History of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine's Efforts to Keep Ultrasound Safe
2003; Wiley; Volume: 22; Issue: 12 Linguagem: Inglês
10.7863/jum.2003.22.12.1293
ISSN1550-9613
Autores Tópico(s)Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography
ResumoJournal of Ultrasound in MedicineVolume 22, Issue 12 p. 1293-1300 Commemoration History of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine's Efforts to Keep Ultrasound Safe Wesley L. Nyborg PhD, Wesley L. Nyborg PhD Physics Department, University of Vermont, Burlington Vermont USASearch for more papers by this author Wesley L. Nyborg PhD, Wesley L. Nyborg PhD Physics Department, University of Vermont, Burlington Vermont USASearch for more papers by this author First published: 01 December 2003 https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2003.22.12.1293Citations: 13Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL References 1Nyborg WL. Biological effects of ultrasound: development of safety guidelines. Part I: personal histories. Ultrasound Med Biol 2000; 26: 911–964. 2Nyborg WL. Biological effects of ultrasound: development of safety guidelines. Part II: general review. Ultrasound Med Biol 2001; 27: 301–333. 3Lehmann JF. The biophysical mode of action of biologic and therapeutic ultrasonic reactions. J Acoust Soc Am 1953; 25: 17–25. 4Holmes JH. A history of AIUM. Reflections 1980; 6: 193–212. 5American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. Communication from the AIUM Bioeffects Committee, August 1976. J Clinical Ultrasound 1976; 5: 2–4. 6American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. Who's Afraid of a Hundred Milliwatts per Square Centimeter (100 mW/cm2, SPTA)? Laurel, MD: American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine; 1978. 7American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. Evaluation of Research Reports: Bioeffects Literature Reviews (1962–1982). Laurel, MD: American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine; 1982. 8American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. Evaluation of Research Reports: Bioeffects Literature Reviews (1985–1991). Laurel, MD: American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine; 1991. 9American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. Bioeffects considerations for the safety of diagnostic ultrasound. J Ultrasound Med 1988; 7(suppl): S1– S38. 10American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. Bioeffects and Safety of Diagnostic Ultrasound. Laurel, MD: American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine; 1993. 11American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. Mechanical bioeffects from diagnostic ultrasound: AIUM consensus statements. J Ultrasound Med 2000; 19: 69–168. 12American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. Acoustical Data for Diagnostic Ultrasound Equipment. Manufacturer's Commendation Panel. Laurel, MD: American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine; 1985. 13American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. Acoustical Data for Diagnostic Ultrasound Equipment. Manufacturer's Commendation Panel. Laurel, MD: American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine; 1987. 14US Food and Drug Administration. 510(k) Guide for Measuring and Reporting Acoustic Output of Diagnostic Ultrasound Medical Devices. Rockville, MD: Center for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug Administration; 1985. 15American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. Safety Considerations for Diagnostic Ultrasound. Laurel, MD: American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine; 1985. 16American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. Recommended Ultrasound Terminology. 2nd ed. Laurel, MD; American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine; 1997. 17Kremkau FW. Diagnostic Ultrasound: Physical Principles and Exercises. New York, NY: Grune & Stratton; 1980. 18Kremkau FW. Diagnostic Ultrasound: Principles and Instruments. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Co; 2002. 19US Congress. Public law 94-295. In: United States Statutes at Large. Vol 90. Pt 1. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1978:539–583. 20Carson PL, Fischella P, Oughton TV. Ultrasonic power and intensities produced by diagnostic ultrasound equipment. Ultrasound Med Biol 1978; 3: 341–350. 21American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, National Electrical Manufacturers Association. Safety standard for diagnostic ultrasound equipment. Publication UL 1-1981. J Ultrasound Med 1983; 2(suppl): S1–S49. 22Stratmeyer ME. FDA model for regulatory purposes. Ultrasound Med Biol 1989; 15(suppl 1): 35–36. 23National Council for Radiation Protection and Measurements. Exposure Criteria for Medical Diagnostic Ultrasound, I: Criteria Based on Thermal Mechanisms. Bethesda, MD: National Council for Radiation Protection and Measurements Publications; 1992. Report 113. 24Nyborg WL. Physical mechanisms for biological effects of ultrasound. Rockville, MD: US Food and Drug Administration; 1978. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare publication (FDA) 78-8062. 25Carstensen EL, Child SZ, Norton S, Nyborg WL. Ultrasonic heating of the skull. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 87: 1310–1317. 26Drewniak JL, Carnes KI, Dunn F. In vitro ultrasonic heating of fetal bone. J Acoust Soc Am 1989; 86: 1254–1258. 27Child SZ, Hartman CL, Schery LA, Carstensen EL. Lung damage from exposure to pulsed ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 1990; 16: 817–825. 28American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, National Electrical Manufacturers Association. Standard for Real-Time Display of Thermal and Mechanical Acoustic Output Indices on Diagnostic Ultrasound Equipment. Laurel, MD: American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine; Rosslyn, VA: National Electrical Manufacturers Association; 1992. 29Apfel RE, Holland CK. Gauging the likelihood of cavitation from short-pulse low-duty-cycle diagnostic ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 1991; 17: 179–185. 30US Food and Drug Administration. Revised 910(k) Guidance for Diagnostic Ultrasound for 1993: Communication from F. A. Andersen. Rockville, MD: Center for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug Administration; 1993. 31US Food and Drug Administration. Information for Manufacturers Seeking Marketing Clearance of Diagnostic Ultrasound Systems and Transducers. Rockville, MD: Center for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug Administration; 1997. 32Abbott JG. Rationale and derivation of MI and TI: a review. Ultrasound Med Biol 1999; 25: 431–441. 33American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. Medical Ultrasound Safety. Laurel, MD: American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine; 1994. 34Carson PL (ed). Effects of nonlinear ultrasound propagation on output display indices. J Ultrasound Med 1999; 18: 27–86. 35National Council for Radiation Protection and Measurements Exposure Criteria for Medical Diagnostic Ultrasound, II: Criteria Based on All Known Mechanisms. Bethesda, MD: National Council for Radiation Protection and Measurements Publications; 2002. Report 140. Citing Literature Volume22, Issue12December 2003Pages 1293-1300 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)