The RSNA Reviewer Mentorship Program
2007; Radiological Society of North America; Volume: 244; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1148/radiol.2443070830
ISSN1527-1315
Autores Tópico(s)scientometrics and bibliometrics research
ResumoHomeRadiologyVol. 244, No. 3 PreviousNext Reviews And CommentaryEditorialsThe RSNA Reviewer Mentorship ProgramRobert G. SheimanRobert G. SheimanAuthor Affiliations1From the Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215. Received May 11, 2007; final version accepted May 14.Address correspondence to: the author (e-mail: [email protected]). Robert G. SheimanPublished Online:Sep 1 2007https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2443070830MoreSectionsFull textPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesCiteTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareShare onFacebookXLinked In References1 Provenzale JM, Stanley RJ. A systematic guide to reviewing a manuscript. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;185:848–854. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar2 Hoppin FG. How I review an original scientific article. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;166:1019–1023. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar3 Roberts LW, Coversale J, Edenharder K, Louie A. How to review a manuscript: a “down-to-earth” approach. Acad Psychiatry 2004;28:81–87. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar4 Ammenwerth E, Wolff AC, Knaup P, et al. Developing and evaluating criteria to help reviewers of biomedical informatics manuscripts. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2003;10:512–514. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar5 Schroter S, Black N, Evans S, Carpenter J, Godlee F, Smith R. Effects of training on quality of peer review randomized controlled trial. BMJ 2004;328:673. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar6 Kliewer MA, Freed KS, DeLong DM, Pickhardt PJ, Provenzale JM. Reviewing the reviewers: comparison of review quality and reviewer characteristics at the American Journal of Roentgenology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:1731–1735. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar7 Kliewer MA, DeLong DM, Freed K, Jenkins CB, Paulson EK, Provenzale JM. Peer review at the American Journal of Roentgenology: how reviewer and manuscript characteristics affected editorial decisions on 196 major papers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;183:1545–1550. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar8 Black N, van Rooyen S, Godlee F, Smith R, Evans S. What makes a good reviewer and a good review for a general medical journal? JAMA 1998;280:231–233. Medline, Google Scholar9 Evans AT, McNutt RA, Fletcher SW, Fletcher RH. The characteristics of peer reviewers who produce good-quality reviews. J Gen Intern Med 1993;8(8):422–428. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar10 Ernst E, Resch KL. Reviewer bias: blinded experimental study. J Lab Clin Med 1994;124(2):178–182. Medline, Google Scholar11 Rogers LF. Reviewing manuscripts for the AJR. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;178:1051–1052. Crossref, Google Scholar12 Proto AV. Radiology 2007: reviewing for Radiology. Radiology 2007;244(1):7–11. Link, Google Scholar13 Proto AV. Radiology 2007: evaluating and processing your manuscript for publication. Radiology 2007;244(1):3–6. Link, Google ScholarArticle HistoryPublished in print: 2007 FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByImproving the Quality of Manuscript Reviews: Impact of Introducing a Structured Electronic Template to Submit ReviewsArumugamRajesh, GretchenCloud, Mukesh G.Harisinghani2013 | American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 200, No. 1To Review or Not to ReviewArumugamRajesh2011 | American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 196, No. 6AJR Reviewers: Do We Need a Mentoring Process?Thomas H.Berquist2011 | American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 197, No. 1Volunteerism: Essential for AJRThomas H.Berquist2011 | American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 197, No. 4Recommended Articles The Road to Wellness: Engagement Strategies to Help Radiologists Achieve Joy at WorkRadioGraphics2018Volume: 38Issue: 6pp. 1651-1664Customer Service in Radiology: Satisfying Your Patients and ReferrersRadioGraphics2018Volume: 38Issue: 6pp. 1872-1887Imaging Informatics: Maturing Beyond Adolescence to Enable the Return of the Doctor’s DoctorRadiology2023Volume: 309Issue: 1Special Report of the RSNA COVID-19 Task Force: Crisis Leadership of Major Health System Radiology Departments during COVID-19Radiology2021Volume: 299Issue: 1pp. E187-E192RESPECT: Radiology Employees Striving for Productive and Effective CommunicationRadioGraphics2020Volume: 40Issue: 7pp. 2068-2079See More RSNA Education Exhibits An Interactive Web-based Radiology Career Awareness Program Design For School & Undergraduate Career Labs.Digital Posters2021How To Develop The Best Radiology Clerkship?: A Guide for EducatorsDigital Posters2022Kaizen Process Improvement in Radiology: A Primer for Creating A Culture of Continuous Quality ImprovementDigital Posters2020 RSNA Case Collection Autosomal recessive polycystic kidney diseaseRSNA Case Collection2021Osteoid OsteomaRSNA Case Collection2020Esophageal Fibrovascular PolypRSNA Case Collection2022 Vol. 244, No. 3 Metrics Altmetric Score PDF download
Referência(s)