Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

The use of apomorphies in taxonomic defining

2003; Wiley; Volume: 52; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês

10.2307/3647307

1996-8175

Kenneth A. Monsch,

Botanical Studies and Applications

TAXONVolume 52, Issue 1 p. 105-107 Points of ViewsFree Access The use of apomorphies in taxonomic defining Kenneth A. Monsch, Kenneth A. Monsch [email protected] Department of Vertebrate Zoology, Institute of Zoology, University of Wroclaw, ul., H. Sienkiewicza 21, 50-335 PolandSearch for more papers by this author Kenneth A. Monsch, Kenneth A. Monsch [email protected] Department of Vertebrate Zoology, Institute of Zoology, University of Wroclaw, ul., H. Sienkiewicza 21, 50-335 PolandSearch for more papers by this author First published: 01 February 2003 https://doi.org/10.2307/3647307Citations: 1AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article. Literature Cited Benton, M. J. 2000. Stems, nodes, crown clades, and rank-free lists: is Linnaeus dead? Biol. Rev. 75: 633–648. Block, B. A., Finnerty, J. R., Stewart, A. F. R. & Kidd, J. 1993. Evolution of endothermy in fish: mapping physiological traits on molecular phylogeny. Science 260: 210–214. Cantino, P. D. & de Queiroz, K. 2000. “PhyloCode: A Phylogenetic Code of Biological Nomenclature”. http://www.ohiou.edu/phylocode. de Queiroz, K. 2000. The definitions of taxon names: a reply to Stuessy. Taxon 49: 533–536. de Queiroz, K. & Cantino, P. D. 2001. Taxon names, not taxa, are defined. Taxon 50: 821–826. de Queiroz, K. & Gauthier, J. 1990. Phylogeny as a central principle in taxonomy: phylogenetic definitions of taxon names. Syst. Zool. 39: 307–322. de Queiroz, K. & Gauthier, J. 1992. Phylogenetic taxonomy. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23: 449–480. de Queiroz, K. & Gauthier, J. 1994. Towards a phylogenetic system of biological nomenclature. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9: 27–31. Dyke, G. J. 2002. Should paleontologists use “phylogenetic” nomenclature? J. Paleontol. 75: 793–796. Gago, F. J. 1997. Character evolution and phylogeny of the cutlassfishes: an ontogenetic perspective (Scombroidei: Trichiuridae). Bull. Mar. Sci. 60: 161–191. Griffiths, P. E. 1999. Squaring the circle: natural kinds with historical essences. Pp. 209–228 in: R. A. Wilson (ed.), Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Härlin, M. 1998. Taxonomic names and phylogenetic trees. Zool. Scr. 27: 381–390. Härlin, M. & Sundberg, P. 1998. Taxonomy and philosophy of names. Biol. and Phil. 13: 233–244. International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature 1999. International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, ed. 4. International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, London. Kluge, A. G. In press. Taxonomy in theory and practice, with arguments for a new phylogenetic system of taxonomy. In: M. A. Donnelly, B. I. Crother, C. Guyer, M. H. Wake & M. E. White (eds.), Ecology and Evolution in the Tropics: A Herpetological Perspective. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago. Leakey, M. G., Spoor, F., Brown, F. H., Gathogo, P. N., Kiarie, C., Leakey, L. N. & McDougall, I. 2001. New hominid genus from eastern Africa shows diverse middle Pliocene lineages. Nature 410: 433–440. Lee, M. S. Y. 2001. On recent arguments for phylogenetic nomenclature. Taxon 50: 175–180. Nixon, K. C. & Carpenter, J. M. 2000. On the other “phylo- genetic systematics”. Cladistics 16: 298–318. Patterson, C. 1982. Morphological characters and homology. Pp. 21–74 in: K. A. Joysey & A. E. Friday (eds.), Problems of Phylogenetic Reconstruction. Syst. Assoc. Spec. Vol. 12. Academic Press, London. Powell, C. L., Edwards, D. & Trewin, N. H. 2000. A new vascular plant from the Lower Devonian Windyfield chert, Rhynie, NE Scotland. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb. Earth Sci. 90: 331–349. Stuessy, T. F. 2000. Taxon names are not defined. Taxon 49: 231–233. Stuessy, T. F. 2001. Taxon names are still not defined. Taxon 50: 185–186. Tyler, J. C., Johnson, G. D., Nakamura I. & Collette, B. B. 1989. Morphology of Luvarus imperialis (Luvaridae), with a phylogenetic analysis of the Acanthuroidei (Pisces). Smiths. Contr. Zool. 485: i-vi, 1-78. Citing Literature Volume52, Issue1February 2003Pages 105-107 ReferencesRelatedInformation