Reputation and Status: Expanding the Role of Social Evaluations in Management Research
2016; Academy of Management; Volume: 59; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês
10.5465/amj.2016.4001
ISSN1948-0989
AutoresGerard George, Linus Dahlander, Scott D. Graffin, Samantha Sim,
Tópico(s)Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
ResumoAcademy of Management JournalVol. 59, No. 1 From the EditorsReputation and Status: Expanding the Role of Social Evaluations in Management ResearchGerard George, Linus Dahlander, Scott D. Graffin and Samantha SimGerard GeorgeSingapore Management University, Linus DahlanderESMT European School of Management and Technology, Scott D. GraffinUniversity of Georgia and Samantha SimSingapore Management UniversityPublished Online:12 Jan 2016https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.4001AboutSectionsView articleView Full TextPDF/EPUB ToolsDownload CitationsAdd to favoritesTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail View articleREFERENCESAzoulay P., Furman J. L., Krieger J. L., Murray F. E. 2012. Retractions (NBER Working Paper No. 18499). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Google ScholarBednar M., Love E., Kraatz M. 2015. Paying the price? The impact of controversial governance practices on managerial reputation. Academy of Management Journal, 58: 1740–1760.Link , Google ScholarBelliveau M. A., O’Reilly C. A., Wade J. B. 1996. Social capital at the top: Effects of social similarity and status on CEO compensation. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 1568–1593.Link , Google ScholarBhattacharya H., Dugar S. 2014. Partnership formation: The role of social status. Management Science, 60: 1130–1147. Google ScholarBitektine A. 2011. Toward a theory of social judgments of organizations: The case of legitimacy, reputation, and status. Academy of Management Review, 36: 151–179.Link , Google ScholarBoivie S., Graffin S. D., Gentry R. J. 2016. Understanding the direction, magnitude, and joint effects of reputation when multiple actors’ reputations collide. Academy of Management Journal, 59: 188–206.Link , Google ScholarBoivie S., Lange D., McDonald M. L., Westphal J. D. 2011. Me or we: The effects of CEO organizational identification on agency costs. Academy of Management Journal, 54: 551–576.Link , Google ScholarBothner M. S., Kang J. H., Stuart T. E. 2007. Competitive crowding and risk taking in a tournament: Evidence from NASCAR racing. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52: 208–247. Google ScholarBothner M. S., Kim Y. K., Smith E. B. 2012. How does status affect performance? Status as an asset vs. status as a liability in the PGA and NASCAR. Organization Science, 23: 416–433. Google ScholarBurt R. S. 2010. Neighbor networks: Competitive advantage local and personal. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Google ScholarCampbell J. C., Sirmon D. G., Schijven M. 2016. Fuzzy logic and the market: A configurational approach to investor perceptions of acquisition announcements. Academy of Management Journal, 59: 163–187.Link , Google ScholarChattopadhyay P., Finn C., Ashkanasy N. M. 2010. Affective responses to professional dissimilarity: A matter of status. Academy of Management Journal, 53: 808–826.Link , Google ScholarDahlander L., McFarland D. A. 2013. Ties that last: Tie formation and persistence in research collaborations over time. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58: 69–110. Google ScholarDineen B. R., Allen D. G. 2016. Third-party employment branding: Human capital inflows and outflows following “Best Places to Work” certifications. Academy of Management Journal, 59: 90–112.Link , Google ScholarDoby V. J., Caplan R. D. 1995. Organizational stress as threat to reputation: Effects on anxiety at work and at home. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 1105–1123.Link , Google ScholarDurand R., Kremp P. 2016. Classical deviation: Organizational and individual status as antecedents of conformity. Academy of Management Journal, 59: 65–89.Link , Google ScholarDutton J. E., Dukerich J. M. 1991. Keeping an eye on the mirror: Image and identity in organizational adaptation. Academy of Management Journal, 34: 517–554.Link , Google ScholarDwertmann D. J. G., Boehm S.A. 2016. Status matters: The asymmetric effects of supervisor–subordinate disability incongruence and climate for inclusion. Academy of Management Journal, 59: 44–64.Link , Google ScholarElsbach K. D., Sutton R. I. 1992. Acquiring organizational legitimacy through illegitimate actions: A marriage of institutional and impression management theories. Academy of Management Journal, 35: 699–738.Link , Google ScholarErtug G., Castellucci F. 2013. Getting what you need: How reputation and status affect team performance, hiring, and salaries in the NBA. Academy of Management Journal, 56: 407–431.Link , Google ScholarErtug G., Yogev T., Lee Y. G., Hedstrom P. 2016. The art of representation: How audience-specific reputations affect success in the contemporary art field. Academy of Management Journal, 59: 113–134.Link , Google ScholarFast N. J., Halevy N., Galinsky A. D. 2012. The destructive nature of power without status. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48: 391–394. Google ScholarFombrun C., Shanley M. 1990. What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33: 233–258.Link , Google ScholarGeorge G., Haas M. R., Pentland A. 2014. Big data and management. Academy of Management Journal, 57: 321–325.Link , Google ScholarGraffin S. D., Bundy J., Porac J., Wade J., Quinn D. 2013. Falls from grace and the hazards of high status: The 2009 British expense scandal and its impact on parliamentary elites. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58: 313–345. Google ScholarGraffin S. D, Haleblian J., Kiley J. T. 2016. Ready, AIM, acquire: Impression offsetting and acquisitions. Academy of Management Journal, 59: 232–252.Link , Google ScholarGuler I., Guillén M. F. 2010. Home country networks and foreign expansion: Evidence from the venture capital industry. Academy of Management Journal, 53: 390–410.Link , Google ScholarHollensbe E., Wookey C., Loughlin H., George G., Nichols V. 2014. Organizations with purpose. Academy of Management Journal, 57: 1227–1234.Link , Google ScholarIbarra H. 1993. Network centrality, power, and innovation involvement: Determinants of technical and administrative roles. Academy of Management Journal, 36: 471–501.Link , Google ScholarJonsson S., Greve H., Fujiwara-Greve T. 2009. Undeserved loss: The spread of legitimacy loss to innocent organizations in response to reported corporate deviance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54: 195–228. Google ScholarKilduff M., Crossland C., Tsai W., Bowers M. T. 2016. Magnification and correction of the acolyte effect: Initial benefits and ex post settling up in NFL coaching careers. Academy of Management Journal, 59: 352–375.Link , Google ScholarLange D., Lee P. M., Dai Y. 2011. Organizational reputation: A review. Journal of Management, 37: 153–184. Google ScholarLanzolla G., Frankort H. T. W. 2016. The online shadow of offline signals: Which sellers get contacted in online B2B marketplaces? Academy of Management Journal, 59: 207–231.Link , Google ScholarManzo G., Baldassarri D. 2015. Heuristics, interactions, and status hierarchies: An agent-based model of deference exchange. Sociological Methods & Research, 44: 329–387. Google ScholarMarr J. C., Thau S. 2014. Falling from great (and not so great) heights: Status loss and performance in groups. Academy of Management Journal, 57: 223–248.Link , Google ScholarMerton R. K. 1968. The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159: 56–63. Google ScholarNeeley T. B. 2012. Language matters: Status loss and achieved status distinctions in global organizations. Organization Science, 24: 476–497. Google ScholarNeeley T. B., Dumas T. L. 2016. Unearned status gain: Evidence from a global language mandate. Academy of Management Journal, 59: 14–43.Link , Google ScholarPaolella L., Durand R. 2016. Category spanning, positive evaluation, and performance: Revised theory and test on the corporate law market. Academy of Management Journal, 59: 330–351.Link , Google ScholarPetkova A. P., Wadhwa A., Yao X., Jain S. 2014. Reputation and decision making under ambiguity: A study of U.S. venture capital firms’ investments in the emerging clean energy sector. Academy of Management Journal, 57: 422–448.Link , Google ScholarPettit N. C., Sivanathan N. 2012. The eyes and ears of status: How status colors perceptual judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38: 570–582. Google ScholarPettit N. C., Yong K., Spataro S. E. 2010. Holding your place: Reactions to the prospect of status gains and losses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46: 396–401. Google ScholarPfarrer M. D., Pollock T. G., Rindova V. P. 2010. A tale of two assets: The effects of firm reputation and celebrity on earnings surprises and investors’ reactions. Academy of Management Journal, 53: 1131–1152.Link , Google ScholarPhillips D. J., Zuckerman E. W. 2001. Middle-status conformity: Theoretical restatement and empirical demonstration in two markets. American Journal of Sociology, 107: 379–429. Google ScholarPiazza A., Castellucci F. 2014. Status in organization and management theory. Journal of Management, 40: 287–315. Google ScholarPodolny J. M. 2005. Status signals: A sociological study of market competition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google ScholarPolidoro F. 2013. The competitive implications of certifications: The effects of scientific and regulatory certifications on entries into new technical fields. Academy of Management Journal, 56: 597–627.Link , Google ScholarRhee M., Haunschild P. R. 2006. The liability of good reputation: A study of product recalls in the U.S. automobile industry. Organization Science, 17: 101–117. Google ScholarSchillebeeckx S., Chaturvedi S., George G., King Z. 2015. What do I want? The effects of individual aspiration and relational capability on collaboration preferences. Strategic Management Journal. Published online ahead of print. Google ScholarShani G., Westphal J. D. 2016. Persona non grata? Determinants and consequences of social distancing from journalists who engage in negative coverage of firm leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 59: 302–329.Link , Google ScholarSkvoretz J., Fararo T. J. 2016. Status and interaction: A stochastic model for the measurement of macro-status value and the determination of micro-status ranking in task group interaction. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 2: 1–16. Google ScholarTihanyi L., Graffin S., George G. 2014. Rethinking governance in management research. Academy of Management Journal, 57: 1535–1543.Link , Google ScholarTurban D. B., Greening D. W. 1997. Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40: 658–672.Link , Google Scholarvan Knippenberg D., Dahlander L., Haas M., George G. 2015. Information, attention, and decision-making. Academy of Management Journal, 58: 649–657.Link , Google ScholarWang T., Wezel F. C., Forgues B. 2016. Protecting market identity: When and how do organizations respond to consumers’ devaluations? Academy of Management Journal, 59: 135–162.Link , Google ScholarWashington M., Zajac E. J. 2005. Status evolution and competition: Theory and evidence. Academy of Management Journal, 48: 282–296.Link , Google ScholarWestphal J. D., Graebner M. E. 2010. A matter of appearances: How corporate leaders manage the impressions of financial analysts about the conduct of their boards. Academy of Management Journal, 53: 15–44.Link , Google ScholarZavyalova A., Pfarrer M. D., Reger R. K., Hubbard T. D. 2016. Reputation as a benefit and a burden? How stakeholders’ organizational identification affects the role of reputation following a negative event. Academy of Management Journal, 59: 253–276.Link , Google ScholarZavyalova A., Pfarrer M. D., Reger R. K., Shapiro D. L. 2012. Managing the message: The effects of firm actions and industry spillovers on media coverage following wrongdoing. Academy of Management Journal, 55: 1079–1101.Link , Google ScholarZhelyazkov P., Gulati R. 2016. After the break-up: The relational and reputational consequences of withdrawals from venture capital syndicates. Academy of Management Journal, 59: 277–301.Link , Google ScholarZuckerman E. W. 1999. The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. American Journal of Sociology, 104: 1398–1438. Google ScholarFiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byStanding Together or Falling Apart? Understanding Employees’ Responses to Organizational Identity ThreatsErk P. Piening, Torsten Oliver Salge, David Antons and Glen E. Kreiner21 April 2020 | Academy of Management Review, Vol. 45, No. 2Willing and Able: A General Model of Organizational Responses to Normative PressuresRodolphe Durand, Olga Hawn and Ioannis Ioannou22 April 2019 | Academy of Management Review, Vol. 44, No. 2Social Valuation Across Multiple Audiences: The Interplay of Ability and Identity JudgmentsRiccardo Fini, Julien Jourdan and Markus Perkmann11 December 2018 | Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 61, No. 6Saving Face: How Exit in Response to Negative Press and Star Analyst Downgrades Reflects Reputation Maintenance by DirectorsJoseph S. Harrison, Steven Boivie, Nathan Y. Sharp and Richard J. Gentry22 June 2018 | Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 61, No. 3Field or Fields? Building the Scaffolding for Cumulation of Research on Institutional FieldsCharlene Zietsma, Peter Groenewegen, Danielle M. Logue and C. R. (Bob) Hinings25 October 2016 | Academy of Management Annals, Vol. 11, No. 1Management Research in AMJ: Celebrating Impact While Striving for MoreGerard George4 November 2016 | Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 59, No. 6Corporate Social Responsibility: An Overview and New Research Directions Thematic Issue on Corporate Social ResponsibilityHeli Wang, Li Tong, Riki Takeuchi and Gerard George12 February 2016 | Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 59, No. 2 Vol. 59, No. 1 Permissions Metrics in the past 12 months History Published online 12 January 2016 Published in print 1 February 2016 Information© Academy of Management JournalDownload PDF
Referência(s)