Cardiac RAGE in Sepsis
2008; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Volume: 102; Issue: 10 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1161/circresaha.108.177261
ISSN1524-4571
Autores Tópico(s)Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
ResumoHomeCirculation ResearchVol. 102, No. 10Cardiac RAGE in Sepsis Free AccessEditorialPDF/EPUBAboutView PDFView EPUBSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationsTrack citationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyReddit Jump toFree AccessEditorialPDF/EPUBCardiac RAGE in SepsisCall TOLL Free for Anti-RAGE Giora Z. Feuerstein Giora Z. FeuersteinGiora Z. Feuerstein From Discovery Translational Medicine, Wyeth Research, Collegeville, Pa. Originally published23 May 2008https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.177261Circulation Research. 2008;102:1153–1154Sepsis is a systemic inflammatory response syndrome triggered by infection. The hallmarks of clinical sepsis are a broad range of systemic and organ function aberrations, including core temperature (hypothermia or hyperthermia), cardiac (rate and contractility), and respiratory and hematologic perturbations. When sepsis results in at least 1 organ failure or dysfunction, it is classified as severe sepsis. Severe sepsis with hypotension unresponsive to fluid resuscitation defines septic shock. Sepsis syndrome afflicts almost 750 000 patients in the United States each year, at a cost of almost $17 billion, and causes more than 200 000 deaths annually. The incidence of sepsis syndrome continues to rise along with the increase in life span and several other important risk factors. Sepsis without organ dysfunction is a relatively benign condition, and spontaneous recovery with conservative measures results in low in-hospital mortality (5% to 10%). Severe sepsis and septic shock carry high mortality, 30% to 50%, in spite of all that modern treatment offers.1–3Genetic predisposing factors have been proposed including mutations in cytokine genes such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-1, and IL-6. Most of these polymorphisms, implicated in increasing severity of sepsis, are associated with increases in these proinflammatory cytokines. Abnormalities in Toll-like receptor-4 and its signaling kinase, IRAK-4, have been associated with worse outcomes. The alarming increase in pathogens resistant to antibiotics that, in the past, were very effective in prevention and treatment of sepsis no doubt contributes to increases in severe sepsis prevalence in the elderly. The key mechanisms believed to initiate and propagate sepsis syndromes are inflammatory mediators that are elicited by the action of toxins released from the pathogen. Most prominent among these factors are the cytokines, released from monocytes and tissue macrophages and innate cellular immune defense elements. These cytokines trigger numerous additional proinflammatory events in all organs, leading to widespread organ dysfunction. However, it is now also recognized that other cytokines, such as IL-10, IL-13, and transforming growth factor-β, elicit a compensatory antiinflammatory response syndrome that is marked by depressed activity of B cells, T cells, and macrophages and modulation of numerous genomic and posttranscriptional pathways. The compensatory antiinflammatory response syndrome response is believed to contribute to severe cases by dysregulation of immune competencies leading to a compromised host defense condition and increased risk for mortality.The hemostasis system plays a major role in the pathophysiology of sepsis and septic shock. The intrinsic clotting factors, the fibrinolysis cascade, platelets, and tissue-derived clotting factors (such as tissue factor) are rapidly activated and persist along the entire evolution of the syndrome. The dysregulation of the hemostasis system is closely linked to the inflammatory cells and cytokine response. TNF-α and other factors stimulate tissue factor expression in macrophages and endothelium, leading to augmented coagulopathy via the extrinsic coagulation pathway, whereas certain coagulation factors, such as thrombin and factor Xa, possess proinflammatory actions via specific receptors. The importance of the hemostasis and inflammation systems in severe sepsis has recently been further recognized following the marginal therapeutic efficacy of activated protein C, which is now approved by the FDA for treatment of severe sepsis.3 Interestingly, in spite of numerous reports pointing to the cardinal pathological role of inflammatory cytokine (TNF-α, IL-1) and acute inflammatory mediators (eicosanoids, platelet-activating factor, leukotrienes, and others) in sepsis and septic shock, no specific treatment targeting single or multiple of these mediators (NSAID, corticosteroids, IL-1 antagonists, or TNF-α inhibitors) have proven decisive efficacy in treatment of this lethal syndrome.More recently, a different albeit related cytokine system has been identified in diverse inflammatory conditions. This system operates via a promiscuous member of the super family of immunoglobulin receptors, RAGE (receptors for advanced glycation end product). RAGE mediates inflammation signaling in response to diverse yet discrete family of ligands that activate proinflammatory mechanisms.4–7 Multiple experimental studies with various inhibitors of RAGE suggest that blocking the RAGE receptor decreases multiple proinflammatory mediators implicated in the sepsis pathophysiology. Furthermore, such inhibitors of RAGE improve short-term survival in rodent models of sepsis. One prominent ligand of RAGE in this family of proteins is the cytokine termed high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) protein, a proximal mediator of RAGE activation, that elicits potent inflammatory responses. Patients with sepsis-induced organ dysfunction have higher than normal serum levels of HMGB1. HMGB1 is released by lipopolysaccharide and cytokine-stimulated macrophages. HMGB1 increases inflammation by stimulating proinflammatory cytokines, including TNF-α, IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, and macrophage inflammatory protein. Anti-HMGB1 antibodies provided dose-dependent protection against endotoxemia and sepsis models in rodents. Anti-HMGB1 treatments hold the promise for efficacy in treatment sepsis at an extended "therapeutic window." The role of RAGE in mediating diverse vascular8 and cardiac9 pathophysiological processes has also well documented.Over this context, Boyd et al10 report on a seminal observation that has the potential to bear significantly on new opportunities for translational medicine of their discoveries into treatment of a major cause of morbidity and mortality from sepsis and septic shock cardiac dysfunction, heart failure, and cardiogenic shock. The authors set to explore the missing link between the known cardiac-depressing activities of the key inflammatory cytokine signaling system, the Toll-like receptors that has already been implicated in suppression of cardiac contractility.11 The discovery stemmed from an elegant group of in vitro and in vivo studies that identified a new role for S100A8 and S100A9, 2 known members of the S100 EF-hand family of proteins. Members of this family have already been implicated in cardiac function and especially contractile performance, such as S100A1 protein.12–13 S100A8/9 have also been implicated in inflammation via RAGE signaling cascade,14,15 and, hence, the authors postulated that, like other members of the S100 proteins, S100A8/9 may have a role in cardiac dysregulation of contractility in association of inflammatory condition such as sepsis. The authors have set to explore their hypothesis under conditions of potent proinflammatory stimulus, lipopolysaccharide endotoxin stimulation of cardiac cells in vitro and simulation of sepsis by endotoxemia in mice. The highlights of their findings include the identification of the S100A8/9 proteins to be products of inflammatory challenge to cardiac cells; the likely apocrine/autocrine actions of the S100A8/9 protein via the RAGE receptor to suppress cardiac contractility (likely by modulation of intracellular Ca+2 fluxes and the association of the S100A8/9 with SERCA2a and ryanodine receptor 2 complex). Considering that S100A8/9 are products of the inflammatory challenged cardiac cells, the authors conclude that a local circuit of cardio-depression is elicited in the sepsis syndrome thereby afflicting direct organ (cardiac) failure.However, important caveats need be pointed out. The in vivo model used in the study does not necessarily represent the human septic shock syndrome because the authors used pure lipopolysaccharide administered in high pharmacological doses. In humans, sepsis evolves following pathogen infections that deteriorates into septic shock over several days or weeks and is associated with pathogens that release diverse toxins. Furthermore, these experimental data have not yet been confirmed in humans or in experimental models in which neutralization of the S100A8/9 proteins is introduced after the onset of sepsis, leading to improved cardiac performance and survival benefits.The data generated in this report may have over-arching implications for treatment of septic shock in general and cardiac dysfunction in particular. The data suggest that S100A8/9 proteins could play a role in broad, multiorgan failure thereby significantly contribute to septic shock. This action of S1008/9 exacerbate cardiac (and possibly other organs) failure independently from the systemic derangements. Thus, effective interventions in S100A8/9 proteins production or actions (via antibodies, small molecules or other modalities) could provide new therapeutic strategies to alleviate multiple organ failures that underwrite septic shock and death.The opinions expressed in this editorial are not necessarily those of the editors or of the American Heart Association.Sources of FundingThe author is an employee of Wyeth Pharmaceuticals.DisclosuresNone.FootnotesCorrespondence to Giora Z. Feuerstein, MD, Discovery Translational Medicine, Wyeth Research, 500 Arcola Rd, S3207, Collegeville, PA 19426. E-mail [email protected] References 1 Vincent J-L, Abraham E. The last 100 years of sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2006; 173: 256–263.CrossrefGoogle Scholar2 Martin GS, Mannino DM, Eaton S, Moss M. Epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979–2000. N Engl J Med. 2003; 348: 1546–1557.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar3 Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Carlet JM, Bion J, Parker MM, Jaeschke R, Reinhart K, Angus DC, Brun-Buisson C, Beale R, Calandra T, Dhainaut JF, Gerlach H, Harvey M, Marini JJ, Marshall J, Ranieri M, Ramsay G, Sevransky J, Thompson BT, Townsend S, Vender JS, Zimmerman JL, Vincent JL, for the International Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Crit Care Med. 2008; 36: 296–327.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar4 Van Zoelen MA, van der Poll T. Targeting RAGE in sepsis. Critical Care. 2008; 12: 103.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar5 Bopp C, Bierhaus A, Hofer S, Bouchon A, Nawroth PP, Martin E, Weigand MA. Bench-to-bedside review: the inflammation-perpetuating pattern-recognition receptor RAGE as a therapeutic target in sepsis. Crit Care. 2008; 12: 201.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar6 Bierhaus A, Stern DM, Nawroth PP. RAGE in inflammation: a new therapeutic target? Curr Opin Invest Drugs. 2006; 7: 985–991.MedlineGoogle Scholar7 Liliensiek B, Weigand MA, Bierhaus A, Nicklas W, Kasper M, Hofer S, Plachky J, Gröne HJ, Kurschus FC, Schmidt AM, Yan SD, Martin E, Schleicher E, Stern DM, Hämmerling GJ, Nawroth PP, Arnold B. Receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) regulates sepsis but not the adaptive immune response. J Clin Invest. 2004; 113: 1641–1650.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar8 Basta G. Receptor for advanced glycation end products and atherosclerosis: from basic mechanism to clinical implications. Atherosclerosis. 2008; 196: 9–21.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar9 Bucciarelli LG, Kaneko M, Ananthakrishnan R, Harja E, Lee LK, Hwang YC, Lerner S, Bakr S, Li Q, Lu Y, Song F, Qu W, Gomez T, Zou YS, Yan SF, Ann Marie Schmidt AM, Ramasamy R. Receptor for advanced-glycation end products: key modulator of myocardial ischemic injury. Circulation. 2006; 113: 1226–1234.LinkGoogle Scholar10 Boyd JH, Kan B, Roberts H, Wang Y, Walley KR. S100A8 and S100A9 mediate endotoxin induced cardiomyocytes dysfunction via receptor for advanced glycation end products. Circ Res. 2008; 102: 1239–1246.LinkGoogle Scholar11 Boyd JH, Mathur S, Wang Y, Bateman RM, Walley KR. Toll-like receptor stimulation in cardiomyocytes decreases contractility and initiates an NF-kappaB dependent inflammation response. Cardiovasc Res. 2006; 72: 384–393.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar12 Most P, Remppis A, Pleger ST, Loffler E, Ehlermann P, Bernotat J, Kleuss C, Heierhorst J, Ruiz P, Witt H, Karczewski P, Mao L, Rockman HA, Duncan SJ, Katus HA, Koch WJ. Transgenic over expression of the Ca2+-binding protein S100A1 in the hear leads to increased in vivo myocardial contractile performance. J Biol Chem. 278: 33809–33817.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar13 Pleger ST, Remppis A, Heidt B, Volker M, Chuprun JK, Kuhn M, Zhou RH, Gao E, Szabo G, Weichenhan D, Muller OJ, Eckhart AD, Katus HA, Koch WJ, Most P. S100A1 gene therapy preserves in vivo cardiac function after myocardial infarction. Mol Ther. 2005; 12: 1120–1129.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar14 Ryckman C, Vandal K, Rouleau P, Talbot M, Tessier PA. Proinflmmatory activities of S100 proteins S100A8, S100A9 and S100A8/A9 induced neutrophil chemotaxis and adhesion. J Immunol. 2003; 170: 3233–3242.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar15 Hoffmann MA, Drury S, Fu C, Qu W, Taguchi A, Lu Y, Avila C, Kambham N, Bierhaus A, Nawroth P, Neurath MF, Slattery T, Beach D, McClary J, Nagashima M, Morser J, Stern D, Schmidt AM. RAGE mediates a novel proinflammatory axis: a central cell surface receptor for S100/calgranulin polypeptide. Cell. 1999; 97: 889–901.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Previous Back to top Next FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited By Yan Z, Luo H, Xie B, Tian T, Li S, Chen Z, Liu J, Zhao X, Zhang L, Deng Y, Billiar T and Jiang Y (2021) Targeting adaptor protein SLP76 of RAGE as a therapeutic approach for lethal sepsis, Nature Communications, 10.1038/s41467-020-20577-3, 12:1, Online publication date: 1-Dec-2021. Adán Areán J, Vico T, Marchini T, Calabró V, Evelson P, Vanasco V and Alvarez S (2021) Energy management and mitochondrial dynamics in cerebral cortex during endotoxemia, Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 10.1016/j.abb.2021.108900, 705, (108900), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2021. Vanasco V, Saez T, Magnani N, Pereyra L, Marchini T, Corach A, Inés Vaccaro M, Corach D, Evelson P and Alvarez S (2014) Cardiac mitochondrial biogenesis in endotoxemia is not accompanied by mitochondrial function recovery, Free Radical Biology and Medicine, 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2014.08.009, 77, (1-9), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2014. Ramasamy R and Schmidt A (2012) Receptor for Advanced Glycation End Products (RAGE) and Implications for the Pathophysiology of Heart Failure, Current Heart Failure Reports, 10.1007/s11897-012-0089-5, 9:2, (107-116), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2012. RAU M, SCHILLER M, KRIENKE S, HEYDER P, LORENZ H and BLANK N (2010) Clinical Manifestations but not Cytokine Profiles Differentiate Adult-onset Still's Disease and Sepsis, The Journal of Rheumatology, 10.3899/jrheum.100247, 37:11, (2369-2376), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2010. Lu X, Xue L, Sun W, Ye J, Zhu Z and Mei H (2017) Identification of key pathogenic genes of sepsis based on the Gene Expression Omnibus database, Molecular Medicine Reports, 10.3892/mmr.2017.8258 May 23, 2008Vol 102, Issue 10 Advertisement Article InformationMetrics https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.177261PMID: 18497315 Originally publishedMay 23, 2008 KeywordsToll-like receptorS1008/9cardiac failuresepsisRAGEPDF download Advertisement
Referência(s)