Produção Nacional
Revisado por pares
Biomass resilience of Neotropical secondary forests
2016; Nature Portfolio; Volume: 530; Issue: 7589 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1038/nature16512
ISSN1476-4687
AutoresLourens Poorter, Frans Bongers, T. Mitchell Aide, Angélica M. Almeyda Zambrano, Patricia Balvanera, Justin M. Becknell, Vanessa Boukili, Pedro H. S. Brancalion, Eben N. Broadbent, Robin L. Chazdon, Dylan Craven, Jarcilene Silva de Almeida‐Cortez, George A. L. Cabral, Ben de Jong, Julie S. Denslow, Daisy H. Dent, Saara J. DeWalt, Juan Manuel Dupuy, Sandra M. Durán, Mário M. Espírito‐Santo, María Fandiño, Ricardo G. César, Jefferson S. Hall, José Luis Hernández‐Stefanoni, Catarina C. Jakovac, André Braga Junqueira, Deborah Kennard, Susan G. Letcher, Juan‐Carlos Licona, Madelon Lohbeck, E. Marín-Spiotta, Miguel Martínez‐Ramos, Paulo Eduardo dos Santos Massoca, Jorge A. Meave, Rita C. G. Mesquita, Francisco Mora, Rodrigo Muñoz, Robert Muscarella, Yule Roberta Ferreira Nunes, Susana Ochoa‐Gaona, Alexandre A. Oliveira, Edith Orihuela-Belmonte, Marielos Peña‐Claros, Eduardo A. Pérez‐García, Daniel Piotto, Jennifer S. Powers, Jorge Rodríguez‐Velázquez, Eunice Romero, Jorge Ruíz, Juan Saldarriaga, Arturo Sánchez‐Azofeifa, Naomi B. Schwartz, Marc K. Steininger, Nathan G. Swenson, Marisol Toledo, María Uriarte, Michiel van Breugel, Hans van der Wal, Maria das Dores Magalhães Veloso, Hans F. M. Vester, Alberto Vicentini, Ima Célia Guimarães Vieira, Tony Vizcarra Bentos, G. Bruce Williamson, Danaë M. A. Rozendaal,
Tópico(s)Forest Management and Policy
ResumoAn analysis of above-ground biomass recovery during secondary succession in forest sites and plots, covering the major environmental gradients in the Neotropics. More than half the world's tropical forests are the product of secondary growth, following anthropogenic disturbance. It is therefore important to know how quickly these secondary forests recover sufficiently to provide ecosystem services equivalent to those of old-growth forest. These authors focus on carbon sequestration in Neotropical forests, and find that carbon uptake is much higher than in old-growth forest, allowing recovery to 90% of the carbon stocks in an average of 66 years, but there is also wide variation in recovery potential. This knowledge could help assess the implications of forest loss — and potential for recovery — in different areas. Land-use change occurs nowhere more rapidly than in the tropics, where the imbalance between deforestation and forest regrowth has large consequences for the global carbon cycle1. However, considerable uncertainty remains about the rate of biomass recovery in secondary forests, and how these rates are influenced by climate, landscape, and prior land use2,3,4. Here we analyse aboveground biomass recovery during secondary succession in 45 forest sites and about 1,500 forest plots covering the major environmental gradients in the Neotropics. The studied secondary forests are highly productive and resilient. Aboveground biomass recovery after 20 years was on average 122 megagrams per hectare (Mg ha−1), corresponding to a net carbon uptake of 3.05 Mg C ha−1 yr−1, 11 times the uptake rate of old-growth forests. Aboveground biomass stocks took a median time of 66 years to recover to 90% of old-growth values. Aboveground biomass recovery after 20 years varied 11.3-fold (from 20 to 225 Mg ha−1) across sites, and this recovery increased with water availability (higher local rainfall and lower climatic water deficit). We present a biomass recovery map of Latin America, which illustrates geographical and climatic variation in carbon sequestration potential during forest regrowth. The map will support policies to minimize forest loss in areas where biomass resilience is naturally low (such as seasonally dry forest regions) and promote forest regeneration and restoration in humid tropical lowland areas with high biomass resilience.
Referência(s)