Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

The Politics of Nonviolent Action

1974; University of Utah Press; Volume: 27; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês

10.2307/447771

2325-8675

H. L. Nieburg, Gene Sharp,

Indian History and Philosophy

PrefaceThere is no pretense that this study is exhaustive. The historical material on nonviolent action which is used here only scratches the surface of past experience, for example. This volume is, however, the most comprehensive attempt thus far to examine the nature of nonviolent struggle as a social and political technique, including its view of power, its specific methods of action, its dynamics in conflict and the conditions for success or failure in its use. The historical material is used primarily in assisting the inductive construction of the analyses, theories and hypotheses. It is hoped that this book will stimulate many other studies and explorations of the nature of this technique and of its potentialities as a substitute for political violence.This study was begun out of a view that alternatives to violence in meeting tyranny, aggression, injustice and oppression are needed. At the Same time it appeared evident that both moral injunctions against violence and exhortations in favor of love and nonviolence have made little or no contribution to ending war and major political violence. It seemed to me that only the adoption of a substitute type of sanction and struggle as a functional alternative to violence in acute conflicts -- where important issues are, or are believed to be, at stake -- could possibly lead to a major reduction of political violence in a manner compatible with freedom, justice and human dignity.But mere advocacy of nonviolent alternatives will not necessarily produce any change either -- unless they are accurately perceived as being at least as effective as the violent alternatives. That, too, is not a matter for sermonizing or declarations. Therefore, a very careful examination of the nature, capacities and requirements of nonviolent struggle was necessary, which needed to be as objective as possible. This study is my primary contribution to that task. This work should not be regarded as final, but as a tool for increasing our understanding and knowledge; its propositions, classifications, analyses and hypotheses should be subjected to further examination, research and critical analysis.Since this book is focused almost exclusively on the nature of the nonviolent technique of action, several closely related areas are not treated here. For example, relationships between this technique and ethical problems, and between the technique and belief systems exhorting to nonviolent behavior, are for the most part not discussed here. This study may be, however, the basis for a fresh look at those problems. The political implications and potentialities of nonviolent action, including for social change and for national defense,2 have also been left for separate exploration; it is hoped that this study will assist those investigations.This book is the culmination of studies which began in 1950 while I was a student at Ohio State University.