Participant motivation: A comparison of male and female athletes competing at the 2009 World Masters Games
2015; Wiley; Linguagem: Inglês
10.1142/9789814723398_0016
ISSN1464-0597
AutoresIan Heazlewood, Joseph Walsh, Mike Climstein, K. Adams, Trish Sevene, Mark DeBeliso, J. J Kettunen,
Tópico(s)Sport Psychology and Performance
ResumoApplied Psychology, pp. 291-297 (2015) No AccessParticipant motivation: A comparison of male and female athletes competing at the 2009 World Masters GamesI. Heazlewood, J. J Walsh, M. Climstein, K. Adams, T. Sevene, M. DeBeliso, and J. J KettunenI. HeazlewoodCharles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia, J. J WalshCharles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia, M. ClimsteinBond University, Robina, Australia, K. AdamsCalifornia State University, Monterey Bay, USA, T. SeveneCalifornia State University, Monterey Bay, USA, M. DeBelisoSouthern Utah University, Cedar City, USA, and J. J KettunenAUAS, Helsinki, Finlandhttps://doi.org/10.1142/9789814723398_0016Cited by:5 Previous AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsRecommend to Library ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail Abstract: Participant motivation evaluates factors that enhance motivation to participate. The research aim was to evaluate similarities and differences in participant motivation between males and females who competed at the 2009 World Masters Games (WMG). Participants were male; n=2522 and female; n=2438. The 56 item Motivations of Marathoners Scale (MOMS) instrument was completed by online survey using a 7-point Likert scale. Participant motivation of health orientation, weight concern, personal goal achievement, competition, recognition, affiliation, psychological coping, life meaning and self-esteem were assessed. Genders displayed similar factors of goal achievement, health orientation and affiliation as most important. Discriminant analysis indicated affiliation and competition as most discriminating with females having higher affiliation scores, whereas males displayed higher competition scores. FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited By 5An Investigation into the Product Attachment between Athletes and Their Sports EquipmentBryce Dyer18 December 2020 | The Design Journal, Vol. 24, No. 2Application of gradient boosted trees to gender prediction based on motivations of masters athletesJoe Walsh, Ian Heazlewood and Mike Climstein1 Aug 2018 | Model Assisted Statistics and Applications, Vol. 13, No. 3Re-evaluation of the Factor Structure of Motivations of Marathoners Scales (MOMS)I. T. Heazlewood, J. Walsh and M. Climstein28 February 2018Participant Motivation Predicting Training Sessions and Training Type in Male and Female Athletes Competing at 2010 Pan Pacific Masters GamesI. T. Heazlewood, J. Walsh, M. Climstein, K. Adams and T. Sevene et al.20 December 2016Differences in Participant Motivation Based on Category of Body Mass Index and GenderI. T. Heazlewood, J. Walsh, M. Climstein, K. Adams and T. Sevene et al.20 December 2016 Applied PsychologyMetrics History PDF download
Referência(s)