Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

THE CONCEPT "SYSTEM OF PHILOSOPHY": THE CASE OF JACOB BRUCKER'S HISTORIOGRAPHY OF PHILOSOPHY1

2005; Wiley; Volume: 44; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1111/j.1468-2303.2005.00309.x

1468-2303

Leo Catana,

Classical Philosophy and Thought

History and TheoryVolume 44, Issue 1 p. 72-90 THE CONCEPT "SYSTEM OF PHILOSOPHY": THE CASE OF JACOB BRUCKER'S HISTORIOGRAPHY OF PHILOSOPHY† LEO CATANA, LEO CATANA University of Copenhagen, DenmarkSearch for more papers by this author LEO CATANA, LEO CATANA University of Copenhagen, DenmarkSearch for more papers by this author First published: 18 January 2005 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2303.2005.00309.xCitations: 6Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditWechat ABSTRACT In this essay I examine and discuss the concept "system of philosophy" as a methodological tool in the history of philosophy; I do so in two moves. First I analyze the historical origin of the concept in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Thereafter I undertake a discussion of its methodological weaknesses–a discussion that is not only relevant to the writing of history of philosophy in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, but also to the writing of history of philosophy in our times, where the concept remains an important methodological tool. My first move is to analyze Jacob Brucker's employment of the concept in his influential history of philosophy, Historia critica philosophiae, dating from 1742–1744. To Brucker, a "system of philosophy" is characterized by the following four features: (a) it is autonomous in regard to other, non-philosophical disciplines; (b) all doctrines stated within the various branches of philosophy can be deduced from one principle; (c) as an autonomous system it comprises all branches of philosophy; (d) the doctrines stated within these various branches of philosophy are internally coherent. Brucker employed the concept on the entire history of philosophy, and he gave it a defining role in regard to two other methodological concepts, namely "eclecticism" and "syncretism," which he regarded as more or less successful forms of systematic philosophy. My second move is to point out the weakness of the concept of "system of philosophy" as a methodological tool in the history of philosophy. I argue that the interdisciplinary nature of much premodern philosophy makes Brucker's methodological concept "system of philosophy" inadequate, and that we may be better off leaving it behind in our future exploration of premodern philosophy. Citing Literature Volume44, Issue1February 2005Pages 72-90 RelatedInformation