Legal Precedent: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis
1976; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 19; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/466868
ISSN1537-5285
AutoresWilliam M. Landes, Richard A. Posner,
Tópico(s)European and International Law Studies
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessLegal Precedent: A Theoretical and Empirical AnalysisWilliam M. Landes and Richard A. PosnerWilliam M. Landes and Richard A. PosnerPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmailPrint SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Journal of Law and Economics Volume 19, Number 2Aug., 1976Conference on the Economics of Politics and Regulation Sponsored by The University of Chicago Booth School of Business and The University of Chicago Law School Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/466868 Views: 91Total views on this site Citations: 152Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1976 The University of Chicago Law SchoolPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Terezie Smejkalová, Tereza Novotná, Jakub Harašta Kvantitativní přístup v kvalitativní doméně práva: odpověď autorů, Časopis pro právní vědu a praxi 31, no.22 (Jul 2023).https://doi.org/10.5817/CPVP2023-2-11Kazutaka Takechi How are the precedents of trade policy rules made under the World Trade Organization?, Economics & Politics 38 (May 2023).https://doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.12246Hanna Ahlström Sustainability in EU Business Law and Financial Market Law: An Interdisciplinary Methodology, (Oct 2022): 111–130.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06924-6_6Peter Grajzl, Peter Murrell Lasting Legal Legacies: Early English Legal Ideas and Later Caselaw Development During the Industrial Revolution, Review of Law & Economics 18, no.11 (Mar 2022): 85–141.https://doi.org/10.1515/rle-2021-0070Goran Dajović The Possibility of Regulatory Function of Judicial Power, Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu , no.Volume 70, Issue 1Volume 70, Issue 1 (Mar 2022): 233–281.https://doi.org/10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22108AAndreea Cosnita-Langlais, Jean-Philippe Tropeano Learning by litigating: An application to antitrust commitments, International Journal of Industrial Organization 80 (Jan 2022): 102795.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2021.102795Daniel Shtob, Jordan Fox Besek Environmental Precedent: Foregrounding the Environmental Consequences of Law in Sociology, Sociological Forum 36, no.33 (May 2021): 712–734.https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12727Peter Murrell Did the Independence of Judges Reduce Legal Development in England, 1600–1800?, The Journal of Law and Economics 64, no.33 (Dec 2021): 539–565.https://doi.org/10.1086/713250D. Hoadley, M. Bartolo, R. Chesterman, A. Faus, W. Hernandez, B. Kultys, A. P. Moore, E. Nemsic, N. Roche, J. Shangguan, B. Steer, K. Tylinski, N. West A Global Community of Courts? Modelling the Use of Persuasive Authority as a Complex Network, Frontiers in Physics 9 (Jul 2021).https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2021.665719Niccolò Ridi, Thomas Schultz Empirically Mapping Investment Arbitration Scholarship: Networks, Authorities, and the Research Front, (Jan 2021): 209–241.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48393-7_13Benoit Pierre Freyens, Xiaodong Gong Judicial arbitration of unfair dismissal cases: The role of peer effects, International Review of Law and Economics 64 (Dec 2020): 105947.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2020.105947Michael P. Fix, Benjamin J. Kassow US Supreme Court Doctrine in the State High Courts, 21 (Aug 2020).https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108891141Jef De Mot, Ben Depoorter, Thomas J Miceli Filtering Tort Accidents, American Law and Economics Review 46 (Jun 2020).https://doi.org/10.1093/aler/ahaa006Rasmus Arler Bogetoft Er en dom et bedre præjudikat, hvisden har flere citationer?, Tidsskrift for Rettsvitenskap 133, no.2-032-03 (Jun 2020): 117–160.https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1504-3096-2020-02-03-01Michael Berlemann, Robin Christmann Disposition time and the utilization of prior judicial decisions: Evidence from a civil law country, International Review of Law and Economics 62 (Jun 2020): 105887.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2020.105887John Szmer, Robert K. Christensen, Samuel Grubbs What influences the influence of U.S. Courts of Appeals decisions?, European Journal of Law and Economics 49, no.11 (Jun 2018): 55–81.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-018-9588-5Péter Cserne Economic Approaches to Legal Reasoning: An Overview, (Jul 2020): 25–41.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40168-9_3Jef De Mot, Ben Depoorter, Thomas J. Miceli Filtering Tort Accidents, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2020).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3636457Florencia Marotta-Wurgler The Evolution of Case Influence in Modern Consumer Standard Form Contracts, (Dec 2019): 204–222.https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108694469.009Jordan Besek, Daniel Shtob Breaking the Divide: Setting Environmental Precedent in the Chicago River, Law & Policy (Sep 2019).https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12137Julian Nyarko and Jerome Hsiang Conforming against Expectations: The Formalism of Nonlawyers at the World Trade Organization, The Journal of Legal Studies 48, no.22 (Dec 2019): 341–375.https://doi.org/10.1086/702167Kathryn E. Spier, J.J. Prescott Contracting on litigation, The RAND Journal of Economics 50, no.22 (Apr 2019): 391–417.https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-2171.12274Abishek S. Choutagunta Effects of Labour Regulation on Manufacturing Firms in India: A Leximetric Approach, Asian Journal of Law and Economics 10, no.11 (Apr 2019).https://doi.org/10.1515/ajle-2019-0007Rose McDermott Psychological Underpinnings of Post-Truth in Political Beliefs, PS: Political Science & Politics 52, no.22 (Jan 2019): 218–222.https://doi.org/10.1017/S104909651800207XJohan Lindholm CAS Decisions as Precedent, (Mar 2019): 85–117.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-285-9_4Péter Cserne Economic Approaches to Legal Reasoning, SSRN Electronic Journal 12 (Jan 2019).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3506738Anita Anand, Andrew Green Securities settlements as examples of crisis-driven regulation, International Review of Law and Economics 55 (Sep 2018): 41–57.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2018.03.001Kawin Ethayarajh, Andrew Green, Albert H. Yoon A Rose by Any Other Name: Understanding Judicial Decisions that Do Not Cite Precedent, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 15, no.33 (Aug 2018): 563–596.https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12186Sophie Harnay Explaining the Production and Dissemination of Global Corporate Governance Standards: A Law and Economics Approach to Corporate Governance Codes as a Global Law-Making Technology, (Oct 2017): 63–78.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60180-9_5Hanna Ahlström, Sarah E. Cornell Governance, polycentricity and the global nitrogen and phosphorus cycles, Environmental Science & Policy 79 (Jan 2018): 54–65.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.10.005Kathryn E. Spier Litigation, Economics of, (Feb 2018): 7939–7950.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2492Anita Anand, Andrew James Green Cross-Country Securities Enforcement as An Example of Pro-Cyclical Regulation, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2018).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205750Andrew Green, Albert H. Yoon Triaging the Law: Developing the Common Law on the Supreme Court of India, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 14, no.44 (Nov 2017): 683–715.https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12161Jakub Harašta, Jakub Míšek, Monika Hanych, Pavel Loutocký, Michal Malaník, Jaromír Šavelka, Markéta Štěpáníková, Matěj Myška Rozměry citací v právu a anotační konvence, Revue pro právo a technologie 8, no.1515 (Jun 2017): 51.https://doi.org/10.5817/RPT2017-1-4Brian J. Broughman and Deborah A. Widiss After the Override: An Empirical Analysis of Shadow Precedent, The Journal of Legal Studies 46, no.11 (Apr 2017): 51–92.https://doi.org/10.1086/689835Edson Anttnio Sousa Pontes Pinto How Efficient Is to Judge by Standards in a Civil Law Country? A Law and Economics Approach on Brazilian's Precedent System, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2017).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3085847Benjamin Alarie, Andrew James Green Quantitative Analysis of Judicial Voting, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2017).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3090789Francesco Castellaneta, Raffaele Conti, Francisco M. Veloso, Carlos A. Kemeny The effect of trade secret legal protection on venture capital investments: Evidence from the inevitable disclosure doctrine, Journal of Business Venturing 31, no.55 (Sep 2016): 524–541.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.07.004Andrew Myburgh and Jordi Paniagua Does International Commercial Arbitration Promote Foreign Direct Investment?, The Journal of Law and Economics 59, no.33 (Feb 2017): 597–627.https://doi.org/10.1086/689188Matthew P. Hitt Measuring Precedent in a Judicial Hierarchy, Law & Society Review 50, no.11 (Jan 2016): 57–81.https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12178Kathryn E. Spier, J.J. Prescott Contracting on Litigation, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2016).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2765033José Neves, John Zeleznikow, Henrique Vicente Quality of Judgment Assessment, (Jan 2016): 96–110.https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0245-6.ch006Rahul Chakraborty, Simonti Chakraborty, Rajendra P. Kundu Network of Legal Citations: An Analysis of Some Supreme Court Decisions on Land Acquisition in India, (Sep 2015): 25–35.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2455-6_3Lee Jack, Epstein Knight Les préférences des juges. Pour une approche réaliste, Les Cahiers de la Justice N° 4, no.44 (Dec 2015): 589–612.https://doi.org/10.3917/cdlj.1504.0589Anthony Niblett, Albert H. Yoon Judicial disharmony: A study of dissent, International Review of Law and Economics 42 (Jun 2015): 60–71.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2014.12.002Brian J. Broughman, Deborah A. Widiss After the Override: An Empirical Analysis of Shadow Precedent, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2015).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2584048Jerome Hsiang, Julian Nyarko Precedent Citation at the WTO - Shifting the Empirical Focus to Panelists, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2015).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2732207David A. Harper Intellectual Property as a Complex Adaptive System, (Feb 2015): 309–339.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13299-0_14Robin Christmann No Judge, No Job! Court errors and the contingent labor contract, European Journal of Law and Economics 38, no.33 (Nov 2012): 409–429.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-012-9365-9David A. Harper Property rights as a complex adaptive system: how entrepreneurship transforms intellectual property structures, Journal of Evolutionary Economics 24, no.22 (Mar 2014): 335–355.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-014-0345-9Davide Carneiro, Paulo Novais, Francisco Andrade, John Zeleznikow, José Neves Online dispute resolution: an artificial intelligence perspective, Artificial Intelligence Review 41, no.22 (Jan 2012): 211–240.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-011-9305-zBrian J. Broughman, Deborah A. Widiss After the Override: An Empirical Analysis of Shadow Precedent, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2014).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2470278Anthony Niblett, Albert Yoon Judicial Disharmony: A Study of Dissent, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2014).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2509465Davide Carneiro, Paulo Novais, José Neves Information Retrieval, (Apr 2014): 141–162.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06239-6_7Davide Carneiro, Paulo Novais, José Neves Artificial Intelligence in Online Dispute Resolution, (Apr 2014): 61–96.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06239-6_4Ivo Teixeira Gico Jr., O capital jurídico e o ciclo da litigância, Revista Direito GV 9, no.22 (Dec 2013): 435–464.https://doi.org/10.1590/S1808-24322013000200003Maria Alessandra Antonelli, Veronica Grembi A microeconomic model of the demand of civil justice: is one institutional context better than another?, European Journal of Law and Economics 36, no.22 (May 2012): 295–318.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-012-9328-1Davide Carneiro, Paulo Novais, Francisco Andrade, John Zeleznikow, José Neves Using Case-Based Reasoning and Principled Negotiation to provide decision support for dispute resolution, Knowledge and Information Systems 36, no.33 (Oct 2012): 789–826.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-012-0563-0Anthony Niblett Case-by-Case Adjudication and the Path of the Law, The Journal of Legal Studies 42, no.22 (Sep 2015): 303–330.https://doi.org/10.1086/669716Anthony Niblett Tracking inconsistent judicial behavior, International Review of Law and Economics 34 (Jun 2013): 9–20.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2012.10.003Ryan C. Black, James F. Spriggs The Citation and Depreciation of U.S. Supreme Court Precedent, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 10, no.22 (Apr 2013): 325–358.https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12012Lee Epstein, Jack Knight Reconsidering Judicial Preferences, Annual Review of Political Science 16, no.11 (May 2013): 11–31.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-032211-214229Yonatan Lupu and James H. Fowler Strategic Citations to Precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court, The Journal of Legal Studies 42, no.11 (Jul 2015): 151–186.https://doi.org/10.1086/669125Sabine Müller-Mall Legal Spaces, (Mar 2013): 95–130.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36730-4_4John W. Patty, Elizabeth Maggie Penn, Keith E. Schnakenberg Measuring the Latent Quality of Precedent: Scoring Vertices in a Network, (Jan 2013): 249–262.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35239-3_12Sabine Müller-Mall Taking a Perspective on Contemporary Law: Complexity and Normativity, (Feb 2013): 5–48.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36730-4_2Eduardo Baistrocchi The transfer pricing problem, (Dec 2012): 10–24.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139208123.003John Morison What Makes An Important Case? An Agenda for Research, Legal Information Management 12, no.44 (Dec 2012): 251–261.https://doi.org/10.1017/S147266961200059XLaura P. Moyer, Holley Tankersley Judicial Innovation and Sexual Harassment Doctrine in the U.S. Courts of Appeals, Political Research Quarterly 65, no.44 (Dec 2012): 784–798.https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912911411097Peter J. Boettke, Alexander Fink, Daniel J. Smith The Impact of Nobel Prize Winners in Economics: Mainline vs. Mainstream, American Journal of Economics and Sociology 71, no.55 (Nov 2012): 1219–1249.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.2012.00861.xTHOMAS J. MICELI Judicial versus 'natural' selection of legal rules with an application to accident law, Journal of Institutional Economics 8, no.22 (Oct 2011): 143–159.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137411000440Anthony Niblett Case-by-Case Adjudication and the Path of the Law, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2012).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1665184Ryan Seamus Whalen Bad Law Before it Goes Bad: Citation Networks and the Life Cycle of Overruled Supreme Court Precedent, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2012).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2101273Giuseppe Dari-Mattiacci, Bruno Deffains, Bruno Lovat The dynamics of the legal system, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 79, no.1-21-2 (Jun 2011): 95–107.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2011.02.001Russell Smyth, Vinod Mishra The Transmission of Legal Precedent Across the Australian State Supreme Courts Over the Twentieth Century, Law & Society Review 45, no.11 (Mar 2011): 139–170.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00430.xVicki Waye, Ping Xiong The Relationship between Mediation and Judicial Proceedings in China, Asian Journal of Comparative Law 6 (Apr 2015): 1–34.https://doi.org/10.1017/S2194607800000466Yonatan Lupu, James H. Fowler Strategic Citations to Precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2011).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1358782Peter J. Boettke, Alexander Fink, Daniel J. Smith The Impact of Nobel Prize Winners in Economics: Mainline vs. Mainstream, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2011).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1949838Thomas Burri Do Lawyers Knead the Dough? – How Law, Chaos, and Uncertainty Interact, European Journal of Risk Regulation 1, no.44 (Jan 2017): 371–381.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1867299X00000817David A. Penn, Joachim Zietz The Development of Water Rights in Colorado: An Empirical Analysis, The American Economist 55, no.22 (Sep 2010): 24–35.https://doi.org/10.1177/056943451005500205Russell Smyth, Vinod Mishra The Prestige of Australian State Supreme Courts Over the 20th Century, Australian Journal of Political Science 45, no.33 (Aug 2010): 323–336.https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2010.499160Camille Chaserant, Sophie Harnay Déréglementer la profession d'avocat en France ?, Revue internationale de droit économique t.XXIV, no.22 (Jul 2010): 147–183.https://doi.org/10.3917/ride.242.0147Anthony Niblett Tracking Inconsistent Judicial Behavior, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2010).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1434685Metin Coşgel, Thomas Miceli, Rasha Ahmed Law, state power, and taxation in Islamic history, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 71, no.33 (Sep 2009): 704–717.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2009.02.017Thomas J. Miceli Legal Change: Selective Litigation, Judicial Bias, and Precedent Miceli, The Journal of Legal Studies 38, no.11 (Jul 2015): 157–168.https://doi.org/10.1086/587439Joanna M. Shepherd The Influence of Retention Politics on Judges' Voting Shepherd, The Journal of Legal Studies 38, no.11 (Jul 2015): 169–206.https://doi.org/10.1086/592096Giuseppe Dari-Mattiacci, Bruno Deffains, Bruno Lovat The Dynamics of the Legal System, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2009).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1399925Ryan C. Black, James F. Spriggs The Depreciation of Precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2009).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1421413Magnus Söderberg, David K. Round Dynamic Influences on Regulatory Dispute Settlements: The Role of Precedents and Preceding Decisions, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2009).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1433626Magnus Söderberg, David K. Round Dynamic Influences on Legal Dispute Settlements: The Case of Regulatory Decisions in Sweden, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2009).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1433643Virginia Rosales-López Economics of court performance: an empirical analysis, European Journal of Law and Economics 25, no.33 (Feb 2008): 231–251.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-008-9047-9 Stephen J. Choi and G. Mitu Gulati Bias in Judicial Citations: A Window into the Behavior of Judges? Choi/Gulati, The Journal of Legal Studies 37, no.11 (Jul 2015): 87–130.https://doi.org/10.1086/588263James H. Fowler, Sangick Jeon The authority of Supreme Court precedent, Social Networks 30, no.11 (Jan 2008): 16–30.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2007.05.001Benjamin H. Barton Judges, Lawyers, and a Predictive Theory of Legal Complexity, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2008).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1136372Margherita Saraceno Access to Justice and Litigation Trade-Off: A Theoretical Analysis, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2008).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1280795Maria Alessandra Antonelli, Veronica Grembi An Economic Model of Filing: Assessing Different Institutional Contexts, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2008).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1624198Álvaro E. Bustos A Dynamic Theory of Common Law Courts, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2008).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.929218Kathryn E. Spier Litigation, Economics of, (Dec 2016): 1–12.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2492-1Scott A. Comparato, Scott D. McClurg A Neo-Institutional Explanation of State Supreme Court Responses in Search and Seizure Cases, American Politics Research 35, no.55 (Jul 2016): 726–754.https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X07302595Carson W. Bays The Determinants of Tying Litigation, 1961–2001, International Advances in Economic Research 13, no.11 (Dec 2006): 81–96.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11294-006-9063-xKathryn E. Spier Chapter 4 Litigation, (Jan 2007): 259–342.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0730(07)01004-3James H. Fowler, Timothy R. Johnson, James F. Spriggs, Sangick Jeon, Paul J. Wahlbeck Network Analysis and the Law: Measuring the Legal Importance of Precedents at the U.S. Supreme Court, Political Analysis 15, no.33 (Jan 2017): 324–346.https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpm011Bruno Deffains, Marie Obidzinski Real Options Theory for Law Makers, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2007).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1099487Gillian K. Hadfield The Quality of Law: Judicial Incentives, Legal Human Capital and the Evolution of Law, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2007).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.967494Dietrich Fausten, Ingrid L. Nielsen, Russell Smyth A Century of Citation Practice on the Supreme Court of Victoria, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2007).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.995060Paresh Kumar Narayan, Russell Smyth Temporal causality and the dynamics of judicial appellate caseload, real income and socio-economic complexity in Australia, Applied Economics 38, no.1919 (Oct 2006): 2209–2219.https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840500427569Stefanie A. Lindquist, David E. Klein The Influence of Jurisprudential Considerations on Supreme Court Decisionmaking: A Study of Conflict Cases, Law Society Review 40, no.11 (Mar 2006): 135–162.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2006.00262.xAlain Marciano Value and Exchange in Law and Economics: Buchanan versus Posner, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2006).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.945367Douglas Glen Whitman The Role of Panels in Enhancing Legal Predictability, International Review of Law and Economics 25, no.44 (Dec 2005): 541–555.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2005.12.004Evelyne Serverin Des fonctions économiques des tribunaux, Économie et Institutions , no.44 (Jun 2004): 97–127.https://doi.org/10.4000/ei.811Mark S. Hurwitz, Oseph V. Stefko Acclimation and Attitudes: "Newcomer" Justices and Precedent Conformance on the Supreme Court, Political Research Quarterly 57, no.11 (Mar 2004): 121–129.https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290405700110Sophie Harnay, Alain Marciano Judicial conformity versus dissidence: an economic analysis of judicial precedent, International Review of Law and Economics 23, no.44 (Dec 2003): 405–420.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2003.07.004Russell Smyth, Mita Bhattacharya How fast do old judges slow down?, International Review of Law and Economics 23, no.22 (Jun 2003): 141–164.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8188(03)00029-2Louis Kaplow, Steven Shavell Economic Analysis of Law, (Jan 2002): 1661–1784.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-4420(02)80029-5Ignacio Palacios-Huerta, Oscar Volij The Measurement of Intellectual Influence, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2002).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.329803Jonathan R. Macey Precedent, (Jan 2017): 1468–1475.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-74173-1_281Peter H. Aranson Judicial Review, (Jan 2017): 1045–1053.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-74173-1_199 James F. Spriggs, II , and Thomas G. Hansford Explaining the Overruling of U.S. Supreme Court Precedent, The Journal of Politics 63, no.44 (Oct 2015): 1091–1111.https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-3816.00102D Vandegrift QUALITY‐ASSURING PRICE AND BREACH OF EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTY, Contemporary Economic Policy 19, no.22 (Mar 2007): 186–196.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7287.2001.tb00060.xAlireza Tahai, John T. Rigsby Information processing using citations to investigate journal influence in accounting, Information Processing & Management 34, no.2-32-3 (Mar 1998): 341–359.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4573(97)00082-4Peter Newman P, (Jan 1998): 1–198.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14286-6_1Alireza Tahai, G. Wayne Kelly An Alternative View of Citation Patterns of Quantitative Literature Cited by Business and Economic Researchers, The Journal of Economic Education 27, no.33 (Jul 2014): 263–275.https://doi.org/10.1080/00220485.1996.10844916Jenny B. Wahl American Slavery and the Path of the Law, Social Science History 20, no.22 (Jan 2016): 281–316.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0145553200021635Donald J. Boudreaux, A. C. Pritchard Reassessing the role of the independent judiciary in enforcing interest-group bargains, Constitutional Political Economy 5, no.11 (Dec 1994): 1–21.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393253Thomas J. Miceli Paradigms and conventions: Uncertainty, decision making, and entrepreneurship, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 25, no.22 (Oct 1994): 299–301.https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(94)90017-5R. Wagner-Döbler The frequency distribution of legal decision citations in the German jurisdiction, Scientometrics 29, no.11 (Jan 1994): 15–26.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02018381Thomas J. Miceli, Metin M. Coşgel Reputation and judicial decision-making, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 23, no.11 (Jan 1994): 31–51.https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(94)90095-7 William M. Landes , and Richard A. Posner The Influence of Economics on Law: A Quantitative Study, The Journal of Law and Economics 36, no.1, Part 21, Part 2 (Oct 2015): 385–424.https://doi.org/10.1086/467281 George Loewenstein , Samuel Issacharoff , Colin Camerer , and Linda Babcock Self-Serving Assessments of Fairness and Pretrial Bargaining, The Journal of Legal Studies 22, no.11 (Oct 2015): 135–159.https://doi.org/10.1086/468160 Keith N. Hylton Asymmetric Information and the Selection of Disputes for Litigation, The Journal of Legal Studies 22, no.11 (Oct 2015): 187–210.https://doi.org/10.1086/468162Anthony Ogus Information, error costs and regulation, International Review of Law and Economics 12, no.44 (Dec 1992): 411–421.https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-8188(92)90019-NLewis A. Kornhauser Modeling collegial courts I: Path-dependence, International Review of Law and Economics 12, no.22 (Jun 1992): 169–185.https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-8188(92)90034-OPETER CLINCH THE USE OF AUTHORITY: CITATION PATTERNS IN THE ENGLISH COURTS, Journal of Documentation 46, no.44 (Apr 1990): 287–317.https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026862Avery Katz Judicial decisionmaking and litigation expenditure, International Review of Law and Economics 8, no.22 (Dec 1988): 127–143.https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-8188(88)90001-4Gregory A. Caldeira Legal precedent: Structures of communication between state supreme courts, Social Networks 10, no.11 (Mar 1988): 29–55.https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(88)90009-3Charles A. Johnson Content-Analytic Techniques and Judicial Research, American Politics Quarterly 15, no.11 (Nov 2016): 169–197.https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X8701500108Charles A. Johnson Follow-Up Citations in the U.S. Supreme Court, Western Political Quarterly 39, no.33 (Sep 2016): 538–547.https://doi.org/10.1177/106591298603900313Aharon Barak Overruling Precedent, Israel Law Review 21, no.3-43-4 (Feb 2016): 269–295.https://doi.org/10.1017/S002122370000916XDavid B. Audretsch The celler kefauver act and the deterrent effect, Review of Industrial Organization 2, no.44 (Dec 1985): 322–338.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02418920CHARLES A. JOHNSON Citations to Authority in Supreme Court Opinions, Law & Policy 7, no.44 (Oct 1985): 509–523.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9930.1985.tb00365.x Frank Way Stability and Change in Constitutional Litigation: The Public Piety Cases, The Journal of Politics 47, no.33 (Oct 2015): 910–925.https://doi.org/10.2307/2131217Gregory A. Caldeira The Transmission of Legal Precedent: A Study of State Supreme Courts, American Political Science Review 79, no.11 (Aug 2014): 178–194.https://doi.org/10.2307/1956126Gregory A. Caldeira On the reputation of state supreme courts, Political Behavior 5, no.11 (Jan 1983): 83–108.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989987Scott A. Boorman, Paul R. Levitt Blockmodeling complex statutes, Economics Letters 13, no.11 (Jan 1983): 1–9.https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(83)90002-2 Lawrence E. Blume , and Daniel L. Rubinfeld The Dynamics of the Legal Process, The Journal of Legal Studies 11, no.22 (Sep 2015): 405–419.https://doi.org/10.1086/467709Ejan Mackaay Economic Analysis of Major Common Law Doctrines, (Jan 1982): 31–79.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-5332-6_3CHARLES A. JOHNSON DO LOWER COURTS ANTICIPATE CHANGES IN SUPREME COURT POLICIES?: A Few Empirical Notes, Law & Policy 3, no.11 (Jan 1981): 55–68.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9930.1981.tb00235.x William M. Landes , and Richard A. Posner Legal Change, Judicial Behavior, and the Diversity Jurisdiction, The Journal of Legal Studies 9, no.22 (Sep 2015): 367–386.https://doi.org/10.1086/467645 George L. Priest Selective Characteristics of Litigation, The Journal of Legal Studies 9, no.22 (Sep 2015): 399–421.https://doi.org/10.1086/467647Joseph J. Cordes, Burton A. Weisbrod Governmental behavior in response to compensation requirements, Journal of Public Economics 11, no.11 (Feb 1979): 47–58.https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(79)90044-6 John C. Goodman An Economic Theory of the Evolution of Common Law, The Journal of Legal Studies 7, no.22 (Sep 2015): 393–406.https://doi.org/10.1086/467600Ben Deoorter, Francesco Parisi Legal Precedents and Judicial Discretion, (): 667–671.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-47828-4_131
Referência(s)