Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Laboratory-Measured MTF of IOLs and Clinical Performance

2016; Slack Incorporated (United States); Volume: 32; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês

10.3928/1081597x-20160125-01

1938-2391

Henk A Weeber, Carmen Cánovas, Aixa Alarcón, Patricia Piers,

Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies

CorrespondenceLaboratory-Measured MTF of IOLs and Clinical Performance Henk A. Weeber, PhD, , , PhD Carmen Cánovas, PhD, , , PhD Aixa Alarcón, PhD, , and , PhD Patricia A. Piers, PhD, , PhD Henk A. Weeber, PhD , Carmen Cánovas, PhD , Aixa Alarcón, PhD , and Patricia A. Piers, PhD Journal of Refractive Surgery, 2016;32(3):211–212Published Online:January 25, 2016https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20160125-01Cited by:3View Full TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMore"Laboratory-Measured MTF of IOLs and Clinical Performance." Journal of Refractive Surgery, 32(3), pp. 211–2121.Esteve-Taboada JJ, Domínguez-Vicent A, Del Águila-Carrasco AJ, Ferrer-Blasco T, Montés-Micó R. Effect of large apertures on the optical quality of three multifocal lenses. J Refract Surg. 2015; 31:666–672.10.3928/1081597X-20150928-01 > LinkGoogle Scholar2.International Organization of Standardization web site. Available at: www.iso.org/iso/home/about.htm. Accessed November 30, 2015. > Google Scholar3.Norrby S. ISO eye model not valid for assessing aspherical lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008; 34:1056–1057.10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.03.038 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar4.Artigas JM, Menezo JL, Peris C, Felipe A, Diaz-Llopis M. Image quality with multifocal intraocular lenses and the effect of pupil size: comparison of refractive and hybrid refractive-diffractive designs. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007; 33:2111–2117.10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.07.035 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar5.Weeber HA, Meijer ST, Piers PA. Extending the range of vision using diffractive intraocular lens technology. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015; 41:2746–2754.10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.07.034 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar6.Ravikumar S, Bradley A, Thibos LN. Chromatic aberration and polychromatic image quality with diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014; 40:1192–1204.10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.11.035 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar7.Weeber HA, Chang DF, Piers PA. Laboratory evaluation of depth of focus for presbyopia correcting IOLs. Presented at the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons; September 13–17 2014; London, United Kingdom. > Google ScholarJRSJournal of Refractive SurgeryJ Refract Surg1081-597X1938-2391SLACK IncorporatedThorofare, NJ10.3928/1081597X-20160125-0110.3928_1081597X-20160125-01Correspondence ReplyEsteve-Taboada Jose Juan, , PhD, Domínguez-Vicent Alberto, , MSc, Del Aguila-Carrasco Antonio J., , MSc, Ferrer-Blasco Teresa, , PhD, and Montés-Micó Robert, , PhDBurjassot, SpainThe authors have no financial or proprietary interest in the materials presented herein.01032016 323212212Copyright 2016, SLACK Incorporated2016SLACK IncorporatedWe have read with interest the comments made by Weeber et al. regarding our manuscript.1 First, we want to point out that we fully agree with all of the comments addressed by the authors. As was noted in our article, the modulation transfer functions of the intraocular lenses were obtained using an aberration-free model eye and a light source with a radiance peak centered on 545-nm wavelength. Therefore, the results shown in our study are only valid under the testing conditions described. It is clear that different results might be obtained for different testing conditions. Our study could be improved if different corneal profiles and different light sources had been included to simulate different testing conditions more representative for the clinical situation.In addition, when the visual performance is being evaluated, many other factors that may influence the results should be taken into account. As stated in our study, in vivo studies would be necessary to fully understand the clinical performance of the intraocular lenses.We appreciate the support of the authors of this letter to help us to explain the potential readers the limitations of our study and the main conclusions of our results.Jose Juan Esteve-Taboada, PhDAlberto Domínguez-Vicent, MScAntonio J. Del Aguila-Carrasco, MScTeresa Ferrer-Blasco, PhDRobert Montés-Micó, PhD Burjassot, Spain Previous article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited by Lee Y, Łabuz G, Son H, Yildirim T, Khoramnia R and Auffarth G (2020) Assessment of the image quality of extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens models in polychromatic light, Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000037, 46:1, (108-115), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2020. Piers P, Chang D, Alarcón A and Cánovas C (2016) Clinically Relevant Interpretations of Optical Bench Measurement of Intraocular Lenses, Journal of Refractive Surgery, 33:1, (64-64), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2017. Alarcon A, Canovas C, Rosen R, Weeber H, Tsai L, Hileman K and Piers P (2016) Preclinical metrics to predict through-focus visual acuity for pseudophakic patients, Biomedical Optics Express, 10.1364/BOE.7.001877, 7:5, (1877), Online publication date: 1-May-2016. Request Permissions InformationCopyright 2016, SLACK IncorporatedPDF download • 189.7 KBThe authors are employees of Abbott Medical Optics (AMO Groningen b.v., Groningen, Netherlands). Published online1/25/16