Size-dependent selection against small queens of the invasive bumblebee Bombus terrestris in Japan
2010; Wiley; Volume: 138; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1111/j.1570-7458.2010.01075.x
ISSN1570-7458
Autores Tópico(s)Insect and Pesticide Research
ResumoEntomologia Experimentalis et ApplicataVolume 138, Issue 1 p. 65-70 Size-dependent selection against small queens of the invasive bumblebee Bombus terrestris in Japan Maki N. Inoue, Corresponding Author Maki N. Inoue E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author Maki N. Inoue, Corresponding Author Maki N. Inoue E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author First published: 03 December 2010 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.2010.01075.xCitations: 11Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Abstract Bombus terrestris (L.) (Hymenoptera: Apidae, Apinae, Bombini) has been introduced to Japan and became the dominant bumblebee in some areas, replacing native species. To implement an effective eradication program, the attributes responsible for establishment of the species must be better understood. Because body size has frequently been related to reproductive success in female insects, I examined the effect of B. terrestris queen size during hibernation, nest founding, and reproduction stages. Queens exhibited clear variation in size. Foundresses were significantly larger than gynes, indicating that larger queens may have an advantage over smaller ones in surviving hibernation. The over-representation of queens with pollen at larger sizes suggested that larger queens may also have an advantage over smaller ones in nest founding. On the other hand, foundress size was not significantly associated with reproductive output. The number of collected foundresses in this study was not sufficient to draw a clear conclusion but factors other than foundress size may also play an important role in determining reproduction. In addition, gyne size increased significantly during the 4-year survey. Because large queens have an advantage during hibernation, increased body size may increase the number of hibernating queens that survive, allowing them to outcompete native bumblebees. References Alford DV (1969) A study of the hibernation of bumblebees (Hymenoptera: Bombidae) in southern England. Journal of Animal Ecology 38: 149– 170. Alford DV (1975) Bumblebees. Davis-Poynter, London, UK. Beekman M, Van Stratum P & Lingeman R (1998) Diapause survival and post-diapause performance in bumblebee queens (Bombus terrestris). Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 89: 207– 214. Blanckenhorn WU (2000) The evolution of body size: what keeps organisms small? Quarterly Review of Biology 75: 385– 407. Bosch J & Vicens N (2006) Relationship between body size, provisioning rate, longevity and reproductive success in females of the solitary bee Osmia cornuta. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 60: 26– 33. Coelho JR & Holliday CW (2001) Effects of size and flight performance on intermale mate competition in the cicada killer, Sphecius speciosus Drury (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae). Journal of Insect Behavior 14: 345– 351. Cumber RA (1949) The biology of humble-bees, with special reference to the production of the worker caste. Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London 100: 1– 45. Cumber RA (1953) Some aspects of the biology and ecology of bumble-bees bearing upon the yields of red-clover seed in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Science and Technology 34: 227– 240. Free JB & Butler CG (1959) Bumblebees. Collins, London, UK. Harris RJ & Beggs JR (1995) Variation in the quality of Vespula vulgaris (L.) queens (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) and its significance in wasp population dynamics. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 22: 131– 142. Heinrich B & Heinrich MJE (1983) Size and caste in temperature regulation by bumblebees. Physiological Zoology 56: 552– 562. Holm SN (1972) Weight and life length of hibernating bumble bee queens (Hymenoptera: Bombidae) under controlled conditions. Entomologica Scandinavica 3: 313– 320. Honek A (1993) Intraspecific variation in body size and fecundity in insects: a general relationship. Oikos 66: 483– 492. Inoue MN & Yokoyama J (2006) Morphological variation in relation to flower use in bumblebees. Entomological Science 9: 147– 159. Inoue MN, Yokoyama J & Washitani I (2008) Displacement of Japanese native bumblebees by the recently introduced Bombus terrestris (L.) (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Journal of Insect Conservation 12: 135– 146. Inoue MN, Ishikawa S, Inoue T & Washitani I (2009) Conservation ecological study of invasion of Bombus terrestris (Hymenoptera: Apidae) into a preserved area of the Notsuke Peninsula of eastern Hokkaido, Japan. Applied Entomology and Zoology 44: 337– 342. Inoue MN, Yokoyama J & Tsuchida K (2010) Colony growth and reproductive ability of feral nests of the introduced bumblebee Bombus terrestris in northern Japan. Insectes Sociaux 57: 29– 38. Kawahara S (2004) Note on Bombus terrestris L. new found in Koshimizu-cho, North-east Hokkaido. Research Reports of Bihoro Museum 12: 69– 74. (in Japanese). Kikuchi R, Muranaka T, Ishii J & Washitani I (2006) Invasive alien species in Japan – their impacts and the countermeasures. Research Journal of Food and Agriculture 29: 41– 45. (in Japanese). Kingsolver JG & Huey RB (2008) Size, temperature, and fitness: three rules. Evolutionary Ecology Research 10: 251– 268. Kingsolver JG & Pfennig DW (2004) Individual-level selection as a cause of Cope's rule of phyletic size increase. Evolution 58: 1608– 1612. Laboratory of Conservation Ecology (2009) http://busters.tkl.iis.u-tokyo.ac.jp/seiyou/en/ . Mueller UG, Warneke AF, Grafe TU & Ode PR (1992) Female size and nest defense in the digger wasp Cerceris fumipennis (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae: Philanthinae). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 65: 44– 52. Nukatsuka Y & Yokoyama J (2009) Environmental factors and land uses related to the naturalization of Bombus terrestris in Hokkaido, northern Japan. Biological Invasions 12: 795– 804. O'Neill KM (1983) The significance of body size in territorial interactions of male beewolves (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae, Philanthus). Animal Behaviour 31: 404– 411. Ono M (1998) Why are now the bumblebees? Nature and Insects 33: 2– 3. (in Japanese). Owen RE (1988) Body size variation and optimal body size of bumble bee queens (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Canadian Entomologist 120: 19– 27. Paxton RJ & Tengo J (1996) Intranidal mating, emergence, and sex ratio in a communal bee Andrena jacobi Perkins 1921 (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae). Journal of Insect Behavior 9: 421– 440. Paxton RJ, Thoren PA, Estoup A & Tengo J (2001) Queen-worker conflict over male production and the sex ratio in a facultatively polyandrous bumblebee, Bombus hypnorum: the consequences of nest usurpation. Molecular Ecology 10: 2489– 2498. Pelletier L & McNeil JN (2003) The effect of food supplementation on reproductive success in bumblebee field colonies. Oikos 103: 688– 694. Pinheiro JC & Bates DM (2000) Mixed-effects Models in S and S-plus. Springer Verlag, New York, NY, USA. Plowright RC & Laverty TM (1984) The ecology and sociobiology of bumble bees. Annual Review of Entomology 29: 175– 199. Prys-Jones OE & Corbet SA (1991) Bumblebees. Richmond Publishing, Slough, UK. Pyke GH (1978) Optimal foraging: movement patterns of bumblebees between inflorescences. Theoretical Population Biology 13: 72– 98. R Development Core Team (2009) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org. Rasmussen JL (1994) The influence of horn and body size on the reproductive behavior of the horned rainbow scarab beetle Phanaeus difformis (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Journal of Insect Behavior 7: 67– 82. Richards KW (1978) Nest site selection by bumble bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in southern Alberta. Canadian Entomologist 110: 301– 318. Richards MH (2000) Evidence for geographic variation in colony social organization in an obligately social sweat bee, Lasioglossum malachurum Kirby (Hymenoptera; Halictidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 78: 1259– 1266. Schmid-Hempel R & Schmid-Hempel P (1998) Colony performance and immunocompetence of a social insect, Bombus terrestris, in poor and variable environments. Functional Ecology 12: 22– 30. Sladen FWL (1912) The Humble-Bee. Macmillan and Co, London, UK. Strohm E & Linsenmair KE (1997) Female size affects provisioning and sex allocation in a digger wasp. Animal Behaviour 54: 23– 34. Szabo TI & Pengelly DH (1973) The over-wintering and emergence of Bombus (Pyrobombus) impatiens (Cresson) (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in southern Ontario. Insectes Sociaux 20: 125– 132. Tepedino VJ & Torchio PF (1994) Founding and usurping: equally efficient paths to nesting success in Osmia lignaria propinqua (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 87: 946– 953. Venables WN & Ripley BD (2002) Modern Applied Statistics with S. Springer, New York, NY, USA. Visser ME (1994) The importance of being large: the relationship between size and fitness in females of the parasitoid Aphaereta minuta (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Journal of Animal Ecology 63: 963– 978. Vogt FD, Heinrich B, Dabolt TO & McBath HL (1994) Ovary development and colony founding in subarctic and temperate-zone bumblebee queens. Canadian Journal of Zoology 72: 1551– 1556. West SA, Flanagan KE & Godfray HCJ (1996) The relationship between parasitoid size and fitness in the field, a study of Achrysocharoides zwoelferi (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). Journal of Animal Ecology 65: 631– 639. Yokoyama J, Matsumura C, Nakajima M, Sugiura N, Matsumoto M et al. (2004) Evaluation of present status on naturalization of introduced bumblebee, Bombus terrestris, and development of extermination procedure against the species for conservation of native bumblebee species (2). Annual Report of Pro Natura Fund 13: 47– 54. (in Japanese). Zobel MU & Paxton RJ (2007) Is big the best? Queen size, usurpation and nest closure in a primitively eusocial sweat bee (Lasioglossum malachurum). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 61: 435– 447. Citing Literature Volume138, Issue1January 2011Pages 65-70 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)