Editor's Comments: Conflict and Conflict Resolution-a Return to Theorizing
2003; Academy of Management; Volume: 28; Issue: 4 Linguagem: Inglês
10.5465/amr.2003.10899363
ISSN1930-3807
Autores Tópico(s)Family Business Performance and Succession
ResumoAcademy of Management ReviewVol. 28, No. 4 ArticlesEditor's Comments: Conflict and Conflict Resolution-a Return to TheorizingElizabeth MannixElizabeth MannixPublished Online:1 Oct 2003https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.10899363AboutSectionsView articleView Full TextPDF/EPUB ToolsDownload CitationsAdd to favoritesTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail View articleREFERENCES Adair W. , Okumura T. , Brett J. 2001. Negotiation behavior when cultures collide: The United States and Japan. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 371–385. Google Scholar Ancona D. , Chong C. 1999. Cycles and synchrony: The temporal role of context in team behavior. In Mannix E.Neale M.Wageman R. (Eds.), Research on managing groups and teams, vol. 2: 33–48. Stamford, CT: JAI Press. Google Scholar Blount S. , Janicik G. 2002. Getting and staying in-pace: The “in-sync” preference and its implication for work-groups. In Mannix E.Neale M.Sondak H. (Eds.), Research on managing groups and teams, vol. 4: 235–266. New York: Elsevier Science Press. Google Scholar Deutsch M. 1973. The resolution of conflict. New Haven, CT: Yale University. Google Scholar Elsbach K. D. , Sutton R. I. , Whetten D. A. 1999. Perspectives on developing management theory, circa 1999: Moving from shrill monologues to (relatively) tame dialogues. Academy of Management Review, 24: 627–634. Abstract , Google Scholar Jehn K. , Chadwick C. , Thatcher S. 1997. To agree or not to agree: Diversity, conflict, and group outcomes. International Journal of Conflict Management, 8: 287–306. Google Scholar Jehn K. , Mannix E. A. 2001. The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 238–251. Link , Google Scholar Jehn K. A. , Northcraft G. B. , Neale M. A. 1999. Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 741–763. Google Scholar Lewicki R. , Saunders D. , Minton J. 1997. Essentials of negotiation. Chicago: Irwin. Google Scholar Mannix E. A. , Tinsley C. , Bazerman M. H. 1995. Negotiating over time: Impediments to integrative solutions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62: 241–251. Google Scholar Neale M. , Bazerman M. 1991. Cognition and rationality in negotiation. New York: Free Press. Google Scholar Pelled L. 1996. Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: An intervening process theory. Organization Science, 7: 615–631. Google Scholar Pelled L. H. , Eisenhardt K. M. , Xin K. R. 1999. Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 1–28. Google Scholar Poole M. S. , Siebold D. , McPhee R. 1996. The structuration of group decisions. In Hirokawa R.Poole M. S. (Eds.), Communication and group decision making: 114–146. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar Pruitt D. G. 1981. Negotiation behavior. New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar Raiffa H. 1982. The art and science of negotiation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar Rubin J. , Brown B. 1975. The social psychology of bargaining and negotiation. San Diego: Academic Press. Google Scholar Sutton R. , Staw B. 1995. What theory is not. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 371–384. Google Scholar Walton R. E. , McKersie R. B. 1965. A behavioral theory of labor negotiations: An analysis of a social interaction system. New York: McGraw-Hill. Google ScholarFiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byEditors' Comments: Myth Busting—What We Hear and What We've Learned About AMRAdelaide W. King and David Lepak30 November 2017 | Academy of Management Review, Vol. 36, No. 2 Vol. 28, No. 4 Permissions Metrics in the past 12 months History Published online 1 October 2003 Published in print 1 October 2003 Information© Academy of Management ReviewDownload PDF
Referência(s)