Artigo Revisado por pares

Linnaeus and the PhyloCode : where are the differences?

2001; Wiley; Volume: 50; Issue: 4 Linguagem: Inglês

10.2307/1224724

ISSN

1996-8175

Autores

Max C. Langer,

Tópico(s)

Plant Diversity and Evolution

Resumo

TAXONVolume 50, Issue 4 p. 1091-1096 Point of View Linnaeus and the PhyloCode: where are the differences? Max C. Langer, Max C. Langer [email protected] Department of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Wills Memorial Building, Queens Road, BS81RJ Bristol, U.K.Search for more papers by this author Max C. Langer, Max C. Langer [email protected] Department of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Wills Memorial Building, Queens Road, BS81RJ Bristol, U.K.Search for more papers by this author First published: 01 November 2001 https://doi.org/10.2307/1224724Citations: 7AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Literature cited Benedetto, J. L. 1973. Herrerasauridae, nueva familia de Saurísquios Triásicos. Ameghiniana 10: 89–102. Benton, M. J. 2000. Stems, nodes, crown clades, and rank-free lists: is Linnaeus dead? Biol. Rev. 75: 633–648. Bryant, H. N. 1997. Cladistic information in phylogenetic definitions and designated phylogenetic contexts for the use of taxon names. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 62: 495–503. Bryant, H. N., Cantino, P. D. & de Queiroz, K. 2000. PhyloCode: a phylogenetic code of biological nomenclature, [http://www.ohiou.edu/phylocode/printable.html] de Queiroz, K. 1992. Phylogenetic definitions and taxonomic philosophy. Biol. & Philos. 7: 295–313. de Queiroz, K. 2000. The definition of taxon names: a reply to Stuessy. Taxon 49: 533–536. de Queiroz, K. & Gauthier, J. A. 1990. Phylogeny as a central principle in taxonomy: Phylogenetic definitions of taxon names. Syst. Zool. 39: 307–322. de Queiroz, K. & Gauthier, J. A. 1992. Phylogenetic taxonomy. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23: 449–480. de Queiroz, K. & Gauthier, J. A. 1994. Towards a phylogenetic system of biological nomenclature. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9: 27–31. Dominguez, E. & Wheeler, Q. D. 1997. Taxonomic stability is ignorance. Cladistics 13: 367–372. Forey, P. L. 2001. The PhyloCode: description and comentary. Bull. Zool. Nomencl. 58: 81–96. Funk, V. A. 2001. SSZ 1970–1989: A view of the years of conflict. Syst. Biol. 50: 153–155. Gaffney, E. S. 1979. An introduction to the logic of phylogenetic reconstruction. Pp. 79–111 in: J. Cracraft & N. Eldredge (eds.), Phylogenetic analysis and paleontology. New York. Galton, P. M. 1977. On Staurikosaurus pricei, an early saurischian dinosaur from the Triassic of Brazil, with notes on the Herrerasauridae and Poposauridae. Paläontol. Z 51: 234–245. Ghiselin, M. T. 1966. An application of the theory of definitions to systematic principles. Syst. Zool. 15: 127–130. Greuter, W., McNeill, J., Barrie, F. R., Burdet, H. M., Demoulin, V., Filgueiras, T. S., Nicolson, D. H., Silva, P. C., Skog, J. E., Trehane, P., Turland, N. J. & Hawksworth, D. L. 2000. International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (Saint Louis Code). Regnum Veg. 138: 1–474. Härlin, M. & Sundberg, P. 1998. Taxonomy and philosophy of names. Biol. & Philos. 13: 233–244. Hennig, W. [Translated by D. D. Davis & R. Zangerl]. 1966. Phylogenese systematics. Urbana. Jergensen, P. M. 2000. Names are defined, but not as taxa. Taxon 49: 779. Lapage, S. P., Sneath, P. H. A., Lessel, E. F., Skerman, V. B. D., Seeliger, H. P. R. & Clarke, W. A. 1992. International code of nomenclature of bacteria and statuses of the bacteriology and Applied Microbiology Section of the International Union of Microbiological Societies. Washington. Lidén, M., Oxelman, B., Backlund, A., Anderson, L., Bremer, B., Eriksson, R., Moberg, R., Nordal, I., Persson, K., Thulin, M. & Zimmer, B. 1997. Charlie is our darling. Taxon 46: 735–738. Løvtrup, S. 1987. On species and other taxa. Cladistics 3: 157–177. Moore, G. 1998. A comparison of traditional and phylogenetic nomenclature. Taxon 47: 31–34. Muir, J. W. 1968. The definition of taxa. Syst. Zool. 17: 345. Nelson, G. L. 1972. Phylogenetic relationships and classification. Syst. Zool. 21: 227–231. Nixon, K. C. & Carpenter, M. J. 2000. On the other “phylogenetic systematics”. Cladistics 16: 298–318. Patterson, C. & Rosen, D. E. 1977. Review of ichthyodectiform and other Mesozoic teleost fishes and the theory and practice of classifying fossils. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist. 158: 81–172. Ride, W. D. L., Cogger, H. G., Dupuis, C., Minelli, A., Thompson, F. C. & Tubbs, P. K. 1999. International code of zoological nomenclature. London. Smith, A. B. 1994. Systematics and the fossil record. Oxford. Stuessy, T. F. 2000. Taxon names are not defined. Taxon 49: 231–233. Citing Literature Volume50, Issue4November 2001Pages 1091-1096 ReferencesRelatedInformation

Referência(s)
Altmetric
PlumX