Revisão Acesso aberto

Angiogenesis in NSCLC: is vessel co-option the trunk that sustains the branches?

2016; Impact Journals LLC; Volume: 8; Issue: 24 Linguagem: Inglês

10.18632/oncotarget.7794

ISSN

1949-2553

Autores

Ana Coelho, Mónica Gomes, Raquel Catarino, Christian Rolfo, Agostinho Marques Lopes, Rui Medeiros, António Araújo,

Tópico(s)

Renal cell carcinoma treatment

Resumo

// Ana Luísa Coelho 1,2 , Mónica Patrícia Gomes 1,3 , Raquel Jorge Catarino 1,2 , Christian Rolfo 4,5 , Agostinho Marques Lopes 2,6 , Rui Manuel Medeiros 1,3,7 and António Manuel Araújo 3,8 1 Instituto Português de Oncologia, Molecular Oncology Group, Porto, Portugal 2 Faculdade de Medicina, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal 3 Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal 4 Phase I, Early Clinical Trials Unit, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium 5 Centre of Oncological Research (CORE), Antwerp University, Edegem, Belgium 6 Centro Hospitalar de S. João, Pulmonology Department, Porto, Portugal 7 Liga Portuguesa Contra o Cancro (NRNorte), Research Department, Porto, Portugal 8 Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Medical Oncology Department, Porto, Portugal Correspondence to: Christian Rolfo, email: // Keywords : NSCLC, angiogenesis, anti-angiogenic strategies, vessel co-option, angiopoietin-2 Received : January 25, 2016 Accepted : February 09, 2016 Published : February 29, 2016 Abstract The critical role of angiogenesis in tumor development makes its inhibition a valuable new approach in therapy, rapidly making anti-angiogenesis a major focus in research. While the VEGF/VEGFR pathway is the main target of the approved anti-angiogenic molecules in NSCLC treatment, the results obtained are still modest, especially due to resistance mechanisms. Accumulating scientific data show that vessel co-option is an alternative mechanism to angiogenesis during tumor development in well-vascularized organs such as the lungs, where tumor cells highjack the existing vasculature to obtain its blood supply in a non-angiogenic fashion. This can explain the low/lack of response to current anti-angiogenic strategies. The same principle applies to lung metastases of other primary tumors. The exact mechanisms of vessel co-option need to be further elucidated, but it is known that the co-opted vessels regress by the action of Angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2), a vessel destabilizing cytokine expressed by the endothelial cells of the pre-existing mature vessels. In the absence of VEGF, vessel regression leads to tumor cell loss and hypoxia, with a subsequent switch to a neoangiogenic phenotype by the remaining tumor cells. Unravelling the vessel co-option mechanisms and involved players may be fruitful for numerous reasons, and the particularities of this form of vascularization should be carefully considered when planning anti-angiogenic interventions or designing clinical trials for this purpose. In view of the current knowledge, rationale for therapeutic approaches of dual inhibition of Ang-2 and VEGF are swiftly gaining strength and may serve as a launchpad to more successful NSCLC anti-vascular treatments.

Referência(s)