Diastolic Dysfunction in Patients With Ischemic Symptoms Without Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease
2014; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Volume: 7; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1161/circimaging.114.001984
ISSN1942-0080
AutoresHarmony R. Reynolds, Leon Axel, Judith S. Hochman,
Tópico(s)Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
ResumoHomeCirculation: Cardiovascular ImagingVol. 7, No. 3Diastolic Dysfunction in Patients With Ischemic Symptoms Without Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease Free AccessEditorialPDF/EPUBAboutView PDFView EPUBSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationsTrack citationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyReddit Jump toFree AccessEditorialPDF/EPUBDiastolic Dysfunction in Patients With Ischemic Symptoms Without Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease Harmony R. Reynolds, Leon Axel and Judith S. Hochman Harmony R. ReynoldsHarmony R. Reynolds From the Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Cardiovascular Clinical Research Center (H.R.R., J.S.H.), and Department of Radiology (L.A.), NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY. , Leon AxelLeon Axel From the Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Cardiovascular Clinical Research Center (H.R.R., J.S.H.), and Department of Radiology (L.A.), NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY. and Judith S. HochmanJudith S. Hochman From the Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Cardiovascular Clinical Research Center (H.R.R., J.S.H.), and Department of Radiology (L.A.), NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY. Originally published1 May 2014https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.114.001984Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2014;7:420–421People with ischemic symptoms who have no angiographically obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) are at increased risk for major adverse cardiovascular outcomes (death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and heart failure) as compared with the general population.1,2 Previous investigation, much of it originating from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute–funded Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) study, has demonstrated objective vascular abnormalities in subsets of patients with ischemic symptoms and without obstructive CAD, that is, with microvascular coronary disease. For example, invasive measurement of coronary flow reserve was abnormal in 47% of such patients, and acetylcholine induced a ≥50% reduction in blood flow in 50% and vasospasm in 5%.3 Stress imaging using any available technique demonstrates inducible ischemia in a subset of patients with symptoms and without obstructive CAD, and these patients typically have worse outcomes than those without ischemia.3–5Article see p 510Increased risk of heart failure with microvascular coronary disease is of interest for several reasons. Peripheral endothelial dysfunction has been identified in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction6,7 and is a risk factor for adverse outcomes in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction,6 which may suggest a link between microvascular disease, diastolic dysfunction, and heart failure. Ranolazine has been shown to reduce angina in patients with microvascular coronary disease8 and to improve left ventricular end-diastolic pressure in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (albeit without an effect on –dP/dt).9 Diastolic dysfunction occurs early in the ischemic cascade.10 It is, therefore, reasonable to hypothesize that diastolic dysfunction is a mediator of increased risk of events, particularly heart failure, among patients with microvascular coronary disease.In this issue of Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging, Nelson et al11 report the use of cardiac MRI (CMR) to evaluate diastolic function in 20 women with ischemic symptoms and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction and without obstructive CAD or history of advanced heart failure. CMR-derived measurements of systolic and diastolic function were compared between these patients and 15 healthy women matched for age and body size.11 The authors identified multiple abnormalities in diastolic function using tissue tagging analysis, a CMR technique that provides quantitative assessment of myocardial deformation throughout the cardiac cycle.12 Specifically, patients had lower diastolic circumferential strain rate, lower peak rate of left ventricular untwisting, and longer time to peak filling rate and peak ventricular untwisting rate, as well as a trend toward longer time to peak diastolic circumferential strain rate. However, there was no difference between patients and controls in peak ventricular filling rate (ie, an expected equivalent to mitral E-wave velocity). Parameters that are often included in echocardiographic analysis of diastolic function, such as mitral annular velocities and Tei index, were not evaluated in this study. It is notable that differences in diastolic function were not because of left ventricular hypertrophy; left ventricular mass was normal and similar between patients and controls, despite the presence of hypertension in 12 of the 20 patients. Systolic parameters including ejection fraction, circumferential strain, and systolic circumferential strain rate were similar between patients and controls. Although the MRI regional motion measurements were confined to circumferential components in this analysis, longitudinal motion may also be altered in diastolic dysfunction, to a degree that may differ from the circumferential components.13 The authors reported that there were no discrete regions of abnormal late gadolinium identified in the patients. However, this does not preclude the possible existence of diffuse fibrosis that could have contributed to increased myocardial passive stiffness. Diffuse fibrosis might not be visually apparent without more quantitative assessments, such as through MRI measurements of the contrast agent partition coefficient.14It is likely that many of the patients in this study had microvascular coronary disease, based on previous research, though the authors do not report detailed characterization of microvascular disease in this cohort. Patients in the current study did have lower myocardial perfusion reserve index (MPRI) compared with controls. MPRI is a CMR-based, semiquantitative measurement of myocardial perfusion in response to adenosine stress, which has excellent diagnostic accuracy for obstructive CAD as determined by fractional flow reserve.15 MPRI has been used to document microvascular disease in patients with ischemic symptoms and no obstructive CAD, although this is somewhat controversial.16,17 MPRI is more widely available than quantitative perfusion methods but is not as accurate, at least for the detection of ischemia because of obstructive CAD.18 There was no correlation between MPRI and diastolic function in the study by Nelson et al,11 which would tend to refute the notion that ischemia was the direct cause of diastolic dysfunction; this may relate to the small sample size. Also, the authors did not mention the possible presence of greater relative ischemia in the subendocardial region, which, if present, may have been partially obscured by the use of total wall thickness measurements in the determination of MPRI (although the frequent presence of dark rim artifacts in this region can make analysis difficult).The finding of objective abnormalities of diastolic function in patients with ischemic symptoms and no obstructive CAD, though limited by factors mentioned earlier, is thought-provoking and does raise interesting questions for further investigation about the relationship between microvascular disease and diastolic dysfunction in patients with cardiac syndrome X and the potential to predict risk of events using noninvasive testing.DisclosuresDr Hochman discloses the following consultant/advisory relationship: entity—Glaxo Smith Kline; role—National Coordinator for the Stabilisation of Atherosclerotic Plaque by Initiation of Darapladib Therapy trial and Steering Committee member for the Stabilization of Plaques Using Darapladib-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 52 Trial. The other authors report no conflicts.FootnotesThe opinions expressed in this article are not necessarily those of the editors or of the American Heart Association.Correspondence to Harmony R. Reynolds, MD, Department of Medicine, NYU School of Medicine, 530 First Ave, SKI-9R, New York, NY 10016. E-mail [email protected]References1. Gulati M, Cooper-DeHoff RM, McClure C, Johnson BD, Shaw LJ, Handberg EM, Zineh I, Kelsey SF, Arnsdorf MF, Black HR, Pepine CJ, Merz CN. Adverse cardiovascular outcomes in women with nonobstructive coronary artery disease: a report from the Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation Study and the St James Women Take Heart Project.Arch Intern Med. 2009; 169:843–850.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar2. Jespersen L, Hvelplund A, Abildstrøm SZ, Pedersen F, Galatius S, Madsen JK, Jørgensen E, Kelbæk H, Prescott E. Stable angina pectoris with no obstructive coronary artery disease is associated with increased risks of major adverse cardiovascular events.Eur Heart J. 2012; 33:734–744.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar3. Wei J, Mehta PK, Johnson BD, Samuels B, Kar S, Anderson RD, Azarbal B, Petersen J, Sharaf B, Handberg E, Shufelt C, Kothawade K, Sopko G, Lerman A, Shaw L, Kelsey SF, Pepine CJ, Merz CN. Safety of coronary reactivity testing in women with no obstructive coronary artery disease: results from the NHLBI-sponsored WISE (Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation) study.J Am Coll Cardiol Cardiovasc Interv. 2012; 5:646–653.CrossrefGoogle Scholar4. Sicari R, Palinkas A, Pasanisi EG, Venneri L, Picano E. Long-term survival of patients with chest pain syndrome and angiographically normal or near-normal coronary arteries: the additional prognostic value of dipyridamole echocardiography test (DET).Eur Heart J. 2005; 26:2136–2141.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar5. Johnson BD, Shaw LJ, Buchthal SD, Bairey Merz CN, Kim HW, Scott KN, Doyle M, Olson MB, Pepine CJ, den Hollander J, Sharaf B, Rogers WJ, Mankad S, Forder JR, Kelsey SF, Pohost GM; National Institutes of Health-National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Prognosis in women with myocardial ischemia in the absence of obstructive coronary disease: results from the National Institutes of Health-National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-Sponsored Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE).Circulation. 2004; 109:2993–2999.LinkGoogle Scholar6. Akiyama E, Sugiyama S, Matsuzawa Y, Konishi M, Suzuki H, Nozaki T, Ohba K, Matsubara J, Maeda H, Horibata Y, Sakamoto K, Sugamura K, Yamamuro M, Sumida H, Kaikita K, Iwashita S, Matsui K, Kimura K, Umemura S, Ogawa H. Incremental prognostic significance of peripheral endothelial dysfunction in patients with heart failure with normal left ventricular ejection fraction.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 60:1778–1786.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar7. Borlaug BA, Olson TP, Lam CS, Flood KS, Lerman A, Johnson BD, Redfield MM. Global cardiovascular reserve dysfunction in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010; 56:845–854.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar8. Mehta PK, Goykhman P, Thomson LE, Shufelt C, Wei J, Yang Y, Gill E, Minissian M, Shaw LJ, Slomka PJ, Slivka M, Berman DS, Bairey Merz CN. Ranolazine improves angina in women with evidence of myocardial ischemia but no obstructive coronary artery disease.J Am Coll Cardiol Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011; 4:514–522.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar9. Maier LS, Layug B, Karwatowska-Prokopczuk E, Belardinelli L, Lee S, Sander J, Lang C, Wachter R, Edelmann F, Hasenfuss G, Jacobshagen C. RAnoLazIne for the Treatment of Diastolic Heart Failure in Patients With Preserved Ejection Fraction: the RALI-DHF Proof-of-Concept Study.J Am Coll Cardiol Heart Fail. 2013; 1:115–122.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar10. Nesto RW, Kowalchuk GJ. The ischemic cascade: temporal sequence of hemodynamic, electrocardiographic and symptomatic expressions of ischemia.Am J Cardiol. 1987; 59:23C–30C.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar11. Nelson MD, Szczepaniak LS, Wei J, Haftabaradaren A, Bharadwaj M, Sharif B, Mehta P, Zhang X, Thomson LE, Berman DS, Li D, Bairey Merz CN. Diastolic dysfunction in women with signs and symptoms of ischemia in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease: a hypothesis-generating study.Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014; 7:510–516.LinkGoogle Scholar12. Pai VM, Axel L. Advances in MRI tagging techniques for determining regional myocardial strain.Curr Cardiol Rep. 2006; 8:53–58.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar13. Wang J, Khoury DS, Yue Y, Torre-Amione G, Nagueh SF. Preserved left ventricular twist and circumferential deformation, but depressed longitudinal and radial deformation in patients with diastolic heart failure.Eur Heart J. 2008; 29:1283–1289.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar14. Flett AS, Hayward MP, Ashworth MT, Hansen MS, Taylor AM, Elliott PM, McGregor C, Moon JC. Equilibrium contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the measurement of diffuse myocardial fibrosis: preliminary validation in humans.Circulation. 2010; 122:138–144.LinkGoogle Scholar15. Rieber J, Huber A, Erhard I, Mueller S, Schweyer M, Koenig A, Schiele TM, Theisen K, Siebert U, Schoenberg SO, Reiser M, Klauss V. Cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion imaging for the functional assessment of coronary artery disease: a comparison with coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve.Eur Heart J. 2006; 27:1465–1471.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar16. Panting JR, Gatehouse PD, Yang GZ, Grothues F, Firmin DN, Collins P, Pennell DJ. Abnormal subendocardial perfusion in cardiac syndrome X detected by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.N Engl J Med. 2002; 346:1948–1953.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar17. Vermeltfoort IA, Bondarenko O, Raijmakers PG, Odekerken DA, Kuijper AF, Zwijnenburg A, van der Vis-Melsen MJ, Twisk JW, Beek AM, Teule GJ, van Rossum AC. Is subendocardial ischaemia present in patients with chest pain and normal coronary angiograms? A cardiovascular MR study.Eur Heart J. 2007; 28:1554–1558.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar18. Mordini FE, Haddad T, Hsu LY, Kellman P, Lowrey TB, Aletras AH, Bandettini WP, Arai AE. Diagnostic accuracy of stress perfusion CMR in comparison with quantitative coronary angiography: fully quantitative, semiquantitative, and qualitative assessment.J Am Coll Cardiol Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014; 7:14–22.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Previous Back to top Next FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited By Loch A, Tan K, Danaee M, Idris I and Ng M (2023) Leucine-Rich Alpha-2-Glycoprotein: A Novel Predictor of Diastolic Dysfunction, Biomedicines, 10.3390/biomedicines11030944, 11:3, (944) May 2014Vol 7, Issue 3 Advertisement Article InformationMetrics © 2014 American Heart Association, Inc.https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.114.001984PMID: 24847007 Originally publishedMay 1, 2014 Keywordsdiastolic dysfunctionEditorialscardiac syndrome XPDF download Advertisement SubjectsComputerized Tomography (CT)
Referência(s)