Communicating with the Public during an Earthquake Sequence: Improving Communication of Geoscience by Coordinating Roles
2015; Seismological Society of America; Volume: 87; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1785/0220150113
ISSN1938-2057
AutoresAnne Wein, Sally H. Potter, Sarb Johal, Emma E.H. Doyle, Julia Becker,
Tópico(s)Disaster Management and Resilience
ResumoResearch Article| November 25, 2015 Communicating with the Public during an Earthquake Sequence: Improving Communication of Geoscience by Coordinating Roles Anne Wein; Anne Wein aPacific Geographic Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Menlo Park, California, U.S.A.awein@usgs.gov Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Sally Potter; Sally Potter bJoint Centre for Disaster Research (JCDR), GNS Science and Massey University, 1 Fairway Drive, Avalon, New Zealand Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Sarb Johal; Sarb Johal bJoint Centre for Disaster Research (JCDR), GNS Science and Massey University, 1 Fairway Drive, Avalon, New Zealand Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Emma Doyle; Emma Doyle bJoint Centre for Disaster Research (JCDR), GNS Science and Massey University, 1 Fairway Drive, Avalon, New Zealand Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Julia Becker Julia Becker bJoint Centre for Disaster Research (JCDR), GNS Science and Massey University, 1 Fairway Drive, Avalon, New Zealand Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Anne Wein aPacific Geographic Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Menlo Park, California, U.S.A.awein@usgs.gov Sally Potter bJoint Centre for Disaster Research (JCDR), GNS Science and Massey University, 1 Fairway Drive, Avalon, New Zealand Sarb Johal bJoint Centre for Disaster Research (JCDR), GNS Science and Massey University, 1 Fairway Drive, Avalon, New Zealand Emma Doyle bJoint Centre for Disaster Research (JCDR), GNS Science and Massey University, 1 Fairway Drive, Avalon, New Zealand Julia Becker bJoint Centre for Disaster Research (JCDR), GNS Science and Massey University, 1 Fairway Drive, Avalon, New Zealand Publisher: Seismological Society of America First Online: 14 Jul 2017 Online Issn: 1938-2057 Print Issn: 0895-0695 © 2015 by the Seismological Society of America Seismological Research Letters (2016) 87 (1): 112–118. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220150113 Article history First Online: 14 Jul 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Anne Wein, Sally Potter, Sarb Johal, Emma Doyle, Julia Becker; Communicating with the Public during an Earthquake Sequence: Improving Communication of Geoscience by Coordinating Roles. Seismological Research Letters 2015;; 87 (1): 112–118. doi: https://doi.org/10.1785/0220150113 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietySeismological Research Letters Search Advanced Search ABSTRACT After a large earthquake, geoscience agencies deliver information to public audiences about earthquakes that have recently occurred and aftershock forecasts about what might happen. We conducted focus groups and interviews about geoscience communications during the 2010–2012 earthquake sequence in Christchurch, New Zealand. Recorded experiences contain information about the public's appetite for scientific earthquake and aftershock information, psychological and psychosocial states that affect communications, increased demands for geoscientists' time and expertise, and multiple communication roles and responsibilities during the Canterbury earthquake sequence. Results of a preliminary analysis reveal that public consumption of geoscience information changes throughout the sequence and differs with respect to ways of coping.We confirm the need to accompany earthquake information with advice on protective actions, psychosocial support, and self‐care strategies but find it necessary to distinguish between crisis and risk communication regarding the balance of these types of information; initially, people are more focused on the crisis than the science. We conclude that when geoscientists are planning and preparing to communicate during an earthquake sequence, they may be able to more effectively utilize their resources if they (1) appreciate the complexity of psychosocial aspects affecting communication of earthquake information and aftershock forecasts and are trained to communicate with compassion and refer to qualified sources, (2) understand diverse and evolving needs within the public for scientific information and prepare ahead for challenges that reduce attention to aftershock forecasts, and (3) understand the benefits of coordinating communication roles and develop relationships with other responding agencies (e.g., health and welfare, emergency management). It appears that clarifying the communication roles and responsibilities of responding agencies and integrating messages into joint statements is where crucial effort is needed. As such, geoscience communications can be improved by coordinating geoscience, emergency management, and mental health messaging ahead of time and practicing these communications during moderate earthquake events, scenario planning, and exercises with earthquake sequences. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
Referência(s)