Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Biodiversity offsets are one solution to widespread poorly compensated biodiversity loss: a response to Curran et al.

2015; Wiley; Volume: 25; Issue: 6 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1890/14-1217.1

1939-5582

Fabien Quétier, A.J.A. van Teeffelen, John D. Pilgrim, Amrei von Hase, Kerry ten Kate,

Forest Management and Policy

Ecological ApplicationsVolume 25, Issue 6 p. 1739-1741 Letter to the Editor Biodiversity offsets are one solution to widespread poorly compensated biodiversity loss: a response to Curran et al. Fabien Quétier, Fabien Quétier Biotope, Mèze, France E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorAstrid J. A. Van Teeffelen, Astrid J. A. Van Teeffelen VU University Amsterdam, Institute for Environmental Studies, Amsterdam, the NetherlandsSearch for more papers by this authorJohn D. Pilgrim, John D. Pilgrim The Biodiversity Consultancy, Cambridge, United KingdomSearch for more papers by this authorAmrei von Hase, Amrei von Hase Forest Trends, Washington, D.C. 20036 USASearch for more papers by this authorKerry ten Kate, Kerry ten Kate Forest Trends, Washington, D.C. 20036 USA Forest Trends, Washington, D.C. 20036 USASearch for more papers by this author Fabien Quétier, Fabien Quétier Biotope, Mèze, France E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorAstrid J. A. Van Teeffelen, Astrid J. A. Van Teeffelen VU University Amsterdam, Institute for Environmental Studies, Amsterdam, the NetherlandsSearch for more papers by this authorJohn D. Pilgrim, John D. Pilgrim The Biodiversity Consultancy, Cambridge, United KingdomSearch for more papers by this authorAmrei von Hase, Amrei von Hase Forest Trends, Washington, D.C. 20036 USASearch for more papers by this authorKerry ten Kate, Kerry ten Kate Forest Trends, Washington, D.C. 20036 USA Forest Trends, Washington, D.C. 20036 USASearch for more papers by this author First published: 01 September 2015 https://doi.org/10.1890/14-1217.1Citations: 15 Corresponding Editor: R. A. Hufbauer. Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Literature Cited BBOP. 2009. The relationship between biodiversity offsets and impact assessment: a BBOP resource paper. Business and Biodiversity Offsets Program, Washington, D.C., USA www.forest-trends.org/biodiversityoffsetprogram/guidelines/eia.pdf Google Scholar BBOP. 2012. Resource paper: limits to what can be offset. Business and Biodiversity Offsets Program, Washington, D.C., USA. http://bbop.forest-trends.org/guidelines/Resource_Paper_Limits.pdf Google Scholar Bekessy, S. A., B. A. Wintle, D. B. Lindenmayer, M. A. McCarthy, M. Colyvan, M. A. Burgman,and H. P. Possingham. 2010. The biodiversity bank cannot be a lending bank. Conservation Letters 3 (3): 151–158. 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2010.00110.x Web of Science®Google Scholar Brownlie, S., N. King,and J. Treweek. 2013. Biodiversity tradeoffs and offsets in impact assessment and decision making: can we stop the loss? Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 31 (1): 24–33. 10.1080/14615517.2012.736763 Web of Science®Google Scholar Bull, J. W., A. Gordon, E. A. Law, K. B. Suttle,and E. J. Milner-Gulland. 2014. Importance of baseline specifications in evaluating conservation interventions and achieving no net loss of biodiversity. Conservation Biology 28 (3): 799–809. 10.1111/cobi.12243 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Bull, J. W., K. B. Suttle, A. Gordon, N. J. Singh,and E. J. Milner-Gulland. 2013. Biodiversity offsets in theory and practice. Oryx 47 (3): 369–380. 10.1017/S003060531200172X Web of Science®Google Scholar Butchart, S. H. M., et al . 2010. Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science 328: 1164–1168. 10.1126/science.1187512 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Curran, M., S. Hellweg,and J. Beck. 2014. Is there any empirical support for biodiversity offset policy? Ecological Applications 24: 617–632. 10.1890/13-0243.1 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Gardner, T. A., et al . 2013. Biodiversity offsets and the challenge of achieving no net loss. Conservation Biology 27 (6): 1254–1264. 10.1111/cobi.12118 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Hanski, I. 2011. Habitat loss, the dynamics of biodiversity, and a perspective on conservation. Ambio 40: 248–255. 10.1007/s13280-011-0147-3 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Hill, D.,and R. Arnold. 2012. Building the evidence base for ecological impact assessment and mitigation. Journal of Applied Ecology 49: 6–9. 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02095.x Web of Science®Google Scholar Kiesecker, J. M., H. Copeland, A. Pocewicz,and B. McKenney. 2010. Development by design: blending landscape-level planning with the mitigation hierarchy. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 8: 261–266. 10.1890/090005 Web of Science®Google Scholar Maron, M., R. J. Hobbs, A. Moilanen, J. W. Matthews, K. Christie, T. A. Gardner, D. A. Keith, D. B. Lindenmayer,and C. A. McAlpine. 2012. Faustian bargains? Restoration realities in the context of biodiversity offset policies. Biological Conservation 155: 141–148. 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.06.003 Web of Science®Google Scholar Pilgrim, J. D., et al . 2013. A process for assessing the offsetability of biodiversity impacts. Conservation Letters 6 (5): 376–384. 10.1111/conl.12002 Web of Science®Google Scholar Quétier, F.,and S. Lavorel. 2011. Assessing ecological equivalence in biodiversity offset schemes: key issues and solutions. Biological Conservation 144: 2991–2999. 10.1016/j.biocon.2011.09.002 Web of Science®Google Scholar Quétier, F., B. Regnery,and H. Levrel. 2014. No net loss of biodiversity or paper offsets? A critical review of the French no net loss policy. Environmental Science & Policy 38: 120–131. 10.1016/j.envsci.2013.11.009 Web of Science®Google Scholar Rainey, H. J., E. H. B. Pollard, G. Dutson, J. M. M. Ekstrom, S. R. Livingstone, H. J. Temple,and J. D. Pilgrim. 2015. A review of corporate goals of No Net Loss and Net Positive Impact on biodiversity. Oryx 49 (2): 232–238. 10.1017/S0030605313001476 Web of Science®Google Scholar Sonter, L. J., D. J. Barrett,and B. S. Soares-Filho. 2014. Offsetting the impacts of mining to achieve no net loss of native vegetation. Conservation Biology 28: 1068–1076. 10.1111/cobi.12260 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Tucker, G., B. Allen, M. Conway, I. Dickie, K. Hart, M. Rayment, C. Schulp,and A. J. A. Van Teeffelen. 2014. Policy options for an EU No Net Loss initiative. Report to the European Commission. Institute for European Environmental Policy, London, UK. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/biodiversity/nnl/index_en.htm Google Scholar Van Teeffelen, A. J. A., P. Opdam, F. Wätzold, F. Hartig, K. Johst, M. Drechsler, C. C. Vos, S. Wissel,and F. Quétier. 2014. Ecological and economic conditions and associated institutional challenges for conservation banking in dynamic landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 130: 64–72. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.06.004 Web of Science®Google Scholar Citing Literature Volume25, Issue6September 2015Pages 1739-1741 ReferencesRelatedInformation