Artigo Revisado por pares

Notes on the Panathenaea

1958; Cambridge University Press; Volume: 78; Linguagem: Inglês

10.2307/628920

ISSN

2041-4099

Autores

J. A. Davison,

Tópico(s)

Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History

Resumo

According to this account, the original name of the festival was Ἀθηναῖα , but this name had already been replaced by Παναθήναια in what we can regard only as having been still mythical times. Since Harpocration does not attempt to explain the nature or the purpose of the reforms which he ascribes to Erichthonius, the questions who really founded the Panathenaea and why do not arise on his account. All that need be said here is that the name Παναθήναια may mean one of two things: ( a ) a festival celebrated by ‘all-Athenians’ ( cf. Πανιώνια ) or ( b ) a festival in honour of Panathena ( cf. Πάνδια ). The most important point in Harpocration's statement, however, is the care with which he distinguishes between the two types of Panathenaic festival, that καθ' ἕκαστον ἐνιαυτόν and that διὰ πενταετηρίδος, ‘which they also called μεγάλα .’ The accuracy of his information on this point is demonstrated by official inscriptions, which speak of Παναθήναια τὰ μεγάλα (first in the Erythrae decree of 453–2— ATL ii. D10.3) and of Παναθήναια τὰ κατ' ἐνιαυτόν ( IG ii–iii 2 . 334.31); the epithet μικρά describing the annual festival is found only in literature (Lysias 21.2, 4, referring to the celebrations of 409 and 403; Menander fr. 428 Körte). Even in official documents Παναθήναια can be used alone; but this usage is not so ambiguous as it appears, since, with the possible exception of IG i 2 . 302.58 (= Tod 75.61) of 415, which will have to be discussed later in this paper, I have not found a single case in which Παναθήναια alone necessarily, or even probably, refers to anything but the great Panathenaea.

Referência(s)
Altmetric
PlumX