Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Nemo through the looking-glass: a commentary on Desjardins & Fernald

2011; Royal Society; Volume: 7; Issue: 4 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1098/rsbl.2010.0760

1744-957X

Rui F. Oliveira, Adelino V. M. Canário,

Primate Behavior and Ecology

You have accessMoreSectionsView PDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail Cite this article Oliveira Rui F. and Canário Adelino V. M. 2011Nemo through the looking-glass: a commentary on Desjardins & FernaldBiol. Lett.7487–488http://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2010.0760SectionYou have accessAnimal behaviourNemo through the looking-glass: a commentary on Desjardins & Fernald Rui F. Oliveira Rui F. Oliveira Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada, Rua Jardim do Tabaco 34, 1149-041 Lisboa, Portugal Champalimaud Neuroscience Programme, Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Rua da Quinta Grande 6, 2780-156 Oeiras, Portugal [email protected] Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for more papers by this author and Adelino V. M. Canário Adelino V. M. Canário Centro de Ciências do Mar, Universidade do Algarve, Campus de Gambelas, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for more papers by this author Rui F. Oliveira Rui F. Oliveira Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada, Rua Jardim do Tabaco 34, 1149-041 Lisboa, Portugal Champalimaud Neuroscience Programme, Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Rua da Quinta Grande 6, 2780-156 Oeiras, Portugal [email protected] Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for more papers by this author and Adelino V. M. Canário Adelino V. M. Canário Centro de Ciências do Mar, Universidade do Algarve, Campus de Gambelas, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for more papers by this author Published:27 April 2011https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2010.0760Mirror-elicited aggression has been widely used in animal behaviour research. Recently, Desjardins & Fernald [1] reported that males of the cichlid fish Astatotilapia burtoni fighting a mirror had higher expression of immediate early genes in brain areas homologous to the amygdala and the hippocampus than males fighting a real opponent, despite the fact that the behavioural and androgen responses did not differ between the two conditions. Surprisingly, Desjardins & Fernald [1] omitted two recent papers (Oliveira et al. [2] in another cichlid fish, Oreochromis mossambicus, and Hirschenhauser et al. [3] in quail, Coturnix japonica), which also found a dissociation between the behavioural and the physiological responses towards mirror images. In these two studies, the mirror image elicited an aggressive response but failed to trigger the androgen response present when fighting a real opponent, suggesting that the physiological response to the fight depends on the cognitive appraisal that the individuals make of the situation [4]. This omission is even more surprising as the two divergent results support contrasting adaptive roles for socially driven changes in androgen levels (aka ‘challenge hypothesis’, [5]): the lack of hormonal response to a mirror fight suggests the need for asymmetric feedback to adjust androgen production, which is therefore only functional for subsequent interactions; the presence of an androgen response triggered by a mirror fight suggests a role for androgens in the modulation of aggressive behaviour in the ongoing fight. Both the O. mossambicus and quail studies support the first hypothesis, while the A. burtoni study is the first evidence for the latter.Three different kinds of factors may contribute to the divergent androgen responses. — Phylogenetic bias. Phylogeny is an unlikely source of variation in this case since two of the species showing divergent responses are closely related cichlid fishes, one of which shares the same pattern of response with the phylogenetically relatively distant quail.— Differences in the behavioural tasks. In the real opponent treatment, Desjardins & Fernald [1] staged fights between males previously placed in separate compartments. Therefore, the fish interacting across the transparent partition were mimicking a territorial border fight between two territorial males, with no initial asymmetry in resource-holding potential and no clear outcome. In contrast, in the other two studies (Hirschenhauser et al. [6], was used as a real opponent control for the mirror fights in Oliveira et al. [2]) a resident/intruder paradigm was used. This could explain why Desjardins & Fernald [1] did not find differences both in aggressive behaviour and in androgen levels between mirror and real fights, but it does not explain why mirror fights elicited a significant androgen response when compared with control males who had not been in an aggressive encounter.— Differences in hormone assays. Androgen levels reported by Desjardins & Fernald [1] are much lower (ca. 2000 times) than those published for other cichlids, including those previously reported for the same species by the same laboratory [7]. Since Desjardins & Fernald [1] appear to have used blood plasma directly in the assay, and not the extracts of fluids (as done in the other studies, i.e. Oliveira et al. [2], Parikh et al. [7] and Hirschenhauser et al. [3]), the presence of androgen-binding globulins could have the effect of reducing apparent levels of androgens in unpredictable and not necessarily proportional ways. The biological meaning of changes at such a low level (less than 150 pg ml−1) is questionable, but assuming a hypothetical proportional distribution of the putative error among the three experimental groups of Desjardins & Fernald [1], the divergent results cannot be explained.The fact that Desjardins & Fernald [1] assayed hormones from plasma, and in the other studies hormones were assayed from excreted metabolites in urine [2], or from droppings [3], raises the possibility that the delayed time for the excretion of hormones could be generating these differences. However, the sampling time used in both non-invasive studies has taken into account the known excretion time for these metabolites [3,8], and should reflect the circulating androgen levels at the end of the fights. Moreover, both studies did detect a response in the presence of real opponents using the same time course, and in cichlid fish, a significant positive correlation was detected between plasma and urine levels [9].Finally, it should be noted here that in the target paper, the expression of the immediate early gene egr-1 in the pre-optic area (POA) exhibited a non-significant trend (owing to high intra-treatment variation) to be higher in fish fighting real opponents than their mirror image. Since the expression of egr-1 in response to social stimuli is highly co-localized with GnRH-1 neurons in the POA (R = 0.93, see Burmeister et al. [10]), these data suggest a higher activity of GnRH-1 neurons in fish fighting real opponents than in mirror fighters, which should translate into higher androgen levels in the former ones. Therefore, the egr-1 expression data in the POA is in agreement with androgen levels reported in previous studies and contrasts with the ones reported in the target paper.In summary, the divergent results between Desjardins & Fernald [1] and previously published studies could have a biological or artefactual basis and should not be ignored. The standardization of behavioural paradigms and hormone assay methods and the integration of brain activation measures in future studies need to be considered in order to promote the integration of data and the establishment of general principles in the field, namely the adaptive function of socially driven changes in androgen levels.AcknowledgementsThe authors thank Katharina Hirschenhauser, Ton Groothuis, Peter Dikstra, David Gonçalves, Magda Teles and Teresa Fagundes for discussing this topic with us. During the writing of this manuscript research undertaken by R.F.O. was supported by FCT (PTDC/PSI/71811/2006).FootnotesThis Journal is © 2010 The Royal SocietyReferences1Desjardins J. K.& Fernald R. D.. 2010What do fish make of mirror images?Biol. Lett.. 6, 744–747.doi:10.1098/rsbl.2010.0247 (doi:10.1098/rsbl.2010.0247). Link, Google Scholar2Oliveira R. F., Carneiro L. A.& Canario A. V. M.. 2005No hormonal response in tied fights. Nature 437, 207–208.doi:10.1038/437207a (doi:10.1038/437207a). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar3Hirschenhauser K., Wittek M., Johnston P.& Möstl E.. 2008Social context rather than behavioral output or winning modulates post-conflict testosterone responses in Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica). Physiol. Behav. 95, 457–463.doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.07.013 (doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.07.013). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar4Oliveira R. F.. 2009Social behavior in context: hormonal modulation of behavioural plasticity and social competence. Integr. Comp. Biol. 49, 423–440.doi:10.1093/icb/icp055 (doi:10.1093/icb/icp055). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar5Wingfield J. C., Hegner R. E., Dufty A. M.& Ball G. F.. 1990The ‘challenge hypothesis’: theoretical implications for patterns of testosterone secretion, mating systems, and breeding strategies. Am. Nat. 136, 829–846.doi:10.1086/285134 (doi:10.1086/285134). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar6Hirschenhauser K., Taborsky M., Oliveira T., Canario A. V. M.& Oliveira R. F.. 2004A test of the ‘challenge hypothesis’ in cichlid fish: simulated partner and territory intruder experiments. Anim. Behav. 68, 741–750.doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.12.015 (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.12.015). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar7Parikh V. N., Clement T. S.& Fernald R. D.. 2006Androgen level and male social status in the African cichlid, Astatotilapia burtoni. Behav. Brain Res. 166, 291–295.doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2005.07.011 (doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2005.07.011). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar8Vermeirssen E. L. M.& Scott A. P.. 1996Excretion of free and conjugated steroids in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): evidence for branchial excretion of the maturation-inducing steroid, 17,20 β-dihydroxy-4-pregnen-3-one. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 101, 180–194.doi:10.1006/gcen.1996.0020 (doi:10.1006/gcen.1996.0020). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar9Hirschenhauser K., Canario A. V. M., Ros A. F. H., Taborsky M.& Oliveira R. F.. 2008Social context may affect urinary excretion of 11-ketotestosterone in African cichlids. Behaviour 145, 1367–1388.doi:10.1163/156853908785765935 (doi:10.1163/156853908785765935). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar10Burmeister S. S., Jarvis E. D.& Fernald R. D.. 2005Rapid behavioral and genomic responses to social opportunity. PLoS Biol. 3, e363.doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030363 (doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030363). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar Previous ArticleNext Article FiguresRelatedReferencesDetailsCited by Ramos A, Alex D, Cardoso S and Gonçalves D (2021) Androgens and corticosteroids increase in response to mirror images and interacting conspecifics in males of the Siamese fighting fish Betta splendens, Hormones and Behavior, 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2021.104991, 132, (104991), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2021. Baran N and Streelman J (2020) Ecotype differences in aggression, neural activity and behaviorally relevant gene expression in cichlid fish, Genes, Brain and Behavior, 10.1111/gbb.12657, 19:6, Online publication date: 1-Jul-2020. Church K and Grant J (2019) Ideal despotic distributions in convict cichlids (Amatitlania nigrofasciata)? Effects of predation risk and personality on habitat preference, Behavioural Processes, 10.1016/j.beproc.2018.12.002, 158, (163-171), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2019. Saraiva J, Keller-Costa T, Hubbard P, Rato A and Canário A (2017) Chemical diplomacy in male tilapia: urinary signal increases sex hormone and decreases aggression, Scientific Reports, 10.1038/s41598-017-07558-1, 7:1, Online publication date: 1-Dec-2017. Teles M and Oliveira R (2016) Androgen response to social competition in a shoaling fish, Hormones and Behavior, 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2015.10.009, 78, (8-12), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2016. Rihel J and Ghosh M (2016) Zebrafish Drug Discovery and Evaluation: Pharmacological Assays, 10.1007/978-3-319-05392-9_135, (4071-4155), . Gonçalves-de-Freitas E, Carvalho T and Oliveira R (2014) Photoperiod modulation of aggressive behavior is independent of androgens in a tropical cichlid fish, General and Comparative Endocrinology, 10.1016/j.ygcen.2014.07.024, 207, (41-49), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2014. Galhardo L and Oliveira R (2014) The effects of social isolation on steroid hormone levels are modulated by previous social status and context in a cichlid fish, Hormones and Behavior, 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2013.10.010, 65:1, (1-5), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2014. Rihel J and Ghosh M (2015) Zebrafish Drug Discovery and Evaluation: Pharmacological Assays, 10.1007/978-3-642-27728-3_135-1, (1-102), . Ariyomo T and Watt P (2013) Aggression and sex differences in lateralization in the zebrafish, Animal Behaviour, 10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.06.019, 86:3, (617-622), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2013. Dijkstra P, Schaafsma S, Hofmann H and Groothuis T (2012) ‘Winner effect’ without winning: Unresolved social conflicts increase the probability of winning a subsequent contest in a cichlid fish, Physiology & Behavior, 10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.08.029, 105:2, (489-492), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2012. Lev-Yadun S and Katzir G (2012) Mirror images: Fish versus terrestrial animals, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.10.023, 294, (182-184), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2012. Oliveira R (2012) Social plasticity in fish: integrating mechanisms and function, Journal of Fish Biology, 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2012.03477.x, 81:7, (2127-2150), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2012. Oliveira R, Silva J and Simões J (2011) Fighting Zebrafish: Characterization of Aggressive Behavior and Winner–Loser Effects, Zebrafish, 10.1089/zeb.2011.0690, 8:2, (73-81), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2011. McGaugh S, Weaver S, Gilbertson E, Garrett B, Rudeen M, Grieb S, Roberts J, Donny A, Marchetto P and Gluesenkamp A (2019) Evidence for rapid phenotypic and behavioural shifts in a recently established cavefish population, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 10.1093/biolinnean/blz162 Oliveira G and Oliveira R (2014) Androgen modulation of social decision-making mechanisms in the brain: an integrative and embodied perspective, Frontiers in Neuroscience, 10.3389/fnins.2014.00209, 8 This Issue23 August 2011Volume 7Issue 4 Article InformationDOI:https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2010.0760PubMed:21525054Published by:Royal SocietyOnline ISSN:1744-957XHistory: Manuscript received19/08/2010Manuscript accepted12/10/2010Published online27/04/2011Published in print23/08/2011 License:This Journal is © 2010 The Royal Society Citations and impact PDF Download Subjectsbehaviourcognitionneuroscience Large datasets are available through Biology Letters' partnership with Dryad