Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Another Woman That Never Existed The Woman That Never Evolved. Sarah Blaffer Hrdy.

1982; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 57; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1086/412805

1539-7718

Donald Symons,

Plant and animal studies

Previous articleNext article No AccessNew Biological BooksAnother Woman That Never Existed The Woman That Never Evolved. Sarah Blaffer Hrdy. Donald SymonsDonald SymonsPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Quarterly Review of Biology Volume 57, Number 3Sep., 1982 Published in association with Stony Brook University Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/412805 Views: 3Total views on this site Citations: 44Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1982 Stony Brook Foundation, Inc.PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Malin Ah-King An Early Female Turn in Primate Research, (Jan 2023): 27–82.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7161-7_2Brooke A. Scelza Choosy But Not Chaste: Multiple Mating in Human Females, Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews 22, no.55 (Oct 2013): 259–269.https://doi.org/10.1002/evan.21373Katherine E. Starkweather, Raymond Hames A Survey of Non-Classical Polyandry, Human Nature 23, no.22 (Jun 2012): 149–172.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-012-9144-xTrish C. Kelley, James F. Hare Pair-Bonded Humans Conform to Sexual Stereotypes in Web-Based Advertisements for Extra-Marital Partners, Evolutionary Psychology 8, no.44 (Oct 2010): 147470491000800.https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491000800403Randy Thornhill The Concept of an Evolved Adaptiation, (Sep 2007): 4–22.https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470515372.ch2Carel P. van Schaik, Gauri R. Pradhan, Maria A. van Noordwijk Mating conflict in primates: infanticide, sexual harassment and female sexuality, (May 2004): 131–150.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511542459.010Sarah Blaffer Hrdy The Optimal Number of Fathers, (Jan 2003): 111–133.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0267-8_6Jonathan Knight Sexual stereotypes, Nature 415, no.68696869 (Jan 2002): 254–256.https://doi.org/10.1038/415254aHeidi Greiling, David M Buss Women's sexual strategies: the hidden dimension of extra-pair mating, Personality and Individual Differences 28, no.55 (May 2000): 929–963.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00151-8SARAH BLAFFER HRDY The Optimal Number of Fathers: Evolution, Demography, and History in the Shaping of Female Mate Preferences, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 907, no.11 (Jan 2006): 75–96.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb06617.xSarah Blaffer Hrdy Raising Darwin’s consciousness, Human Nature 8, no.11 (Mar 1997): 1–49.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-997-1003-9Joseph H. Manson Female mate choice in primates, Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews 3, no.66 (Jun 2005): 192–195.https://doi.org/10.1002/evan.1360030605Craig T. Palmer The use and abuse of Darwinian psychology: Its impact on attempts to determine the evolutionary basis of human rape, Ethology and Sociobiology 13, no.44 (Jul 1992): 289–299.https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(92)90028-3Randy Thornhill, Nancy Wilmsen Thornhill The evolutionary psychology of men's coercive sexuality, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.22 (May 2011): 363–375.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00069120Kathleen A. Akins, Mary E. Windham Just science?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.22 (May 2011): 376–377.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00069132Elizabeth Rice Allgeier, Michael W. Wiederman Evidence for an evolved adaptation to rape? Not yet, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.22 (May 2011): 377–379.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00069144John Archer Mating tactics are complex and involve females too, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.22 (May 2011): 379–380.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00069156Betty M. Bayer, Robert S. Steele The derealization of rape, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.22 (May 2011): 380–381.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00069168Ray H. Bixler Men: A genetically invariant predisposition to rape?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.22 (May 2011): 381–381.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0006917XSusan Brownmiller, Barbara Mehrhof A feminist response to rape as an adaptation in men, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.22 (May 2011): 381–382.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00069181John Dupré Blinded by “science”: How not to think about social problems, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.22 (May 2011): 382–383.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00069193Irenäus Eibl-Eibesfeldt Coercive sexuality and dominance, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.22 (May 2011): 383–384.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0006920XAurelio J. Figueredo Does rape equal sex plus violence?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.22 (May 2011): 384–385.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00069211Jennifer J. Freyd, J. Q. Johnson The evolutionary psychology of priesthood celibacy, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.22 (May 2011): 385–385.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00069223Andrew Futterman, Sabrina Zirkel Men are not born to rape, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.22 (May 2011): 385–386.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00069235Nicola J. Gavey, Russell D. Gray Rape: The perfect adaptationist story, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.22 (May 2011): 386–388.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00069247Michael T. Ghiselin Genetics, functional anatomy and coercive behavior, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.22 (May 2011): 388–388.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00069259Brian A. Gladue Evolution, biosocial behavior and coercive sexuality, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.22 (May 2011): 388–389.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00069260Patricia Adair Gowaty What if within-sex variation is greater than between-sex variation?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.22 (May 2011): 389–390.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00069272John Hartung Getting real about rape, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.22 (May 2011): 390–392.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00069284Philip Kitcher Loose associations, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.22 (May 2011): 392–393.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00069296Travis Langley Empirical criteria for evaluating rape as an evolutionary phenomenon, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.22 (May 2011): 393–394.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00069302Neil M. Malamuth Evolution and laboratory research on men's sexual arousal: What do the data show and how can we explain them?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.22 (May 2011): 394–396.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00069314Allan Mazur The evolutionary psychology of rape and food robbery, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.22 (May 2011): 397–397.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00069326Linda Mealey Alternative adaptive models of rape, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.22 (May 2011): 397–398.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00069338Craig T. Palmer Psychological mechanisms versus behavior: Does the difference really make a difference?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.22 (May 2011): 398–399.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0006934XDaniel Pérusse Specific versus general adaptations: Another unnecessary dichotomy?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.22 (May 2011): 399–400.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00069351Vernon L. Quinsey Individual differences in the propensity to rape, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.22 (May 2011): 400–400.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00069363P. A. Russell Psychological adaptation: Alternatives and implications, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.22 (May 2011): 401–401.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00069375Barbara Smuts Psychological adaptations, development and individual differences, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.22 (May 2011): 401–402.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00069387Eckart Voland Selection for rape or selection for sexual opportunism?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.22 (May 2011): 402–403.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00069399Margo Wilson, Martin Daly What about the evolutionary psychology of coerciveness?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.22 (May 2011): 403–404.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00069405Randy Thornhill, Nancy Wilmsen Thornhill The study of men's coercive sexuality: What course should it take?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.22 (May 2011): 404–421.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00069417Horst D. Steklis, Catherine H. Whiteman Loss of estrus in human evolution: Too many answers, too few questions, Ethology and Sociobiology 10, no.66 (Oct 1989): 417–434.https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(82)90037-1