Social Media in Cancer Care: Highlights, Challenges & Opportunities
2016; Future Medicine; Volume: 12; Issue: 13 Linguagem: Inglês
10.2217/fon-2016-0065
ISSN1744-8301
AutoresDeanna J. Attai, Mina S. Sedrak, Matthew S. Katz, Michael A. Thompson, Patricia F Anderson, Jennifer C. Kesselheim, Michael Fisch, David L. Graham, Audun Utengen, Claire Johnston, Robert S. Miller, Don S. Dizon,
Tópico(s)Web and Library Services
ResumoFuture OncologyVol. 12, No. 13 CommentarySocial media in cancer care: highlights, challenges & opportunitiesDeanna J Attai‡, Mina S Sedrak‡, Matthew S Katz, Michael A Thompson, Patricia F Anderson, Jennifer C Kesselheim, Michael J Fisch, David L Graham, Audun Utengen, Claire Johnston, Robert S Miller & Don S Dizon; for the Collaboration for Outcomes on Social Media in Oncology (COSMO)Deanna J Attai‡*Author for correspondence: E-mail Address: dattai@mednet.ucla.edu David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA, Mina S Sedrak‡ Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA, Matthew S Katz Department of Radiation Medicine, Lowell General Hospital, Lowell, MA, USA, Michael A Thompson Aurora Research Institute, Aurora Health Care, Milwaukee, WI, USA, Patricia F Anderson Taubman Health Sciences Library, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, Jennifer C Kesselheim Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer & Blood Disorders Center, Boston, MA, USA, Michael J Fisch AIM Specialty Health, Chicago, IL, USA, David L Graham Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, NC, USA, Audun Utengen Symplur LLC, Los Angeles, CA, USA, Claire Johnston American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA, USA, Robert S Miller American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA, USA & Don S Dizon Gillette Center for Gynecologic Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; for the Collaboration for Outcomes on Social Media in Oncology (COSMO)Published Online:30 Mar 2016https://doi.org/10.2217/fon-2016-0065AboutSectionsView ArticleView Full TextPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInReddit View articleKeywords: cancercancer researchclinical trialscommunicationcrowdsourcinghealth informationhealth promotionsocial mediasocial supportTwitterReferences1 Ahlqvist T, Bäck A, Heinonen S, Halonen M. Road-mapping the societal transformation potential of social media. Foresight 12(5), 3–26 (2010).Crossref, Google Scholar2 Duggan M, Brenner J. The demographics of social media users – 2012. http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Social-media-users.aspx.Google Scholar3 Koskan A, Klasko L, Davis SN et al. Use and taxonomy of social media in cancer-related research: a systematic review. Am. J. Public Health. 104(7), e20–e37 (2014).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar4 Moorhead SA, Hazlett DE, Harrison L, Carroll JK, Irwin A, Hoving C. A new dimension of health care: systematic review of the uses, benefits, and limitations of social media for health communication. J. Med. Internet. Res. 15(4), e85 (2013).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar5 Katz MS, Utengen A, Anderson P et al. Disease-specific hashtags for online communication about cancer care. JAMA Oncol. 2(3), 392–394 (2015).Crossref, Google Scholar6 Attai DJ, Cowher MS, Al-Hamadani M, Schoger JM, Staley AC, Landercasper J. Twitter social media is an effective tool for breast cancer patient education and support: patient-reported outcomes by survey. J. Med. Internet Res. 17(7), e188 (2015).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar7 Higgins JPT GS Consumer Involement. In: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration (2011). http://handbook.cochrane.org/chapter_2/2_3_4_2_consumer_involvement.htm.Google Scholar8 Cottrell E, Whitlock E, Kato E et al. Defining the Benefits of Stakeholder Engagement in Systematic Reviews. (Prepared by the Scientific Resource Center under Contract No. 290-2012-00004-C.) AHRQ Publication No. 14-EHC006-EF. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD, USA. https://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/ehc/products/581/1883/stakeholder-engagement-benefits-report-140318.pdf.Google Scholar9 Howe J. The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired Mag. 14(06), 1–5 (2006).Google Scholar10 Korpela, Eric. About SETI@home. http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu.Google Scholar11 Ranard BL, Ha YP, Meisel ZF et al. Crowdsourcing-harnessing the masses to advance health and medicine, a systematic review. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 29(1), 187–203 (2014).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar12 Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology. How to submit a concept (for the general public). www.allianceforclinicaltrialsinoncology.org/main/public/standard.xhtml?path=%2FPublic%2FSCRC.Google Scholar13 Walker G. ASCO collaborates in launch of crowd-sourced molecular oncology tumor board series (2015). www.asco.org/press-center/asco-collaborates-launch-crowd-sourced-molecular-oncology-tumor-board-series.Google Scholar14 CrowdCare Foundation. Impatient cancer patients help drive first ever crowdfunding initiative for multiple myeloma research. PR Newswire (2014). www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/impatient-cancer-patients-help-drive-first-ever-crowdfunding-initiative-for-multiple-myeloma-research-300004356.html.Google Scholar15 Thompson MA. Social media in clinical trials. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. Educ. Book e101–e105 (2014).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar16 Weiss M, Jacobus S, Abonour R et al. Identification of significant barriers to accrual (BTA) to NCI sponsored multiple myeloma-clinical trials (MM-CT): a step towards improving accrual to clinical trials. Presented at: 54th ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition. Atlanta, GA, USA, 8–11 December 2012.Crossref, Google Scholar17 Sedrak MS, Cohen RB, Merchant RM, Schapira MM. Cancer communication in the social media age. JAMA Oncol. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.5475 (2016) (Epub ahead of print).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar18 Menachemi N, Collum TH. Benefits and drawbacks of electronic health record systems. Risk Manag. Healthc. Policy 4, 47–55 (2011).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar19 Dizon DS, Graham D, Thompson MA et al. Practical guidance: the use of social media in oncology practice. J. Oncol. Pract. 8(5), e114–e124 (2012).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar20 Good BM, Su AI. Crowdsourcing for bioinformatics. Bioinformatics 29(16), 1925–1933 (2013).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google ScholarFiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByA systematic review of the available literature on the use of social media in brain tumor28 February 2023 | Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, Vol. 20The Use of Traditional, Complementary, and Integrative Medicine in Cancer: A Data-Mining Study of One-million Online Posts from Health Forums and Social Media Platforms (Preprint)2 January 2023 | Journal of Medical Internet ResearchBranding cancer research institutions through social media platformsOnline Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, Vol. 13, No. 2Bibliometric analysis of rumor detection via web of science from 1989 to 20217 September 2022 | Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, Vol. 34, No. 25Social Media and Professional Development for Oncology ProfessionalsJCO Oncology Practice, Vol. 18, No. 8Social Media and Oncology: The Time Is NowJCO Oncology Practice, Vol. 18, No. 8World Gynecologic Oncology Day: the use of Twitter to raise awareness of gynecologic cancersAJOG Global Reports, Vol. 2, No. 3#ColonCancer: Social Media Discussions About Colorectal Cancer During the COVID-19 PandemicJCO Clinical Cancer Informatics, Vol. 3, No. 6Using Twitter to promote #orthodontic research and clinical innovations: Practice and challengesAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Vol. 161, No. 4Optimizing Social Support in Oncology with Digital Platforms24 June 2022 | JMIR Cancer, Vol. 8, No. 2International Gynaecological Cancer Society (IGCS) 2020 Annual Global Meeting: Twitter activity analysis6 September 2021 | International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer, Vol. 31, No. 11Online reputation management by cancer hospitals: A systematic literature review in the USA and Spain4 December 2020 | El profesional de la informaciónAn exploratory study in breast cancer of factors involved in the use and communication with health professionals of Internet information7 February 2020 | Supportive Care in Cancer, Vol. 28, No. 10Evidence‐Based Communication in Clinical, Mass Media, and Social Media Contexts to Enhance Informed Consent for Participation in Clinical Trials and Precision Medicine Initiatives12 May 2020Examining Public Communication About Kidney Cancer on TwitterJCO Clinical Cancer Informatics, No. 3Physician Perceptions of the Use of Social Media for Recruitment of Patients in Cancer Clinical Trials18 September 2019 | JAMA Network Open, Vol. 2, No. 9Engaging Transgender Patients: Using Social Media to Inform Medical Practice and Research in Transgender HealthTransgender Health, Vol. 3, No. 1Incorporating Digital Tools to Improve Clinical Trial Infrastructure: A White Paper From the Digital Engagement Committee of SWOGJCO Clinical Cancer Informatics, Vol. 5, No. 2Interventions Using Social Media for Cancer Prevention and ManagementCancer Nursing, Vol. 41, No. 6Integrating Social Media in Modern Oncology Practice and ResearchAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book, Vol. 14, No. 38Social Media in Hematology in 2017: Dystopia, Utopia, or Somewhere In-between?24 October 2017 | Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports, Vol. 12, No. 6Risks and benefits of Twitter use by hematologists/oncologists in the era of digital medicineSeminars in Hematology, Vol. 54, No. 4The use and impact of Twitter at medical conferences: Best practices and Twitter etiquetteSeminars in Hematology, Vol. 54, No. 4Social Media and Pathology: Where Are We Now and Why Does it Matter?Advances in Anatomic Pathology, Vol. 24, No. 5Social media for radiation oncologists: A practical primerAdvances in Radiation Oncology, Vol. 2, No. 3The emerging role of professional social media use in oncologyMina S Sedrak, Don S Dizon, Patricia F Anderson, Michael J Fisch, David L Graham, Matthew S Katz, Jennifer C Kesselheim, Robert S Miller, Michael A Thompson & Audun Utengen, Deanna J Attai; for the Collaboration for Outcomes on Social Media in Oncology (COSMO)7 June 2017 | Future Oncology, Vol. 13, No. 15Social Media for Networking, Professional Development, and Patient EngagementAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book, Vol. 65, No. 37#InSituPathologists: how the #USCAP2015 meeting went viral on Twitter and founded the social media movement for the United States and Canadian Academy of PathologyModern Pathology, Vol. 30, No. 2Welcome to the 13th volume of Future OncologyJade Parker & Sebastian Dennis-Beron1 December 2016 | Future Oncology, Vol. 13, No. 1Social Media and Internet Resources for Patients with Blastic Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cell Neoplasm (BPDCN)4 August 2016 | Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports, Vol. 11, No. 6 Vol. 12, No. 13 eToC Sign up Follow us on social media for the latest updates Metrics Downloaded 871 times History Published online 30 March 2016 Published in print July 2016 Information© Future Medicine LtdKeywordscancercancer researchclinical trialscommunicationcrowdsourcinghealth informationhealth promotionsocial mediasocial supportTwitterFinancial & competing interests disclosureThe authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.PDF download
Referência(s)