using penile skin or buccal mucosa for repair of bulbar urethral stricture: results of a prospective single center study. Eur Urol2005; 48: 1013. Google Scholar 32 : Early experience with the use of buccal mucosa for substitution urethroplasty. Br J Urol1998; 81: 738. Google Scholar 33 : Use of free grafts in urethral stricture reconstruction. J Urol1996; 155: 1912. Link, Google Scholar 34 : Combined buccal mucosa graft and local flap for urethral reconstruction in various forms of hyposapdias. J Urol2005; 174: 690. Link, Google Scholar 35 : Use of buccal mucosal grafts in hypospadia-crippled adult patients. Ann Plast Surg2003; 50: 382. Google Scholar 36 : Buccal mucosal graft for secondary hypospadias repair and urethral replacement. Br J Urol1997; 80: 328. Google Scholar 37 : One-stage and multi-stage penile urethroplasty in 60 adult patients after failed hypospadias repair: comparison between penile skin and buccal mucosa grafts. J Urol, suppl2005; 173: 89, abstract 322. Link, Google Scholar 38 : Autologous buccal mucosal graft for urethral reconstruction. Urology1994; 44: 753. Google Scholar 39 : Reconstruction of hypospadias and epispadias with buccal mucosa free graft as primary surgery: more than 10 years of experience. J Urol2003; 170: 1600. Link, Google Scholar 40 : A buccal mucosal harvesting technique for urethral reconstruction. J Urol1997; 157: 1268. Link, Google Scholar 41 : Long-term followup of buccal mucosa onlay graft for hypospadias repair: analysis of complications. J Urol2004; 172: 1970. Link, Google Scholar 42 : Refinements in buccal mucosal grafts urethroplasty for hypospadias repair. World J Urol1998; 16: 192. Google Scholar 43 : The use of a dorsal buccal mucosal graft with urethral plate incision (Snodgrass) for hypospadias salvage. BJU Int1999; 83: 508. Google Scholar 44 : Buccal mucosa grafts for hypospadias surgery: long-term results. J Urol2002; 168: 1734. Link, Google Scholar 45 : Reconstruction or substitution of the pediatric urethra with buccal mucosa: indications, technical aspects, and results. Tech Urol1999; 5: 133. Google Scholar 46 : The utility of buccal mucosa graft in salvage urethroplasty. Can J Urol2002; 9: 1641. Google Scholar 47 : Coronal cuff: a problem site for buccal mucosal grafts. J Urol1999; 162: 1442. Link, Google Scholar 48 : Current controversies in anterior urethral stricture repair: free-graft versus pedicled skin-flap reconstruction. World J Urol1998; 16: 175. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 49 : New 2-stage buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty. J Urol2002; 167: 130. Link, Google Scholar 50 : The problems of penile urethroplasty with particular reference to 2-stage reconstructions. J Urol2003; 170: 87. Link, Google Scholar 51 : Buccal mucosa urethroplasty for the treatment of bulbar urethral strictures. J Urol1999; 161: 1501. Link, Google Scholar 52 : Dorsal onlay graft urethroplasty using penile skin or buccal mucosa in adult bulbourethral strictures. J Urol1998; 160: 1307. Link, Google Scholar 53 : Interim outcomes of dorsal skin graft bulbar urethroplasty. J Urol2004; 172: 1365. Link, Google Scholar 54 : Anastomotic fibrous ring as cause of stricture recurrence after bulbar onlay graft urethroplasty. J Urol2006; 176: 614. Link, Google Scholar 55 : Patient-reported sexual function after oral mucosa graft urethroplasty for hypospadias. Urology2005; 66: 1086. Google Scholar 56 : Buccal mucosal grafts: lessons learned from an 8-year experience. J Urol2001; 166: 1459. Link, Google Scholar 57 : Buccal mucosal urethral replacement. J Urol1995; 153: 1660. Link, Google Scholar 58 : Buccal mucosa grafts in hypospadias surgery. Br J Urol, suppl1995; 76: 23. Google Scholar 59 : Buccal mucosal grafts for urethral reconstruction. Urology1998; 51: 15. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 60 : Single stage reconstruction of complex anterior urethral strictures: combined tissue transfer techniques. J Urol1997; 157: 1271. Link, Google Scholar 61 : Changing practice in anterior urethroplasty. BJU Int1999; 83: 631. Google Scholar 62 : Which urethroplasty for which results?. Curr Opin Urol2002; 12: 223. Google Scholar 63 : Technique of harvesting buccal mucosa for urethral reconstruction. J Urol1996; 155: 1696. Link, Google Scholar 64 : Labial mucosa and combined labial/bladder mucosa free graft for urethral reconstruction. J Pediatr Surg1995; 30: 1554. Google Scholar © 2007 by American Urological AssociationFiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byLee Z, Waldorf B, Cho E, Liu J, Metro M and Eun D (2017) Robotic Ureteroplasty with Buccal Mucosa Graft for the Management of Complex Ureteral StricturesJournal of Urology, VOL. 198, NO. 6, (1430-1435), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2017.Xu Y, Li C, Xie H, Sa Y, Fu Q, Wu D, Zhang J, Feng C, Jin C, Song L, Li H and Liu Y (2017) Intermediate-Term Outcomes and Complications of Long Segment Urethroplasty with Lingual Mucosa GraftsJournal of Urology, VOL. 198, NO. 2, (401-406), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2017.Fine R, Reda E, Zelkovic P, Gitlin J, Freyle J, Franco I and Palmer L (2015) Tunneled Buccal Mucosa Tube Grafts for Repair of Proximal HypospadiasJournal of Urology, VOL. 193, NO. 5S, (1813-1818), Online publication date: 1-May-2015.Barbagli G, Fossati N, Sansalone S, Larcher A, Romano G, Dell'Acqua V, Guazzoni G and Lazzeri M (2013) Prediction of Early and Late Complications after Oral Mucosal Graft Harvesting: Multivariable Analysis from a Cohort of 553 Consecutive PatientsJournal of Urology, VOL. 191, NO. 3, (688-693), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2014.Leslie B, Lorenzo A, Figueroa V, Moore K, Farhat W, Bägli D and Pippi Salle J (2011) Critical Outcome Analysis of Staged Buccal Mucosa Graft Urethroplasty for Prior Failed Hypospadias Repair in ChildrenJournal of Urology, VOL. 185, NO. 3, (1077-1082), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2011.Goyal A, Singh M and Dickson A (2010) Oral Mucosa Graft for Repair of Hypospadias: Outcomes at PubertyJournal of Urology, VOL. 184, NO. 6, (2504-2509), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2010.Castagnetti M, Ghirardo V, Capizzi A, Andretta M and Rigamonti W (2008) Donor Site Outcome After Oral Mucosa Harvest for Urethroplasty in Children and AdultsJournal of Urology, VOL. 180, NO. 6, (2624-2628), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2008. Volume 178Issue 2August 2007Page: 387-394 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2007 by American Urological AssociationKeywordsbuccal mucosahypospadiasepispadiasoral mucosaurethral strictureAcknowledgmentsDr. Gerald Sufrin, Department of Urology, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo provided insight and critique. Dr. Elizabeth N. Allred, Children's Hospital Boston, Harvard Medical School, and Harvard School of Public Health provided statistical expertise.Metrics Author Information Michael R. Markiewicz School of Dental Medicine, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York The Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts The Center for Applied Clinical Investigation, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts More articles by this author Melissa A. Lukose School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York More articles by this author Joseph E. Margarone Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York More articles by this author Guido Barbagli Center for Reconstructive Urethral Surgery, Arezzo, Italy More articles by this author Kennon S. Miller Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Brown Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island More articles by this author Sung-Kiang Chuang The Center for Applied Clinical Investigation, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...