What the New Archaeology Has Accomplished [and Comments and Reply]
1991; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 32; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/203954
ISSN1537-5382
AutoresRichard A. Watson, William Y. Adams, Barbara E. Barich, James Bell, Francesco Fedele, Z. Kobyliński, Robert D. Leonard, Mats P. Malmer, Robert W. Preucel, Zdeněk Vašíček,
Tópico(s)Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessWhat the New Archaeology Has Accomplished [and Comments and Reply]Richard A. Watson, William Y. Adams, Barbara E. Barich, James A. Bell, F. G. Fedele, Zbigniew Kobylinski, Robert D. Leonard, Mats P. Malmer, Robert W. Preucel, and Zdenek VasicekRichard A. Watson Search for more articles by this author , William Y. Adams Search for more articles by this author , Barbara E. Barich Search for more articles by this author , James A. Bell Search for more articles by this author , F. G. Fedele Search for more articles by this author , Zbigniew Kobylinski Search for more articles by this author , Robert D. Leonard Search for more articles by this author , Mats P. Malmer Search for more articles by this author , Robert W. Preucel Search for more articles by this author , and Zdenek Vasicek Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Current Anthropology Volume 32, Number 3Jun., 1991 Sponsored by the Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/203954 Views: 17Total views on this site Citations: 19Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1991 The Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological ResearchPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Agustín Mariano Agnolin Variability in the use of caves and rockshelters among ethnographic hunter-gatherers and its archaeological implications, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 64 (Dec 2021): 101359.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2021.101359K. Paddayya New Archaeology, Development of, (Oct 2020): 7743–7757.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30018-0_1018Marie-Lorraine Pipes Evidence of Public Celebrations and Feasting: Politics and Agency in Late Eighteenth-Early Nineteenth Century New York, (Nov 2012): 265–283.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5272-0_16Aleksandra Mcclain Theory, Disciplinary Perspectives and the Archaeology of Later Medieval England, Medieval Archaeology 56, no.11 (Jul 2013): 131–170.https://doi.org/10.1179/0076609712Z.0000000005Tina Thurston Unity and Diversity in the European Iron Age: Out of the Mists, Some Clarity?, Journal of Archaeological Research 17, no.44 (May 2009): 347–423.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10814-009-9032-zAlison Wylie Philosophy of archaeology;Philosophy in archaeology, (Jan 2007): 517–549.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-044451542-1/50016-7Lawrence A. Kuznar, Robert Jeske Analogic Reasoning, Ethnoarchaeology, and the Impact of Canines on the Archaeological Record, Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association 16, no.11 (Jun 2008): 37–46.https://doi.org/10.1525/ap3a.2006.16.1.37Philip J. Arnold III, Brian S. Wilkens On the Vanpools' “Scientific” Postprocessualism, American Antiquity 66, no.22 (Jan 2017): 361–366.https://doi.org/10.2307/2694614Todd L. VanPool, Christine S. VanPool Postprocessualism and the Nature of Science: A Response to Comments by Hutson and Arnold and Wilkens, American Antiquity 66, no.22 (Jan 2017): 367–375.https://doi.org/10.2307/2694615Christine S. VanPool, Todd L. VanPool The Scientific Nature of Postprocessualism, American Antiquity 64, no.11 (Jan 2017): 33–53.https://doi.org/10.2307/2694344Erica Hill Gender-informed archaeology: The priority of definition, the use of analogy, and the multivariate approach, Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 5, no.11 (Mar 1998): 99–128.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02428417Murray L. Wax On Negating Positivism: An Anthropological Dialectic, American Anthropologist 99, no.11 (Mar 1997): 17–23.https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1997.99.1.17Tim Murray From Sydney to Sarajevo, Archaeological Dialogues 3, no.11 (Jan 2009): 56–70.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203800000593Robert W. Preucel The postprocessual condition, Journal of Archaeological Research 3, no.22 (Jun 1995): 147–175.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02231436G. A. Clark Migration as an explanatory concept in paleolithic archaeology, Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 1, no.44 (Dec 1994): 305–343.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02242740G. A. Clark Paradigms in science and archaeology, Journal of Archaeological Research 1, no.33 (Sep 1993): 203–234.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01326535 Alison Wylie , and Richard A. Watson On Scepticism, Philosophy, and Archaeological Science, Current Anthropology 33, no.22 (Oct 2015): 209–214.https://doi.org/10.1086/204052James A. Bell Universalization in Archaeological Explanation, (Jan 1992): 143–163.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1826-2_6Mark P. Leone, Parker B. Potter Legitimation and the Classification of Archaeological Sites, American Antiquity 57, no.11 (Jan 2017): 137–145.https://doi.org/10.2307/2694840
Referência(s)