Johannes Althusius: Medieval Constitutionalist or Modern Federalist?
1979; Oxford University Press; Volume: 9; Issue: 4 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a038568
ISSN1747-7107
Autores Tópico(s)American Constitutional Law and Politics
ResumoOn a rather cold and unfriendly morning in October 1625, Rudolph Christian, the newly enthroned count of Eastern Frisia, arrived at the city gate of Emden, expecting that the city would welcome him and immediately start with the traditional ceremonies during which it had to pay homage to its new sovereign. But nobody met Rudolph Christian at the gate, and only later in the day a delegation of the city council appeared at the count's residence, telling him to his great surprise, that it had not been possible to meet him at the city gate because it had not been known through which of the several gates he had wished to enter. The intention behind this lame excuse was only too obvious: the city denied its sovereign the oath of loyalty. In fact, the count of Eastern Frisia should have expected this-and probably did so-as this denial of homage was just another high point in the city's efforts to expand its autonomy and independence from the territorial sovereign.' When the homage was finally paid two years later, on the 28th of June 1627, the relation between city and sovereign had indeed been radically changed. In the place of the unilateral obligation of the city, there now was a mutual contract: in exchange for the city's oath of loyalty, the count had to guarantee the city's privileges by an equally binding
Referência(s)