Social Modification of the Activity of Ants in Nest-Building
1937; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 10; Issue: 4 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/physzool.10.4.30151428
ISSN1937-4267
Autores Tópico(s)Animal Behavior and Reproduction
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessSocial Modification of the Activity of Ants in Nest-BuildingShisan C. ChenShisan C. Chen Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Volume 10, Number 4Oct., 1937 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/physzool.10.4.30151428 Views: 12Total views on this site Citations: 47Citations are reported from Crossref Journal History This article was published in Physiological Zoology (1928-1998), which is continued by Physiological and Biochemical Zoology (1999-present). PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Claire Barrault, Adrian Soldati, Catherine Hobaiter, Stephen Mugisha, Delphine De Moor, Klaus Zuberbühler, Guillaume Dezecache Thermal imaging reveals social monitoring during social feeding in wild chimpanzees, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 377, no.18601860 (Aug 2022).https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0302Jian Chen Evidence of social facilitation and inhibition in digging behavior of red imported fire ants, Solenopsis invicta, Insect Science 28, no.22 (Jul 2020): 566–570.https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7917.12781Katherine McAuliffe, Richard Wrangham, Luke Glowacki, Andrew F. Russell When cooperation begets cooperation: the role of key individuals in galvanizing support, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 370, no.16831683 (Dec 2015): 20150012.https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0012Yukiko Ogura, Takeshi Izumi, Mitsuhiro Yoshioka, Toshiya Matsushima Dissociation of the neural substrates of foraging effort and its social facilitation in the domestic chick, Behavioural Brain Research 294 (Nov 2015): 162–176.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2015.07.052Masatoshi Ukezono, Satoshi F. Nakashima, Ryunosuke Sudo, Akira Yamazaki, Yuji Takano The combination of perception of other individuals and exogenous manipulation of arousal enhances social facilitation as an aftereffect: re-examination of Zajonc’s drive theory, Frontiers in Psychology 6 (May 2015).https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00601Roberto da Silva Camargo, Luiz Carlos Forti, Efeito de grupo versus produção de CO2 em operárias da formiga cortadeira Atta sexdens rubropilosa, Ciência Rural 43, no.1010 (Oct 2013): 1754–1758.https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782013001000004Serge Ciccotti Soziale Einflüsse, Macht und Manipulation, (Jan 2011): 203–281.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8274-2844-8_5Jonathan Z. Shik The metabolic costs of building ant colonies from variably sized subunits, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 64, no.1212 (Jul 2010): 1981–1990.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-010-1009-xPaul Bardunias, Nan-Yao Su, Rou-Ling Yang Behavioral variation among tunnelers in the Formosan subterranean termite, Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology 13, no.11 (Mar 2010): 45–49.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aspen.2009.11.002Raphaël Jeanson, Rebecca M. Clark, C. Tate Holbrook, Susan M. Bertram, Jennifer H. Fewell, Penelope F. Kukuk Division of labour and socially induced changes in response thresholds in associations of solitary halictine bees, Animal Behaviour 76, no.33 (Sep 2008): 593–602.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.04.007Joshua M. Feinberg, John R. Aiello Social Facilitation: A Test of Competing Theories1, Journal of Applied Social Psychology 36, no.55 (May 2006): 1087–1109.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00032.xJACQUES GAUTRAIS, Guy THERAULAZ, JEAN-LOUIS DENEUBOURG, CARL ANDERSON Emergent Polyethism as a Consequence of Increased Colony Size in Insect Societies, Journal of Theoretical Biology 215, no.33 (Apr 2002): 363–373.https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.2001.2506Susan L. Thomas, Linda J. Skitka, Stacy Christen, Mark Jurgena Social Facilitation and Impression Formation, Basic and Applied Social Psychology 24, no.11 (Jun 2010): 67–70.https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324834BASP2401_6Linda J. Skitka, Kathleen L. Mosier, Mark Burdick, Bonnie Rosenblatt Automation Bias and Errors: Are Crews Better Than Individuals?, The International Journal of Aviation Psychology 10, no.11 (Jan 2000): 85–97.https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327108IJAP1001_5Simon K. Robson, James F. A. Traniello Key individuals and the organisation of labor in ants, (Jan 1999): 239–259.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8739-7_13Tomás Gómez Delgado, José María León Rubio Contrastación experimental de las teorías del drive o impulso de la facilitación social, Revista de Psicología Social 9, no.22 (Jan 2014): 129–150.https://doi.org/10.1174/021347494763490223R. V. Solé, O. Miramontes, B. C. Goodwin Emergent Behavior in Insect Societies: Global Oscillations, Chaos and Computation, (Jan 1993): 77–88.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51030-4_7Annie Bonavita-Cougourdan, Laurence Morel Interindividual Variability and Idiosyncrasy in Social Behaviours in the Ant Camponotus vagus Scop, Ethology 77, no.11 (Apr 2010): 58–66.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1988.tb00191.xGeoffrey R. Hosey, Maureen Wood, Robin J. Thompson, Patricia L. Druck Social facilitation in a ‘non-social’ animal, the centipede Lithobius forficatus, Behavioural Processes 10, no.1-21-2 (Jan 1985): 123–130.https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-6357(85)90123-8Evelyne Garnier-Sillam Le polyéthisme chezReticulitermes lucifugus santonensis (Isoptera-Rhinotermitidae), Insectes Sociaux 30, no.11 (Mar 1983): 9–26.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02225654A. Lenoir, H. Ataya Polyéthisme et Répartition des Niveaux d'Activité chez la Fourmi Lasius niger L., Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 63, no.2-32-3 (Apr 2010): 213–232.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1983.tb00088.x David A. Clayton Socially Facilitated Behavior, The Quarterly Review of Biology 53, no.44 (Oct 2015): 373–392.https://doi.org/10.1086/410789M. Meudec Le comportement de transport du couvain lors d'une perturbation du nid chezTapinoma erraticum (Dolichoderinae). Rôle de l'individu, Insectes Sociaux 24, no.44 (Dec 1977): 345–352.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02223785Bennett G. Galef Social Transmission of Acquired Behavior: A Discussion of Tradition and Social Learning in Vertebrates, (Jan 1976): 77–100.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-3454(08)60082-0Carrie L. Randall, David Lester Social Modification of Alcohol Consumption in Inbred Mice, Science 189, no.41974197 (Jul 1975): 149–151.https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1138373Cathryn P. Brown, Patricia C. Kiely The role of early experience and emotionality in social facilitation of pecking in chickens, Animal Behaviour 22, no.11 (Feb 1974): 100–109.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(74)80058-8Peter J. Hunt, Joseph M. Hillery Social facilitation in a coaction setting: An examination of the effects over learning trials, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 9, no.66 (Nov 1973): 563–571.https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(73)90038-3J. Michael Davis Imitation: A Review and Critique, (Jan 1973): 43–72.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-7569-6_2J.H. Sudd The absence of social enhancement of digging in pairs of ants (formica lemani bondroit), Animal Behaviour 20, no.44 (Nov 1972): 813–819.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(72)80156-8 Howard Topoff Polymorphism in Army Ants Related to Division of Labor and Colony Cyclic Behavior, The American Naturalist 105, no.946946 (Oct 2015): 529–548.https://doi.org/10.1086/282743J.H. Sudd The effect of tunnel depth and of working in pairs on the speed of excavation in ants (Formica lemani bondroit), Animal Behaviour 19, no.44 (Nov 1971): 677–686.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(71)80171-9 Ian I. Mitroff Solipsism: An Essay in Psychological Philosophy, Philosophy of Science 38, no.33 (Oct 2015): 376–394.https://doi.org/10.1086/288379Guy Theraulaz, Jacques Gautrais, Jean-Louis Deneubourg Origines et fonctions de la variabilité chez les insectes sociaux, (): 371–390.https://doi.org/10.4000/books.editionsmsh.6731J. H. Sudd The Excavation of Soil by Ants, Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 26, no.33 (Apr 2010): 257–276.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1969.tb01951.xR. B. Zajonc Social Facilitation, Science 149, no.36813681 (Jul 1965): 269–274.https://doi.org/10.1126/science.149.3681.269 REFERENCES, (Jan 1965): 110–127.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4832-3269-0.50021-1Shôichi F. Sakagami, Kazuo Hayashida Work efficiency in heterospecific ant groups composed of hosts and their labour parasites, Animal Behaviour 10, no.1-21-2 (Jan 1962): 96–104.https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(62)90136-7J. Soulié Les nids et le comportement nidificateur des Fourmis du genreCremasto gaster d'Europe, d'Afrique du Nord et d'Asie du Sud-Est, Insectes Sociaux 8, no.33 (Sep 1961): 213–297.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02224010Plerre-P. Grassé La reconstruction du nid et les coordinations interindividuelles chezBellicositermes natalensis etCubitermes sp. la théorie de la stigmergie: Essai d'interprétation du comportement des termites constructeurs, Insectes Sociaux 6, no.11 (Mar 1959): 41–80.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02223791J. S. Weir Polyethism in workers of the antMyrmica, Insectes Sociaux 5, no.11 (Mar 1958): 97–128.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02222431J. B. Free THE EFFECT OF SOCIAL FACILITATION ON THE OVARIAL DEVELOPMENT OF BUMBLE-BEE WORKERS., Proceedings of the Royal Entomological Society of London. Series A, General Entomology 32, no.10-1210-12 (Apr 2009): 182–184.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3032.1957.tb00368.xD.M. Vowles The foraging of ants, The British Journal of Animal Behaviour 3, no.11 (Jan 1955): 1–13.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-5601(55)80069-XL. Pardi Recenti ricerche sulla divisione di lavoro negli Imenotteri sociali, Bolletino di zoologia 17, no.sup1sup1 (Jan 1950): 17–66.https://doi.org/10.1080/11250005009439105DEREK WRAGGE MORLEY Individual Activity of Ants, Nature 160, no.40564056 (Jul 1947): 122–123.https://doi.org/10.1038/160122b0Pierre-P. Grassé Sociétés animales et effet de groupe, Experientia 2, no.33 (Mar 1946): 77–82.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02172562Charles Harding Reviews of the Literature: Objective Studies of the Social Behavior of Animals, Human Organization 2, no.44 (Jul 1943): 21–39.https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.2.4.bp5l6k5117316581Wolfgang Weyrauch Wie ein Wespennest entsteht, Die Naturwissenschaften 27, no.55 (Feb 1939): 73–77.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01493215
Referência(s)