Rethinking Polygyny: Co-Wives, Codes, and Cultural Systems [and Comments and Reply]
1988; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 29; Issue: 4 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/203674
ISSN1537-5382
AutoresDougľas R. White, Laura Betzig, Monique Borgerhoff Mulder, Garry Chick, John Hartung, William Irons, Bobbi S. Low, Keith F. Otterbein, Paul C. Rosenblatt, Paul Spencer,
Tópico(s)Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessRethinking Polygyny: Co-Wives, Codes, and Cultural Systems [and Comments and Reply]Douglas R. White, Laura Betzig, Monique Borgerhoff Mulder, Garry Chick, John Hartung, William Irons, Bobbi S. Low, Keith F. Otterbein, Paul C. Rosenblatt, and Paul SpencerDouglas R. White Search for more articles by this author , Laura Betzig Search for more articles by this author , Monique Borgerhoff Mulder Search for more articles by this author , Garry Chick Search for more articles by this author , John Hartung Search for more articles by this author , William Irons Search for more articles by this author , Bobbi S. Low Search for more articles by this author , Keith F. Otterbein Search for more articles by this author , Paul C. Rosenblatt Search for more articles by this author , and Paul Spencer Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Current Anthropology Volume 29, Number 4Aug. - Oct., 1988 Sponsored by the Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/203674 Views: 48Total views on this site Citations: 115Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1988 The Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological ResearchPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Vegard Skirbekk Fertility from the Dawn of Humanity Through the Nineteenth Century, (Apr 2022): 39–65.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91611-4_4Victor Karandashev Socio-biological Models of Love, (Sep 2022): 125–152.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05343-6_3Magdalena Brzezińska Transcontinental polygyny, migration and hegemonic masculinity in Guinea‐Bissau and the Gambia, The Australian Journal of Anthropology 32, no.33 (Nov 2021): 257–271.https://doi.org/10.1111/taja.12417Kathryn V. Walter, Daniel Conroy-Beam, David M. Buss, Kelly Asao, Agnieszka Sorokowska, Piotr Sorokowski, Toivo Aavik, Grace Akello, Mohammad Madallh Alhabahba, Charlotte Alm, Naumana Amjad, Afifa Anjum, Chiemezie S. Atama, Derya Atamtürk Duyar, Richard Ayebare, Carlota Batres, Mons Bendixen, Aicha Bensafia, Boris Bizumic, Mahmoud Boussena, Marina Butovskaya, Seda Can, Katarzyna Cantarero, Antonin Carrier, Hakan Cetinkaya, Ilona Croy, Rosa María Cueto, Marcin Czub, Daria Dronova, Seda Dural, Izzet Duyar, Berna Ertugrul, Agustín Espinosa, Ignacio Estevan, Carla Sofia Esteves, Luxi Fang, Tomasz Frackowiak, Jorge Contreras Garduño, Karina Ugalde González, Farida Guemaz, Petra Gyuris, Mária Halamová, Iskra Herak, Marina Horvat, Ivana Hromatko, Chin-Ming Hui, Jas Laile Jaafar, Feng Jiang, Konstantinos Kafetsios, Tina Kavčič, Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair, Nicolas Kervyn, Truong Thi Khanh Ha, Imran Ahmed Khilji, Nils C. Köbis, Hoang Moc Lan, András Láng, Georgina R. Lennard, Ernesto León, Torun Lindholm, Trinh Thi Linh, Giulia Lopez, Nguyen Van Luot, Alvaro Mailhos, Zoi Manesi, Rocio Martinez, Sarah L. McKerchar, Norbert Meskó, Girishwar Misra, Conal Monaghan, Emanuel C. Mora, Alba Moya-Garófano, Bojan Musil, Jean Carlos Natividade, Agnieszka Niemczyk, George Nizharadze, Elisabeth Oberzaucher, Anna Oleszkiewicz, Mohd Sofian Omar-Fauzee, Ike E. Onyishi, Baris Özener, Ariela Francesca Pagani, Vilmante Pakalniskiene, Miriam Parise, Farid Pazhoohi, Annette Pisanski, Katarzyna Pisanski, Edna Ponciano, Camelia Popa, Pavol Prokop, Muhammad Rizwan, Mario Sainz, Svjetlana Salkičević, Ruta Sargautyte, Ivan Sarmány-Schuller, Susanne Schmehl, Shivantika Sharad, Razi Sultan Siddiqui, Franco Simonetti, Stanislava Yordanova Stoyanova, Meri Tadinac, Marco Antonio Correa Varella, Christin-Melanie Vauclair, Luis Diego Vega, Dwi Ajeng Widarini, Gyesook Yoo, Marta Marta Zaťková, Maja Zupančič Sex differences in human mate preferences vary across sex ratios, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 288, no.19551955 (Jul 2021): 20211115.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.1115Corry Gellatly Benefits of Commitment and Marriage, (Apr 2021): 548–552.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19650-3_222Simon Martin Ancient Maya Politics, 10 (Jul 2020).https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108676694Riana Minocher, Pavel Duda, Adrian V. Jaeggi Explaining marriage patterns in a globally representative sample through socio-ecology and population history: A Bayesian phylogenetic analysis using a new supertree, Evolution and Human Behavior 40, no.22 (Mar 2019): 176–187.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.11.003David Lawson, Mhairi A. Gibson Polygynous marriage and child health in sub-Saharan Africa: What is the evidence for harm?, Demographic Research 39 (Jul 2018): 177–208.https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2018.39.6Corry Gellatly Benefits of Commitment and Marriage, (May 2018): 1–5.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_222-1Coren L. Apicella, Alyssa N. Crittenden, Victoria A. Tobolsky Hunter-gatherer males are more risk-seeking than females, even in late childhood, Evolution and Human Behavior 38, no.55 (Sep 2017): 592–603.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.01.003Satoshi Kanazawa Possible evolutionary origins of human female sexual fluidity, Biological Reviews 92, no.33 (May 2016): 1251–1274.https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12278Wataru Nakahashi Cultural sexual selection in monogamous human populations, Royal Society Open Science 4, no.66 (Jun 2017): 160946.https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160946Ben Raffield, Neil Price, Mark Collard Polygyny, Concubinage, and the Social Lives of Women in Viking-Age Scandinavia, Viking and Medieval Scandinavia 13 (Jan 2017): 165–209.https://doi.org/10.1484/J.VMS.5.114355Chris T. Bauch, Richard McElreath Disease dynamics and costly punishment can foster socially imposed monogamy, Nature Communications 7, no.11 (Apr 2016).https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11219Andrey Korotayev, Julia Zinkina, Jack Goldstone, Sergey Shulgin Explaining Current Fertility Dynamics in Tropical Africa From an Anthropological Perspective, Cross-Cultural Research 50, no.33 (Apr 2016): 251–280.https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397116644158David W. Lawson, Susan James, Esther Ngadaya, Bernard Ngowi, Sayoki G. M. Mfinanga, Monique Borgerhoff Mulder Reply to Rieger and Wagner: Context matters when studying purportedly harmful cultural practices, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113, no.1313 (Mar 2016).https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1601420113David W. Lawson, Susan James, Esther Ngadaya, Bernard Ngowi, Sayoki G. M. Mfinanga, Monique Borgerhoff Mulder No evidence that polygynous marriage is a harmful cultural practice in northern Tanzania, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112, no.4545 (Oct 2015): 13827–13832.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1507151112David P. Schmitt Fundamentals of Human Mating Strategies, (Sep 2015): 258–291.https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470939376.ch9Pascal Gagneux Primate Groups and Their Correlates, (Jan 2015): 897–903.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.82007-3Jacques Balthazart, Larry J. Young Mate Selection, Sexual Orientation, and Pair Bonding, (Jan 2015): 2157–2210.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-397175-3.00048-XDavid C. Geary Sexual Selection and Human Vulnerability, (Jan 2015): 153–182.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801562-9.00005-3 References, (Jan 2015): 295–362.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801562-9.09998-1Thomas V. Pollet, Joshua M. Tybur, Willem E. Frankenhuis, Ian J. Rickard What Can Cross-Cultural Correlations Teach Us about Human Nature?, Human Nature 25, no.33 (Aug 2014): 410–429.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-014-9206-3Gerhard van der Horst, Liana Maree Sperm form and function in the absence of sperm competition, Molecular Reproduction and Development 81, no.33 (Nov 2013): 204–216.https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.22277David W. Lawson, Caroline Uggla Family Structure and Health in the Developing World: What Can Evolutionary Anthropology Contribute to Population Health Science?, (Mar 2014): 85–118.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0280-4_5David C. Geary, Benjamin Winegard, Bo Winegard Reflections on the Evolution of Human Sex Differences: Social Selection and the Evolution of Competition Among Women, (Jan 2014): 393–412.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0314-6_20Jeffrey Winking, Jonathan Stieglitz, Jenna Kurten, Hillard Kaplan, Michael Gurven Polygyny among the Tsimane of Bolivia: an improved method for testing the polygyny–fertility hypothesis, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 280, no.17561756 (Apr 2013): 20123078.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.3078Charles Negy, Catherine Pearte, Katharine Lacefield Young Adults' Attitudes Toward Polygamous Marriage as a Function of Gender, Attitudes Toward Same-Sex Marriage, and Other Sociopersonality Constructs, Marriage & Family Review 49, no.11 (Jan 2013): 51–82.https://doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2012.728556KATHARINE CHARSLEY, ANIKA LIVERSAGE Transforming polygamy: migration, transnationalism and multiple marriages among Muslim minorities, Global Networks 13, no.11 (Jul 2012): 60–78.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2012.00369.xJoseph Henrich, Robert Boyd, Peter J. Richerson The puzzle of monogamous marriage, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 367, no.15891589 (Mar 2012): 657–669.https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0290E. HEYER, R. CHAIX, S. PAVARD, F. AUSTERLITZ Sex-specific demographic behaviours that shape human genomic variation, Molecular Ecology 21, no.33 (Dec 2011): 597–612.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05406.xAlfonso Díez Minguela Mating (marriage) patterns and economic development, The History of the Family 16, no.44 (Feb 2012): 312–330.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hisfam.2011.07.003Brad R. Huber, William F. Danaher, William L. Breedlove New Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Marriage Transactions, Cross-Cultural Research 45, no.44 (May 2011): 339–375.https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397111402466Carol R. Ember What We Know and What We Don?t Know About Variation in Social Organization: Melvin Ember?s Approach to the Study of Kinship, Cross-Cultural Research 45, no.11 (Nov 2010): 16–36.https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397110383947Menelaos. Apostolou Parental choice: What parents want in a son-in-law and a daughter-in-law across 67 pre-industrial societies, British Journal of Psychology 101, no.44 (Dec 2010): 695–704.https://doi.org/10.1348/000712609X480634Alex Stewart Sources of entrepreneurial discretion in kinship systems, (Mar 2015): 291–313.https://doi.org/10.1108/S1074-7540(2010)0000012014L. FORTUNATO, M. ARCHETTI Evolution of monogamous marriage by maximization of inclusive fitness, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 23, no.11 (Jan 2010): 149–156.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01884.xWalter Scheidel A peculiar institution? Greco–Roman monogamy in global context, The History of the Family 14, no.33 (Aug 2009): 280–291.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hisfam.2009.06.001Gillian R. Brown, Kevin N. Laland, Monique Borgerhoff Mulder Bateman's principles and human sex roles, Trends in Ecology & Evolution 24, no.66 (Jun 2009): 297–304.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.02.005DAVID C. GEARY Sex Differences in Reciprocal Altruism: Reply to Mower, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 39, no.11 (Mar 2009): 121–124.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2008.00392.xMichael Minkov Risk-Taking Reproductive Competition Explains National Murder Rates Better Than Socioeconomic Inequality, Cross-Cultural Research 43, no.11 (Oct 2008): 3–29.https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397108326290Satoshi Kanazawa Evolutionary Psychological Foundations of Civil Wars, The Journal of Politics 71, no.11 (Jul 2015): 25–34.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381608090026Malcolm M. Dow Network Autocorrelation Regression With Binary and Ordinal Dependent Variables, Cross-Cultural Research 42, no.44 (Jul 2008): 394–419.https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397108320411 References Cited, Plains Anthropologist 53, no.208208 (Feb 2014): 577–594.https://doi.org/10.1179/pan.2008.040Laure Ségurel, Begoña Martínez-Cruz, Lluis Quintana-Murci, Patricia Balaresque, Myriam Georges, Tatiana Hegay, Almaz Aldashev, Firuza Nasyrova, Mark A. Jobling, Evelyne Heyer, Renaud Vitalis, Molly Przeworski Sex-Specific Genetic Structure and Social Organization in Central Asia: Insights from a Multi-Locus Study, PLoS Genetics 4, no.99 (Sep 2008): e1000200.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000200Robert J. Quinlan Human pair-bonds: Evolutionary functions, ecological variation, and adaptive development, Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews 17, no.55 (Oct 2008): 227–238.https://doi.org/10.1002/evan.20191Brooke Scelza, Rebecca Bliege Bird Group Structure and Female Cooperative Networks in Australia’s Western Desert, Human Nature 19, no.33 (Jul 2008): 231–248.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-008-9041-5Christopher G. Wilson Male genital mutilation: an adaptation to sexual conflict, Evolution and Human Behavior 29, no.33 (May 2008): 149–164.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.11.008Trevor Denton Indexes of Validity and Reliability for Cross-Societal Measures, Cross-Cultural Research 42, no.22 (Feb 2008): 118–147.https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397107311185Nigel Barber Explaining Cross-National Differences in Polygyny Intensity, Cross-Cultural Research 42, no.22 (Feb 2008): 103–117.https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397108314587Walter Scheidel Monogamy and Polygyny in Greece, Rome, and World History, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2008).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1214729Melvin Ember, Carol R. Ember, Bobbi S. Low Comparing Explanations of Polygyny, Cross-Cultural Research 41, no.44 (Jul 2016): 428–440.https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397107307672Alean Al-Krenawi, John R. Graham, Sivan Ben-Shimol-Jacobsen Attitudes Toward and Reasons for Polygamy Differentiated by Gender and Age Among Bedouin-Arabs of the Negev, International Journal of Mental Health 35, no.11 (Dec 2014): 46–61.https://doi.org/10.2753/IMH0020-7411350104G. Destro-Bisol Genetic variation and social structure: a case-study from Africa, Human Evolution 20, no.2-32-3 (Apr 2005): 93–98.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02438727 Bibliography, (Apr 2014): 300–343.https://doi.org/10.13109/9783666538889.300Lewellyn Hendrix Courtship and Marriage, (Jan 2003): 71–77.https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-29907-6_7Alean Al-Krenawi, Rachel Lev-Wiesel Wife Abuse Among Polygamous and Monogamous Bedouin-Arab Families, Journal of Divorce & Remarriage 36, no.3-43-4 (Mar 2002): 151–165.https://doi.org/10.1300/J087v36n03_09Monique Borgerhoff Mulder, Margaret George-Cramer, Jason Eshleman, Alessia Ortolani A Study of East African Kinship and Marriage Using a Phylogenetically Based Comparative Method, American Anthropologist 103, no.44 (Dec 2001): 1059–1082.https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2001.103.4.1059Alean Al-Krenawi, John Graham, Abuelaish Izzeldin The Psychosocial Impact of Polygamous Marriages on Palestinian Women, Women & Health 34, no.11 (Oct 2008): 1–16.https://doi.org/10.1300/J013v34n01_01Alean Al-Krenawi Women from Polygamous and Monogamous Marriages in an Out-Patient Psychiatric Clinic, Transcultural Psychiatry 38, no.22 (Jun 2016): 187–199.https://doi.org/10.1177/136346150103800203David Geary, Mark Flinn Evolution of Human Parental Behavior and the Human Family, Parenting 1, no.11 (May 2001): 5–61.https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327922PAR011&2_2Monique Borgerhoff Mulder Using phylogenetically based comparative methods in anthropology: More questions than answers, Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews 10, no.33 (Jun 2001): 99–111.https://doi.org/10.1002/evan.1020Connie M. Anderson The Persistence of Polygyny as an Adaptive Response to Poverty and Oppression in Apartheid South Africa, Cross-Cultural Research 34, no.22 (Jul 2016): 99–112.https://doi.org/10.1177/106939710003400201Andrey Korotayev, Dmitri Bondarenko Polygyny and Democracy: A Cross-Cultural Comparison, Cross-Cultural Research 34, no.22 (Jul 2016): 190–208.https://doi.org/10.1177/106939710003400205 References, (Jan 2000): 379–462.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012487460-2/50013-1Alean Al-Krenawi, John R Graham The story of bedouin-arab women in a polygamous marriage, Women's Studies International Forum 22, no.55 (Sep 1999): 497–509.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-5395(99)00054-0Anna Pérez-Lezaun, Francesc Calafell, David Comas, Eva Mateu, Elena Bosch, Rosa Martínez-Arias, Jordi Clarimón, Giovanni Fiori, Donata Luiselli, Fiorenzo Facchini, Davide Pettener, Jaume Bertranpetit Sex-Specific Migration Patterns in Central Asian Populations, Revealed by Analysis of Y-Chromosome Short Tandem Repeats and mtDNA, The American Journal of Human Genetics 65, no.11 (Jul 1999): 208–219.https://doi.org/10.1086/302451Mark T. Seielstad, Eric Minch, L. Luca Cavalli-Sforza Genetic evidence for a higher female migration rate in humans, Nature Genetics 20, no.33 (Nov 1998): 278–280.https://doi.org/10.1038/3088Garry Chick Cultural Complexity: The Concept and Its Measurement, Cross-Cultural Research 31, no.44 (Nov 1997): 275–307.https://doi.org/10.1177/106939719703100401Lewellyn Hendrix Making Historical Connections: Galton's Problem and Opportunity, Cross-Cultural Research 31, no.44 (Nov 1997): 308–330.https://doi.org/10.1177/106939719703100402Raymond Hames Costs and benefits of monogamy and polygyny for Yanomamö women, Ethology and Sociobiology 17, no.33 (May 1996): 181–199.https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(96)00003-9Laura Betzig Medieval Monogamy, Journal of Family History 20, no.22 (Jun 1995): 181–216.https://doi.org/10.1177/036319909602000204Richley H. Crapo Factors in the Cross-Cultural Patterning of Male Homosexuality: A Reappraisal of the Literature, Cross-Cultural Research 29, no.22 (Jul 2016): 178–202.https://doi.org/10.1177/106939719502900204Melvin Ember, Carol R. Ember Worldwide cross-cultural studies and their relevance for archaeology, Journal of Archaeological Research 3, no.11 (Mar 1995): 87–111.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02231488Mike U. Smith, Harvey Siegel, Joseph D. McInerney Foundational issues in evolution education, Science & Education 4, no.11 (Jan 1995): 23–46.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00486589Edward M. Miller Paternal provisioning versus mate seeking in human populations, Personality and Individual Differences 17, no.22 (Aug 1994): 227–255.https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(94)90029-9Laura Betzig, Samantha Weber Polygyny in American Politics, Politics and the Life Sciences 12, no.11 (May 2016): 45–52.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0730938400011230Laura Betzig Roman monogamy, Ethology and Sociobiology 13, no.5-65-6 (Sep 1992): 351–383.https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(92)90009-SWARREN M. HERN Shipibo polygyny and patrilocality, American Ethnologist 19, no.33 (Oct 2009): 501–522.https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1992.19.3.02a00050Monique Borgerhoff Mulder Women’s strategies in polygynous marriage, Human Nature 3, no.11 (Mar 1992): 45–70.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692266James S. Chisholm, Victoria K. Burbank Monogamy and polygyny in Southeast Arnhem land: Male coercion and female choice, Ethology and Sociobiology 12, no.44 (Jul 1991): 291–313.https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(91)90022-INancy Wilmsen Thornhill An evolutionary analysis of rules regulating human inbreeding and marriage, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, no.22 (May 2011): 247–261.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00066449Jerome H. Barkow Evolved self-interest and the cross-cultural survey, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, no.22 (May 2011): 261–263.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00066450Stephen Beckerman The cross cultural method and the incest taboo, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, no.22 (May 2011): 263–264.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00066462Laura Betzig A little more mortar for a firm foundation, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, no.22 (May 2011): 264–264.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00066474A. H. Bittles Societal stratification, consanguinity and fertility, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, no.22 (May 2011): 264–265.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00066486Ray H. Bixler Multiple causes, eye witnesses and imaginative fertility, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, no.22 (May 2011): 265–266.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00066498James F. Crow Deleterious versus beneficial effects of inbreeding, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, no.22 (May 2011): 266–266.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00066504Wim E. Crusio No evolution without genetic variation, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, no.22 (May 2011): 267–267.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00066516Malcom M. Dow, Gregory B. Pollock Galton's problem for strict adaptationists, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, no.22 (May 2011): 267–268.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00066528R. I. M. Dunbar Marriage rules in perspective, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, no.22 (May 2011): 268–269.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0006653XDaniel G. Freedman On incestuous attraction and natural selection between populations, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, no.22 (May 2011): 269–269.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00066541Sam Glucksberg Rules regulating inbreeding and marriage: Evolutionary or socioeconomic?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, no.22 (May 2011): 269–270.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00066553Katherine L. Hann The nature of the data, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, no.22 (May 2011): 270–271.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00066565Michael E. Hyland What were the incest rules of the Upper Paleolithic People? Putting evolution into an evolutionary analysis, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, no.22 (May 2011): 271–271.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00066577Paul Kline Evolutionary analysis: Antithetical or irrelevant to psychoanalytic theory?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, no.22 (May 2011): 271–272.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00066589Gregory C. Leavitt Evolutionary analysis: Biological or cultural?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, no.22 (May 2011): 272–273.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00066590Frank B. Livingstone What happened to the universality of the incest taboo?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, no.22 (May 2011): 273–273.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00066607Kathleen M. MacQueen Power as a contextual variable in the analysis of human inbreeding rules, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, no.22 (May 2011): 273–274.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00066619Karin C. Meiselman Beyond the Westermarck effect: The role of denial and nurturant bonding in incest avoidance, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, no.22 (May 2011): 274–275.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00066620John Money Correlation is not causation, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, no.22 (May 2011): 275–275.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00066632Jim Moore Another definition of “human” falls, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, no.22 (May 2011): 275–276.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00066644Robert A. Paul Psychoanalytic theory and incest avoidance rules, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, no.22 (May 2011): 276–277.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00066656P. A. Russell Evolutionary theories must fit the data better than other theories, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, no.22 (May 2011): 277–278.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00066668David H. Spain Muddled theory and misinterpreted data: Comments on yet another attempt to identify a so-called Westermarck effect and, in the process, to refute Freud, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, no.22 (May 2011): 278–279.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0006667XEckart Voland Rules regulating inbreeding, cultural variability and the great heuristic problem of evolutionary anthropology, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, no.22 (May 2011): 279–280.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00066681Margo Wilson, Martin Daly The metaphorical extension of “incest”: A human universal?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, no.22 (May 2011): 280–281.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00066693Nancy Wilmsen Thornhill Mental mechanisms underlying inbreeding rule making, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, no.22 (May 2011): 281–293.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0006670XMichael L. Burton, Douglas R. White Regional Comparisons, Replications, and Historical Network Analysis, Behavior Science Research 25, no.1-41-4 (Sep 2016): 55–78.https://doi.org/10.1177/106939719102500104Carol R. Ember, David Levinson The Substantive Contributions of Worldwide Cross-Cultural Studies Using Secondary Data, Behavior Science Research 25, no.1-41-4 (Sep 2016): 79–140.https://doi.org/10.1177/106939719102500105Robert L. Munroe, Ruth H. Munroe Comparative Field Studies: Methodological Issues and Future Possibilities, Behavior Science Research 25, no.1-41-4 (Sep 2016): 155–185.https://doi.org/10.1177/106939719102500107Carol R. Ember, Marc Howard Ross, Michael L. Burton, Candice Bradley Problems of Measurement in Cross-Cultural Research Using Secondary Data, Behavior Science Research 25, no.1-41-4 (Sep 2016): 187–216.https://doi.org/10.1177/106939719102500108Elliot Fratkin, Patricia Lyons Johnson Empirical approaches to household organization, Human Ecology 18, no.44 (Dec 1990): 357–362.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00889462 Thomas Schweizer , and Hartmut Lang Sample Size and Research Strategy in Cultural Anthropology, Current Anthropology 30, no.44 (Oct 2015): 514–517.https://doi.org/10.1086/203776Douglas R. White Focused Ethnographic Bibliography: Standard Cross-Cultural Sample, Behavior Science Research 23, no.1-41-4 (Sep 2016): 1–145.https://doi.org/10.1177/106939718902300102
Referência(s)