Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Efficacy and tolerability of low‐volume (2 L) versus single‐ (4 L) versus split‐dose (2 L + 2 L) polyethylene glycol bowel preparation for colonoscopy: Randomized clinical trial

2014; Wiley; Volume: 26; Issue: 6 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1111/den.12265

1443-1661

Félix I. Téllez‐Ávila, Enrique Murcio‐Pérez, Ángela Saúl, Salvador Herrera‐Gómez, Francisco Valdovinos‐Andraca, Víctor Manuel Acosta-Nava, Rafael Ferreira Barreto, Javier Elizondo‐Rivera,

Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research

Background and Aim To compare the efficacy and tolerability of a low‐volume (2‐ L ) polyethylene glycol ( PEG ) regimen for colonoscopy compared to single (4‐ L ) or split‐dose (2‐ L + 2‐ L ) regimens. Methods In‐hospital patients who were candidates for colonoscopy were randomly assigned to: group 1 single‐dose ( PEG 4 L the day before the study, n = 60); group 2: split‐dose (2 L the day before and 2 L on the day of the procedure, n = 61); and group 3: low‐volume 2‐ L PEG solution (the day of the procedure, n = 59). A blinded evaluation of the quality of colonic preparation was assessed by the B oston bowel preparation scale. Results Satisfactory bowel preparation of the right colon was more frequently reported for group 3 than for group 1 (70% vs 53%, P = 0.045), in the transverse colon it was 82% versus 69% ( P = 0.032), and on the left side of the colon it was 80% versus 67.7% ( P = 0.028). Compared to group 2, satisfactory bowel preparation in group 3 was similar in the transverse colon and left colon. Nausea, vomiting, and abdominal discomfort were less frequent in patients of group 3. Patients in group 3 had fewer sleep disorders and fewer hours of sleep loss compared to patients in the other groups. Conclusions Preparation with 2 L caused less abdominal discomfort and fewer sleep disorders. The split dose had a better quality of preparation in the right colon. Both preparations were clearly better than the 4‐ L preparation.