Revisão Acesso aberto Revisado por pares

Evolution of Clinical Trial Design in Early Drug Development: Systematic Review of Expansion Cohort Use in Single-Agent Phase I Cancer Trials

2013; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Volume: 31; Issue: 33 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1200/jco.2012.47.4957

ISSN

1527-7755

Autores

Arif Manji, Irene Braña, Eitan Amir, George Tomlinson, Ian F. Tannock, Philippe L. Bédard, Amit M. Oza, Lillian L. Siu, Albiruni R. Abdul Razak,

Tópico(s)

Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth

Resumo

Purpose To evaluate the use and objectives of expansion cohorts in phase I cancer trials and to explore trial characteristics associated with their use. Methods We performed a systematic review of MEDLINE and EMBASE, limiting studies to single-agent phase I trials recruiting adults and published after 2006. Eligibility assessment and data extraction were performed by two reviewers. Data were assessed descriptively, and associations were tested by univariable and multivariable logistic regression. Results We identified 611 unique phase I cancer trials, of which 149 (24%) included an expansion cohort. The trials were significantly more likely to use an expansion cohort if they were published more recently, were multicenter, or evaluated a noncytotoxic agent. Objectives of the expansion cohort were reported in 74% of trials. In these trials, safety (80%), efficacy (45%), pharmacokinetics (28%), pharmacodynamics (23%), and patient enrichment (14%) were cited as objectives. Among expansion cohorts with safety objectives, the recommended phase II dose was modified in 13% and new toxicities were described in 54% of trials. Among trials aimed at assessing efficacy, only 11% demonstrated antitumor activity assessed by response criteria that was not previously observed during dose escalation. Conclusion The utilization of expansion cohorts has increased with time. Safety and efficacy are common objectives, but 26% fail to report explicit aims. Expansion cohorts may provide useful supplementary data for phase I trials, particularly with regard to toxicity and definition of recommended dose for phase II studies.

Referência(s)