Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Smiling in the rain: Seven reasons to be positive about uncertainty in hydrological modelling

2012; Wiley; Volume: 27; Issue: 7 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1002/hyp.9625

1099-1085

John Juston, A. Kauffeldt, B. Quesada Montano, Jan Seibert, Keith Beven, Ida Westerberg,

Hydrological Forecasting Using AI

Hydrological ProcessesVolume 27, Issue 7 p. 1117-1122 Invited Commentary Smiling in the rain: Seven reasons to be positive about uncertainty in hydrological modelling John M. Juston, Corresponding Author John M. Juston KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Land and Water Resources Engineering, Stockholm, Sweden Correspondence to: John M. Juston, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Land and Water Resources Engineering, Stockholm, Sweden. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorAnna Kauffeldt, Anna Kauffeldt Uppsala University, Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala, SwedenSearch for more papers by this authorBeatriz Quesada Montano, Beatriz Quesada Montano Uppsala University, Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden University of Costa Rica, Centre for Geophysical Research, San José, Costa RicaSearch for more papers by this authorJan Seibert, Jan Seibert University of Zurich, Department of Geography, Zurich, Switzerland Uppsala University, Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden Stockholm University, Department of Physical Geography and Quaternary Geology, Stockholm, SwedenSearch for more papers by this authorKeith J. Beven, Keith J. Beven Lancaster University, Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster, UK Uppsala University, Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden ECHO, EPFL, Lausanne, SwitzerlandSearch for more papers by this authorIda K. Westerberg, Ida K. Westerberg Uppsala University, Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute, Stockholm, SwedenSearch for more papers by this author John M. Juston, Corresponding Author John M. Juston KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Land and Water Resources Engineering, Stockholm, Sweden Correspondence to: John M. Juston, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Land and Water Resources Engineering, Stockholm, Sweden. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorAnna Kauffeldt, Anna Kauffeldt Uppsala University, Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala, SwedenSearch for more papers by this authorBeatriz Quesada Montano, Beatriz Quesada Montano Uppsala University, Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden University of Costa Rica, Centre for Geophysical Research, San José, Costa RicaSearch for more papers by this authorJan Seibert, Jan Seibert University of Zurich, Department of Geography, Zurich, Switzerland Uppsala University, Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden Stockholm University, Department of Physical Geography and Quaternary Geology, Stockholm, SwedenSearch for more papers by this authorKeith J. Beven, Keith J. Beven Lancaster University, Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster, UK Uppsala University, Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden ECHO, EPFL, Lausanne, SwitzerlandSearch for more papers by this authorIda K. Westerberg, Ida K. Westerberg Uppsala University, Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute, Stockholm, SwedenSearch for more papers by this author This commentary is dedicated to the memory of Lars-Christer Lundin (1956–2012), Professor of Hydrology at Uppsala University, who was an inspiration in being positive as a researcher and in seeing opportunities rather than difficulties in the analysis and management of catchments. First published: 31 October 2012 https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9625Citations: 41Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat References AghaKouchak A, Nakhjiri N, Habib E. 2012. An educational model for ensemble streamflow simulation and uncertainty analysis. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions 9: 7297–7315. Beven KJ. 2002. Towards an alternative blueprint for a physically based digitally simulatedhydrologic response modelling system. Hydrological Processes 16(2): 189–206. Beven KJ. 2011. I believe in climate change but how precautionary do we need to be in planning for the future? Hydrological Processes 25: 1517–1520. DOI: 10.1002/hyp.7939 Beven KJ. 2012. Causal models as multiple working hypotheses about environmental processes. Comptes Rendus Geoscience, Académie de Sciences, Paris. DOI: 10.1016/j.crte.2012.01.005 Beven KJ, Binley AM. 1992. The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. Hydrological Processes 6: 279–298. Beven KJ, Westerberg I. 2011. On red herrings and real herrings: disinformation and information in hydrological inference. Hydrological Processes 25: 1676–1680. DOI: 10.1002/hyp.7963 Beven KJ, Smith, PJ, Freer JE. 2008. So just why would a modeller choose to be incoherent. Journal of Hydrology 354: 15–32. Beven KJ, Smith PJ, Wood A. 2011. On the colour and spin of epistemic error (and what we might do about it). Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 15: 3123–3133. Birkel C, Tetzlaff D, Dunn SM, Soulsby C. 2010. Towards a simple dynamic process conceptualization in rainfall-runoff models using multi-criteria calibration and tracers in temperate, upland catchments. Hydrological Processes 24: 260–275. Blazkova S, Beven KE. 2009. A limits of acceptability approach to model evaluation and uncertainty estimation in flood frequency estimation by continuous simulation: Skalka catchment, Czech Republic. Water Resources Research 45. DOI: 10.1029/2007WR006726 Box GE. 1976. Science and statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association 71(356): 791–799. Brath A, Montanari A, Toth E. 2004. Analysis of the effects of different scenarios of historical data availability on the calibration of a spatially-distributed hydrological model. Journal of Hydrology 291(3-4): 232–253. Brunner P, Doherty J, Simmons CT. 2012. Uncertainty assessment and implications for data acquisition in support of integrated hydrologic models. Water Resources Research 48: W07513. DOI: 10.1029/2011WR011342 Bulygina N, McIntyre N, Wheater H. 2009. Conditioning rainfall-runoff model parameters for ungauged catchments and land management impacts analysis. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 13(6): 893–904. Chatfield C. 1995. Model uncertainty, data mining and statistical inference. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A 158: 419–466. Fenicia F, McDonnell JJ, Savenije HHG. 2008. Learning from model improvement: On the contribution of complimentary data to process understanding. Water Resources Research 44: W06419. Frewer L, Hunt S, Brennan M, Kuznesof S, Ness M, Ritson C. 2003. The views of scientific experts on how the public conceptualize uncertainty. Journal of Risk Research 6(1): 75–85. Gelatt HB. 1989. Positive uncertainty: a new decision-making framework for counceling. Journal of Counceling Psychology 36(2): 252–256. Grayson RB, Moore ID, Mcmahon TA. 1992. Physically Based Hydrologic Modeling.2. Is the Concept Realistic. Water Resources Research 28(10): 2659–2666. Hamilton AS, Moore RD. 2012. Quantifying Uncertainty in Streamflow Records. Canadian Water Resources Journal 37(1): 3–21. Hughes DA, Sawunyama T, Kapangaziwiri E. 2008. Incorporating estimation uncertainty into water resource development planning in ungauged basins in southern Africa. In: Sustainable Hydrology for the 21st Century, Proc. 10th BHS National Hydrology Symposium, Exeter. Jacob M, Hellström T. 2000. Policy understanding of science, public trust and the BSE-CJD crisis. Journal of Hazardous Materials 78: 303–317. Juston J, Seibert J, Johansson, P-O. 2009. Temporal sampling strategies and uncertainty in calibrating a conceptual hydrological model for a small boreal catchment. Hydrological Processes 23: 3093–3109. Juston JM, Andrèn O, Kätterer T, Jansson P-E. 2010. Uncertainty analyses for calibrating a soil carbon balance model to agricultural field trial data in Sweden and Kenya. Ecological Modelling 221: 1880–1888. Kirchner JW. 2006. Getting the right answers for the right reasons: Linking measurements, analyses, and models to advance the science of hydrology. Water Resources Research 42( 3): W03S04. DOI: 10.1029/2005wr004362 Klemeš V. 1986. Dilettantism in Hydrology - Transition or Destiny. Water Resources Research 22(9): 177S–188S. Konz M, Seibert J. 2010. On the value of glacier mass balances for hydrological model calibration. Journal of Hydrology 385: 238–246. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.02.025 Krueger T, Freer J, Quinton JN, Macleod CJA, Bilotta GS, Brazier RE, Butler P, Haygarth PM. 2010. Ensemble evaluation of hydrological model hypotheses. Water Resources Research 46: W07516. DOI: 10.1029/2009WR00784 Lerat J, Andréassian V, Perrin C, Vaze J, Perraud JM, Ribstein P, Loumagne C. 2012. Do internal flow measurements improve the calibration of rainfall-runoff models? Water Resources Research 48, W02511. DOI: 10.1029/2010WR010179 McMillan H, Freer J, Pappenberger F, Krueger T, Clark M. 2010. Impacts of uncertain river flow data on rainfall-runoff model calibration and discharge predictions. Hydrological Processes 24(10): 1270–1284. McMillan H, Krueger K, Freer J. 2012. Benchmarking observational uncertainties for hydrology: Rainfall, river discharge and water quality. Hydrological Processes. DOI: 10.1002/hyp.9384 Pappenberger F, Beven KJ. 2006. Ignorance is bliss: 7 reasons not to use uncertainty analysis. Water Resources Research 42: W05302. DOI: 10.1029/2005WR004820, 2006 Pappenberger F, Stephens E, Thielen J, Salamon P, Demeritt D, van Andel SJ, Wetterhall F, Alfieri L. 2012. Visualising probabilistic flood forecast information: expert preferences and perceptions of best practice in uncertainty communication. Hydrological Processes. DOI: 10.1002/hyp.9253 Refsgaard JC, van der Sluijs JP, Brown J, van der Keur P. 2006. A framework for dealing with uncertainty due to model structure error. Advances in Water Resources 29: 1586–1597. Reusser DE, Zehe E. 2011. Inferring model structural deficits by analyzing temporal dynamics of model performance and parameter sensititvity. Water Resources Research 47: W07550. Roth D, Warner J. 2007. Flood risk, uncertainty and changing river protection policy in the Netherlands: the case of the 'calamity polders'. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 98(4): 519–525. Seibert J. 2000. Multi-criteria calibration of a conceptual rainfall-runoff model using a genetic algorithm. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 4(2): 215–224. Seibert J, Beven KJ. 2009. Gauging the ungauged basin: how many discharge measurements are needed? Hydrology and Earth Science Systems 13: 883–892. Seibert J, McDonnell JJ. 2002. On the dialog between experimentalist and modeler in catchment hydrology: Use of soft data for multicriteria model calibration. Water Resources Research 38(11): 1241. Seibert J, McDonnell JJ. 2010. Land-cover impacts on streamflow: A change-detection modeling approach that incorporates parameter uncertainty. Hydrological Sciences Journal 55(3): 316–332. Singh R, Wagener T, van Werkhoven K, Mann ME, Crane R. 2011. A trading-space-for-time approach to probabilistic continuous streamflow predictions in a changing climate – accounting for changing watershed behaviour. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 15: 3591–3603. Sivapalan M, Takeuchi K, Franks SW, Gupta VK, Karambiri H, Lakshmi V, Liang X, McDonnell JJ, Mendiondo EM, O'Connell PE, Oki T, Pomeroy JW, Schertzer D, Uhlenbrook S, Zehe E. 2003. IAHS decade on Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB), 2003-2012: Shaping an exciting future for the hydrological sciences. Hydrological Sciences Journal-Journal Des Sciences Hydrologiques 48(6): 857–880. Stephens GL, Kummerow CD. 2007. The remote sensing of clouds and precipitation from space: A review. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 64(11): 3742–3765. Thyer M, Renard B, Kavetski D, Kuczera G, Franks SW, Srikanthan S. 2009. Critical evaluation of parameter consistency and predictive uncertainty in hydrological modeling: A case study using Bayesian total error analysis. Water Resources Research 45: W00b14. DOI: 10.1029/2008wr006825 Treagust DF, Chittleborough G, Mamiala TL. 2002. Students' understanding of the role of scientific models in learning science. International Journal of Science Education 24(4): 357–368. Viney NR, Bates BC. 2004. It never rains on Sunday: The prevalence and implications of untagged multi-day rainfall accumulations in the Australian high quality data set. International Journal of Climatology 24(9): 1171–1192. Vrugt JA, Bouten W, Gupta HV, Sorooshian S. 2002. Toward improved identifiability of hydrologic model parameters: The information content of experimental data. Water Resources Research 38(12): 1312. DOI: 10.1029/2001WR001118, 2002 Wagener T, Montanari A. 2011. Convergence of approaches toward reducing uncertainty in predictions in ungauged basins. Water Resources Research 47: W06301. Wagener T, Kelleher C, Weiler M, McGlynn B, Gooseff M, Marshall L, Meixner T, McGuire K, Gregg S, Sharma P, Zappe S. 2012. It takes a community to raise a hydrologist: the Modular Curriculum for Hydrologic Advancement (MOCHA). Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions 9: 2321–2356. Wardekker JA, Van der Sluijs JP, Janssen PHM, Kloprogge P, Petersen AC. 2008. Uncertainty communication in environmental assessments: views from the Dutch science-policy interface. Environmental Science & Policy 11: 627–641. Westerberg IK, Walther A, Guerrero J-L, Coello Z, Halldin S, Xu CY, Chen D, Lundin L-C. 2010. Precipitation data in a mountainous catchment in Honduras: quality assessment and spatiotemporal characteristics. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Climatology 101: 381–396. Westerberg IK, Guerrero J-L, Younger PM, Beven KJ, Seibert J, Halldin S, Freer JE, Xu C-Y. 2011. Calibration of hydrologic models using flow-duration curves. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 7: 9467–9522. Wilby R, Dessai S. 2010. Robust adaptation to climate change. Weather 65: 180–185. Winsemius HC, Schaefli B, Montanari A, Savenije HHG. 2009. On the calibration of hydrological models in ungauged basins: A framework for integrating hard and soft hydrological information. Water Resources Research 45: W12422. DOI: 10.1029/2009wr007706 Yadav M, Wagener T, Gupta H. 2007. Regionalization of constraints on expected watershed response behavior for improved predictions in ungauged basins. Advances in Water Resources 30(8): 1756–1774. Citing Literature Volume27, Issue730 March 2013Pages 1117-1122 This article also appears in:HPToday: Invited Commentaries ReferencesRelatedInformation