Learning to Patent: Institutional Experience, Learning, and the Characteristics of U.S. University Patents After the Bayh-Dole Act, 1981-1992
2002; Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences; Volume: 48; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1287/mnsc.48.1.73.14278
ISSN1526-5501
AutoresDavid C. Mowery, Bhaven N. Sampat, Arvids A. Ziedonis,
Tópico(s)Innovation and Knowledge Management
ResumoAboutSectionsView PDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail Go to Section HomeManagement ScienceVol. 48, No. 1 Learning to Patent: Institutional Experience, Learning, and the Characteristics of U.S. University Patents After the Bayh-Dole Act, 1981-1992David C. Mowery, Bhaven N. Sampat, Arvids A. ZiedonisDavid C. Mowery, Bhaven N. Sampat, Arvids A. ZiedonisPublished Online:1 Jan 2002https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.1.73.14278 Previous Back to Top Next FiguresReferencesRelatedInformationCited ByUniversity–industry collaboration and firm innovation: an empirical study of the biopharmaceutical industry25 August 2021 | The Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 47, No. 5Universities involvement in patent litigation: an analysis of the characteristics of US litigated patents21 September 2022 | Scientometrics, Vol. 92Systematic analysis of 50 years of Stanford University technology transfer and commercializationPatterns, Vol. 3, No. 9Alliance-to-acquisition transitions: The technological performance implications of acquiring one's alliance partnersResearch Policy, Vol. 51, No. 6How commercializing academic patents promote economic growth: mediating effect and spatial spill over28 June 2022 | Applied Economics Letters, Vol. 000Exploring the role of R&D collaborations and non-patent IP policies in government technology transfer performance: Evidence from U.S. federal agencies (1999–2016)24 May 2022 | PLOS ONE, Vol. 17, No. 5R versus D, from knowledge creation to value appropriation: Ownership of patents filed by European biotechnology foundersTechnovation, Vol. 108A bibliometric review of the technology transfer literature14 January 2020 | The Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 46, No. 5Engines need transmission belts: the importance of people in technology transfer offices3 February 2021 | The Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 46, No. 5Academic spill-ins or spill-outs? Examining knowledge spillovers of university patents23 June 2020 | Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 29, No. 5The licensing and selling of inventions by US universitiesTechnological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 159University regulations, regional development and technology transfer: The case of BrazilTechnological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 158The role of research outcome quality in the relationship between university research collaboration and technology transfer: empirical results from China21 December 2019 | Scientometrics, Vol. 122, No. 2Geographical Concentration of Funding of Academic Research27 April 2019Does Funding Source Matter for University R&D? The Effect of Government vs. Industry GrantsSSRN Electronic JournalMotivation for the development of patents in universities in the state of Pernambuco, Brazil1 January 2020 | Gestão & Produção, Vol. 27, No. 4Public sector financial support for late stage discovery of new drugs in the United States: cohort study23 October 2019 | BMJOn the transfer of technology from universities: The impact of the Bayh–Dole Act of 1980 on the institutionalization of university researchEuropean Economic Review, Vol. 119The UBC ecosystem: putting together a comprehensive framework for university-business cooperation10 March 2017 | The Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 44, No. 4Knowledge transfer in university–industry research partnerships: a review28 March 2018 | The Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 44, No. 4Control versus execution: endogenous appropriability and entrepreneurial strategy24 September 2018 | Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 28, No. 2Patent management by universities: evidence from Italian academic inventions7 February 2019 | Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 28, No. 2The role of ORIC in the evolution of the triple helix culture of innovation: The case of PakistanTechnology in Society, Vol. 56Grace, gold, or glory? Exploring incentives for invention disclosure in the university context26 February 2013 | The Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 43, No. 6Federal funding and the rate and direction of inventive activityResearch Policy, Vol. 47, No. 9Factors affecting the propensity of academic researchers in Mexico to become inventors and their productivity19 October 2018 | Contaduría y Administración, Vol. 64, No. 1Joint modeling of the association between NIH funding and its three primary outcomes: patents, publications, and citation impact20 July 2018 | Scientometrics, Vol. 117, No. 1Rowing against the wind: how do times of austerity shape academic entrepreneurship in unfriendly environments?16 November 2017 | International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Vol. 14, No. 3Experience and Signaling Value in Technology Licensing Contract Payment StructuresAcademy of Management Journal, Vol. 61, No. 4Student employability via university-industry linkagesHuman Systems Management, Vol. 37, No. 2When the clock starts ticking: Measuring strategic responses to TRIPS's patent term changeResearch Policy, Vol. 47, No. 4Superstars in the making? The broad effects of interdisciplinary centersResearch Policy, Vol. 47, No. 3Faculty patent assignment in the Chinese mainland: evidence from the top 35 patent application universities1 September 2015 | The Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 43, No. 1Why Would You Ever Want to Become An Academic Entrepreneur?16 September 2017University patenting and technology commercialization - legal frameworks and the importance of local practice11 February 2015 | R&D Management, Vol. 48, No. 1Social Capital Formation in EU ICT SMEs: The Role Played by the Mobility of Knowledge Workers23 March 2017 | European Management Review, Vol. 14, No. 4Patents as proxy for measuring innovations: A case of changing patent filing behavior in Indian public funded research organizationsTechnological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 123“Only the Initiates Will Have the Secrets Revealed”: Computational Chemists and the Openness of Scientific SoftwareIEEE Annals of the History of Computing, Vol. 39, No. 4Universities and economic development in lagging regions: ‘triple helix’ policy in Wales25 May 2016 | Regional Studies, Vol. 51, No. 7Can universities profit from general purpose inventions? The case of Canadian nanotechnology patentsTechnological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 120The Effects of Academic Incubators on University Innovation30 January 2017 | Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, Vol. 11, No. 2An entropy-based indicator system for measuring the potential of patents in technological innovation: rejecting moderation7 March 2017 | Scientometrics, Vol. 111, No. 3A Dynamic Network Measure of Technological ChangeRussell J. Funk, Jason Owen-Smith22 March 2016 | Management Science, Vol. 63, No. 3Control Versus Execution: Endogenous Appropriability and Entrepreneurial StrategySSRN Electronic JournalFederal Funding and the Rate and Direction of Inventive ActivitySSRN Electronic JournalCapital Structure and Innovation Trajectory: The Role of Debt in Balancing Exploration and ExploitationByungchul Choi, M. V. Shyam Kumar, Fabio Zambuto5 October 2016 | Organization Science, Vol. 27, No. 5Are researchers deliberately bypassing the technology transfer office? An analysis of TTO awareness28 June 2016 | Small Business Economics, Vol. 47, No. 3Leveraging knowledge as a competitive asset? The intensity, performance and structure of universities’ entrepreneurial knowledge exchange activities at a regional level20 June 2016 | Small Business Economics, Vol. 47, No. 3Applications of fuzzy logic for determining the driving forces in collaborative research contractsJournal of Business Research, Vol. 69, No. 4Patenting rationales of academic entrepreneurs in weak and strong organizational regimesResearch Policy, Vol. 45, No. 2Chinese university patents: quantity, quality, and the role of subsidy programs10 December 2014 | The Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 41, No. 1Cost-Reducing Innovation and the Role of Patent Intermediaries in Increasing Market Efficiency4 June 2015 | Production and Operations Management, Vol. 25, No. 2SECTORAL DIFFERENCES IN TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER23 February 2016 | International Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 20, No. 02Academic Entrepreneurship: Spin-offs in Sweden and the UKThe Effects of Academic Incubators on University InnovationSSRN Electronic JournalExclusive or open? An economic analysis of university intellectual property patenting and licensing strategiesJournal of Innovation Economics, Vol. 21, No. 3From the lab to the stock market? The characteristics and impact of university-oriented seed funds in Europe17 December 2014 | The Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 40, No. 6How does the entrepreneurial orientation of scientists affect their scientific performance? Evidence from the quadrant model19 May 2015 | Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, Vol. 27, No. 9Enterprising scientists: The shaping role of norms, experience and scientific productivityTechnological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 99Learning in university technology transfer offices: transactions-focused and relations-focused approaches to commercialization of academic researchTechnovation, Vol. 41-42The Role of Equity, Royalty, and Fixed Fees in Technology Licensing to University Spin-OffsNicos Savva, Niyazi Taneri11 December 2014 | Management Science, Vol. 61, No. 6Applying patent survival analysis in the academic context19 February 2015 | Research Evaluation, Vol. 24, No. 2Commercialization of university inventions: Individual and institutional factors affecting licensing of university patentsTechnovation, Vol. 36-37Distant recombination and the creation of basic inventions: An analysis of the diffusion of public and private sector nanotechnology patents in CanadaTechnovation, Vol. 36-37The Ownership of Academic Patents and Their ImpactRevue économique, Vol. Vol. 66, No. 1The role of public funding in nanotechnology scientific production: Where Canada stands in comparison to the United States11 September 2014 | Scientometrics, Vol. 102, No. 1A new approach to measuring time-lags in technology licensing: study of U.S. academic research institutions11 December 2013 | The Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 39, No. 5Purpose and experience of patenting and the processes of patent management employed by university scientistsBenefiting From Alliance Portfolio Diversity23 March 2012 | Journal of Management, Vol. 40, No. 6An Exploratory Study of the Role of Publishing Inventors in NanotechnologyTranslational Research: From Biological Discovery to Public Benefit (or Not)Advances in Biology, Vol. 2014Factors affecting spin-off creationJournal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, Vol. 8, No. 2Ambition Is Nothing Without Focus: Compensating for Negative Transfer of Experience in R&DAnindya Ghosh, Xavier Martin, Johannes M. Pennings, Filippo Carlo Wezel17 September 2013 | Organization Science, Vol. 25, No. 2Patentes en Instituciones de Educación Superior en México1Revista de la Educación Superior, Vol. 43, No. 170Current Trends in Science and Technology Policy Research: An Examination of Published Works from 2010-201214 May 2014 | Policy Studies Journal, Vol. 42Do Ties Really Bind? The Effect of Knowledge and Commercialization Networks on Opposition to StandardsAcademy of Management Journal, Vol. 57, No. 2Business social networks and academics' entrepreneurial intentionsIndustrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 114, No. 2The relationship between academic consulting and research performance: Evidence from five Spanish universitiesInternational Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 32Biotech patents and science policy: the Spanish experience9 January 2014 | Nature Biotechnology, Vol. 32, No. 1Does the learning value of individual failure experience depend on group-level success? Insights from a University Technology Transfer Office8 February 2013 | Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 22, No. 6Academic Patenting in Europe: A Reassessment of Evidence and Research PracticesIndustry & Innovation, Vol. 20, No. 5Performance of technology transfer offices in Germany22 December 2011 | The Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 38, No. 3Job Mobility, Patent Ownership and Knowledge Diffusion: Evidence on a Sample of Italian InventorsIndustry & Innovation, Vol. 20, No. 4The Timing of Using Patent Information by University Scientists: A Lesson from the Biotechnology Sector in TaiwanPatent quality and ownership: An analysis of UK faculty patentingResearch Policy, Vol. 42, No. 2The impact of alliance network structure on firm innovation capabilityJournal of Science and Technology Policy in China, Vol. 4, No. 1Lens or Prism? Patent Citations as a Measure of Knowledge Flows from Public ResearchMichael Roach, Wesley M. Cohen, 9 November 2012 | Management Science, Vol. 59, No. 2The Role of Equity, Royalty and Fixed Fees in Technology Licensing to University Spin-OffsSSRN Electronic JournalChinese University Patents: Quantity and Quality, 1985–2010SSRN Electronic JournalTime Allocation Decisions of Academic Scientists and Their Impact on Technology CommercializationIEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 59, No. 4The nexus between science and industry: evidence from faculty inventions20 February 2011 | The Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 37, No. 5Employing patent data to measure automobile components suppliers' knowledge creationAcqusition patent body of knowledge by professors A lesson from university professors in the biotechnology sector in TaiwanSpatial differences in the quality of university patenting: Do regions matter?Research Policy, Vol. 41, No. 4The Determinants of Science-Based Cluster Growth: The Case of Nanotechnology1 January 2012 | Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, Vol. 30, No. 1Academic Entrepreneurship in a Resource-Constrained Environment: Diversification and Synergistic Effects28 November 2012Fuzzy-QFD approach based decision support model for licensor selectionExpert Systems with Applications, Vol. 39, No. 1A Dynamic Network Approach to Breakthrough InnovationSSRN Electronic JournalLearning from one another? International policy "emulation" and university-industry technology transfer12 November 2011 | Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 20, No. 6Linking induced technological change, and environmental regulation: Evidence from patenting in the U.S. auto industryResearch Policy, Vol. 40, No. 9Commercializing academic research: the quality of faculty patenting12 July 2011 | Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 20, No. 5The management of the role of patent attorneys during university patenting: An exploratory study from university professors' perspective in the biotechnology sector in TaiwanThe Productivity of Nanobiotechnology Research and Education in U.S. Universities15 July 2011 | American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 93, No. 4Scientific and Technological Knowledge of Universities in the EU-15: Implications for Convergence1 April 2011 | European Planning Studies, Vol. 19, No. 4New Plant Venture Performance Differences Among Incumbent, Diversifying, and Entrepreneurial Firms: The Impact of Industry Learning IntensityNatarajan Balasubramanian, 28 January 2011 | Management Science, Vol. 57, No. 3On transformation of public sector research: A preliminary post-STBL assessment in TaiwanTechnological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 78, No. 3Patenting Public-Funded Research for Technology Transfer: A Conceptual-Empirical Synthesis of US Evidence and Lessons for India11 November 2010 | The Journal of World Intellectual Property, Vol. 14, No. 1The Effect of Academic Consulting on Research Performance: Evidence from Five Spanish UniversitiesSSRN Electronic JournalLens or Prism? A Comparative Assessment of Patent Citations as a Measure of Knowledge Flows from Public ResearchSSRN Electronic JournalAcademic Entrepreneurship in a Resource Constrained Environment: Diversification and Synergistic EffectsSSRN Electronic JournalThe commercialization of academic patents: black boxes, pipelines, and Rubik’s cubes26 May 2009 | The Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 35, No. 6The dynamic impact of innovative capability and inter-firm network on firm valuation: A longitudinal study of biotechnology start-upsJournal of Business Venturing, Vol. 25, No. 6Inside or outside the IP system? Business creation in academiaResearch Policy, Vol. 39, No. 8Patent Incentives, Technology Markets, and Public–Private Bio-Medical Innovation Networks in BrazilWorld Development, Vol. 38, No. 8SOURCES OF SUCCESS IN ADVANCED MATERIALS INNOVATION: THE ROLE OF "CORE RESEARCHERS" IN UNIVERSITY–INDUSTRY COLLABORATION IN JAPAN20 November 2011 | International Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 14, No. 02Categories of university-level entrepreneurship: a literature survey26 January 2008 | International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Vol. 6, No. 1Scientific and Commercial Incentives in R&D: Research versus Development?Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Vol. 19, No. 1Do royalties really foster university patenting activity? An answer from ItalyTechnovation, Vol. 30, No. 2The impact of small world on innovation: An empirical study of 16 countriesJournal of Informetrics, Vol. 4, No. 1University-Industry Collaboration and Technology Transfer in Hong Kong and Knowledge-based Economic GrowthThe Role of Regional Knowledge Production in University Technology Transfer: Isolating Coevolutionary EffectsSSRN Electronic JournalImplementing Bayh–Dole-like laws: Faculty problems and their impact on university patenting activityResearch Policy, Vol. 38, No. 8Absorptive capacity and the search for innovationResearch Policy, Vol. 38, No. 2Heterogeneity of patenting activity and its implications for scientific researchResearch Policy, Vol. 38, No. 1Does Excellence in Academic Research Attract Foreign R&D?SSRN Electronic JournalWhen Does University Research Get Commercialized? Creating Ambidexterity in Research InstitutionsJournal of Management Studies, Vol. 45, No. 8Why Did Universities Start Patenting?1 December 2008 | Social Studies of Science, Vol. 38, No. 6Research Universities: Autonomy and Self-Reliance after the Entrepreneurial University1 January 2008 | Policy Futures in Education, Vol. 6, No. 4Inventive and uninventive clusters: The case of Canadian biotechnologyResearch Policy, Vol. 37, No. 6-7Negative effects of university patenting: Myths and grounded evidence8 March 2008 | Scientometrics, Vol. 75, No. 2Spatial mobility of knowledge transfer and absorptive capacity: analysis and measurement of the impact within the geoeconomic space28 April 2007 | The Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 33, No. 1Chapter 6 Knowledge Creation and Diffusion of Public Science with Intellectual Property Rights1 Moving Beyond Schumpeter: Management Research on the Determinants of Technological InnovationThe Academy of Management Annals, Vol. 2, No. 1From Bureaucratic Tech Transfer to Entrepreneurial Tech CommercializationSSRN Electronic Journal1 Moving Beyond Schumpeter: Management Research on the Determinants of Technological InnovationAcademy of Management Annals, Vol. 2, No. 1The Frontiers of Intellectual Property: Expanded Protection versus New Models of Open ScienceAnnual Review of Law and Social Science, Vol. 3, No. 1The Role of Human Capital in Technological EntrepreneurshipEntrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 31, No. 6Determinants of knowledge transfer: evidence from Canadian university researchers in natural sciences and engineering17 July 2006 | The Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 32, No. 6Measuring the efficiency of university technology transferTechnovation, Vol. 27, No. 5THE INSTITUTIONAL SOURCES OF KNOWLEDGE AND THE VALUE OF ACADEMIC PATENTSEconomics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol. 16, No. 2To patent or not to patent? A survey of Italian inventors on motivations, incentives, and obstacles to university patentingScientometrics, Vol. 70, No. 2Assessing the Regional Economic Development Impacts of Universities: A Review of Current Approaches26 July 2016 | International Regional Science Review, Vol. 30, No. 1The licensing dilemma: understanding the determinants of the rate of technology licensing1 January 2006 | Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 27, No. 12Academic versus industry patenting: An in-depth analysis of what determines patent valueResearch Policy, Vol. 35, No. 10UNIVERSITY RESEARCH, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS AND EUROPEAN INNOVATION SYSTEMSJournal of Economic Surveys, Vol. 20, No. 4University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidenceResearch Policy, Vol. 35, No. 6Patenting and US academic research in the 20th century: The world before and after Bayh-DoleResearch Policy, Vol. 35, No. 6Institutional changes and the commercialization of academic knowledge: A study of Italian universities’ patenting activities between 1965 and 2002Research Policy, Vol. 35, No. 4Academic Capitalism and University Incentives for Faculty EntrepreneurshipThe Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 31, No. 2University start-up formation and technology licensing with firms that go public: a resource-based view of academic entrepreneurshipJournal of Business Venturing, Vol. 20, No. 3Determinants of Scientist Entrepreneurship: An Integrative Research AgendaInstitutional Changes and the Commercialization of Academic Knowledge: A Study of Italian Universities' Patenting Activities between 1965 and 2002SSRN Electronic JournalThe university-industry knowledge relationship: Analyzing patents and the science base of technologies1 January 2004 | Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 55, No. 11The Framework of Static and Dynamic Components: An Examination of Entrepreneurial Orientation and University Ability to Teach Entrepreneurship19 December 2012 | Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, Vol. 17, No. 4Government Subsidized Academic Research: Economic and Ethical Conflicts26 May 2005 | Journal of Academic Ethics, Vol. 2, No. 3Biotechnology entrepreneurial scientists and their collaborationsResearch Policy, Vol. 33, No. 450th Anniversary Article: Technological Innovation, Product Development, and Entrepreneurship in Management ScienceScott A. Shane, Karl T. Ulrich, 1 February 2004 | Management Science, Vol. 50, No. 2University Patenting and its Effects on Academic ResearchSSRN Electronic JournalSocial Networks in Organizational Emergence: The University Spinout PhenomenonNicos Nicolaou, Sue Birley, 1 December 2003 | Management Science, Vol. 49, No. 12Changes in university patent quality after the Bayh–Dole act: a re-examinationInternational Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 21, No. 9The expanding role of university patenting in the life sciences: assessing the importance of experience and connectivityResearch Policy, Vol. 32, No. 9EmpirieThe evolution of university patenting and licensing procedures: An empirical study of institutional change Volume 48, Issue 1January 2002Pages v-170 Article Information Metrics Information Received:December 01, 2000Published Online:January 01, 2002 © 2002 INFORMSCite asDavid C. Mowery, Bhaven N. Sampat, Arvids A. Ziedonis, (2002) Learning to Patent: Institutional Experience, Learning, and the Characteristics of U.S. University Patents After the Bayh-Dole Act, 1981-1992. Management Science 48(1):73-89. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.1.73.14278 KeywordsPatentsUniversitiesTechnology TransferLearningPDF download
Referência(s)