Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Allergic contact dermatitis from an anthraquinone derivative in a chemical plant

1994; Wiley; Volume: 30; Issue: 4 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1111/j.1600-0536.1994.tb00654.x

1600-0536

Mark Wilkinson, J. R. Blache ́re and Harry G. Brittain, M. H. Beck,

Synthesis and properties of polymers

Contact DermatitisVolume 30, Issue 4 p. 241-242 Allergic contact dermatitis from an anthraquinone derivative in a chemical plant S. M. Wilkinson, S. M. Wilkinson The Skin Hospital, Chapel Street, Salford M60 9EP, UKSearch for more papers by this authorJ. Brittain, J. Brittain Research and Development, Solvay Interox Limited, Widnes, UKSearch for more papers by this authorM. H. Beck, M. H. Beck The Skin Hospital, Chapel Street, Salford M60 9EP, UKSearch for more papers by this author S. M. Wilkinson, S. M. Wilkinson The Skin Hospital, Chapel Street, Salford M60 9EP, UKSearch for more papers by this authorJ. Brittain, J. Brittain Research and Development, Solvay Interox Limited, Widnes, UKSearch for more papers by this authorM. H. Beck, M. H. Beck The Skin Hospital, Chapel Street, Salford M60 9EP, UKSearch for more papers by this author First published: April 1994 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.1994.tb00654.xCitations: 7AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article. References 1 Harber L C, Bickers D E. Photosensitivity diseases. Philadelphia : W. B. Saunders Company, 1981: 125. Google Scholar 2 Menezes Brandão F, Valente A. Photodermatitis from anthraquinone. Contact Dermatitis 1988: 18: 171–172. 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1988.tb04507.x PubMedGoogle Scholar 3 Cronin E. Contact dermatitis, Edinburgh . Churchill Livingstone 1980: 36–55. Google Scholar 4 Hatch K. L, Maibach H I. Textile dye dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 1985: 12: 1079–1092. 10.1016/S0190-9622(85)70137-5 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 5 Gardiner J S, Dickson A, MacLeod T M, Frain-Bell W. The investigation of photo-contact dermatitis in a dye manufacturing process. Br J Dermatol 1972: 86: 264–271. 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1972.tb02227.x CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 6 Hjorth N, Moller H. Phototoxic textile dermatitis (“Bikini dermatitis”). Arch Dermatol 1976: 112: 1445–1447. 10.1001/archderm.1976.01630340063018 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 7 Dooms-Goossens A, Bonamie A, Parys M, Dooms M. Sensitising anthraquinone dye in spectable frames. Contact Dermatitis 1981: 7: 214–215. 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1981.tb04049.x CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 8 Hausen B M, Sawall E-M. Sensitization experiments with textile dyes in guinea pigs. Contact Dermatitis 1989: 20: 27–31. 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1989.tb03091.x CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 9 Rietschel R L. The patch test as an exercise in cutaneous pharmacokinetics. Does compound allergy exist Arch Dermatol 1992: 128: 678–679. PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 10 Whitmore S E. The importance of proper vehicle selection in the detection of minoxidil sensitivity. Arch Dermatol 1992: 128: 653–656. 10.1001/archderm.1992.01680150083011 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Citing Literature Volume30, Issue4April 1994Pages 241-242 ReferencesRelatedInformation