Volunteer Macroinvertebrate Monitoring: Assessing Training Needs through Examining Error and Bias in Untrained Volunteers
2003; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 22; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês
10.2307/1467984
ISSN1937-237X
AutoresJulia Frost Nerbonne, Bruce Vondracek,
Tópico(s)Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
ResumoPrevious articleNext article BridgesVolunteer Macroinvertebrate Monitoring: Assessing Training Needs through Examining Error and Bias in Untrained VolunteersJulia Frost Nerbonne and Bruce VondracekJulia Frost Nerbonne Search for more articles by this author and Bruce Vondracek Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmailPrint SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Volume 22, Number 1Mar., 2003 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.2307/1467984 Views: 46Total views on this site Citations: 34Citations are reported from Crossref Journal History This article was published in the Journal of the North American Benthological Society (1986-2011), which is continued by Freshwater Science (2012-present). Copyright 2003 The North American Benthological SocietyPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Marti Louw, Camellia W. Sanford‐Dolly Learning to see, seeing to learn: Impacts of an online tool on volunteers' observational practices during aquatic macroinvertebrate identification, Science Education 42 (Sep 2023).https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21834Erin Grantz, Brian E. Haggard, BENG 4973/5973 Informing Volunteer Water Quality Monitoring Program Design and Watershed Planning: Case Study of StreamSmart Data Analysis in the Upper White River Basin, Arkansas, Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education 177, no.11 (Apr 2023): 46–62.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1936-704X.2022.3380.xAlene M. Onion, Alexander J. Smith, Brian T. Duffy New York State’s WAVE Method - Evaluation of a Method for Water Quality Monitoring by Citizen Scientists using Benthic Macroinvertebrates, Environmental Management 71, no.22 (Dec 2022): 432–438.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-022-01753-1Julia von Gönner, Diana E. Bowler, Jonas Gröning, Anna-Katharina Klauer, Matthias Liess, Lilian Neuer, Aletta Bonn Citizen science for assessing pesticide impacts in agricultural streams, Science of The Total Environment (Oct 2022): 159607.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159607Lowell Andrew R. Iporac, Danielle C. Hatt, Natalie K. Bally, Alicia Castro, Elizabeth Cardet, Remsly Mesidor, Samantha Olszak, Alain Duran, Derek A. Burkholder, Ligia Collado-Vides Community-based monitoring reveals spatiotemporal variation of sargasso inundation levels and morphotype dominance across the Caribbean and South Florida, Aquatic Botany 182 (Oct 2022): 103546.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2022.103546Jo A. Latimore, Christopher S. Lowry Citizen Science, Crowdsourcing, and Social Media Advance Our Understanding and Conservation of Inland Waters, (Jan 2022): 625–638.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819166-8.00169-9Luciana Rocha, Cecilia Hegoburu, Ana Torremorell, Claudia Feijoó, Enrique Navarro, Hugo R. Fernández Use of ecosystem health indicators for assessing anthropogenic impacts on freshwaters in Argentina: a review, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 192, no.99 (Sep 2020).https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-08559-wLauren Quinlivan, Deborah V. Chapman, Timothy Sullivan Applying citizen science to monitor for the Sustainable Development Goal Indicator 6.3.2: a review, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 192, no.44 (Mar 2020).https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-8193-6Paulo Pinto, José Max Barbosa Oliveira-Junior, Francisco Leitão Leitão, Maria M. Morais, Luis Chícharo, Paula Vaz, Sofia M. A. Delgado, Catherina Voreadou, Eduardo A. Morales, Maria Alexandra Teodósio Development of a Metric of Aquatic Invertebrates for Volunteers (MAIV): A Simple and Friendly Biotic Metric to Assess Ecological Quality of Streams, Water 12, no.33 (Feb 2020): 654.https://doi.org/10.3390/w12030654Kelly Hibbeler Albus, Ruthanne Thompson, Forrest Mitchell, James Kennedy, Alexandra G. Ponette-González, Md. Saifur Rahaman Accuracy of long-term volunteer water monitoring data: A multiscale analysis from a statewide citizen science program, PLOS ONE 15, no.11 (Jan 2020): e0227540.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227540Kelly Albus, Ruthanne Thompson, Forrest Mitchell Usability of Existing Volunteer Water Monitoring Data: What Can the Literature Tell Us?, Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 4, no.11 (Nov 2019).https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.222N. Njue, J. Stenfert Kroese, J. Gräf, S.R. Jacobs, B. Weeser, L. Breuer, M.C. Rufino Citizen science in hydrological monitoring and ecosystem services management: State of the art and future prospects, Science of The Total Environment 693 (Nov 2019): 133531.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.337Alison B. Cariveau, Erik Anderson, Kristen A. Baum, Jennifer Hopwood, Eric Lonsdorf, Chris Nootenboom, Karen Tuerk, Karen Oberhauser, Emilie Snell-Rood Rapid Assessment of Roadsides as Potential Habitat for Monarchs and Other Pollinators, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 7 (Oct 2019).https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2019.00386Christopher S. Lowry, Michael N. Fienen, Damon M. Hall, Kristine F. Stepenuck Growing Pains of Crowdsourced Stream Stage Monitoring Using Mobile Phones: The Development of CrowdHydrology, Frontiers in Earth Science 7 (May 2019).https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2019.00128R. G. Storey, A. Wright-Stow Community-based monitoring of New Zealand stream macroinvertebrates: agreement between volunteer and professional assessments and performance of volunteer indices, New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 51, no.11 (Jan 2017): 60–77.https://doi.org/10.1080/00288330.2016.1266674N L. Rose, S. D. Turner, B. Goldsmith, L. Gosling, T. A. Davidson Quality control in public participation assessments of water quality: the OPAL Water Survey, BMC Ecology 16, no.S1S1 (Jul 2016).https://doi.org/10.1186/s12898-016-0063-2Patrick M. Edwards, Stefano Goffredo The Value of Long-Term Stream Invertebrate Data Collected by Citizen Scientists, PLOS ONE 11, no.44 (Apr 2016): e0153713.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153713ER Moffett, MW Neale Volunteer and professional macroinvertebrate monitoring provide concordant assessments of stream health, New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 49, no.33 (Apr 2015): 366–375.https://doi.org/10.1080/00288330.2015.1018913Kerissa K. Fuccillo, Theresa M. Crimmins, Catherine E. de Rivera, Timothy S. Elder Assessing accuracy in citizen science-based plant phenology monitoring, International Journal of Biometeorology 59, no.77 (Sep 2014): 917–926.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-014-0892-7Graham Forrester, Patricia Baily, Dennis Conetta, Linda Forrester, Elizabeth Kintzing, Lianna Jarecki Comparing monitoring data collected by volunteers and professionals shows that citizen scientists can detect long-term change on coral reefs, Journal for Nature Conservation 24 (Apr 2015): 1–9.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2015.01.002Elizabeth R. Ellwood, Betty A. Dunckel, Paul Flemons, Robert Guralnick, Gil Nelson, Greg Newman, Sarah Newman, Deborah Paul, Greg Riccardi, Nelson Rios, Katja C. Seltmann, Austin R. Mast Accelerating the Digitization of Biodiversity Research Specimens through Online Public Participation, BioScience 65, no.44 (Feb 2015): 383–396.https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biv005Jo A. Latimore and Paul J. Steen Integrating freshwater science and local management through volunteer monitoring partnerships: the Michigan Clean Water Corps, Freshwater Science 33, no.22 (Jul 2015): 686–692.https://doi.org/10.1086/676118Maria E. Dahmus, Kristen C. Nelson Yard stories: examining residents’ conceptions of their yards as part of the urban ecosystem in Minnesota, Urban Ecosystems 17, no.11 (Mar 2013): 173–194.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-013-0306-3Riikka Kaartinen, Bess Hardwick, Tomas Roslin Using citizen scientists to measure an ecosystem service nationwide, Ecology 94, no.1111 (Nov 2013): 2645–2652.https://doi.org/10.1890/12-1165.1John Gollan, Lisa Lobry de Bruyn, Nick Reid, Lance Wilkie Can Volunteers Collect Data that are Comparable to Professional Scientists? A Study of Variables Used in Monitoring the Outcomes of Ecosystem Rehabilitation, Environmental Management 50, no.55 (Aug 2012): 969–978.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-012-9924-4Shelby Gull Laird, Stacy A.C. Nelson, Harriett S. Stubbs, April L. James, Erika Menius Organizational Structures and Data Use in Volunteer Monitoring Organizations (VMOs), Applied Environmental Education & Communication 11, no.3-43-4 (Jul 2012): 165–177.https://doi.org/10.1080/1533015X.2012.776918T. E. Cox, J Philippoff, E Baumgartner, C. M. Smith Expert variability provides perspective on the strengths and weaknesses of citizen-driven intertidal monitoring program, Ecological Applications 22, no.44 (Jun 2012): 1201–1212.https://doi.org/10.1890/11-1614.1Christopher Nagy, Kyle Bardwell, Robert F. Rockwell, Rod Christie, Mark Weckel Validation of a Citizen Science-Based Model of Site Occupancy for Eastern Screech Owls with Systematic Data in Suburban New York and Connecticut, Northeastern Naturalist 19, no.sp6sp6 (Mar 2012): 143–158.https://doi.org/10.1656/045.019.s611C. KREMEN, K. S. ULLMAN, R. W. THORP Evaluating the Quality of Citizen-Scientist Data on Pollinator Communities, Conservation Biology 25, no.33 (Apr 2011): 607–617.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01657.xKristine F. Stepenuck, Lois G. Wolfson, Barbara W. Liukkonen, Jerome M. Iles, Timothy S. Grant Volunteer monitoring of E. coli in streams of the upper Midwestern United States: a comparison of methods, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 174, no.1-41-4 (May 2010): 625–633.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1483-7J.V. Loperfido, Pieter Beyer, Craig L. Just, Jerald L. Schnoor Uses and Biases of Volunteer Water Quality Data, Environmental Science & Technology 44, no.1919 (Jun 2010): 7193–7199.https://doi.org/10.1021/es100164cNicholas G. Aumen,5 Martin E. Gurtz,6 Michael T. Barbour,7 and Ashley Moerke8 BRIDGES: evolution of basic and applied linkages in benthic science, Journal of the North American Benthological Society 29, no.11 (Jul 2015): 359–371.https://doi.org/10.1899/08-031.1Ralph W. Holzenthal,12 Desiree R. Robertson,3 Steffen U. Pauls,4 and Patina K. Mendez5 Taxonomy and systematics: contributions to benthology and J-NABS, Journal of the North American Benthological Society 29, no.11 (Jul 2015): 147–169.https://doi.org/10.1899/08-065.1Julia Frost Nerbonne, Kristen C. Nelson Volunteer Macroinvertebrate Monitoring: Tensions Among Group Goals, Data Quality, and Outcomes, Environmental Management 42, no.33 (Apr 2008): 470–479.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-008-9103-9
Referência(s)