Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding via pars flaccida versus perigastric positioning: technique, complications, and results in 2,549 patients

2010; Springer Science+Business Media; Volume: 24; Issue: 7 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1007/s00464-009-0669-y

1866-6817

Nicola Di Lorenzo, Francesco Furbetta, Franco Favretti, Giovanni Segato, Maurizio De Luca, Giancarlo Micheletto, Marco Antonio Zappa, Paolo De Meis, Ezio Lattuada, Michele Paganelli, Marcello Lucchese, Nicola Basso, Francesco Domenico Capizzi, L. Di Cosmo, Vincenzo Mancuso, Simona Civitelli, A. Gardinazzi, Cristiano Giardiello, A Veneziani, Marcello Boni, Vincenzo Borrelli, Angelo Michele Schettino, Pietro Forestieri, Vincenzo Pilone, Ida Camperchioli, Michele Lorenzo,

Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments

Retrospective multicenter analysis of the results of two different approaches for band positioning: perigastric and pars flaccida.Data were collected from the database of the Italian Group for LapBand (GILB). Patients operated from January 2001 to December 2004 were selected according to criteria of case-control studies to compare two different band positioning techniques: perigastric (PG group) and pars flaccida (PF group). Demographics, laparotomic conversion, postoperative complications, and weight loss parameters were considered. Data are expressed as mean +/- standard deviation.2,549 patients underwent the LapBand System procedure [age: 40 +/- 11.7 years; sex: 2,130 female, 419 male; body mass index (BMI): 46.4 +/- 6.9 kg/m(2); excess weight (EW): 60.1 +/- 23.6 kg; %EW: 90.1 +/- 32.4]. During this period 1,343/2,549 (52.7%) were operated via the pars flaccida (PF group) and 1,206/2,549 (47.3%) via the perigastric approach (PG group). Demographics for both groups were similar. Thirty-day mortality was absent in both groups. Operative time was significantly longer in the PG group (80 +/- 20 min versus 60 +/- 40 min; p < 0.05). Hospital stay was similar in the two groups (2 +/- 2 days). Laparotomic conversion was significantly higher in the PG group (6 versus 2 patients; p < 0.001). Overall postoperative complication rate was 172/2,549 (6.7%) and was linked to gastric pouch dilation/slippage (67/172), intragastric migration/erosion (17/172), and tube/port failure (88/172). Gastric pouch dilation and intragastric migration were significantly more frequent in the PG group: 47 versus 20 (p < 0.001) and 12 versus 5 (p < 0.001), respectively. Patients eligible for minimum 3-year follow-up were 1,118/1,206 (PG group) and 1,079/1,343 (PF group). Mean BMI was 33.8 +/- 12.1 kg/m(2) (PG group) and 32.4 +/- 11.7 kg/m(2) (PF group) (p = ns), and mean percentage excess weight loss (%EWL) was 47.2 +/- 25.4 and 48.9 +/- 13.2 in PG and PF groups, respectively (p = ns).Significant improvement in LapBand System results with regard to laparotomic conversion and postoperative complication rate, with similar weight loss results, was observed in the pars flaccida group.