Guest editorial: Improving the interpretation and reporting of quantitative research
1998; Wiley; Volume: 35; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1002/(sici)1098-2736(199803)35
ISSN1098-2736
Autores Tópico(s)Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
ResumoJournal of Research in Science TeachingVolume 35, Issue 3 p. 237-248 EditorialFree Access Guest editorial: Improving the interpretation and reporting of quantitative research Léonie J. Rennie, Corresponding Author Léonie J. Rennie Science and Mathematics Education Center, Curtin University of Technology, GPO Box U1987, Perth, Western Australia 6845Science and Mathematics Education Center, Curtin University of Technology, GPO Box U1987, Perth, Western Australia 6845Search for more papers by this author Léonie J. Rennie, Corresponding Author Léonie J. Rennie Science and Mathematics Education Center, Curtin University of Technology, GPO Box U1987, Perth, Western Australia 6845Science and Mathematics Education Center, Curtin University of Technology, GPO Box U1987, Perth, Western Australia 6845Search for more papers by this author First published: 07 December 1998 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199803)35:3 3.0.CO;2-SCitations: 37AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL References Amabile, T. M. (1982). Conversation I: The gap between teachers and researchers. In T. M. Amabile & M. L. Stubbs (Eds.), Psychological research in the classroom: Issues for educators and reseachers (pp. 9– 20). New York: Pergamon Press. Amabile, T. M., & Stubbs, M. L. (1982). Psychological research in the classroom: Issues for educators and researchers. New York: Pergamon Press. American Psychological Association. (1995). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association ( 4th ed.). Washington DC: Author. Anderson, R. D., Kahl, S. R., Glass, G. V., & Smith, M. L. (1983). Science education: A meta-analysis of major questions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 379– 385. Asher, W. (1993). The role of statistics in research. The Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 388– 392. Behrens, J. (1997, March). The logical and historical bases and inferential limitations of confidence intervals. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago. Bourke, S. (1993). Babies, bath water and straw persons: A response to Menon. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 5, 19– 22. Caliendo, S. M., & Kyle, W. C., Jr. (1996). Establishing the theoretical frame. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 225– 227. Carver, R. P. (1978). The case against statistical significance testing. Harvard Educational Review, 48, 378– 399. Carver, R. P. (1993). The case against statistical significance testing, revisited. The Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 287– 292. Clements, M. A. (1993). Statistical significance testing: Providing historical perspective for Menon's paper. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 5, 23– 27. Cohen, J. (1994). The Earth is round (p<.05). American Psychologist, 49, 997– 1003. Daniel, L. G. (1997, March). Statistical significance testing in Educational and Psychological Measurement and other journals. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago. Dugan, J., Huston, D., Franz, S., & Izzo, R. (1997, March). How confidence intervals are used in educational research. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago. Dunlap, W. P., Cortina, J. M., Vaslow, J. B., & Burke, M. J. (1996). Meta-analysis of experiments with matched groups or repeated measures designs. Psychological Methods, 1, 170– 177. Edwards, W., Lindman, H., & Savage, L. J. (1963). Bayesian statistical inference for psychological research. Psychological Review, 70, 193– 242. Glass, G. V. (1977). Integrating findings: The meta-analysis of research. Review of Research in Education, 5, 351– 379. Glass, G. V. (1982). Meta-analysis: An approach to the synthesis of research results. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 19, 93– 112. Huberty, C. J. (1987). On statistical testing. Educational Researcher, 16, 4– 9. Huberty, C. J. (1993). Historical origins of statistical testing practices: The treatment of Fisher versus Neyman-Pearson views in textbooks. The Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 317– 333. Kirk, R. E. (1996). Practical significance: A concept whose time has come. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 746– 759. Koballa, T., Jr. (1997). Two communities: One challenge. Address from exiting President of NARST. NARST News, 40, 3– 4. Krockover, G. H., & Shepardson, D. P. (1995). Editorial: The missing links in gender equity research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 223– 224. Kyle, W. C., Jr., Abell, S. K., & Roth, W.-M. (1992). Toward a mature discipline of science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 1015– 1018. Lazarowitz, R., Hertz-Lazarowitz, R., & Baird, J. H. (1994). Learning science in a cooperative setting: Academic achievement and affective outcomes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 1121– 1131. Lazarowitz, R., Hertz-Lazarowitz, R., & Baird, J. H. (1996). Reply: Learning and teaching science in the classroom: New settings and statistical comments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 681– 683. Lederman, N. G. (1992). You can't do it by arithmetic, you have to do it by algebra! Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 1011– 1014. Levin, J. R. (1993). Statistical significance testing from three perspectives. The Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 378– 382. Menon, R. (1993a). Statistical significance testing should be discontinued in mathematics education research. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 5, 4– 18. Menon, R. (1993b). Take off those blinkers, mate! Response to Bourke, Clements and Rowley. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 5, 30– 33. Pekarek, R., Krockover, G. H., & Shepardson, D. P. (1996). The research-practice gap in science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 111– 113. Plucker, J. A., & Ball, D. (1996). Comment on "Learning science in a cooperative setting: Academic achievement and affective outcomes." Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 677– 679. Robinson, D. H., & Levin, J. R. (1997). Reflections on statistical and substantive significance, with a slice of replication. Educational Researcher, 26, 21– 26. Rowley, G. (1993). Response to Menon. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 5, 28– 29. Schafer, W. D. (1993). Interpreting statistical significance and nonsignificance. The Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 383– 387. Schmidt, F. L. (1996). Statistical significance testing and cumulative knowledge in psychology: Implications for training of researchers. Psychological Methods, 1, 15– 129. Serlin, R. C. (1993). Confidence intervals and the scientific method: A case for Holm on the range. The Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 350– 360. Shaver, J. P. (1985a). Chance and nonsense: A conversation about interpreting tests of significance: Part 1. Phi Delta Kappan, 67, 57– 60. Shaver, J. P. (1985b). Chance and nonsense: A conversation about interpreting tests of significance: Part 2. Phi Delta Kappan, 67, 138– 141. Erratum, 1986, Phi Delta Kappan, 67, 624. Shaver, J. P. (1993). What statistical significance testing is, and what it is not. The Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 293– 316. Shymansky, J. A., & Kyle, W. C., Jr. (1992). Establishing a research agenda: Critical issues of science curriculum reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 749– 778. Snyder, P., & Lawson, S. (1993). Evaluating results using corrected and uncorrected effect size estimates. The Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 334– 349. Stubbs, M. L. (1982). Conversation II: Issues in the application of research results. In T. M. Amabile & M. L. Stubbs (Eds.), Psychological research in the classroom: Issues for educators and researchers (pp. 21– 35). New York: Pergamon Press. Tatsuoka, M. (1993). Effect size. In G. Keren & C. Lewis (Eds.), A handbook for data analysis in the behavioral sciences: Methodological issues (pp. 461– 479). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Thompson, B. (1994a). Guidelines for authors. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 837– 847. Thompson, B. (1994b). The pivotal role of replication in psychological research: Empirically evaluating the replicability of sample results. Journal of Personality, 62, 157– 175. Thompson, B. (1996). AERA editorial policies regarding statistical significance testing: Three suggested reforms. Educational Researcher, 25, 26– 30. Thompson, B. (1997). Editorial policies regarding statistical significance tests: Further comments. Educational Researcher, 26, 29– 32. Thompson, B. (Ed.). (1993). Statistical significance testing in contemporary practice: Some proposed alternatives with comments from Journal editors [Special issue]. Journal of Experimental Education, 61(4). Thompson, B., & Snyder, P. A. (1997, March). Use of statistical significance tests and reliability analyses in published counseling research. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago. White, R. T. (1984). Research, and the end of schools as we know them. Australian Journal of Education, 28, 3– 16. Zumbo, B., Pope, G. A., & Stork, J. (1997, March). Are confidence intervals useful? Looking beyond the simple cases. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago. Zwick, R. (1997, March). Would the abolishment of significance testing lead to better science? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago. Citing Literature Volume35, Issue3March 1998Pages 237-248 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)