The essential genome of a bacterium
2011; Springer Nature; Volume: 7; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1038/msb.2011.58
ISSN1744-4292
AutoresBeat Christen, Eduardo Abeliuk, J.M. Collier, Virginia S. Kalogeraki, Ben Passarelli, John A. Coller, M.J. Fero, Harley H. McAdams, Lucy Shapiro,
Tópico(s)RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
ResumoArticle30 August 2011Open Access The essential genome of a bacterium Beat Christen Beat Christen Department of Developmental Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA Search for more papers by this author Eduardo Abeliuk Eduardo Abeliuk Department of Developmental Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA Search for more papers by this author John M Collier John M Collier Functional Genomics Facility, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA Search for more papers by this author Virginia S Kalogeraki Virginia S Kalogeraki Department of Developmental Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA Search for more papers by this author Ben Passarelli Ben Passarelli Functional Genomics Facility, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA Stem Cell Institute Genome Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA Search for more papers by this author John A Coller John A Coller Functional Genomics Facility, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA Search for more papers by this author Michael J Fero Michael J Fero Department of Developmental Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA Search for more papers by this author Harley H McAdams Harley H McAdams Department of Developmental Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA Search for more papers by this author Lucy Shapiro Corresponding Author Lucy Shapiro Department of Developmental Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA Search for more papers by this author Beat Christen Beat Christen Department of Developmental Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA Search for more papers by this author Eduardo Abeliuk Eduardo Abeliuk Department of Developmental Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA Search for more papers by this author John M Collier John M Collier Functional Genomics Facility, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA Search for more papers by this author Virginia S Kalogeraki Virginia S Kalogeraki Department of Developmental Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA Search for more papers by this author Ben Passarelli Ben Passarelli Functional Genomics Facility, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA Stem Cell Institute Genome Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA Search for more papers by this author John A Coller John A Coller Functional Genomics Facility, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA Search for more papers by this author Michael J Fero Michael J Fero Department of Developmental Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA Search for more papers by this author Harley H McAdams Harley H McAdams Department of Developmental Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA Search for more papers by this author Lucy Shapiro Corresponding Author Lucy Shapiro Department of Developmental Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA Search for more papers by this author Author Information Beat Christen1,‡, Eduardo Abeliuk1,2,‡, John M Collier3, Virginia S Kalogeraki1, Ben Passarelli3,4, John A Coller3, Michael J Fero1, Harley H McAdams1 and Lucy Shapiro 1 1Department of Developmental Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA 2Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA 3Functional Genomics Facility, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA 4Stem Cell Institute Genome Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA ‡These authors contributed equally to this work *Corresponding author. Department of Developmental Biology, Stanford University, B300 Beckman Center, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. Tel.: +1 650 725 7678; Fax: +1 650 725 7739; E-mail: [email protected] Molecular Systems Biology (2011)7:528https://doi.org/10.1038/msb.2011.58 PDFDownload PDF of article text and main figures. Peer ReviewDownload a summary of the editorial decision process including editorial decision letters, reviewer comments and author responses to feedback. ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions Figures & Info Caulobacter crescentus is a model organism for the integrated circuitry that runs a bacterial cell cycle. Full discovery of its essential genome, including non-coding, regulatory and coding elements, is a prerequisite for understanding the complete regulatory network of a bacterial cell. Using hyper-saturated transposon mutagenesis coupled with high-throughput sequencing, we determined the essential Caulobacter genome at 8 bp resolution, including 1012 essential genome features: 480 ORFs, 402 regulatory sequences and 130 non-coding elements, including 90 intergenic segments of unknown function. The essential transcriptional circuitry for growth on rich media includes 10 transcription factors, 2 RNA polymerase sigma factors and 1 anti-sigma factor. We identified all essential promoter elements for the cell cycle-regulated genes. The essential elements are preferentially positioned near the origin and terminus of the chromosome. The high-resolution strategy used here is applicable to high-throughput, full genome essentiality studies and large-scale genetic perturbation experiments in a broad class of bacterial species. Synopsis This study reports the essential Caulobacter genome at 8 bp resolution determined by saturated transposon mutagenesis and high-throughput sequencing. This strategy is applicable to full genome essentiality studies in a broad class of bacterial species. The regulatory events that control polar differentiation and cell-cycle progression in the bacterium Caulobacter crescentus are highly integrated, and they have to occur in the proper order (McAdams and Shapiro, 2011). Components of the core regulatory circuit are largely known. Full discovery of its essential genome, including non-coding, regulatory and coding elements, is a prerequisite for understanding the complete regulatory network of this bacterial cell. We have identified all the essential coding and non-coding elements of the Caulobacter chromosome using a hyper-saturated transposon mutagenesis strategy that is scalable and can be readily extended to obtain rapid and accurate identification of the essential genome elements of any sequenced bacterial species at a resolution of a few base pairs. We engineered a Tn5 derivative transposon (Tn5Pxyl) that carries at one end an inducible outward pointing Pxyl promoter (Christen et al, 2010). We showed that this transposon construct inserts into the genome randomly where it can activate or disrupt transcription at the site of integration, depending on the insertion orientation. DNA from hundred of thousands of transposon insertion sites reading outward into flanking genomic regions was parallel PCR amplified and sequenced by Illumina paired-end sequencing to locate the insertion site in each mutant strain (Figure 1). A single sequencing run on DNA from a mutagenized cell population yielded 118 million raw sequencing reads. Of these, >90 million (>80%) read outward from the transposon element into adjacent genomic DNA regions and the insertion site could be mapped with single nucleotide resolution. This yielded the location and orientation of 428 735 independent transposon insertions in the 4-Mbp Caulobacter genome. Within non-coding sequences of the Caulobacter genome, we detected 130 non-disruptable DNA segments between 90 and 393 bp long in addition to all essential promoter elements. Among 27 previously identified and validated sRNAs (Landt et al, 2008), three were contained within non-disruptable DNA segments and another three were partially disruptable, that is, insertions caused a notable growth defect. Two additional small RNAs found to be essential are the transfer-messenger RNA (tmRNA) and the ribozyme RNAseP (Landt et al, 2008). In addition to the 8 non-disruptable sRNAs, 29 out of the 130 intergenic essential non-coding sequences contained non-redundant tRNA genes; duplicated tRNA genes were non-essential. We also identified two non-disruptable DNA segments within the chromosomal origin of replication. Thus, we resolved essential non-coding RNAs, tRNAs and essential replication elements within the origin region of the chromosome. An additional 90 non-disruptable small genome elements of currently unknown function were identified. Eighteen of these are conserved in at least one closely related species. Only 2 could encode a protein of over 50 amino acids. For each of the 3876 annotated open reading frames (ORFs), we analyzed the distribution, orientation, and genetic context of transposon insertions. There are 480 essential ORFs and 3240 non-essential ORFs. In addition, there were 156 ORFs that severely impacted fitness when mutated. The 8-bp resolution allowed a dissection of the essential and non-essential regions of the coding sequences. Sixty ORFs had transposon insertions within a significant portion of their 3′ region but lacked insertions in the essential 5′ coding region, allowing the identification of non-essential protein segments. For example, transposon insertions in the essential cell-cycle regulatory gene divL, a tyrosine kinase, showed that the last 204 C-terminal amino acids did not impact viability, confirming previous reports that the C-terminal ATPase domain of DivL is dispensable for viability (Reisinger et al, 2007; Iniesta et al, 2010). In addition, we found that 30 out of 480 (6.3%) of the essential ORFs appear to be shorter than the annotated ORF, suggesting that these are probably mis-annotated. Among the 480 ORFs essential for growth on rich media, there were 10 essential transcriptional regulatory proteins, including 5 previously identified cell-cycle regulators (McAdams and Shapiro, 2003; Holtzendorff et al, 2004; Collier and Shapiro, 2007; Gora et al, 2010; Tan et al, 2010) and 5 uncharacterized predicted transcription factors. In addition, two RNA polymerase sigma factors RpoH and RpoD, as well as the anti-sigma factor ChrR, which mitigates rpoE-dependent stress response under physiological growth conditions (Lourenco and Gomes, 2009), were also found to be essential. Thus, a set of 10 transcription factors, 2 RNA polymerase sigma factors and 1 anti-sigma factor are the core essential transcriptional regulators for growth on rich media. To further characterize the core components of the Caulobacter cell-cycle control network, we identified all essential regulatory sequences and operon transcripts. Altogether, the 480 essential protein-coding and 37 essential RNA-coding Caulobacter genes are organized into operons such that 402 individual promoter regions are sufficient to regulate their expression. Of these 402 essential promoters, the transcription start sites (TSSs) of 105 were previously identified (McGrath et al, 2007). The essential genome features are non-uniformly distributed on the Caulobacter genome and enriched near the origin and the terminus regions. In contrast, the chromosomal positions of the published E. coli essential coding sequences (Rocha, 2004) are preferentially located at either side of the origin (Figure 4A). This indicates that there are selective pressures on chromosomal positioning of some essential elements (Figure 4A). The strategy described in this report could be readily extended to quickly determine the essential genome for a large class of bacterial species. Introduction In addition to protein-coding sequences, the essential genome of any organism contains essential structural elements, non-coding RNAs and regulatory sequences. We have identified the Caulobacter crescentus essential genome to 8 bp resolution by performing ultrahigh-resolution transposon mutagenesis followed by high-throughput DNA sequencing to determine the transposon insertion sites. A notable feature of C. crescentus is that the regulatory events that control polar differentiation and cell-cycle progression are highly integrated, and they occur in a temporally restricted order (McAdams and Shapiro, 2011). Many components of the core regulatory circuit have been identified and simulation of the circuitry has been reported (Shen et al, 2008). The identification of all essential DNA elements is essential for a complete understanding of the regulatory networks that run a bacterial cell. Essential protein-coding sequences have been reported for several bacterial species using relatively low-throughput transposon mutagenesis (Hutchison et al, 1999; Jacobs et al, 2003; Glass et al, 2006) and in-frame deletion libraries (Kobayashi et al, 2003; Baba et al, 2006). Two recent studies used high-throughput transposon mutagenesis for fitness and genetic interaction analysis (Langridge et al, 2009; van Opijnen et al, 2009). Here, we have reliably identified all essential coding and non-coding chromosomal elements, using a hyper-saturated transposon mutagenesis strategy that is scalable and can be extended to obtain rapid and highly accurate identification of the entire essential genome of any bacterial species at a resolution of a few base pairs. Results and discussion We engineered a Tn5 derivative transposon (Tn5Pxyl) that carries at one end an inducible outward pointing Pxyl promoter (Christen et al, 2010; Supplementary Figure 1A; Materials and methods). Thus, the Tn5Pxyl element can activate or disrupt transcription at any site of integration, depending on the insertion orientation. About 8 × 105 viable Tn5Pxyl transposon insertion mutants capable of colony formation on rich media (PYE) plates were pooled. Next, DNA from hundred of thousands of transposon insertion sites reading outwards into flanking genomic regions was parallel PCR amplified and sequenced by Illumina paired-end sequencing (Figure 1; Supplementary Figure 1B; Materials and methods). A single sequencing run yielded 118 million raw sequencing reads. Of these, >90 million (>80%) read outward from the transposon element into adjacent genomic DNA regions (Supplementary Figure 1C) and were subsequently mapped to the 4-Mbp genome, allowing us to determine the location and orientation of 428 735 independent transposon insertions with base-pair accuracy (Figure 2A; Materials and methods). Figure 1.Genomic high-resolution transposon scanning strategy. Insertion mutants are pooled to generate a hyper-saturated Tn5 mutant library. Subsequent parallel amplification of individual transposon junctions by a nested arbitrary PCR yields DNA fragments reading out of transposon elements into adjacent genomic DNA sequences. DNA fragments carry terminal adapters (orange, blue) compatible to the Illumina flow-cell and are sequenced in parallel by standard paired-end sequencing. Download figure Download PowerPoint Figure 2.Identification of essential genome features. (A) 28 735 unique Tn5 insertions sites (red) were mapped onto the 4-Mbp Caulobacter genome that encodes 3876 annotated ORFs shown in the inner (minus strand) and middle (plus strand) tracks by black lines. (B) An 192-bp essential genome segment (no Tn5 insertions) contains a stationary phase expressed non-coding sRNA (Landt et al, 2008). The rectangular heat map above shows the micro-array probe cross-correlation pattern of the sRNA (Landt et al, 2008). The locations of transposon insertions (red marks) are shown above the genome track. P-values for essentiality for the different gap sizes observed are below. (C) A small non-disruptable segment containing an essential tRNA. (D) Two non-disruptable genome regions include two regulatory sequences required for chromosome replication. (E) Locations of mapped transposon insertion sites (red marks) on a segment of the Caulobacter genome. Non-essential ORFs (blue) have dense Tn5 transposon insertions, while large non-disruptable genome regions contain essential ORFs (light red). For every non-disruptable genome region, a P-value for gene essentiality is calculated assuming uniform distributed Tn5 insertion frequency and neutral fitness costs. (F) For each of the 3876 Caulobacter ORFs, the number of Tn5 insertions is plotted against the corresponding ORF length. Non-essential ORFs (blue), fitness relevant ORFs (Supplementary information) (green) and essential ORFs (red) have different transposon insertion frequencies. (G) The essential cell-cycle gene divL had multiple transposon insertions within the 3′ tail. This dispensable region encodes parts of the histidine kinase domain as well as an ATPase domain that is non-essential. (H) One of the ORFs with mis-annotated start site. The essential cell-cycle gene chpT tolerates disruptive Tn5 insertions in the 5′ region of the mis-annotated ORF. The native promoter element and TSS are located downstream of the mis-annotated start codon as confirmed by lacZ promoter activity assays. Download figure Download PowerPoint Eighty percent of the genome sequence showed an ultrahigh density of transposon hits; an average of one insertion event every 7.65 bp. The largest gap detectable between consecutive insertions was 6% of all essential ORFs (30 out of 480) appear to be shorter than the annotated ORF (Supplementary Table 1), suggesting that these are probably mis-annotated, as well. Thus, 145 ORFs showed all regions were essential, 60 ORFs showed non-essential C-termini and the start of 30 ORFs were mis-annotated. The remaining 245 ORFs tolerated occasional insertions within a few amino acids of the ORF boundaries (Supplementary Figure 3; Materials and methods). The majority of the essential ORFs have annotated functions. They participate in diverse core cellular processes such as ribosome biogenesis, energy conversion, metabolism, cell division and cell-cycle control. Forty-nine of the essential proteins are of unknown function (Table I; Supplementary Table 2). We attempted to delete 11 of the genes encoding essential hypothetical proteins and recovered no in-frame deletions, confirming that these proteins are indeed essential (Supplementary Table 3). Table 1. The essential Caulobacter genome Quantity Size (bp) Fraction of genome (%)a Essential non-coding elements 130 14 991 0.37 Non-coding elements, unknown function 91 10 893 0.27 tRNAs 29 2312 0.06 Small non-coding RNAs 8 1488 0.04 Genome replication elements in the Cori 2 298 0.01 Essential ORFs 480 444 417 11.00 Metabolism 176 160 011 3.96 Ribosome function 95 76 420 1.89 Cell wall & membrane biogenesis 54 63 393 1.57 Proteins of unknown function 49 30 469 0.75 Cell cycle, division and DNA replication 43 52 322 1.29 Other cellular processes 39 36 017 0.89 Transcription 15 16 417 0.41 Signal transduction 9 9368 0.23 Essential promoter regions 402 33 533 0.83 Contained within intergenic sequences 210 13 150 0.33 Extending into upstream ORFs 101 11 428 0.28 Driving operons 91 8955 0.22 Essential Caulobacter genome 492 941 12.19 The identified essential non-coding, protein-coding and regulatory genome features are shown. a Fraction of the entire Caulobacter genome encoding essential elements. Among the 480 essential ORFs, there were 10 essential transcriptional regulatory proteins (Supplementary Table 4), including the cell-cycle regulators ctrA, gcrA, ccrM, sciP and dnaA (McAdams and Shapiro, 2003; Holtzendorff et al, 2004; Collier and Shapiro, 2007; Gora et al, 2010; Tan et al, 2010), plus 5 uncharacterized putative transcription factors. We surmise that these five uncharacterized transcription factors either comprise transcriptional activators of essential genes or repressed genes that would move the cell out of its replicative state. In addition, two RNA polymerase sigma factors RpoH and RpoD, as well as the anti-sigma factor ChrR, which mitigates rpoE-dependent stress response under physiological growth conditions (Lourenco and Gomes, 2009), were also found to be essential. Thus, a set of 10 transcription factors, 2 RNA polymerase sigma factors and 1 anti-sigma factor comprise the essential core transcriptional regulators for growth on rich media. Essential promoter elements To characterize the core components of the Caulobacter cell-cycle control network, we identified essential regulatory sequences and operon transcripts (Supplementary Data-DT3 and DT4). Figure 3A illustrates the transposon scanning strategy used to locate essential promoter sequences. The promoter regions of 210 essential genes were fully contained within the upstream intergenic sequences, and promoter regions of 101 essential genes extended upstream into flanking ORFs (Table I). We also identified 206 essential genes that are co-transcribed with the corresponding flanking gene(s) and experimentally mapped 91 essential operon transcripts (Table I; Supplementary Data-DT4). One example of an essential operon is the transcript encoding ATPase synthase components (Figure 3B). Altogether, the 480 essential protein-coding and 37 essential RNA-coding Caulobacter genes are organized into operons such that 402 individual promoter regions are sufficient to regulate their expression (Table I). Of these 402 essential promoters, the transcription start sites (TSSs) of 105 were previously identified (McGrath et al, 2007). Figure 3.Genome-wide identification of essential gene regulatory sequences. (A) Transposon insertions within the promoter region of an essential gene are only viable if the transposon-specific promoter points toward the gene (sense insertion); insertions in the opposite orientation (anti-sense insertions) are lethal. The distance between the annotated start codon and the first detected occurrence of an anti-sense insertion within the upstream region of an essential gene defines its essential promoter region. (B) Anti-sense insertions (red marks below genome track) are absent throughout the entire ATP synthase operon while sense insertions (red marks above genome track) are only tolerated within the non-essential lead gene and within non-coding regions of co-transcribed downstream genes. (C) Lengths of promoter regions that extend upstream of predicted transcriptional start sites. (D) Size distribution of essential promoter regions. The cell-cycle master regulators ctrA, dnaA and gcrA, which are subjected to complex cell cycle-dependent regulation, ranked among the longest essential promoter regions identified. (E) Essential cell cycle-regulated genes are clustered according to their temporal expression profile. Essential genes with long essential promoter regions indicate cell-cycle hub nodes subjected to complex transcriptional regulation. (F) Only insertions in the sense strand (red lines above the genome track) are tolerated within the 171 bp long essential promoter region of the cell-cycle master regulator ctrA. Insertions in the anti-sense strand (red lines below the genome track) are absent from the essential ctrA promoter. Both transcription start sites (arrows P1, P2), two DNA binding sites for CtrA (gray boxes) and one of two reported binding site for the SciP transcription factor (yellow boxes) are contained within the identified essential promoter region. Download figure Download PowerPoint We found that 79/105 essential promoter regions extended on average 53 bp upstream beyond previously identified TSS (Figure 3C; McGrath et al, 2007). These essential control elements accommodate binding sites for transcription factors and RNA polymerase sigma factors (Supplementary Table 5). Of the 402 essential promoter regions, 26 mapped downstream of the predicted TSS. To determine if these contained an additional TSS, we fused the newly identified promoter regions with lacZ and found that 24 contained an additional TSS (Supplementary Table 6). Therefore, 24 genes contain at least 2 TSS and only the downstream site was found to be essential during growth on rich media. The upstream TSS may be required under alternative growth conditions. Cell cycle-regulated essential genes Of the essential ORFs, 84 have a cell cycle-dependent transcription pattern (McGrath et al, 2007; Supplementary Data-DT5). The cell cycle-regulated essential genes had statistically significant longer promoter regions compared with non-cell cycle-regulated genes (median length 87 versus 41 bp, Mann–Whitney test, P-value 0.0018). The genes with longer promoter regions generally have more complex transcriptional control. Among these are key genes that are critical for the commitment to energy requirements and regulatory controls for cell-cycle progression. For example, the cell-cycle master regulators ctrA, dnaA and gcrA (Collier et al, 2006) ranked among the genes with the longest essential promoter regions (Figure 3D and E; Supplementary Data-DT5). Other essential cell cycle-regulated genes with exceptionally long essential promoters included ribosomal genes, gyrB encoding DNA gyrase and the ftsZ cell-division gene (Figure 3E). The essential promoter region of ctrA extended 171 bp upstream of the start codon (Figure 3F) and included two previously characterized promoters that control its transcription by both positive and negative feedback regulation (Domian et al, 1999; Tan et al, 2010). Only one of the two upstream SciP binding sites in the ctrA promoter (Tan et al, 2010) was contained within the essential promoter region (Figure 3F), suggesting that the regulatory function of the second SciP binding site upstream is non-essential for growth on rich media. Altogether, the essential Caulobacter genome contains at least 492 941 bp. Essential protein-coding sequences comprise 90% of the essential genome. The remaining 10% consists of essential non-coding RNA sequences, gene regulatory elements and essential genome replication features (Table I). Essential genome features are non-uniformly distributed along the Caulobacter genome and enriched near the origin and the terminus regions, indicating that there are constraints on the chromosomal positioning of essential elements (Figure 4A). The chromosomal positions of the published E. coli essential coding sequences are preferentially located at either side of the origin (Figure 4A; Rocha, 2004). Figure 4.Chromosomal distribution of essential transcripts and phylogenetic conservation of essential Caulobacter ORFs. (A) Chromosome distribution of essential transcripts and ORFs found within a 500-kb window. Top panel: Essential Caulobacter transcripts are non-uniformly distributed and are enriched near the replication origin (ori) and terminus (ter) regions of the chromosome. The P-values for enrichment of essential Caulobacter ORFs (middle panel) and E. coli ORFs (bottom panel) are graphed as a function of chromosomal position. Inserts show a schematic representation of the corresponding circular chromosomes indicating regions of enrichment in red. (B) A heat map showing the sequence conservation of essential Caulobacter proteins across the α, β, γ, δ and ε classes of proteobacteria. Highly conserved essential proteins are in red while poorly conserved proteins are in black. (C) Venn diagram of overlap between Caulobacter and E. coli ORFs (outer circles) as well as their subsets of essential ORFs (inner circles). Less than 38% of essential Caulobacter ORFs are conserved and essential in E. coli. Only essential Caulobacter ORFs present in the STING database were considered, leading to a small disparity in the total number of essential Caulobacter ORFs. Download figure Download PowerPoint The question of what genes constitute the minimum set required for prokaryotic life has been generally estimated by comparative essentiality analysis (Carbone, 2006) and for a few species experimentally via large-scale gene perturbation studies (Akerley et al, 1998; Hutchison et al, 1999; Kobayashi et al, 2003; Salama et al, 2004). Of the 480 essential Caulobacter ORFs, 38% are absent in most species outside the α-proteobacteria and 10% are unique to Caulobacter (Figure 4B). Interestingly, among 320 essential Caulobacter proteins that are conserved in E. coli, more than one third are non-essential (Figure 4C). The variations in essential gene complements relate to differences in bacterial physiology and life style. For example, ATP synthase components are essential for Caulobacter, but not for E. coli, since Caulobacter cannot produce ATP through fermentation. Thus, the essentiality of a gene is also defined by non-local properties that not only depend on its own function but also on the functions of all other essential elements in the genome. The strategy described here provides a direct experimental approach that, because of its simplicity and general applicability, can be used to quickly determine the essential genome for a large class of bacterial species. Materials and methods Supplementary information includes descriptions of (i) transposon construction and mutagenesis, (ii) DNA library preparation and sequencing, (iii) sequence processing, (iv) essentiality analysis and (v) statistical data analysis. Acknowledgements This research was supported by DOE Office of Science grant DE-FG02-05ER64136 to HM; NIH grants K25 GM070972-01A2 to MF, R01, GM51426k, R01 GM32506 and GM073011-04 to LS; Swiss National Foundation grant PA00P3-126243 to BC and the L&Th. La Roche Foundation Fellowship to BC. Author contributions: BC designed the research. BC, EA, VSK and MJF performed the experiments and analysis. BC, JMC, BP and JAC performed the sequencing and related analysis. BC, EA, HHM and LS wrote the manuscript. Conflict of Interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Supporting Information Supplementary Information Supplementary Figures S1–3, Supplementary Tables S1–7 (PDF document, 582.9 KB) Dataset 1 Excel file containing several Supplemental data tables in different worksheets (application/xls, 1.1 MB) Review Process File (PDF document, 209.3 KB) References Akerley BJ, Rubin EJ, Camilli A, Lampe DJ, Robertson HM, Mekalanos JJ (1998) Systematic identification of essential genes by in vitro mariner mutagenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 8927–8932CrossrefCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Baba T, Ara T, Hasegawa M, Takai Y, Okumura Y, Baba M, Datsenko KA, Tomita M, Wanner BL, Mori H (2006) Construction of Escherichia coli K-12 in-frame, single-gene knockout mutants: the Keio collection. Mol Syst Biol 2: 2006 0008Wiley Online LibraryPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Biondi EG, Reisinger SJ, Skerker JM, Arif M, Perchuk BS, Ryan KR, Laub MT (2006) Regulation of the bacterial cell cycle by an integrated genetic circuit. Nature 444: 899–904CrossrefCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Carbone A (2006) Computational prediction of genomic functional cores specific to different microbes. J Mol Evol 63: 733–746CrossrefCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Christen B, Fero MJ, Hillson NJ, Bowman G, Hong SH, Shapiro L, McAdams HH (2010) High-throughput identification of protein localization dependency networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107: 4681–4686CrossrefCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Collier J, Murray SR, Shapiro L (2006) DnaA couples DNA replication and the expression of two cell cycle master regulators. EMBO J 25: 346–356Wiley Online LibraryCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Collier J, Shapiro L (2007) Spatial complexity and control of a bacterial cell cycle. Curr Opin Biotechnol 18: 333–340CrossrefCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Domian IJ, Reisenauer A, Shapiro L (1999) Feedback control of a master bacterial cell-cycle regulator. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 6648–6653CrossrefCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Glass JI, Assad-Garcia N, Alperovich N, Yooseph S, Lewis MR, Maruf M, Hutchison CA, Smith HO, Venter JC (2006) Essential genes of a minimal bacterium. Proc Natl Acad Sc USA 103: 425–430CrossrefCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Gora KG, Tsokos CG, Chen YE, Srinavasan BS, Perchuk BS, Laub MT (2010) A cell-type-specific protein-protein interaction modulates transcriptional activity of a master regulator in Caulobacter crescentus. Mol Cell 39: 455–467CrossrefCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Holtzendorff J, Hung D, Brende P, Reisenauer A, Viollier PH, McAdams HH, Shapiro L (2004) Oscillating global regulators control the genetic circuit driving a bacterial cell cycle. Science 304: 983–987CrossrefCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Hutchison CA, Peterson SN, Gill SR, Cline RT, White O, Fraser CM, Smith HO, Venter JC (1999) Global transposon mutagenesis and a minimal Mycoplasma genome. Science 286: 2165–2169CrossrefCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Iniesta AA, Hillson NJ, Shapiro L (2010) Cell pole-specific activation of a critical bacterial cell cycle kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107: 7012–7017CrossrefCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Jacobs MA, Alwood A, Thaipisuttikul I, Spencer D, Haugen E, Ernst S, Will O, Kaul R, Raymond C, Levy R, Chun-Rong L, Guenthner D, Bovee D, Olson MV, Manoil C (2003) Comprehensive transposon mutant library of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 14339–14344CrossrefCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Kobayashi K, Ehrlich SD, Albertini A, Amati G, Andersen KK, Arnaud M, Asai K, Ashikaga S, Aymerich S, Bessieres P, Boland F, Brignell SC, Bron S, Bunai K, Chapuis J, Christiansen LC, Danchin A, Debarbouille M, Dervyn E, Deuerling E et al (2003) Essential Bacillus subtilis genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 4678–4683CrossrefCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Landt SG, Abeliuk E, McGrath PT, Lesley JA, McAdams HH, Shapiro L (2008) Small non-coding RNAs in Caulobacter crescentus. Mol Microbiol 68: 600–614Wiley Online LibraryCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Langridge GC, Phan MD, Turner DJ, Perkins TT, Parts L, Haase J, Charles I, Maskell DJ, Peters SE, Dougan G, Wain J, Parkhill J, Turner AK (2009) Simultaneous assay of every Salmonella typhi gene using one million transposon mutants. Genome Res 19: 2308–2316CrossrefCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Lourenco RF, Gomes SL (2009) The transcriptional response to cadmium, organic hydroperoxide, singlet oxygen and UV-A mediated by the sigmaE-ChrR system in Caulobacter crescentus. Mol Microbiol 72: 1159–1170Wiley Online LibraryCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Marczynski GT, Lentine K, Shapiro L (1995) A developmentally regulated chromosomal origin of replication uses essential transcription elements. Genes Dev 9: 1543–1557CrossrefCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar McAdams HH, Shapiro L (2003) A bacterial cell-cycle regulatory network operating in time and space. Science 301: 1874–1877CrossrefCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar McAdams HH, Shapiro L (2011) The architecture and conservation pattern of whole-cell control circuitry. J Mol Biol 409: 28–35CrossrefCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar McGrath PT, Lee H, Zhang L, Iniesta AA, Hottes AK, Tan MH, Hillson NJ, Hu P, Shapiro L, McAdams HH (2007) High-throughput identification of transcription start sites, conserved promoter motifs and predicted regulons. Nat Biotechnol 25: 584–592CrossrefCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Reisinger SJ, Huntwork S, Viollier PH, Ryan KR (2007) DivL performs critical cell cycle functions in Caulobacter crescentus independent of kinase activity. J Bacteriol 189: 8308–8320CrossrefCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Rocha EP (2004) The replication-related organization of bacterial genomes. Microbiology 150: 1609–1627CrossrefCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Salama NR, Shepherd B, Falkow S (2004) Global transposon mutagenesis and essential gene analysis of Helicobacter pylori. J Bacteriol 186: 7926–7935CrossrefCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Shen X, Collier J, Dill D, Shapiro L, Horowitz M, McAdams HH (2008) Architecture and inherent robustness of a bacterial cell-cycle control system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 11340–11345CrossrefCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Tan MH, Kozdon JB, Shen X, Shapiro L, McAdams HH (2010) An essential transcription factor, SciP, enhances robustness of Caulobacter cell cycle regulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107: 18985–18990CrossrefCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar van Opijnen T, Bodi KL, Camilli A (2009) Tn-seq: high-throughput parallel sequencing for fitness and genetic interaction studies in microorganisms. Nat Methods 6: 767–772CrossrefCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Previous ArticleNext Article Volume 7Issue 11 January 2011In this issue FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsLoading ...
Referência(s)