Comparison of the Ames II and traditional Ames test responses with respect to mutagenicity, strain specificities, need for metabolism and correlation with rodent carcinogenicity
2009; Oxford University Press; Volume: 24; Issue: 4 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1093/mutage/gep017
ISSN1464-3804
AutoresMarkus Kamber, Sini Flückiger‐Isler, G. Engelhardt, R. Jaeckh, Errol Zeiger,
Tópico(s)Genetically Modified Organisms Research
ResumoThe Ames II Salmonella mutagenicity assay procedure was used to test 71 chemicals, and the results were compared with those from the traditional Ames Salmonella test using the NTP database as the reference. All Ames II tests were performed using a fluctuation procedure in microplate format, using TAMix for the detection of base pair substitutions and TA98 to detect frameshift mutations. There was 84% agreement between the two procedures in identifying mutagens and non-mutagens, which is equivalent to the intra- and interlaboratory reproducibility of 87% for the traditional test. The two tests also performed similarly in their predictions of rodent carcinogenicity.
Referência(s)