Ejaculate dynamics in butterflies: a strategy for maximizing fertilization success?
1996; Royal Society; Volume: 263; Issue: 1373 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1098/rspb.1996.0154
ISSN1471-2954
Autores Tópico(s)Animal Behavior and Reproduction
ResumoRestricted accessMoreSectionsView PDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail Cite this article Cook Penny A. and Wedell Nina 1996Ejaculate dynamics in butterflies: a strategy for maximizing fertilization success?Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B.2631047–1051http://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1996.0154SectionRestricted accessArticleEjaculate dynamics in butterflies: a strategy for maximizing fertilization success? Penny A. Cook Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for more papers by this author and Nina Wedell Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for more papers by this author Penny A. Cook Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed and Nina Wedell Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Published:22 August 1996https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1996.0154AbstractThe butterfly spermatophore is a complex structure containing both sperm and accessory substances. Most of the sperm are anucleated 'apyrene' sperm, which do not fertilize the eggs. The fertilizing 'eupyrene' sperm comprise only 10-15 % of the total sperm number transferred to the female at mating. In addition to sperm, some butterfly species also provide the female with nutrients that are used for egg production and/or somatic maintenance. Many butterflies eclose with most resources available for reproduction already present. Consequently, resources have to be allocated to the different spermatophore components over consecutive matings. This study is the first to quantify eupyrene and apyrene sperm numbers in relation to spermatophore mass, mating history and larval diet. Spermatophore mass was significantly reduced on the male's second mating. However, both eupyrene and apyrene sperm numbers were dramatically increased, as was the proportion of eupyrene sperm. Theory predicts that sperm numbers should increase under sperm competition. On males' second matings, the probability of encountering virgin females is reduced. Males may therefore maximise fertilization success by providing these females with large numbers of sperm. Simultaneously, it may be advantageous for males to reduce their nutrient donation because of their lower paternity assurance. Larval diet affected mass of the first spermatophore but had no effect on sperm number. This suggests that males maintain sperm numbers when resources are limited, prioritising fertilization success over investment in offspring.FootnotesThis text was harvested from a scanned image of the original document using optical character recognition (OCR) software. As such, it may contain errors. Please contact the Royal Society if you find an error you would like to see corrected. Mathematical notations produced through Infty OCR. Previous ArticleNext Article VIEW FULL TEXT DOWNLOAD PDF FiguresRelatedReferencesDetailsCited by Dederichs T, Huber B and Michalik P (2022) Evolutionary morphology of sperm in pholcid spiders (Pholcidae, Synspermiata), BMC Zoology, 10.1186/s40850-022-00148-3, 7:1 Gols R, Croijmans L, Dicke M, van Loon J and Harvey J (2022) Plant quantity affects development and reproduction of a gregarious butterfly more than plant quality, Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 10.1111/eea.13192, 170:8, (646-655), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2022. Magris M (2021) Strategic adjustment of ejaculate quality in response to variation of the socio-sexual environment, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 10.1007/s00265-021-03032-1, 75:6, Online publication date: 1-Jun-2021. Hiroyoshi S, Mitsunaga T and Reddy G (2020) Temporal shift between daily sperm movement and mating (sperm reflux) in the Asian comma butterfly, Polygonia c‐aureum , Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 10.1111/eea.12980, 168:11, (857-868), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2020. Liu J, Zhang Y, Zheng X, He X, Wang Q and Miller C (2020) Combined cues of male competition influence spermatozoal investment in a moth, Functional Ecology, 10.1111/1365-2435.13554, 34:6, (1223-1234), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2020. Hiroyoshi S, Reddy G and Mitsunaga T (2020) Effects of photoperiod and aging on the adult spermatogenesis of Polygonia c-aureum (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae), in relation to adult diapause, Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 10.1007/s00359-020-01413-x, 206:3, (467-475), Online publication date: 1-May-2020. Xu J and Wang Q (2020) Body weight of the two sexes determines the occurrence of polyandry in a moth, Animal Behaviour, 10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.10.021, 159, (13-19), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2020. Marec F and Vreysen M (2019) Advances and Challenges of Using the Sterile Insect Technique for the Management of Pest Lepidoptera, Insects, 10.3390/insects10110371, 10:11, (371) Alpern J, Asselin M and Moehring A (2018) Identification of a novel sperm class and its role in fertilization in Drosophila , Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 10.1111/jeb.13409, 32:3, (259-266), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2019. Kaufmann E and Otti O Males increase their fitness by choosing large females in the common bedbug Cimex lectularius, Animal Biology, 10.1163/15707563-20181033, 69:1, (17-32) Jensen K and Silverman J (2018) Frequently mated males have higher protein preference in German cockroaches, Behavioral Ecology, 10.1093/beheco/ary104 Duplouy A, Woestmann L, Gallego Zamorano J and Saastamoinen M (2017) Impact of male condition on his spermatophore and consequences for female reproductive performance in the Glanville fritillary butterfly, Insect Science, 10.1111/1744-7917.12424, 25:2, (284-296), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2018. Ng S, Bhardwaj S and Monteiro A (2017) Males Become Choosier in Response to Manipulations of Female Wing Ornaments in Dry Season Bicyclus anynana Butterflies, Journal of Insect Science, 10.1093/jisesa/iex053, 17:4, Online publication date: 1-Jul-2017., Online publication date: 1-Jul-2017. Ju J, Hoffmann A, Zhang Y, Duan X, Guo Y, Gong J, Zhu W and Hong X (2017) Wolbachia -induced loss of male fertility is likely related to branch chain amino acid biosynthesis and iLvE in Laodelphax striatellus, Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 10.1016/j.ibmb.2017.04.002, 85, (11-20), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2017. Chechi T, Ali Syed Z and Prasad N (2017) Virility does not imply immensity: Testis size, accessory gland size and ejaculate depletion pattern do not evolve in response to experimental manipulation of sex ratio in Drosophila melanogaster, Journal of Insect Physiology, 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2016.11.012, 98, (67-73), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2017. Bhavanam S and Trewick S (2017) Effects of larval crowding and nutrient limitation on male phenotype, reproductive investment and strategy in Ephestia kuehniella Zeller (Insecta: Lepidoptera), Journal of Stored Products Research, 10.1016/j.jspr.2017.01.004, 71, (64-71), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2017. Moreau J, Desouhant E, Louâpre P, Goubault M, Rajon E, Jarrige A, Menu F and Thiéry D (2017) How Host Plant and Fluctuating Environments Affect Insect Reproductive Strategies? Insect-Plant Interactions in a Crop Protection Perspective, 10.1016/bs.abr.2016.09.008, (259-287), . Seth R, Khan Z, Rao D and Zarin M (2016) Appraisal of Sperm Dynamics as a Crucial Trait of Radiosterilized Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and Its F 1 Progeny for Evaluation of the 'Inherited Sterility Technique' for Pest Suppression , Florida Entomologist, 10.1653/024.099.sp114, 99:sp1, (105-118), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2016. Bocedi G and Reid J (2016) Coevolutionary Feedbacks between Female Mating Interval and Male Allocation to Competing Sperm Traits Can Drive Evolution of Costly Polyandry, The American Naturalist, 10.1086/684746, 187:3, (334-350), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2016. Westerman E, Monteiro A and Etges W (2016) Rearing Temperature Influences Adult Response to Changes in Mating Status, PLOS ONE, 10.1371/journal.pone.0146546, 11:2, (e0146546) Larsdotter‐Mellström H, Eriksson K, Janz N, Nylin S, Carlsson M and Blanckenhorn W (2015) Male butterflies use an anti‐aphrodisiac pheromone to tailor ejaculates, Functional Ecology, 10.1111/1365-2435.12521, 30:2, (255-261), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2016. Chargé R, Wedell N, Lindstedt C, Hämäläinen L, Övermark E and Mappes J (2016) Variation in male fertility in a polymorphic moth, Parasemia plantaginis, Animal Behaviour, 10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.10.014, 111, (33-40), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2016. Watanabe M (2016) Mating Conflict Sperm Competition in Butterflies, 10.1007/978-4-431-55945-0_5, (93-120), . Kehl T, Dublon I and Fischer K (2015) Young male mating success is associated with sperm number but not with male sex pheromone titres, Frontiers in Zoology, 10.1186/s12983-015-0124-y, 12:1, Online publication date: 1-Dec-2015. Win A and Ishikawa Y (2015) Effects of diapause on post-diapause reproductive investment in the moth Ostrinia scapulalis , Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 10.1111/eea.12373, 157:3, (346-353), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2015. Swierk L, Tennessen J and Langkilde T (2015) Sperm depletion may not limit male reproduction in a capital breeder, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 10.1111/bij.12603, 116:3, (684-690), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2015. Jakubikova L and Kadlec T (2015) Butterfly bait traps versus zigzag walks: What is the better way to monitor common and threatened butterflies in non-tropical regions?, Journal of Insect Conservation, 10.1007/s10841-015-9809-y, 19:5, (911-919), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2015. Kehl T, Beaulieu M, Kehl A and Fischer K (2015) Old male sex: large ejaculate, many sperm, but few offspring, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 10.1007/s00265-015-1966-1, 69:9, (1543-1552), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2015. Sevgili H, Önal H and Yiğit A (2015) Mating Behavior and Spermatophore Characteristics in Two Closely Related Bushcricket Species of the Genus Phonochorion (Orthoptera: Phaneropterinae), Journal of Insect Behavior, 10.1007/s10905-015-9509-1, 28:4, (369-386), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2015. Larsdotter-Mellström H and Wiklund C (2015) Different mating expenditure in response to sperm competition risk between generations in the bivoltine butterfly Pieris napi, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 10.1007/s00265-015-1919-8, 69:7, (1067-1074), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2015. Uma R and Sevgili H (2014) Spermatophore allocation strategy over successive matings in the bushcricket Isophya sikorai (Orthoptera Phaneropterinae) , Ethology Ecology & Evolution, 10.1080/03949370.2014.896830, 27:2, (129-147), Online publication date: 3-Apr-2015. Muller K, Thiéry D, Moret Y and Moreau J (2014) Male larval nutrition affects adult reproductive success in wild European grapevine moth (Lobesia botrana), Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 10.1007/s00265-014-1815-7, 69:1, (39-47), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2015. Kehl T, Burmeister M, Donke E, Köhn N, Metschke K, Pfender D, Karl I, Fischer K and Herberstein M (2014) Pheromone Blend Does not Explain Old Male Mating Advantage in a Butterfly, Ethology, 10.1111/eth.12287, 120:11, (1137-1145), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2014. Wilson C, Buzatto B, Robinson S and Tomkins J (2014) Sociosexual environment influences patterns of ejaculate transfer and female kicking in Callosobruchus maculatus, Animal Behaviour, 10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.05.014, 94, (37-43), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2014. Westerman E, Drucker C and Monteiro A (2014) Male and Female Mating Behavior is Dependent on Social Context in the Butterfly Bicyclus anynana, Journal of Insect Behavior, 10.1007/s10905-014-9441-9, 27:4, (478-495), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2014. Xu J and Wang Q (2014) Ejaculate economics: an experimental test in a moth, Biology Letters, 10:1, Online publication date: 1-Jan-2014. Lewis Z, Lizé A and Wedell N (2013) The interplay between different stages of reproduction in males of the moth Plodia interpunctella, Animal Behaviour, 10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.08.006, 86:5, (917-922), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2013. Kehl T, Karl I and Fischer K (2013) Old-male paternity advantage is a function of accumulating sperm and last-male precedence in a butterfly, Molecular Ecology, 10.1111/mec.12386, 22:16, (4289-4297), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2013. Nandy B, Chakraborty P, Gupta V, Ali S and Prasad N (2013) SPERM COMPETITIVE ABILITY EVOLVES IN RESPONSE TO EXPERIMENTAL ALTERATION OF OPERATIONAL SEX RATIO, Evolution, 10.1111/evo.12076, 67:7, (2133-2141), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2013. Parker K, Roessingh P and Menken S (2012) Do Female Life Span and Fecundity of Small Ermine Moth Increase with Multiple Mating and Adult Nutrition?, Journal of Insect Behavior, 10.1007/s10905-012-9360-6, 26:3, (416-427), Online publication date: 1-May-2013. Cordes N, Yiğit A, Engqvist L and Schmoll T (2013) Differential sperm expenditure reveals a possible role for post‐copulatory sexual selection in a lekking moth, Ecology and Evolution, 10.1002/ece3.458, 3:3, (503-511), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2013. Tigreros N and Kay A (2012) Linking nutrition and sexual selection across life stages in a model butterfly system, Functional Ecology, 10.1111/1365-2435.12006, 27:1, (145-154), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2013. Karl I and Fischer K (2013) Old male mating advantage results from sexual conflict in a butterfly, Animal Behaviour, 10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.10.018, 85:1, (143-149), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2013. Vande Velde L, Schtickzelle N and Van Dyck H (2012) Effect of larval food stress on male adult behaviour, morphology and reproductive investment in the butterfly Pararge aegeria, Evolutionary Ecology, 10.1007/s10682-012-9580-4, 27:1, (221-234), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2013. South A and Lewis S (2012) Determinants of reproductive success across sequential episodes of sexual selection in a firefly, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279:1741, (3201-3208), Online publication date: 22-Aug-2012. Vande Velde L, Silvestre P, Damiens D and Van Dyck H (2011) Male reproductive investment relative to age and flight behaviour in the monandrous butterfly Pararge aegeria, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 10.1007/s00265-011-1281-4, 66:3, (347-359), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2012. Velde L, Damiens D and Van Dyck H (2011) Spermatophore and Sperm Allocation in Males of the Monandrous Butterfly Pararge aegeria: the Female's Perspective, Ethology, 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2011.01914.x, 117:7, (645-654), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2011. Rath S (2011) Male Mating History in Antheraea mylitta and its Effect on Ejaculation Size and Female Reproductive Fitness, International Journal of Industrial Entomology, 10.7852/ijie.2011.22.2.51, 22:2, (51-57), Online publication date: 30-Jun-2011. Lewis Z, Champion de Crespigny F, Sait S, Tregenza T and Wedell N (2010) Wolbachia infection lowers fertile sperm transfer in a moth, Biology Letters, 7:2, (187-189), Online publication date: 23-Apr-2011. Allen C, Zwaan B and Brakefield P (2011) Evolution of Sexual Dimorphism in the Lepidoptera, Annual Review of Entomology, 10.1146/annurev-ento-120709-144828, 56:1, (445-464), Online publication date: 7-Jan-2011. Wedell N (2010) Variation in male courtship costs in butterflies, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 10.1007/s00265-010-0953-9, 64:9, (1385-1391), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2010. Ingleby F, Lewis Z and Wedell N (2010) Level of sperm competition promotes evolution of male ejaculate allocation patterns in a moth, Animal Behaviour, 10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.03.022, 80:1, (37-43), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2010. LEWIS Z, BRAKEFIELD P and WEDELL N (2010) Speed or sperm: A potential trade-off between development and reproduction in the butterfly, Bicyclus anynana (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae), European Journal of Entomology, 10.14411/eje.2010.006, 107:1, (55-59), Online publication date: 15-Feb-2010. Alonzo S and Pizzari T (2010) Male Fecundity Stimulation: Conflict and Cooperation Within and Between the Sexes: Model Analyses and Coevolutionary Dynamics, The American Naturalist, 10.1086/649596, 175:2, (174-185), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2010. McNamara K, Elgar M and Jones T Adult Responses to Larval Population Size in the Almond Moth, Cadra cautella, Ethology, 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2009.01714.x, 116:1, (39-46) Carrière Y, Showalter A, Fabrick J, Sollome J, Ellers-Kirk C and Tabashnik B (2009) Cadherin gene expression and effects of Bt resistance on sperm transfer in pink bollworm, Journal of Insect Physiology, 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2009.07.013, 55:11, (1058-1064), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2009. Wedell N, Wiklund C and Bergström J (2009) Coevolution of non-fertile sperm and female receptivity in a butterfly, Biology Letters, 5:5, (678-681), Online publication date: 23-Oct-2009. BRETMAN A, NEWCOMBE D and TREGENZA T (2009) Promiscuous females avoid inbreeding by controlling sperm storage, Molecular Ecology, 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04301.x, 18:16, (3340-3345), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2009. Lewis Z and Wedell N (2009) Male moths reduce sperm investment in relatives, Animal Behaviour, 10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.03.013, 77:6, (1547-1550), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2009. Fischer K, Zimmer K and Wedell N (2007) Correlated responses to selection on female egg size in male reproductive traits in a butterfly, Evolutionary Ecology, 10.1007/s10682-007-9233-1, 23:3, (389-402), Online publication date: 1-May-2009. McNamara K, Elgar M and Jones T (2009) Large spermatophores reduce female receptivity and increase male paternity success in the almond moth, Cadra cautella, Animal Behaviour, 10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.01.007, 77:4, (931-936), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2009. Xu J and Wang Q (2009) Male moths undertake both pre- and in-copulation mate choice based on female age and weight, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 10.1007/s00265-009-0713-x, 63:6, (801-808), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2009. Solensky M and Oberhauser K (2009) Male monarch butterflies, Danaus plexippus, adjust ejaculates in response to intensity of sperm competition, Animal Behaviour, 10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.10.026, 77:2, (465-472), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2009. Niihara S and Watanabe M (2009) Effects of Saline Intake until the Second Mating on the Ejaculates and Sperm Number of Male Swallowtail Butterfly, Papilio xuthus Linnaeus, Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology, 10.1303/jjaez.2009.91, 53:3, (91-96), . Larsdotter Mellström H and Wiklund C (2009) Males use sex pheromone assessment to tailor ejaculates to risk of sperm competition in a butterfly, Behavioral Ecology, 10.1093/beheco/arp109, 20:5, (1147-1151), ., Online publication date: 1-Sep-2009. Koene J, Loose M and Wolters L (2008) Mate choice is not affected by mating history in the simultaneously hermaphroditic snail Lymnaea stagnalis, Journal of Molluscan Studies, 10.1093/mollus/eyn020, 74:4, (331-335), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2008., Online publication date: 1-Nov-2008. Kemp D, Macedonia J, Ball T and Rutowski R (2007) Potential direct fitness consequences of ornament-based mate choice in a butterfly, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 10.1007/s00265-007-0529-5, 62:6, (1017-1026), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2008. Linklater J, Wertheim B, Wigby S and Chapman T (2007) EJACULATE DEPLETION PATTERNS EVOLVE IN RESPONSE TO EXPERIMENTAL MANIPULATION OF SEX RATIO IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER , Evolution, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00157.x, 61:8, (2027-2034), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2007. McNamara K, Jones T and Elgar M (2007) No cost of male mating experience on female reproductive success in the almond moth, Cadra cautella (Lepidoptera; Pyralidae), Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 10.1007/s00265-006-0347-1, 61:8, (1177-1184), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2007. Lewis Z and Wedell N (2007) Effect of Adult Feeding on Male Mating Behaviour in the Butterfly, Bicyclus anynana (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae), Journal of Insect Behavior, 10.1007/s10905-007-9075-2, 20:2, (201-213), Online publication date: 20-Mar-2007. FOX C, STILLWELL R, WALLIN W and HITCHCOCK L (2006) Temperature and host species affect nuptial gift size in a seed-feeding beetle, Functional Ecology, 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2006.01197.x, 20:6, (1003-1011), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2006. Friberg U (2006) Male perception of female mating status: its effect on copulation duration, sperm defence and female fitness, Animal Behaviour, 10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.03.021, 72:6, (1259-1268), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2006. Ferkau C and Fischer K (2006) Costs of Reproduction in Male Bicyclus anynana and Pieris napi Butterflies: Effects of Mating History and Food Limitation, Ethology, 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2006.01266.x, 112:11, (1117-1127), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2006. Hodgson D and Hosken D (2006) Sperm competition promotes the exploitation of rival ejaculates, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.06.024, 243:2, (230-234), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2006. Goetz A and Shackelford T (2006) Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in humans Female Infidelity and Paternal Uncertainty, 10.1017/CBO9780511617812.006, (103-128) Wedell N (2006) MALE GENOTYPE AFFECTS FEMALE FITNESS IN A PATERNALLY INVESTING SPECIES, Evolution, 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb00508.x, 60:8, (1638-1645), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2006. Alves L, Mancini K, Lino-Neto J and Dolder H (2006) Morphology of the male reproductive system and sperm ultrastructure of Leucoptera coffeella (Lepidoptera: Lyonetiidae), Acta Zoologica, 10.1111/j.1463-6395.2006.00226.x, 87:2, (131-139) Wedell N (2006) MALE GENOTYPE AFFECTS FEMALE FITNESS IN A PATERNALLY INVESTING SPECIES, Evolution, 10.1554/06-018.1, 60:8, (1638), . Shackelford T and Goetz A (2006) Comparative evolutionary psychology of sperm competition., Journal of Comparative Psychology, 10.1037/0735-7036.120.2.139, 120:2, (139-146) Denk A, Holzmann A, Peters A, Vermeirssen E and Kempenaers B (2005) Paternity in mallards: effects of sperm quality and female sperm selection for inbreeding avoidance, Behavioral Ecology, 10.1093/beheco/ari065, 16:5, (825-833), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2005. Shackelford T, Pound N and Goetz A (2005) Psychological and Physiological Adaptations to Sperm Competition in Humans, Review of General Psychology, 10.1037/1089-2680.9.3.228, 9:3, (228-248), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2005. Marcotte M, Delisle J and McNeil J (2005) Impact of male mating history on the temporal sperm dynamics of Choristoneura rosaceana and C. fumiferana females, Journal of Insect Physiology, 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2004.12.009, 51:5, (537-544), Online publication date: 1-May-2005. Mancini K, Báo S, Fernandes A and Dolder H (2005) Immunocytochemical localization of tubulins in spermatids and spermatozoa of Euptoieta hegesia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae), Tissue and Cell, 10.1016/j.tice.2004.10.008, 37:2, (81-89), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2005. WATANABE M and HACHISUKA A (2005) Dynamics of eupyrene and apyrene sperm storage in ovipositing females of the swallowtail butterfly Papilio xuthus (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae), Entomological Science, 10.1111/j.1479-8298.2005.00100.x, 8:1, (65-71), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2005. Torres-Vila L and Jennions M (2004) Male mating history and female fecundity in the Lepidoptera: do male virgins make better partners?, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 10.1007/s00265-004-0857-7, 57:4, (318-326), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2005. Friedländer M, Seth R and Reynolds S (2005) Eupyrene and Apyrene Sperm: Dichotomous Spermatogenesis in Lepidoptera Advances in Insect Physiology Volume 32, 10.1016/S0065-2806(05)32003-0, (206-308), . Carpenter J, Bloem S and Marec F Inherited Sterility in Insects Sterile Insect Technique, 10.1007/1-4020-4051-2_5, (115-146) Andersson J, Borg-Karlson A and Wiklund C (2004) Sexual conflict and anti–aphrodisiac titre in a polyandrous butterfly: male ejaculate tailoring and absence of female control, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 271:1550, (1765-1770), Online publication date: 7-Sep-2004. Wedell N and Ritchie M (2004) Male age, mating status and nuptial gift quality in a bushcricket, Animal Behaviour, 10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.10.007, 67:6, (1059-1065), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2004. Oppliger A, Naciri-Graven Y, Ribi G and Hosken D (2003) Sperm length influences fertilization success during sperm competition in the snail Viviparus ater, Molecular Ecology, 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.01748.x, 12:2, (485-492), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2003. Marcotte M, Delisle J and McNeil J (2003) Pheromonostasis is not directly associated with post-mating sperm dynamics in Choristoneura fumiferana and C. rosaceana females, Journal of Insect Physiology, 10.1016/S0022-1910(02)00251-2, 49:1, (81-90), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2003. Pound N (2002) Male interest in visual cues of sperm competition risk, Evolution and Human Behavior, 10.1016/S1090-5138(02)00103-4, 23:6, (443-466), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2002. Vermette R and Fairbairn D (2002) HOW WELL DO MATING FREQUENCY AND DURATION PREDICT PATERNITY SUCCESS IN THE POLYGYNANDROUS WATER STRIDER AQUARIUS REMIGIS?, Evolution, 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb00195.x, 56:9, (1808-1820), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2002. Pilastro A, Scaggiante M and Rasotto M (2002) Individual adjustment of sperm expenditure accords with sperm competition theory, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 10.1073/pnas.152133499, 99:15, (9913-9915), Online publication date: 23-Jul-2002. Wedell N, Gage M and Parker G (2002) Sperm competition, male prudence and sperm-limited females, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02533-8, 17:7, (313-320), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2002. Balshine S, Kempenaers B, Székely T and Bussière L (2002) A model of the interaction between 'good genes' and direct benefits in courtship-feeding animals: when do males of high genetic quality invest less?, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 357:1419, (309-317), Online publication date: 29-Mar-2002. Martin O and Hosken D (2002) Strategic ejaculation in the common dung fly Sepsis cynipsea, Animal Behaviour, 10.1006/anbe.2001.1929, 63:3, (541-546), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2002. Vermette R and Fairbairn D (2002) HOW WELL DO MATING FREQUENCY AND DURATION PREDICT PATERNITY SUCCESS IN THE POLYGYNANDROUS WATER STRIDER AQUARIUS REMIGIS?, Evolution, 10.1554/0014-3820(2002)056[1808:HWDMFA]2.0.CO;2, 56:9, (1808), . Seth R, Rao D and Reynolds S (2002) Movement of spermatozoa in the reproductive tract of adult male Spodoptera litura: daily rhythm of sperm descent and the effect of light regime on male reproduction, Journal of Insect Physiology, 10.1016/S0022-1910(01)00155-X, 48:1, (119-131), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2002. Wedell N (2008) Female remating in butterflies: interaction between female genotype and nonfertile sperm, Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2001.00327.x, 14:5, (746-754) Simmons L (2001) The evolution of polyandry: an examination of the genetic incompatibility and good-sperm hypotheses, Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2001.00309.x, 14:4, (585-594) LOCHER R and BAUR B (2000) Sperm delivery and egg production of the simultaneously hermaphroditic land snail Arianta arbustorum exposed to an increased sperm competition risk , Invertebrate Reproduction & Development, 10.1080/07924259.2000.9652436, 38:1, (53-60), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2000. Poulin R and Morand S (2006) Testes size, body size and male–male competition in acanthocephalan parasites, Journal of Zoology, 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2000.tb00796.x, 250:4, (551-558), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2000. Lamunyon C (2000) Sperm storage by females of the polyandrous noctuid moth Heliothis virescens, Animal Behaviour, 10.1006/anbe.1999.1294, 59:2, (395-402), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2000. Wedell N and Cook P (1999) Butterflies tailor their ejaculate in response to sperm competition risk and intensity, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 266:1423, (1033-1039), Online publication date: 22-May-1999.Oppliger A, Hosken and Ribi G (1998) Snail sperm production characteristics vary with sperm competition risk, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 265:1405, (1527-1534), Online publication date: 22-Aug-1998.Wedell N and Cook P (1998) Determinants of paternity in a butterfly, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 265:1396, (625-630), Online publication date: 7-Apr-1998. Møller A (1998) Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection, 10.1016/B978-012100543-6/50027-1, (55-90), . Parker G, Ball M, Stockley P and Gage M (1997) Sperm competition games: a prospective analysis of risk assessment, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 264:1389, (1793-1802), Online publication date: 22-Dec-1997.Cook P, Harvey I and Parker G (1997) Predicting variation in sperm precedence, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 352:1355, (771-780), Online publication date: 29-Jul-1997. This Issue22 August 1996Volume 263Issue 1373 Article InformationDOI:https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1996.0154Published by:Royal SocietyPrint ISSN:0962-8452Online ISSN:1471-2954History: Manuscript received03/04/1996Manuscript accepted29/05/1996Published online01/01/1997Published in print22/08/1996 License:Scanned images copyright © 2017, Royal Society Citations and impact Large datasets are available through Proceedings B's partnership with Dryad
Referência(s)