Artigo Revisado por pares

Monte Verde, Chile: A Comment on Lynch

1991; Cambridge University Press; Volume: 56; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês

10.2307/281422

ISSN

2325-5064

Autores

Tom D. Dillehay, Michael B. Collins,

Tópico(s)

Evolution and Paleontology Studies

Resumo

A recent review by Lynch of late Pleistocene sites in South America is impaired by numerous errors and misrepresentations. Although Lynch omits several important sites and often selectively uses data to support his own position, this comment addresses his review of the Monte Verde site in Chile. Although Lynch has not visited Monte Verde and has inspected few artifacts from the site, he questions the Pleistocene association of artifacts and the “hand of humans” in the site. Lynch’s interpretations are refuted on the grounds that he is unfamiliar with the site, that he reviewed obsolete publications, and that he often misrepresented material in these publications. The archaeological evidence for late Pleistocene human activity at Monte Verde is reviewed in terms of the site stratigraphy, chronology, and artifacts.

Referência(s)
Altmetric
PlumX