The Puzzling (In)Dependence of Courts: A Comparative Approach
1994; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 23; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/467943
ISSN1537-5366
Autores Tópico(s)Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessThe Puzzling (In)Dependence of Courts: A Comparative ApproachJ. Mark RamseyerJ. Mark RamseyerPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Journal of Legal Studies Volume 23, Number 2Jun., 1994 Sponsored by The University of Chicago Law School Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/467943 Views: 64Total views on this site Citations: 190Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1994 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Mordechai E. Schwarz A master of two servants: lessons from the israeli experience about the effect of separation of powers on public accountability and social welfare, Constitutional Political Economy 34, no.11 (May 2022): 59–87.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-022-09363-zAylin Aydin-Cakir Duration of the constitution-making process as an indicator of post-constitutional political uncertainty: The insurance theory revisited, Global Constitutionalism 19 (Feb 2023): 1–28.https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381722000302Guilherme Lambais, Henrik Sigstad Judicial subversion: The effects of political power on court outcomes, Journal of Public Economics 217 (Jan 2023): 104788.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2022.104788Jay Krehbiel The politics of panel systems: political insurance and the organization of high courts, European Political Science 21, no.44 (Apr 2022): 522–536.https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-022-00379-5Andrea Pozas-Loyo, Camilo Saavedra-Herrera, Francisca Pou-Giménez When More Leads to More: Constitutional Amendments and Interpretation in Mexico 1917-2020, Law & Social Inquiry 5 (Sep 2022): 1–32.https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2022.35Eugénie Mérieau Democratic Breakdown through Lawfare by Constitutional Courts: The Case of Post-"Democratic Transition" Thailand, Pacific Affairs 95, no.33 (Sep 2022): 475–496.https://doi.org/10.5509/2022953475Álvaro Bustos, Nuno Garoupa How Does Court Stability Affect Legal Stability?, The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 61 (Jul 2022).https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewac010Paola Bertoli, Adriana G. Garcia, Nuno Garoupa Testing an application of the political insurance model: The case of the Mexican state-level administrative courts, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 195 (Mar 2022): 272–287.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2022.01.021COLE J. HARVEY Can Courts in Nondemocracies Deter Election Fraud? De Jure Judicial Independence, Political Competition, and Election Integrity, American Political Science Review 19 (Feb 2022): 1–15.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055422000090Björn Dressel, Tomoo Inoue Politics and the Federal Court of Malaysia, 1960–2018: An Empirical Investigation, Asian Journal of Law and Society 9, no.11 (Sep 2020): 26–58.https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2020.18Zhenhuan Lei, Yishuang Li Judicial Independence through Recentralization: Evidence from China, SSRN Electronic Journal 127 (Jan 2022).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4052769Guorong Chen, Zhiyuan Wang Climbing to the Top? How Globalized Competition for Capital Affects Judicial Independence, Studies in Comparative International Development 56, no.44 (Jul 2021): 511–535.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-021-09345-6John D. Huber and Michael M. Ting Civil Service and Patronage in Bureaucracies, The Journal of Politics 83, no.33 (May 2021): 902–916.https://doi.org/10.1086/711057Julius Yam Approaching the Legitimacy Paradox in Hong Kong: Lessons for Hybrid Regime Courts, Law & Social Inquiry 46, no.11 (Sep 2020): 153–191.https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2020.20Muhammet ERDAL Siyasetin Yargısallaşması Üzerine Bir Literatür Taraması: Farklı Yaklaşımlar, Liberal Düşünce Dergisi (Jan 2021).https://doi.org/10.36484/liberal.852409Benjamin G. Engst The Two Faces of Judicial Power, (Apr 2021): 1–24.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46016-7_1George Tridimas Independent Judiciary, (Sep 2021): 1–9.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_12-2Maria Popova Can a leopard change its spots? Strategic behavior versus professional role conception during Ukraine's 2014 court chair elections, Law & Policy 42, no.44 (Dec 2020): 365–381.https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12156Brandon L. Bartels, Christopher D. Johnston Curbing the Court, 14 (Aug 2020).https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316979754Thiago do Nascimento Fonseca Entre riscos e ameaças: independência e controle do Tribunal de Contas da União na Assembleia Constituinte de 1988, Opinião Pública 26, no.22 (Aug 2020): 122–153.https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-01912020262122Chris Kendall Avoiding International Human Rights Law in the Pursuit of Peace, (May 2020): 55–91.https://doi.org/10.1108/S1059-433720200000082004Constantina P. Tridimas, George Tridimas Is the UK Supreme Court rogue to un-prorogue Parliament?, European Journal of Law and Economics 49, no.22 (Apr 2020): 205–225.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-020-09647-5Ketevan Bolkvadze To Reform or to Retain? Politicians' Incentives to Clean Up Corrupt Courts in Hybrid Regimes, Comparative Political Studies 53, no.3-43-4 (Jul 2019): 500–530.https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414019859029BRANDON L. BARTELS, ERIC KRAMON Does Public Support for Judicial Power Depend on Who is in Political Power? Testing a Theory of Partisan Alignment in Africa, American Political Science Review 114, no.11 (Nov 2019): 144–163.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055419000704James R. Rogers, Joseph Daniel Ura , Journal of Theoretical Politics 32, no.33 ( 2020): 435.https://doi.org/10.1177/0951629820927784Tomas Aquino Guimaraes, Edson Ronaldo Guarido Filho, Bruno Batista de Carvalho Luz Courts as Organizations: Governance and Legitimacy, BAR - Brazilian Administration Review 17, no.44 (Jan 2020).https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2020200032Massimiliano Vatiero How Judicial Efficiency Affects Economic Transactions: A Review of the Empirical Literature, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2020).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3576136Tatsuya Iseki Why does a central government file a suit against a local government with the constitutional court?:, The Annuals of Japanese Political Science Association 71, no.11 (Jan 2020): 1_267–1_291.https://doi.org/10.7218/nenpouseijigaku.71.1_267Eric C. Ip Hybrid Constitutionalism, 452 (Apr 2019).https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108163804Carsten Hefeker Political polarization, term length and too much delegation, Constitutional Political Economy 30, no.11 (Jun 2018): 50–69.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-018-9265-2Michael C. Munger A Stream That Rises above Its Source: Judicial Review from a Public Choice Perspective, Supreme Court Economic Review 27 (Oct 2019): 25–59.https://doi.org/10.1086/704212Yanrong ZHAO , Asian Journal of Law and Society 6, no.0101 ( 2019): 131.https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2018.27Alexander Stroh Sustaining and jeopardising a credible arbiter: Judicial networks in Benin's consolidating democracy, International Political Science Review 39, no.55 (Nov 2018): 600–615.https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512118805366Björn Dressel, Raul Sanchez-Urribarri, Alexander Stroh Courts and informal networks: Towards a relational perspective on judicial politics outside Western democracies, International Political Science Review 39, no.55 (Nov 2018): 573–584.https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512118807065Erik H. Wang, Yiqing Xu Awakening Leviathan: The effect of democracy on state capacity, Research & Politics 5, no.22 (May 2018): 205316801877239.https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168018772398Oya Yeğen Judicial "empowerment" through constitutional change: the case of Chilean and Turkish Constitutional Courts, Research and Policy on Turkey 3, no.11 (Apr 2018): 40–67.https://doi.org/10.1080/23760818.2018.1445233Konstantinos Pilpilidis A Constitution for Eternity: An Economic Theory of Explicit Unamendability, (Sep 2018): 63–87.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95141-6_3Simon Zschirnt , Human Rights Review 19, no.11 ( 2018): 97.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-018-0492-8yvind Stiansen Competition and Compliance: Electoral Uncertainty and Implementation of Judgments from the International Human Rights Judiciary, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2018).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3116708Jay Krehbiel Unpacking Unconstitutionality: Examining the Varieties of Judicial Decisions, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2018).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205341Daniel Berliner Sunlight or Window Dressing? Local Government Compliance with South Africa's Promotion of Access to Information Act, Governance 30, no.44 (Sep 2016): 641–661.https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12246David K. Ma Judicial independence and state-business relations: the case of Taiwan's ordinary courts, Democratization 24, no.66 (Oct 2016): 889–905.https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2016.1242580Sabina Schnell Cheap talk or incredible commitment? (Mis)calculating transparency and anti-corruption, Governance 37 (Jun 2017).https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12298BRAD EPPERLY Political competition and de facto judicial independence in non-democracies, European Journal of Political Research 56, no.22 (Dec 2016): 279–300.https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12186Jeffrey L. Dunoff, Mark A. Pollack The Judicial Trilemma, American Journal of International Law 111, no.0202 (Sep 2017): 225–276.https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2017.23Daryl Levinson The Inevitability and Indeterminacy of Game-Theoretic Accounts of Legal Order, Law & Social Inquiry 42, no.0101 (Dec 2018): 28–37.https://doi.org/10.1111/lsi.12278Joshua Boston, David Carlson, JBrandon Duck-Mayr Judicial Independence and Political Competition: Comparing Democracies Over Time, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2017).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2994416Mariana Llanos, Cordula Tibi Weber, Charlotte Heyl, Alexander Stroh Informal interference in the judiciary in new democracies: a comparison of six African and Latin American cases, Democratization 23, no.77 (Sep 2015): 1236–1253.https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2015.1081170Bernd Hayo, Stefan Voigt Explaining constitutional change: The case of judicial independence, International Review of Law and Economics 48 (Oct 2016): 1–13.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2016.06.003Kirk A. Randazzo, Douglas M. Gibler, Rebecca Reid Examining the Development of Judicial Independence, Political Research Quarterly 69, no.33 (Sep 2016): 583–593.https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912916656277Sun-Woo Lee The politics of prosecution service reform in new presidential democracies: The South Korea and Russia cases in comparative perspective, Journal of Eurasian Studies 7, no.22 (Dec 2018): 141–150.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euras.2015.09.001Ayşe Aslıhan Çelenk The myth of 'independent judiciary': the evolution of judiciary-executive relations in Turkish politics, Contemporary Politics 22, no.22 (Mar 2016): 232–247.https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2016.1153283Katarína Šipulová Armin von Bogdandy and Pál Sonnevend (eds.): Constitutional Crisis in the European Constitutional Area. Theory, Law and Politics in Hungary and Romania, Středoevropské politické studie Central European Political Studies Review 18, no.11 (Apr 2016): 101.https://doi.org/10.5817/CEPSR.2016.1.101Liviu Damşa Justice, Property and Law in Post-communist Transformations of Property, (Jan 2017): 53–98.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48530-0_3Dror Brenner, Alon Cohen Ideology and Strategy among Politicians: The Case of Judicial Independence, Review of Law & Economics 12, no.22 (Jan 2016).https://doi.org/10.1515/rle-2015-0038Alexander Stroh The Consequences of Appointment Policies for Court Legitimacy in Benin: A Network Analysis Approach, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2016).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2786614J. Mark Ramseyer Social Capital and the Formal Legal System: Evidence from Prefecture-Level Data in Japan, Journal of Legal Analysis 7, no.22 (Aug 2015): 421–466.https://doi.org/10.1093/jla/lav008Santiago Basabe-Serrano Informal Institutions and Judicial Independence in Paraguay, 1954-2011, Law & Policy 37, no.44 (Sep 2015): 350–378.https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12038Nadia Fiorino, Nicolas Gavoille, Fabio Padovano Rewarding judicial independence: Evidence from the Italian Constitutional Court, International Review of Law and Economics 43 (Aug 2015): 56–66.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2015.05.002Alessandro Melcarne, Giovanni B. Ramello Judicial Independence, Judges' Incentives and Efficiency, Review of Law & Economics 11, no.22 (Jun 2015): 149–169.https://doi.org/10.1515/rle-2015-0024Georg Vanberg Constitutional Courts in Comparative Perspective: A Theoretical Assessment, Annual Review of Political Science 18, no.11 (May 2015): 167–185.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-040113-161150J. Fox, M. C. Stephenson The Constraining, Liberating, and Informational Effects of Nonbinding Law, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 31, no.22 (Jul 2014): 320–346.https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewu013DANIEL BERLINER, AARON ERLICH Competing for Transparency: Political Competition and Institutional Reform in Mexican States, American Political Science Review 109, no.11 (Mar 2015): 110–128.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055414000616Marcelo Leiras, Guadalupe Tuñón, and Agustina Giraudy Who Wants an Independent Court? Political Competition and Supreme Court Autonomy in the Argentine Provinces (1984–2008), The Journal of Politics 77, no.11 (Jun 2015): 175–187.https://doi.org/10.1086/678975Malcolm M. Feeley, Carlo Guarnieri Courts and Adjudication, (Jan 2015): 103–107.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.86017-1Erik Haixiao Wang, Yiqing Xu Awakening Leviathan: The Effect of Democratization on State Capacity, 1960-2009, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2015).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2626849Christian Bjjrnskov, Stefan Voigt The Determinants of Emergency Constitutions, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2015).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2697144Christine Rothmayr Allison Law in Books Versus Law in Action: A Review of the Socio-legal Literature, (Feb 2015): 35–54.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14953-0_3 Constraints on courts, (Oct 2014): 62–113.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139381260.003Gretchen Helmke, Elena V. McLean Inducing independence: A strategic model of World Bank assistance and legal reform, Conflict Management and Peace Science 31, no.44 (Nov 2013): 383–405.https://doi.org/10.1177/0738894213508696T. Ginsburg, M. Versteeg Why Do Countries Adopt Constitutional Review?, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 30, no.33 (Jul 2013): 587–622.https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewt008Peter Brett Explaining South Africa's Bill of Rights: an interpretive approach, Commonwealth & Comparative Politics 52, no.33 (Jul 2014): 423–442.https://doi.org/10.1080/14662043.2014.921401André Schultz, Vladimir Kozlov, Alexander Libman Judicial alignment and criminal justice: evidence from Russian courts, Post-Soviet Affairs 30, no.2-32-3 (Dec 2013): 137–170.https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2013.856574MATTHEW M. TAYLOR The Limits of Judicial Independence: A Model with Illustration from Venezuela under Chávez, Journal of Latin American Studies 46, no.22 (Apr 2014): 229–259.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X14000017Björn Dressel Governance, Courts and Politics in Asia, Journal of Contemporary Asia 44, no.22 (Feb 2014): 259–278.https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2013.870827 Daniel Berliner The Political Origins of Transparency, The Journal of Politics 76, no.22 (Jul 2015): 479–491.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381613001412Eric C. Ip The judicial review of legislation in the United Kingdom: a public choice analysis, European Journal of Law and Economics 37, no.22 (Nov 2011): 221–247.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-011-9281-4Alon Cohen Independent judicial review: A blessing in disguise, International Review of Law and Economics 37 (Mar 2014): 209–220.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2013.10.006Tom Ginsburg The Politics of Law and Development in Middle-Income Countries, (Feb 2014): 21–35.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139235730.003Patrick Brown, Jerg Gutmann, Stefan Voigt Let the Sunshine in: Why Countries Adopt Freedom of Information Acts, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2014).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2405415J. Mark Ramseyer Social Capital and the Formal Legal System: Evidence from Prefecture-Level Data in Japan, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2014).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2425763Mariana Llanos, Cordula Tibi Weber, Charlotte Heyl, Alexander Stroh Informal Interference in the Judiciary in New Democracies: A Comparison of Six African and Latin American Cases, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2014).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2428108Gretchen Helmke The Puzzle of Purges: A New Theory of Judicial Manipulation with Evidence from Latin America, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2014).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2481064Lorenz Blume, Bernd Hayo, Stefan Voigt Correlates and Determinants of Direct Democracy, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2014).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2542156Veronica Michel Judicial Reform and Access to Justice: The Impact of Criminal Justice Reforms on Transitional Justice Efforts in Latin America, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2014).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2647482Bryon J. Moraski Constructing courts after communism: Reevaluating the effect of electoral uncertainty, Communist and Post-Communist Studies 46, no.44 (Dec 2013): 433–443.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2013.10.001Ran Hirschl The Strategic Foundations of Constitutions, (Oct 2013): 157–181.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139507509.009Pedro C. Magalhães Explaining the Constitutionalization of Social Rights, (Oct 2013): 432–468.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139507509.020Cristina E. Parau THE DORMANCY OF PARLIAMENTS: THE INVISIBLE CAUSE OF JUDICIARY EMPOWERMENT IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE, Representation 49, no.33 (Oct 2013): 267–280.https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2013.830480Eric C. Ip THE INSTITUTIONAL FOUNDATIONS OF SUPREME COURT POWER IN BRITAIN'S REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY, Representation 49, no.33 (Oct 2013): 281–293.https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2013.830481Diana Kapiszewski, Matthew M. Taylor Compliance: Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Explaining Adherence to Judicial Rulings, Law & Social Inquiry 38, no.44 (Sep 2012): 803–835.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2012.01320.xEric Ip The Evolution of Constitutional Adjudication in the Chinese Special Administrative Regions: Theory and Evidence, American Journal of Comparative Law 61, no.44 (Sep 2013): 799–829.https://doi.org/10.5131/AJCL.2013.0008Aylin Aydın Judicial Independence across Democratic Regimes: Understanding the Varying Impact of Political Competition, Law & Society Review 47, no.11 (Feb 2013): 105–134.https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12003Cristina E. Parau The Dormancy of Parliaments: The Invisible Cause of Judiciary Empowerment in Central and Eastern Europe, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2013).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2261728Justin Fox, Matthew Caleb Stephenson The Constraining, Liberating, and Informational Effects of Non-Binding Law, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2013).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2291723Jill Goldenziel Veiled Political Questions: Islamic Dress, Constitutionalism, and the Ascendance of Courts, American Journal of Comparative Law 61, no.11 (Jan 2013): 1–50.https://doi.org/10.5131/AJCL.2012.0015Matthew E. K. Hall Rethinking Regime Politics, Law & Social Inquiry 37, no.44 (Mar 2012): 878–907.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2012.01290.xBJÖRN DRESSEL, MARCUS MIETZNER A Tale of Two Courts: The Judicialization of Electoral Politics in Asia, Governance 25, no.33 (Feb 2012): 391–414.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01571.xEric Ip A Positive Theory of Constitutional Judicial Review: Evidence from Singapore and Taiwan, Asian Journal of Law and Economics 2, no.44 (Jan 2012): 1–43.https://doi.org/10.1515/2154-4611.1050Tara Leigh Grove The Exceptions Clause as a Structural Safeguard, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2012).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2029041Matthew J. Steilen Collaborative Departmentalism, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2012).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2102640Hossein Alikamar Abbasi Judicial Independence, Constitutions, and Politicians, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2012).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2109901Michael Zilis Discretion v. Independence: Distinguishing Two Forms of Autonomy in Models of Judicial Behavior, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2012).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2157090Veronica Michel Understanding the Relationship between the Rule of Law, Judicial Reform, and Transitional Justice, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2012).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2346899Nuno Garoupa, Tom Ginsburg Hybrid Judicial Career Structures, Journal of Legal Analysis 3, no.22 (Oct 2011): 411–448.https://doi.org/10.1093/jla/lar004Fiona Colgan, Todd Brower How judges decide: lesbian/gay identity and social cognition, Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal 30, no.88 (Nov 2011): 633–650.https://doi.org/10.1108/02610151111183171Axel Dreher, Stefan Voigt Does membership in international organizations increase governments' credibility? Testing the effects of delegating powers, Journal of Comparative Economics 39, no.33 (Sep 2011): 326–348.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2011.04.003Jordi Blanes i Vidal, Clare Leaver Are tenured judges insulated from political pressure?, Journal of Public Economics 95, no.7-87-8 (Aug 2011): 570–586.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.11.004Diana Kapiszewski Tactical Balancing: High Court Decision Making on Politically Crucial Cases, Law & Society Review 45, no.22 (May 2011): 471–506.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00437.xEyal Benvenisti, George W. Downs Prospects for the Increased Independence of International Tribunals, German Law Journal 12, no.55 (Mar 2019): 1057–1082.https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200017223Sascha Kneip Constitutional courts as democratic actors and promoters of the rule of law: institutional prerequisites and normative foundations, Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft 5, no.11 (Apr 2011): 131–155.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12286-011-0096-zRebecca Bill Chávez, John A. Ferejohn, Barry R. Weingast A Theory of the Politically Independent Judiciary, (Jan 2011): 219–247.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511976520.009George Tridimas Comparison of Central Bank and Judicial Independence, (Jun 2011): 155–170.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6784-8_11Stefan Voigt Positive constitutional economics II—a survey of recent developments, Public Choice 146, no.1-21-2 (May 2010): 205–256.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-010-9638-1Stefan Voigt The Economics of Informal International Law - An Empirical Assessment, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2011).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1835963Armen Mazmanyan Constrained, pragmatic pro-democratic appraising constitutional review courts in post-Soviet politics, Communist and Post-Communist Studies 43, no.44 (Dec 2010): 409–423.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2010.10.003Maria Popova Political Competition as an Obstacle to Judicial Independence: Evidence From Russia and Ukraine, Comparative Political Studies 43, no.1010 (May 2010): 1202–1229.https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414010369075Diana Kapiszewski Judicial Reform as Political Insurance: Argentina, Peru, and Mexico in the 1990s - by Finkel, Jodi S., Bulletin of Latin American Research 29, no.33 (Jun 2010): 394–396.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-9856.2010.00398.xRobert K. Fleck, F. Andrew Hanssen Repeated adjustment of delegated powers and the history of eminent domain, International Review of Law and Economics 30, no.22 (Jun 2010): 99–112.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2009.09.006Vanessa A. Baird, Debra Javeline The Effects of National and Local Funding on Judicial Performance: Perceptions of Russia's Lawyers, Law & Society Review 44, no.22 (Jul 2010): 331–364.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2010.00401.xRebecca Bill Chávez The Quest for Justice in Latin America, Latin American Politics and Society 52, no.11 (Mar 2010): 155–163.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2010.00077.xGeorge Tridimas Constitutional judicial review and political insurance, European Journal of Law and Economics 29, no.11 (Jun 2009): 81–101.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-009-9112-zVeronica Michel Epistemic Networks and the Diffusion of Legal Institutions: The Case of Criminal Private Prosecution in Latin America, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2010).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2647491Ran Hirschl The Realist Turn in Comparative Constitutional Politics, Political Research Quarterly 62, no.44 (Nov 2009): 825–833.https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912909347202Sofia Amaral-Garcia, Nuno Garoupa, Veronica Grembi Judicial Independence and Party Politics in the Kelsenian Constitutional Courts: The Case of Portugal, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 6, no.22 (Jun 2009): 381–404.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2009.01147.xGretchen Helmke, Frances Rosenbluth Regimes and the Rule of Law: Judicial Independence in Comparative Perspective, Annual Review of Political Science 12, no.11 (Jun 2009): 345–366.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.12.040907.121521Clifford James Carrubba A Model of the Endogenous Development of Judicial Institutions in Federal and International Systems, The Journal of Politics 71, no.11 (Jul 2015): 55–69.https://doi.org/10.1017/S002238160809004XStefan Voigt Positive Constitutional Economics - A Survey of Recent Developments, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2009).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1358508George Tridimas Constitutional Judicial Review and Political Insurance, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2009).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1419912Daniel Berkowitz, Karen B. Clay Institutional Hysterisis: Courts and Politics in the American States (Chapters 5&6 of a Book Project), SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2009).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1425725Arianna Sanchez, Beatriz Magaloni, Eric Magar Legalist vs. Interpretativist: The Supreme Court and the Democratic Transition in Mexico, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2009).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1499490Cristina E. Parau Beyond Judicial Independence: What Kind of Judiciary is Emerging in Post-Communist Eastern Europe?, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2009).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1523285Rebecca Gill The Fading Utility of the Australian Legalist Story: Using Social Background Theory to Explain Outcomes on the High Court, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2009).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1539885Vicki C. Jackson Packages of judicial independence: implications for reform proposals on the selection & tenure of Article III judges, Daedalus 137, no.44 (Oct 2008): 48–63.https://doi.org/10.1162/daed.2008.137.4.48Jeffrey K. Staton, Georg Vanberg The Value of Vagueness: Delegation, Defiance, and Judicial Opinions, American Journal of Political Science 52, no.33 (Jul 2008): 504–519.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00326.xStephan Haggard, Andrew MacIntyre, Lydia Tiede The Rule of Law and Economic Development, Annual Review of Political Science 11, no.11 (Jun 2008): 205–234.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.081205.100244Ran Hirschl The Judicialization of Mega-Politics and the Rise of Political Courts, Annual Review of Political Science 11, no.11 (Jun 2008): 93–118.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053006.183906Pablo T. Spiller, Mariano Tommasi The Institutions of Regulation: An Application to Public Utilities, (Jan 2008): 515–543.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69305-5_21Jeffrey K. K. Staton, Will H. Moore The Last Pillar to Fall? Domestic and International Legal Institutions, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2008).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1306802Bernd Hayo, Stefan Voigt Explaining de facto judicial independence, International Review of Law and Economics 27, no.33 (Sep 2007): 269–290.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2007.07.004Shannon Roesler Permutations of Judicial Power: The New Constitutionalism and the Expansion of Judicial Authority, Law & Social Inquiry 32, no.22 (Jun 2007): 545–579.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2007.00068.xStefan Voigt, Michael Ebeling, Lorenz Blume Improving credibility by delegating judicial competence—the case of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, Journal of Development Economics 82, no.22 (Mar 2007): 348–373.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2006.04.004Matthew M. Taylor, O judiciário e as políticas públicas no Brasil, Dados 50, no.22 (Jan 2007): 229–257.https://doi.org/10.1590/S0011-52582007000200001Jeffrey K. K. Staton, Georg Vanberg The Value of Vagueness: Delegation, Defiance, and Judicial Opinions, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2007).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1028671Daniel Berkowitz, Karen B. Clay Legal Origins and the Evolution of Institutions: Evidence from American State Courts, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2007).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.993886Clifford Carrubba A Model of the Endogenous Development of Judicial Institutions, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2007).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.999704Maria Popova Watchdogs or attack dogs? The role of the Russian courts and the central election commission in the resolution of electoral disputes, Europe-Asia Studies 58, no.33 (Aug 2006): 391–414.https://doi.org/10.1080/09668130600601800Scott R. MeinkeScott R. Meinke is assistant professor of political science, Bucknell University, Lewisburg, PA 17837.Jeffrey K. StatonJeffrey K. Staton is assistant professor of political science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306..Steven T. WuhsSteven T. Wuhs is assistant professor of government, University of Redlands, Redlands, CA 92373. State Delegate Selection Rules for Presidential Nominations, 1972–2000, The Journal of Politics 68, no.11 (Jul 2015): 180–193.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00379.xFrancisco Ramos The Establishment of Constitutional Courts: A Study of 128 Democratic Constitutions, Review of Law & Economics 2, no.11 (Jan 2006).https://doi.org/10.2202/1555-5879.1043Robert K. Fleck, F. Andrew Hanssen 'Deja Vu All Over Again': Repeated Adjustment of Delegated Powers and the History of Eminent Domain, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2006).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.943525KEITH E. WHITTINGTON "Interpose Your Friendly Hand": Political Supports for the Exercise of Judicial Review by the United States Supreme Court, American Political Science Review 99, no.44 (Oct 2005): 583–596.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051890Joseph L. Staats Book Review: The Rule of Law in Nascent Democracies: Judicial Politics in Argentina, Comparative Political Studies 38, no.55 (Jun 2005): 581–583.https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414004273859George Tridmas Judges and Taxes: Judicial Review, Judicial Independence and the Size of Government, Constitutional Political Economy 16, no.11 (Mar 2005): 5–30.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-005-5850-2Fabrice Lehoucq, Gabriel L. Negretto, Francisco Javier Aparicio, Benito Nacif, Allyson Benton Political Institutions, Policymaking Processes, and Policy Outcomes in Mexico, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2005).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1815888Georg Vanberg The Politics of Constitutional Review in Germany, 1 (Jul 2009).https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511510427Alexei Trochev Less Democracy, More Courts: A Puzzle of Judicial Review in Russia, Law Society Review 38, no.33 (Sep 2004): 513–548.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-9216.2004.00056.xLeslie Friedman Goldstein From Democracy to Juristocracy, Law Society Review 38, no.33 (Sep 2004): 611–629.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-9216.2004.00059.x F. Andrew Hanssen Learning about Judicial Independence: Institutional Change in the State Courts Hanssen, The Journal of Legal Studies 33, no.22 (Jul 2015): 431–473.https://doi.org/10.1086/421572F. Andrew Hanssen Is There a Politically Optimal Level of Judicial Independence?, American Economic Review 94, no.33 (May 2004): 712–729.https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828041464470R. Daniel Kelemen, Eric C. Sibbitt The Globalization of American Law, International Organization 58, no.0101 (Mar 2004).https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818304581043John A. Ferejohn, Frances McCall Rosenbluth, Charles R. Shipan Comparative Judicial Politics, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2004).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1154123Richard W. Carney National Security and National Finance: Locating the Origins of Modern Financial Capitalism, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2004).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2188902Tom Ginsburg Judicial Review in New Democracies, 1 (Jul 2009).https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511511189Joseph Sanders Adversarial Legalism and Civil Litigation: Prospects for Change, Law Social Inquiry 28, no.33 (Jul 2003): 719–741.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2003.tb00213.x Matthew C. Stephenson "When the Devil Turns … ": The Political Foundations of Independent Judicial Review Stephenson, The Journal of Legal Studies 32, no.11 (Jul 2015): 59–89.https://doi.org/10.1086/342038Matthew Caleb Stephenson Court of Public Opinion: Government Accountability and Judicial Independence, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2003).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.437480J. Mark Ramseyer Judicial Independence, (Jan 2002): 1041–1045.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-74173-1_198Pablo T. Spiller Agency Discretion and Accountability in Regulation, (Jan 2002): 30–35.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-74173-1_8Eric Bennett Rasmusen, J. Mark Mark Ramseyer When are Judges and Bureaucrats Left Independent? Theory and History from Imperial Japan, Postwar Japan, and the United States, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2002).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.305900Pablo T. Spiller Regulatory Agencies and the Courts, (Jan 2017): 1663–1667.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-74173-1_315MARY L. VOLCANSEK Constitutional courts as veto players: Divorce and decrees in Italy, European Journal of Political Research 39, no.33 (May 2001): 347–372.https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00580Eli M. Salzberger Temporary Appointments and Judicial Independence: Theoretical Analysis and Empirical Findings from the Supreme Court of Israel, Israel Law Review 35, no.2-32-3 (Jul 2014): 481–523.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021223700012279Eric A. Posner Strategies of Constitutional Scholarship, Law & Social Inquiry 26, no.0202 (Dec 2018): 529–546.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2001.tb00187.xRebecca Gill Disagreement on the Australian High Court: Reconsidering the Legalist Model, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2001).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1539820Richard W. Carney The Political Economy of Financial Systems, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2001).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2165154Paul B. Stephan Redistributive Litigation - Judicial Innovation, Private Expectations and the Shadow of International Law, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2001).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.269131Ran Hirschl The Political Origins of Judicial Empowerment through Constitutionalization: Lessons from Four Constitutional Revolutions, Law & Social Inquiry 25, no.0101 (Dec 2018): 91–149.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2000.tb00152.xPeter Newman R, (Jan 1998): 205–394.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14286-6_3Eric Bennett Rasmusen A Theory of Trustees, and Other Thoughts, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 1998).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.84388William M. Reisinger, Arthur H. Miller, Vicki L. Hesli Russians and the legal system: Mass views and behaviour in the 1990s, Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 13, no.33 (Sep 1997): 24–55.https://doi.org/10.1080/13523279708415352Eugenia F. Toma A contractual model of the voting behavior of the supreme court: The role of the chief justice, International Review of Law and Economics 16, no.44 (Dec 1996): 433–447.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8188(96)00036-1Robert D. Cooter, Tom Ginsburg Comparative judicial discretion: An empirical test of economic models, International Review of Law and Economics 16, no.33 (Sep 1996): 295–313.https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-8188(96)00018-XTHOMAS H. HAMMOND Formal Theory and the Institutions of Governance, Governance 9, no.22 (Apr 1996): 107–185.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.1996.tb00237.xMasaki Abe The internal control of a bureaucratic judiciary: The case of Japan, International Journal of the Sociology of Law 23, no.44 (Dec 1995): 303–320.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0194-6595(05)80001-2Pablo T. Spiller, Mariano Tommasi The Institutions of Regulation: An Application to Public Utilities, (): 515–543.https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-25092-1_21André Brodocz Bedrohungen der Judikative, (): 250–269.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91156-4_15Donald L. Horowitz Low-Quality Democracy and Its Discontents, (): 207–260.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139225724.009Samuel Issacharoff, Stéphanie Novak, Jon Elster The majoritarian threat to democracy, (): 236–256.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107286160.012Diana Kapiszewski, Gordon Silverstein, Robert A. Kagan, Diana Kapiszewski, Gordon Silverstein, Robert A. Kagan Introduction, (): 1–42.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139207843.001Amnon Reichman, Diana Kapiszewski, Gordon Silverstein, Robert A. Kagan Judicial Constitution Making in a Divided Society, (): 233–261.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139207843.012
Referência(s)